Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of emotional ambiguity and emotional intensity on true and false memory

  • Published:
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whereas the effects of emotional intensity (the perceived strength of an item’s valence or arousal) have long been studied in true- and false-memory research, emotional ambiguity (the uncertainty that attaches to perceived emotional intensity) has only been studied recently. Available evidence suggests that emotional ambiguity has reliable effects on true memory that are distinct from those of emotional intensity. However, those findings are mostly restricted to recall, and the effects of emotional ambiguity on false memory remain unexplored. The current study addressed both limitations by measuring the effects of emotional ambiguity and emotional intensity on true and false recognition. In two experiments, we manipulated valence ambiguity and valence intensity (Experiment 1) and arousal ambiguity and arousal intensity (Experiment 2) of Deese/Roediger/McDermott lists. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted for Experiment 1, Experiment 2, and the combined data of the experiments to separate the effects of emotional ambiguity and emotional intensity. Our results showed that both valence ambiguity and arousal ambiguity improved true recognition, and the effects of valence ambiguity remained robust even when controlling for valence intensity, arousal intensity, and arousal ambiguity. More importantly, for both valence and arousal, there was an interaction between ambiguity and intensity in false memory. Specifically, we found that valence ambiguity increased false recognition with positive valence, while arousal ambiguity amplified the effect of arousal intensity on false recognition. Our results are discussed in the context of the emotional ambiguity hypothesis and fuzzy-trace theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and materials are available online (https://osf.io/4bw9a/).

Code availability

Available upon request to the first author.

References

Download references

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: M.C., C.J.B.; Methodology: M.C.; Formal analysis and investigation: M.C.; Writing —original draft preparation: M.C.; Writing—review and editing: M.C., C.J.B.; Supervision: C.J.B.

All experiments in this manuscript were approved by Cornell Institutional Review Board. None of the experiments was preregistered.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minyu Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Not applicable

Open practice statement

All data and materials are available online (https://osf.io/4bw9a/). None of the experiments was preregistered.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, M., Brainerd, C.J. Effects of emotional ambiguity and emotional intensity on true and false memory. Mem Cogn (2024). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01559-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01559-y

Keywords

Navigation