Skip to main content
Log in

The color of anxiety: Neurobehavioral evidence for distraction by perceptually salient stimuli in anxiety

  • Published:
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anxiety is reliably associated with an attentional bias favoring threatening information which is thought to be a key mechanism in the etiology and maintenance of anxious pathology. However, whether and how anxiety is related to attentional capture at a more basic level (i.e., in the absence of threat) is less well understood. To address this gap in the literature, we examined the association between anxiety and attentional capture in the context of visually salient, yet affectively neutral, stimuli. Specifically, we used a visual search task in which participants were required to locate a target while ignoring a salient distractor stimulus. A total of 122 undergraduates—half of whom were assigned to a state-anxiety induction—completed this task while event-related potentials were recorded and also completed self-report measures of trait and state anxiety. The results revealed that trait anxiety, but not state anxiety, was associated with impaired attentional control in the presence of a salient distractor. That is, behavioral slowing and the N2pc event-related potential—a neural measure of attentional selection—were enhanced for trait-anxious participants when the distractor was proximate to the target and required controlled attention in order to inhibit it. These findings extend previous work by providing evidence from multiple levels of analysis that attentional aberrations in anxiety reflect broad deficits in inhibiting distracting stimuli and are not limited to threat-relevant contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Referring to both the RT and N2pc as “distractors costs” is a convenience to aid in the reading of this text; it is not to imply a relationship between these measures or to posit a theoretical explanation for the effect of distractors on these measures.

  2. Note that, since the N2pc is a negative deflection, this negative correlation should be interpreted as a positive association. That is, greater anxiety predicted greater N2pc enhancement.

  3. We quantified the N2pc elicited on lateral target/contralateral distractor trials across the entire time window (200–300 ms). However, some authors (Hickey et al., 2006) have divided this time window into two segments: an early segment characterized by a positivity (i.e., target-contralateral activity was less negative because attention was initially allocated to the distal distractor), and a later time window characterized by the standard N2pc effect (greater negativity at target-contralateral sites). On the basis of visual inspection, we divided the contralateral distractor N2pc wave into two segments: 200–240 and 240–300 ms. However, neither of the costs were related to anxiety (ps > .31).

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amir, N., Beard, C., Burns, M., & Bomyea, J. (2009). Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 28–33. doi:10.1037/a0012589

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threatrelated attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bögels, S. M., & Mansell, W. (2004). Attention processes in the maintenance and treatment of social phobia: Hyper vigilance, avoidance and self-focused attention. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 827–856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buodo, G., Sarlo, M., & Munafò, M. (2010). The neural correlates of attentional bias in blood phobia as revealed by the N2pc. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 29–38. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp050

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58, 306–324.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, T. A., Chen, C. C., & McCandliss, B. D. (2008). Threat-related attentional biases: An analysis of three attentional systems. Depression and Anxiety, 25, E1–E10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshan, N., Ansari, T. L., Shoker, L., Hansard, M., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety and inhibition: An investigation using the antisaccade task. Experimental Psychology, 56, 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency and cognitive performance: New developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14, 168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egloff, B., & Hock, M. (2001). Interactive effects of state anxiety and trait anxiety on emotional Stroop interference. Personality and Individual Indifferences, 31, 875–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225–234. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esterman, M., DeGutis, J., Mercado, R., Rosenblatt, A., Vasterling, J. J., Milberg, W., & McGlinchey, R. (2013). Stress-related psychological symptoms are associated with attention al capture by visually salient distractors. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., & Derakhshan, N. (2011). New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 955–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakhshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1988). Topography of cognition: Parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 11, 137–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for the off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468–484. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, T. C., Green, V., Klein, R. M., & Mangun, G. R. (2007). Combined expectancies: Event-related potentials reveal the early benefits of spatial attention that are obscured by reaction time measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 303–317. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.303

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, C., McDonald, J. J., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 604–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004). Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: Differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1183–1192. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2006). It’s under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 132–138. doi:10.3758/BF03193824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J. (2012). Electrophysiological correlates of the focusing of attention within complex visual scenes: N2pc and related ERP components. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 329–360). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J., Girelli, M., McDermott, M. T., & Ford, M. A. (1997). Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: An ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 64–87. doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994a). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31, 291–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994b). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1000–1014. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.5.1000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.95.1.15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 107–123. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.111.1.107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, W., Clark, D. M., Ehlers, A., & Chen, Y. (1999). Social anxiety and attention away from emotional faces. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. J., & Ward, L. M. (1999). Spatial relevance determines facilitatory and inhibitory effects of auditory covert spatial orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1234–1252. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.5.1234

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Mathews, A., Bird, C., & Macgregor-Morris, R. (1990). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1230–1237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782–784. doi:10.1126/science.4023713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, J. S., Becker, M. W., & Moran, T. P. (2012). Enhanced attentional capture in trait anxiety. Emotion, 12, 213–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, G. F., & Tucker, D. M. (2001). Frontal evaluation and posterior representation in target detection. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 147–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y): Self-evaluation questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, D. M., Shackman, A. J., & Larson, C. L. (2013). Failure to filter: Anxious individuals show inefficient gating of threat from working memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 58. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00058

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester, C. M., Corbetta, M., Raichle, M. E., Rodebaugh, T., Schlaggar, B. L., Sheline, Y. I., . . . Lenze, E. J. (2012). Functional network dysfunction in anxiety and anxiety disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 35, 527–535.

  • Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184–193. doi:10.3758/BF03212219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606. doi:10.3758/BF03211656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77–99. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier, P., & Pourtois, G. (2007). Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychologia, 45, 174–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (1999). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature, 400, 867–869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 121–138. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason S. Moser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moran, T.P., Moser, J.S. The color of anxiety: Neurobehavioral evidence for distraction by perceptually salient stimuli in anxiety. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 15, 169–179 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0314-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0314-7

Keywords

Navigation