Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of threat on the efficiency of goal-directed attentional control

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anxiety has consistently been found to potentiate attentional capture by physically salient stimuli, which could be due to enhanced distractor processing, impaired goal-directed attention, or both. At the same time, a recent study demonstrated that a threat manipulation reduces attentional capture by reward-associated stimuli, suggesting that anxiety does not increase distractibility or, otherwise, interfere with the control of attention generally. Here, we experimentally induced anxiety via threat-of-shock in the adaptive choice visual search task to examine whether the experience of threat influences goal-directed attentional control. Participants chose to search through one of two task-relevant colors on each trial, where searching through the less abundant color would be optimal for maximizing performance. Performance was evaluated with and without the threat of unpredictable electric shock. Under threat, participants were more optimal in their visual search and missed fewer targets. Performance improvements were demonstrated on trials that the optimal target color switched, demonstrating that threat is beneficial in adapting to changing attentional demands. Our findings demonstrate that threat can facilitate the efficiency of goal-directed attentional control and are at odds with an antagonistic relationship between anxiety and the control of attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data sets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Open Science Framework repository (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TEJKF).

References

  • Anderson, B. A., & Britton, M. K. (2019). On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000596.

  • Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(25), 10367–10371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., Li, R., Wright, C. M., Rome, F., Fairchild, G., Dunn, B. D., et al. (2012). Risk-avoidant decision making increased by threat of electric shock. Psychophysiology, 49(10), 1436–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, B. R., Arkin, N., Overstreet, C., Carver, F. W., & Grillon, C. (2012). Distinct contributions of human hippocampal theta to spatial cognition and anxiety. Hippocampus, 22(9), 1848–1859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., Walker, D. L., Miles, L., & Grillon, C. (2010). Phasic vs sustained fear in rats and humans: Role of the extended amygdala in fear vs anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 105–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esterman, M., DeGutis, J., Mercado, R., Rosenblatt, A., Vasterling, J. J., Milberg, W., et al. (2013). Stress-related psychological symptoms are associated with increased attentional capture by visually salient distractors. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19(7), 835–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etkin, A., Prater, K. E., Hoeft, F., Menon, V., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2010). Failure of anterior cingulate activation and connectivity with the amygdala during implicit regulation of emotional processing in generalized anxiety disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry., 167, 545–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etkin, A., & Schatzberg, A. (2012). Common abnormalities and disorder-specific compensation during implicit regulation of emotional processing in generalized anxiety and major depressive disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 968–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, R., & Murray, J. (1983). Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory—measuring anxiety with and without an audience during performance on a stabilometer. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57(1), 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, C.M., Vaghi, M.M., Hezemans, F.H., van Ghesel, G.S., Dafflon, J., Bruhl, A. B., Savulich, G., & Robbins, T. W. (2020). Psychol Med https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720000203

  • Grillon, C. (2008). Models and mechanisms of anxiety: evidence from startle studies. Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 199, 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grillon, C., & Charney, D. R. (2011). In the face of fear: Anxiety sensitizes defensize responses to fearful faces. Psychophysiology, 48(12), 1745–1752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, K., Bauer, A., Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2012). Threat of bodily harm has opposing effects on cognition. Emotion, 12(1), 28–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, K., Fan, Z., & He, S. (2015). Uncovering the interaction between emphatic pain and cognition. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79(6), 1054–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons, J. L., & Leber, A. B. (2016). Choosing attentional control settings in a dynamically changing environment. Attention Perception Psychophysics, 78(7), 2031–2048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons, J. L., & Leber, A. B. (2018). Characterizing individual variation in the strategic use of attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(10), 1637–1654.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., Rosenbaum, G. M., & Herzig, C. (2013). Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 87–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A. J., & Anderson, B. A. (2019). Threat reduces value-driven but not salience-driven attentional capture. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000599.

  • Krug, M. K., & Carter, C. S. (2012). Proactive and reactive control during emotional interference and its relationship to trait anxiety. Brain Research, 1481, 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. H., Itti, L., & Mather, M. (2012). Evidence for arousal-biased competition in perceptual learning. Front Psychol, 3, 241.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. H., Sakaki, M., Cheng, R., Velasco, R., & Mather, M. (2014). Emotional arousal amplifies the effects of biased competition in the brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(12), 2067–2077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom, B. R., & Bohlin, G. (2012). Threat-relevance impairs executive functions: Negative impact on working memory and response inhibition. Emotion, 12(2), 384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, M., & Sutherland, M. R. (2011). Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 114–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miu, A. C., Heilman, R. M., & Houser, D. (2008). Anxiety impairs decision-making: Psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biological Psychology, 77(3), 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, J. S., Becker, M. W., & Moran, T. P. (2012). Enhanced attentional capture in trait anxiety. Emotion, 12(2), 213–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 160–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, O. J., Letkiewicz, A. M., Overstreet, C., Ernst, M., & Grillon, C. (2011). The effect of induced anxiety on cognition: threat of shock enhances aversive processing in healthy individuals. Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, O. J., Vytal, K., Cornwell, B. R., & Grillon, C. (2013). The impact of anxiety upon cognition: perspectives from human threat of shock studies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, A., & Grillon, C. (2012). Assessing fear and anxiety in humans using the threat of predictable and unpredictable aversive events (the NPU-threat test). Nature Protocols, 7(3), 527–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M. R., & Mather, M. (2012). Negative arousal amplifies the effects of saliency in short-term memory. Emotion, 12(6), 1367–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M. R., & Mather, M. (2015). Negative arousal increases the effects of stimulus salience in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 41(3), 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(6), 599–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier, P. (2005). How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vytal, K. E., Cornwell, B. R., Letkiewicz, A. M., Arkin, N. E., & Grillon, C. (2013). The complex interaction between anxiety and cognition: Insight from spatial and verbal working memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 419–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Miskovich, T. A., & Larson, C. L. (2018). State anxiety impairs proactive but enhances reactive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation [NARSAD 26008] and National Institutes of Health [R01-DA046410] to BAA.

Funding

This study was supported by Grants from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation [NARSAD 26008] and National Institutes of Health [R01-DA046410] to BAA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andy Jeesu Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Texas A&M University Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, A.J., Lee, D.S. & Anderson, B.A. The influence of threat on the efficiency of goal-directed attentional control. Psychological Research 85, 980–986 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01321-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01321-4

Navigation