Skip to main content
Log in

Agroecological Efficiency of Traditional and New Organic Fertilizers

  • AGRICULTURAL SOIL SCIENCE AND AGROECOLOGY
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

Municipal waste in the form of sewage sludge and the use of unconventional sources of organic raw materials, in particular, is of great importance as a result of the critical shortage of organic fertilizers, the use of which has not exceeded 15–18% of the demand in Russia in recent years. Research in this direction is relevant due to the poor knowledge of the effects of sewage sludge and products based on them on the soil-plant system. The goal of the study is to establish the comparative agroecological effectiveness of the effect and long–term aftereffect of compost from sewage sludge and dung manure at different application rates when cultivating perennial grasses. The research was carried out in the conditions of the long-term micro-field experiment arranged by the Pryanishnikov Institute of Agrochemistry in Moscow oblast (Barybino village). In the experiment, orchard grass was sown under a cover of spring barley. The design of the experiment considered the following options: (1) control without fertilizers, (2) compost one at a rate of 10 t/ ha, (3) compost one at a rate of 35 t/ha, (4) compost two at a rate of 10 t/ha, (5) compost two at a rate of 35 t/ha, (6) manure at a rate of 10 t/ha, and (7) manure at a rate of 35 t/ha on a dry weight basis. Compost is prepared from sewage sludge from the Kur’yanovskaya aeration station; specifically, compost one from sludge from filter presses and compost two from sludge from the drain beds. Compost two was characterized by a higher content of heavy metals, the total amount of which was two times higher than in compost one and ten times higher than in dung manure. All fertilizers were introduced before sowing crops in 2000 and then their aftereffect was tested for 22 years. The rates of all organic fertilizers are given on a dry weight basis. According to the results of the long-term studies, comparison between two types of compost contaminated with heavy metals to different degrees shows that the greatest effect was achieved from compost with a lower pollution level, that is, produced from fresh (nontreated) sludge from filter presses at an increased rate of 35 t/ha on a dry weigh basis, from which gain in the yield was 41% relative to the control. This improvement due to the use of dung manure varied from 28 to 73% depending on the application rate. As for the accumulation of heavy metals in the soil and in the dry matter of perennial grasses, there were no clear dependencies on the types and rates of fertilizers applied. At the same time, levels of cadmium, nickel, and lead in the plant and soil samples did not exceed the permissible values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Milashchenko, Z.N., Ed., Strategiya ispol’zovaniya osadkov stochnykh vod i kompostov na ikh osnove v agrikul’ture (The Strategy for Utilizing Waste Water Depositions and Composts on Their Base in Agriculture) Moscow: Agrokonsalt, 2002.

  2. Kasatikov, V.A., Shabardina, N.P., and Raskatov, V.A., The effect of agrochemicals based on organogenic urban and livestock waste on the trace element composition of soil and plants in agrocenosis, Plodorodie, 2020, no. 5, pp. 64–66. https://doi.org/10.25680/S19948603.2020.116.18

  3. Merzlaya, G.E. and Afanas’ev, R.A., Agrochemical aspects of using sewage sludge for reclamation of land for various purposes, Agrokhimiya, 2020, no. 8, pp. 70–77. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188120080050

  4. Savich, V.I., Raskatov, V.A., Tazin, I.T., et al., Ways of optimization during soils and landfills pollution with toxicants, Plodorodie, 2019, no. 4, pp. 52–56. https://doi.org/10.25680/S19948603.2019.109.17

  5. Kovalev, N.G., Rabinovich, G.Yu., and Fomicheva, N.V., Resource-conserving and zero-waste principles of technologies for producing liquid-phase biosubstances, Russ. Agric. Sci., 2012, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 4–7. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367412010120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Podolyan, E.A. and Baranovskii, I.T., Efficiency of fertilizers based on sewage sludge in the part of field crop rotation, Plodorodie, 2019, no. 4, pp. 57–59. https://doi.org/10.25680/S19948603.2019.109.18

  7. Kutera, J., Wykorzystanie Ścieków w Rolnictwie, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burghard, W. and Schneider, Th., Bulk density, and content density and stock of carbon, nitrogen and heavy metals in vegetable patches and lawns of allotments gardens in the north-western Ruhr area, Germany, J. Soils Sediments, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1553-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhigareva, Yu.V. and Merzlaya, G.E., Agri-environmental assessment of the effectiveness of sewage sludge in the rotation with barley, Plodorodie, 2018, no. 3, pp. 42–44. https://doi.org/10.25680/S19948603.2018.102.13

  10. Plodorodiye pochv Rossii: sostoyaniye i vozmozhnosti (Soil Fertility in Russia: Status and Opportunities), Sychev, V.G., Ed., Moscow: Vseross. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Avtomatiki, 2019.

  11. Metodicheskie i organizatsionnye osnovy provedeniya agroekologicheskogo monitoringa v intensivnom zemledelii (na baze Geograficheskoi seti opytov) (Methodical and Organizational Basis for Agroecological Monitoring in Intensive Agriculture (Based on the Geographic Experiment Network)), Moscow: Vseross. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. im. D.N. Pryanishnikova, 1991.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. E. Merzlaya.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by E. Kuznetsova

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Merzlaya, G.E. Agroecological Efficiency of Traditional and New Organic Fertilizers. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 48, 499–503 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367422060106

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367422060106

Keywords:

Navigation