Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inactivation Dynamics of Gram-negative and Gram-positive Microbes in Drinking Water: a Comparative Study of Chlorine and Monochloramine Disinfection

  • BIOLOGICAL METHODS OF WATER PURIFICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assure the prevention of microbial contamination and the provision of safe potable water to consumers, efficient disinfection is the final barrier. Chlorine, once a widely applied disinfectant, has essentially been re-considered by many water treatment practitioners. Since the research unveiled chlorine-associated health repercussions, the investigation shifted to more viable disinfection options such as the use of monochloramines, that remains active in the system for relatively long periods. Keeping in view, the present study compared the biocidal competence of chlorine and monochloramine to inactivate the gram-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa along with the gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus. A lab-scale testing batch was set up in carefully monitored conditions to investigate the response of these bacterial species to the applied disinfection dosages of 1 and 2 mg/L. Moreover, a referenced batch of control evidenced the accuracy of results. A significant difference in the response to chlorine and monochloramine was recorded both in mixed and mono-cultures of bacteria. The bench-scale inactivation experiments revealed that chlorine and monochloramine greatly damaged K. pneumoniae and S. aureus in monocultures. Whereas these bacterial species revealed greater tolerance when acted together in a mixed-cultures and, hence, an overall lower degree of disinfection was achieved. P. aeruginosa exhibited reduced vulnerability to disinfectants in mixed-cultures, marking K. pneumoniae tolerant to chlorine. Most significant correlation between disinfectant species was found at 30 min of exposure with notable logremoval of K. pneumoniae (p = 0.01), P. aeruginosa (p = 0.003) and S. aureus (p = 0.0001). In conclusion, for prolonged exposures, monochloramine is advisable owing to its immediate microbial inactivation upon contact as well as enhanced stability in drinking water networks. The results could predict the pattern of bacterial inactivation in drinking water distribution networks and fill a major gap in the water sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Fass, S., Dincher, M., Reasoner, D., Gatel, D., and Block, J., Fate of Escherichia coli experimentally injected in a drinking water distribution pilot system, Water Res., 1996, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2215–2221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaz-Moreira, I., Nunes, O.C., and Manaia, C.M., Ubiquitous and persistent Proteobacteria and other Gram-negative bacteria in drinking water, Sci. Total Environ., 2017, vol. 586, pp. 1141–1149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gagnon, G., O’Leary, K., Volk, C.J., Chauret, C., Stover, L., and Andrews, R., Comparative analysis of chlorine dioxide, free chlorine and chloramines on bacterial water quality in model distribution systems, J. Environ. Eng., 2004, vol. 130, no. 11, pp. 1269–1279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, Geneva: World Health Org., 2011, 4th ed.

  5. Li, D., Zeng, S., Gu, A.Z., He, M., and Shi, H., Inactivation, reactivation and re-growth of indigenous bacteria in reclaimed water after chlorine disinfection of a municipal wastewater treatment plant, J. Environ. Sci., 2013, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1319–1325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oliver, J.D., Dagher, M., and Linden, K., Induction of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium into the viable but nonculturable state following chlorination of wastewater, J. Water Health, 2005, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 249–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coronel-Olivares, C., Reyes-Gómez, L.M., Hernández-Muñoz, A., Martínez-Falcón, A.P., Vázquez-Rodríguez, G.A., and Iturbe, U., Chlorine disinfection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, total coliforms, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis: Revisiting reclaimed water regulations, Water Sci. Technol., 2011, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 2151–2157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Geldreich, E.E. and Rice, E.W., Occurrence, significance, and detection of Klebsiella in water systems, J. AWWA, 1987, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 74–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ayeni, F.A., Andersen, C., and Nørskov-Lauritsen, N., Comparison of growth on mannitol salt agar, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, VITEK®2 with partial sequencing of 16S rRNA gene for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci, Microb. Pathog., 2017, vol. 105, pp. 255–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rasheed, S., Hashmi, I., and Campos, L., Inactivation of Escherichia coli and Salmonella with chlorine in drinking waters at various pH and temperature levels, Proc. Pak. Acad. Sci., 2016, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington, DC: Am. Publ. Health Assoc., 2012, vol. 22.

  12. Shang, C. and Blatchley, E., Chlorination of pure bacterial cultures in aqueous solution, Water Res., 2001, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 244–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gougoutsa, C., Christophoridis, C., Zacharis, C., and Fytianos, K., Assessment, modeling and optimization of parameters affecting the formation of disinfection by-products in water, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2016, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 16620–16630.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cherchi, C. and Gu, A.Z., Effect of bacterial growth stage on resistance to chlorine disinfection, Water Sci. Technol., 2011, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 7–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart, M.H. and Olson, B.H., Physiological studies of chloramine resistance developed by Klebsiella pneumoniae under low-nutrient growth conditions, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1992, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 2918–2927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fazlzadeh, M., Rahmani, K., Zarei, A., Abdoallahzadeh, H., Nasiri, F., and Khosravi, R., A novel green synthesis of zero valent iron nanoparticles (NZVI) using three plant extracts and their efficient application for removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions, Adv. Powder Technol., 2017, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 122–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Pakistan Science Foundation for providing financial support through the project (PSF/Res/C-NUST/Envr(112) and Lab staff of IESE, SCEE, NUST.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Amrah Qureshi, Imran Hashmi, Romana Khan & Sajida Rasheed

  2. Department of Biotechnology, University of Kotli (UoK), Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJ&K), Pakistan

    Sajida Rasheed

Authors
  1. Amrah Qureshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Imran Hashmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Romana Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sajida Rasheed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amrah Qureshi.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amrah Qureshi, Hashmi, I., Khan, R. et al. Inactivation Dynamics of Gram-negative and Gram-positive Microbes in Drinking Water: a Comparative Study of Chlorine and Monochloramine Disinfection. J. Water Chem. Technol. 42, 381–389 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063455X20050112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063455X20050112

Keywords:

Search

Navigation