Skip to main content
Log in

Thermal Effect in Surface Atmosphere of the Solar Eclipse on June 10, 2021

  • DYNAMICS AND PHYSICS OF BODIES OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
  • Published:
Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The solar eclipse (SE) on June 10, 2021, was annular and a member of Saros 147. The first contact occurred at 08:12:20 UT on June 10, 2021, and the fourth contact occurred at 13:11:19 UT. The maximal SE magnitude was observed from 09:49:50 to 11:33:43 UT. The annularity took place from 10:33:16 to 10:36:56 UT. The solar eclipse began over the territory of Canada. The shadow moved across Greenland (where the annularity took place), the Arctic Ocean, the North Pole, New Siberia Island, and the Russian Federation. The partial eclipse was observed in Mongolia, in a major part of China, in the northeast of the United States, in North Alaska, all over the Arctic Ocean, and in the North Atlantic, as well as over a major part of Ukraine, except for the Odessa, Nikolaev, and Kherson regions and Crimea. In this work, the observations of the thermal (temperature) effect of the SE of June 10, 2021, in the surface air layer in the city of Kharkiv are described; the thermal effects of eight SEs that occurred in the same region in 1999–2021 are compared. The observations of the effects in the surface air layer were made at Karazin National University Radiophysics Observatory, in the vicinity of Kharkiv. The air temperature, atmospheric pressure and humidity, and the wind speed and direction were measured with standard instrumentation. The temperature measurement accuracy was 0.1°C. The solar eclipse energy balance is estimated. The internal energy of gas in the surface atmosphere has been shown to decrease by ~5.3 × 1018 J due to the SE, which corresponds to an average power of 1.2 PW. The specific energy and power were 6.5 kJ/m3 and 1.4 W/m3. The variations in the air temperature of the surface atmosphere were observed during the day of the solar eclipse and on the reference days. They were analyzed along with the tropospheric weather for those days. The weather was not favorable for observations of the thermal effect of the eclipse. The atmospheric cooling occurring during the eclipse magnitude maximum is estimated; the decrease in the temperature amounted to approximately 1°C. The differences in the thermal effects during the eight SEs compared are explained by different seasons, local time, cloud structure, state of the Earth’s surface, and atmospheric convection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. L. A. Akimov, E. I. Grigorenko, V. I. Taran, O. F. Tyrnov, and L. F. Chernogor, “Complex radar and optical studies of dynamic processes in the atmosphere and geospace, related to the solar eclipse of August 11, 1999,” Zarub. Radioelektron. Usp. Sovrem. Radioelektron., No. 2, 25–63 (2002).

  2. L. A. Akimov, E. I. Grigorenko, V. I. Taran, and L. F. Chernogor, “The features of atmosphere and ionosphere effects of May 31, 2003 solar eclipse: Optical and radiophysical observations results in Kharkiv,” Usp. Sovrem. Radioelektron, No. 3, 55–70 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. L. Akimov, V. K. Bogovskii, E. I. Grigorenko, V. I. Taran, and L. F. Chernogor, “Atmospheric-ionospheric effects of the solar eclipse of May 31, 2003, in Kharkov,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 45, 494–518 (2005).

  4. A. L. Akimov, L. A. Akimov, and L. F. Chernogor, “Turbulence parameters in the atmosphere associated with solar eclipses,” Radiofiz. Radioastron. 12, 117–134 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. L. Akimov and L. F. Chernogor, “Effects of the solar eclipse of August 1, 2008, on the Earth’s lower atmosphere,” Kinematics Phys. Celestial Bodies 26, 135–145 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Egedal and N. Ambolt, “The effect on geomagnetism of the solar eclipse of 30 June 1954,” J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 7, 40–48 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. V. P. Burmaka, V. I. Taran, and L. F. Chernogor, “Wave-like processes in the ionosphere under quiet and disturbed conditions. 1. Kharkov incoherent scatter radar observations,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 46, 183–198 (2006).

  8. V. P. Burmaka, V. I. Taran, and L. F. Chernogor, “Wave-like processes in the ionosphere under quiet and disturbed conditions. 2. Analysis of observations and simulation,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 46, 199–208 (2006).

  9. V. P. Burmaka, E. I. Grigorenko, L. Ya. Emel’yanov, V. H. Lysenko, M. V. Lyashenko, and L. F. Chernogor, “Radar observations of effects in geospace caused by a partial solar eclipse on 29 March 2006,” Usp. Sovrem. Radioelektron, No. 3, 38–53 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. P. Burmaka, V. N. Lysenko, M. V. Lyashenko, and L. F. Chernogor, “Tropospheric-ionospheric effects of the 3 October 2005 partial solar eclipse in Kharkiv. 1. Observations,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol. 13 (6), 74–86 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K. P. Garmash, S. G. Leus, and L. F. Chernogor, “January 4, 2011 solar eclipse effects over radio circuits at oblique incidence,” Radiofiz. Radioastron. 16, 164–176 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. M. Gokov and L. F. Chernogor, “Processes in lower ionosphere during August 11, 1999 solar eclipse,” Radiofiz. Radioastron. 5, 348–360 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. I. Grigorenko, S. A. Pazyura, V. A. Pulyaev, V. I. Taran, and L. F. Chernogor, “Dynamic processes in the ionosphere during the geospace storm on 30 May and solar eclipse on 31 May 2003,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol. 10 (1), 12–25 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. E. I. Grigorenko, M. V. Lyashenko, and L. F. Chernogor, “Effects of the solar eclipse of March 29, 2006, in the ionosphere and atmosphere,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 48, 337–351 (2008).

  15. D. A. Dzyubanov, L. Ya. Emel’yanov, and L. F. Chernogor, “Plasma dynamics of the ionosphere above Kharkiv during the solar eclipse of 1 august 2008,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol. 15 (3), 62–69 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. I. F. Domnin, L. Ya. Emel’yanov, and L. F. Chernogor, “The dynamics of ionosphere plasma over Kharkiv during the solar eclipse of January 4, 2011,” Radiofiz. Radioastron. 17, 132–145 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Ya. Emel’yanov, M. V. Lyashenko, and L. F. Chernogor, “Some effects in the geospace plasma during partial solar eclipse of 1 August 2008 above Kharkiv. 1. The observation results,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol. 15 (3), 70–81 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Ya. Emel’yanov, I. B. Sklyarov, and L. F. Chernogor, “Ionosphere response to the solar eclipse on 1 August 2008: Some results of vertical sounding,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol. 15 (4), 12–21 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. S. Kostrov and L. F. Chernogor, “Processes in bottomside ionosphere during August 11, 1999 solar eclipse,” Radiofiz. Radioastron. 5, 361–370 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. V. Lyashenko and L. F. Chernogor, “Tropospheric-ionospheric effects of the 3 October 2005 partial solar eclipse in Kharkiv. 2. Modeling and discussion,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol. 14 (1), 57–64 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. V. Lyashenko and L. F. Chernogor, “Some effects in the geospace plasma during the partial solar eclipse of 1 August 2008 above Kharkov. 2. Calculation results and discussion,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol. 15 (4), 3–11 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. F. Chernogor, “Magnetosphere electron precipitation induced by a solar eclipse,” Radiofiz. Radioastron. 5, 371–375 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. F. Chernogor, “Wave response of the ionosphere to the partial solar eclipse of August 1, 2008,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 50, 346–361 (2010).

  24. L. F. Chernogor, “The Earth–atmosphere–geospace system: Main properties and processes,” Int. J. Remote Sens. 32, 3199–3218 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. F. Chernogor and V. V. Barabash, “The response of the middle ionosphere to the solar eclipse of 4 January 2011 in Kharkiv: Some results of vertical sounding,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol. 17 (4), 41–52 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. L. F. Chernogor, Physical Effects of Solar Eclipses in Atmosphere and Geospace (Khark. Nats. Univ. im. V. N. Karazina, Kharkiv, 2013) [in Russian].

  27. L. F. Chernogor, “Physical processes in the middle ionosphere accompanying the Solar eclipse of January 4, 2011, in Kharkov,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 53, 19–31 (2013).

  28. L. F. Chernogor, “Atmosphere–ionosphere response to solar eclipse over Kharkiv on March 20, 2015,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 56, 627–638 (2016).

  29. L. F. Chernogor and Yu. B. Mylovanov, “Ionospheric effects of the August 11, 2018, solar eclipse over the People’s Republic of China,” Kinematics Phys. Celestial Bodies 36, 274–290 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. L. F. Chernogor and K. P. Garmash, “Magneto-ionospheric effects of the solar eclipse of March 20, 2015, over Kharkov,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 57, 72–83 (2017).

  31. L. F. Chernogor, I. F. Domnin, L. Ya. Emelyanov, and M. V. Lyashenko, “Physical processes in the ionosphere during the solar eclipse on March 20, 2015 over Kharkiv, Ukraine (49.6°N, 36.3°E),” J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 182, 1–9 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. A. J. Coster, L. Goncharenko, S. R. Zhang, P. J. Erickson, W. Rideout, and J. Vierinen, “GNSS observations of ionospheric variations during the 21 August 2017 solar eclipse,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 12041–12048 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. J. J. Curto, B. Heilig, and M. Piñol, “Modeling the geomagnetic effects caused by the solar eclipse of 11 August 1999,” J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 111, A07312 (2006).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Q. Guo, L. F. Chernogor, K. P. Garmash, V. T. Rozumenko, and Y. Zheng, “Radio monitoring of dynamic processes in the ionosphere over China during the partial solar eclipse of 11 August 2018,” Radio Sci. 55 (2) (2020).

  35. A. V. Ladynin, N. N. Semakov, and S. Yu. Khomutov, “Changes in the daily geomagnetic variation during the total solar eclipse of 1 August 2008,” Russ. Geol. Geophys. 52, 343–352 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. S. R. S. Malin, O. Özcan, S. B. Tank, M. K. Tunçer, and O. Yazici-Çakin, “Geomagnetic signature of the 11 August 1999 total eclipse,” Geophys. J. Int. 140, F13–F16 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. G. J. Marlton, P. D. Williams, and K. A. Nicoll, “On the detection and attribution of gravity waves generated by the 20 March 2015 solar eclipse,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 374 (2016).

  38. E. V. Onovughe, “Geomagnetic signature of the total solar eclipse of 29 March 2006 over Africa and the comprehensive model prediction,” Univers. J. Geosci. 1, 77–83 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. O. Özcan and M. Aydoğdu, “Possible effects of the total solar eclipse of August 11, 1999 on the geomagnetic field variations over Elaziğ-Turkey,” J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 66, 997–1000 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. S. V. Panasenko, Y. Otsuka, M. van de Kamp, L. F. Chernogor, A. Shinbori, T. Tsugawa, and M. Nishioka, “Observation and characterization of traveling ionospheric disturbances induced by solar eclipse of 20 March 2015 using incoherent scatter radars and GPS networks,” J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 191, 105051 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7 (Special Issue) (2007).

  42. S. M. Stankov, N. Bergeot, D. Berghmans, D. Bolsée, C. Bruyninx, J. M. Chevalier, F. Clette, H. De Backer, J. De Keyser, E. D’Huys, M. Dominique, J. F. Lemaire, J. Magdalenić, C. Marqué, N. Pereira, V. Pierrard, D. Sapundjiev, D. B. Seaton, K. Stegen, R. V. Linden, T. G. W. Verhulst, and M. J. West, “Multi-instrument observations of the solar eclipse on 20 March 2015 and its effects on the ionosphere over Belgium and Europe,” J. Space Weather Space Clim. 7, A19 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. V. P. Uryadov, A. A. Kolchev, F. I. Vybornov, V. V. Shumaev, A. I. Egoshin, and A. G. Chernov, “Ionospheric effects of a solar eclipse of March 20, 2015 on oblique sounding paths in the Eurasian longitudinal sector,” Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 59, 431–441 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. T. G. W. Verhulst, D. Sapundjiev, and S. M. Stankov, “High-resolution ionospheric observations and modeling over Belgium during the solar eclipse of 20 March 2015 including first results of ionospheric tilt and plasma drift measurements,” Adv. Space Res. 57, 2407–2419 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the Ukraine National Research Foundation (project 2020.02/0015 “Theoretical and Experimental Study of Global Perturbations of Natural and Anthropogenic Origin in the Earth–Atmosphere–Ionosphere System”) and partly by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (state assignment nos. 0119U002538, 0121U109881, and 0121U109882).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. F. Chernogor.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by O. Ponomareva

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chernogor, L.F. Thermal Effect in Surface Atmosphere of the Solar Eclipse on June 10, 2021. Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies 37, 293–299 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591321060040

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591321060040

Keywords:

Navigation