Skip to main content
Log in

Russian Scientific Periodicals in the Directory of Open-Access Journals

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

The current state of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) is characterized and the quality criteria of its periodicals are discussed. Russian scientific journals included in the Directory, their topics, publishers, language, and licenses are comprehensively considered. Journal ratings based on generally accepted international scientometric indicators used by the Russian Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Web of Science are analyzed. Periodicals are ranked using bibliometric indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Introduction to Open Access, UNESCO, 2015, p. 19. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002319/231920E. pdf. Accessed May 30, 2018.

  2. Suber, P., Open Access, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2012, p. 4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 17 July 2012 on Access to and Preservation of Scientific Information, 2012. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32012H0417&rid= 1. Accessed June 30, 2018.

  4. H2020 Programme. Guidelines to the Rules on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Open Access to Research Data in Horizon 2020. Version 3.2 March 21, 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilotguide_en.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2018.

  5. Johansson, A.-L. and Wahlgren, I., The One Stop Shop to Open Access Journals—DOAJ, 2008. http://portal. research.lu.se/ws/files/3867639/1361286.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adams, C., Directory of Open Access Journals Introduces New Standards to Help Community Address Quality Concerns, 2005. https://sparcopen.org/news/2015/directory-of-open-access-journals-introduces-newstandards-to-help-community-address-quality-concerns/. Accessed June 30, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olijhoek, T., Mitchell, D., and Bjornshauge, L., Criteria for Open Access and Publishing, 2015. https://www. scienceopen.com/document/read?vid=2befee62-f9c0-4dc8-93c5-790d6102877d. Accessed May 24, 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. About the Directory of Open Access Journals. https://doaj.org. Accessed June 15, 2018.

  9. Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., and Hedlund, T., The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009, PLoS ONE, 2011, vol. 6, no. 6, e20961. https://doi.org/. July 3, 2018. doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0020961

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Beall, J., Predatory publishers are corrupting open access, Nature, 2012, vol. 489, no. 7415, pp. 179–179. doi 10.1038/489179a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Khatib, A., Protecting authors from predatory journals and publishers, Publ. Res. Q., 2016, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nwagwu, W.E., Open access in the developing regions: Situating the altercations about predatory publishing/l'acces libre dans les regions en voie de developpement: Situation de la controverse concernant les pratiques d’edition deloyales, Can. J. Inf. Libr. Sci., 2016, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 58–80.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Butler, D., The dark side of publishing, Nature, 2013, vol. 495, no. 7442, pp. 433–435. doi 10.1038/495433a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bohannon, J., Who’s afraid of peer review?, Science, 2013, vol. 342, no. 6154, pp. 60–65. doi 10.1126/science. 342.6154.60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berger, M. and Cirasella, J., Beyond Beall’s list: Better understanding predatory publishers, Coll. Res. Libr. News, 2015, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 132–135. doi 10.5860/crln.76.3.9277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Crawford, W., Ethics and Access 1: The Sad Case of Jeffrey Beall, Cites Insights, 2014, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1–14. http://citesandinsights.info/civ14i4.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neylon, C., Blog post, blacklists are technically infeasible, practically unreliable and unethical. Period, 2017. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/02/21/blacklists-are-technically-infeasible-practically-unreliableand-unethical-period/. Accessed July 4, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dalmeet Singh Chawla, Mystery as controversial list of predatory publishers disappears, 2018. Accessed May 31, 2018. doi 10.1126/science.aal0625

  19. Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. Committee on Publication Ethics, 2017. https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practicescholarly-publishing.

  20. Marchitelli, A., Galimberti, P., Bollini, A., and Mitchell, D., Improvement of editorial quality of journals indexed in DOAJ: A data analysis, JLIS.it, 2017, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–21. doi 10.4403/jlis.it-12052

    Google Scholar 

  21. FP7 post-Open Access publishing funds pilot. The OpenAIRE Consortium 2017. https://old.openaire.eu/postgrantoapilot. Accessed May 26, 2018.

  22. The Open Access Landscape in Scientific Publishing, 2015. http://blog.polygrant.com/post/123659374020/theopen-access-landscape-in-scientific-publishing.

  23. Solomon, D., Types of open access publishers in Scopus, Publications, 2013, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16–26. doi 10.3390/publications1010016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ivanov, V.V., Markusova, V.A., and Mindeli, L.E., Government investments and the publishing activity of higher educational institutions: Bibliometric analysis, Herald Russ. Acad. Sci., 2016, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 314–321. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1019331616040031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Belyaeva, S., Growth Place: Web of Science attracts Russian journals, Poisk, 2016, nos. 18–19, pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moskaleva, O.V. and Pislyakov, V.V. Russian journals in EMERGING SOURCES CITATION INDEX, 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316473644_ROSSIJSKIE_ZURNALY_V_EMERGING_ SOURCES_CITATION_INDEX. Accessed June 30, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vikhreva, G.M., Open access to electronic journals as a progressive model of information support of science, Tr. Gos. Publ. Nauchno-Tekh. Bibl. Sib. Otdel. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2015, no. 8; Novye napravleniya deyatel’nosti traditsionnykh bibliotek v elektronnoi srede: materialy mezhregional’noi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (22–26 sentyabrya 2014 g., g. Krasnoyarsk) (New Activities of Traditional Libraries in the Electronic Environment: Proc. Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf. (September 22–26, 2014, Krasnoyarsk)), Novosibirsk, 2015, pp. 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zasurskii, I. and Trishchenko, N., Open access and open science: On the threshold of inevitable evolution, 2017. http://www.unkniga.ru/copyright/copyrightcom/8030-otkrytiy-dostup-i-otkrytata-nauka.html. Accessed July 7, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. N. Domnina.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © T.N. Domnina, 2018, published in Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i Metodika Informatsionnoi Raboty, 2018, No. 10, pp. 26–40.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Domnina, T.N. Russian Scientific Periodicals in the Directory of Open-Access Journals. Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. 45, 219–234 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688218040032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688218040032

Keywords

Navigation