Skip to main content
Log in

Bibliometric analysis of the document flow of informetrics based on the Russian Science Citation Index

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

The results of a bibliometric analysis of the informetrics document flow are presented, based on the Russian Science Citation Index data for 2000–2013. The flow composition by subject matter and document type has been studied. The dynamics of publications has been analyzed and a time-series trend model has been constructed. The authors with the greatest number of publications on the subject matter under study have been identified. The most-frequently cited articles and their authors have been indicated. The list of journals that published most of the articles and the leading organizations in the knowledge area under consideration have been determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Noorden, R., A profusion of measures, Nature, 2010, vol. 465, pp. 864–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Galyavieva, M.S., On the formation of the concept of informetrics (review), Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2013, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Egghe, L., Expansion of the field of informetrics: Origins and consequences, Information Processing Management, 2005, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1311–1316.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Priem, J., Taborelli, D., Groth, P., and Neylon, C., Altmetrics: A manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto. Cited June 19, 2014.

  5. Tague-Sutcliffe, J.M., An introduction to informetrics, Information Processing Management, 1992, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Egghe, L., Welcome to the journal of informetrics, J. Informetrics, 2007, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayr, P. and Umstätter, W., Why is a new Journal of Informetrics needed?, Cybermetrics, 2007, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–6. http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v11i1p1.pdf. Cited June 19, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.V., Rossiya v mirovoi nauke: bibliometricheskii analiz (Russia in World Science: A Bibliometric Analysis), Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Voverene, O.I., Bibliometrics as a structural part of the methodology of informatics, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 1985, no. 7, pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klimov, Yu.N. and Konovalov, Yu.V., Modeling, predicting the growth of documentary information flows and assessing the potential of scientific trends in scientometrics, bibliometrics, and informetrics, Nauchn.-Tekhn. Inform. Ser. 2, 1997, no. 4, pp. 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morales, M., Informetrics and its importance, Mezhdunar. Forum Inform. Dokumentatsii, 1985, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pen’kova, O.V. and Tyutyunnik, V.M., Informetrics, scientometrics, and bibliometrics: A scientometric analysis of the current state, Vestn. Tambov. Univer. Ser.: Estestv. Tekhn. Nauki, 2001, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bar-Ilan, J., Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century — a review, J. Informetrics, 2008, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peritz, B.C., Bibliometric literature: A quantitative analysis, in Informetrics 87/88. Select Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval, Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R., Eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1988, pp. 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peritz, B.C., A Bradford distribution for bibliometrics, Scientometrics, 1990, vol. 18, no. 5–6, pp. 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson, C.S., Informetrics, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 1999, vol. 34, pp. 107–247.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wouters, P. and Leydesdorff, L., Has Price’s dream come true: Is scientometrics a hard science?, Scientometrics, 1994, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoepflin, U. and Glänzel, W., Two decades of “scientometrics.” An interdisciplinary field represented by its leading journal, Scientometrics, 2001, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schubert, A., The web of scientometrics, Scientometrics, 2002, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 3–20.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Peritz, B.C. and Bar-Ilan, J., The sources used by bibliometrics-scientometrics as reflected in references, Scientometrics, 2002, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., and Persson, O., Combining full-text analysis and bibliometric indicators: A pilot study, Scientometrics, 2005, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Persson, O., A Bibliometric View of Scientometrics. http://www.umu.se/inforsk/scientometrics/index.html. Cited June 19, 2014.

  23. Mukherjee, B., Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2000–2007): A bibliometric study, IFLA J., 2009, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bar-Ilan, J., JASIST 2001–2010, Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Egghe, L., Five years “Journal of Informetrics,” J. Informetrics, 2012, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 422–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Das, P.K., Journal of informetrics: A bibliometric profile, DESIDOC J. Lib. Inf. Technol., 2013, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Milojević, S. and Leydesdorff, L., Information metrics (iMetrics): A research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity?, Scientometrics, 2013, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bar-Ilan, J. and Peritz, B.C., The lifespan of “informetrics” on the Web: An eight year study (1998–2006), Scientometrics, 2009, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Glänzel, W., Bibliometrics as a research field: A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators: Course Handouts. http://nsdl.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/968/1/Bib_Module. Cited June 19, 2014.

  30. Hood, W.W. and Wilson, C.S., The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics, Scientometrics, 2001, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chetyrkin, E.M., Statisticheskie metody prognozirovaniya (Statistical Methods of Prediction), Moscow: Statistika, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Galyavieva.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.S. Galyavieva, 2014, published in Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya I, 2014, No. 10, pp. 24–34.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galyavieva, M.S. Bibliometric analysis of the document flow of informetrics based on the Russian Science Citation Index. Sci. Tech.Inf. Proc. 41, 220–229 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688214040042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688214040042

Keywords

Navigation