Abstract
At the occasion of the completion of the 25th volume ofScientometrics, we present a combined bibliometric and social network analysis of this journal. In more than one respect,Scientometrics displays the characteristics of a social science journal. Its Price Index amounts to 43.0 percent, and is remarkably stable over time. The majority of the published items inScientometrics has been written by a single author. Moreover, the network of co-authorships is highly fragmented: most authors cooperate with no more than one or two colleagues. Both the citation networks of the authors and the network of title words indicate that the field is nonetheless highly cohesive. In this sense, a specific identity seems to have developed, indeed. Some indications concerning the character of this identity are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. A. Abt, Publication practices in various sciences,Scientometrics, 24 (1992) 441–447.
H. A. Abt, Long-term citation histories of astronomical papers,Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 93 (1981) 207–210.
M. T. Beck, Editorial statements,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 3–4.
R. S. Burt,Toward a Structural Theory of Action. Network Models of Social Structure, Perception and Action. Academic Press, New York, 1982.
M. Callon, J.-P. Courtial, W. A. Turner, S. Bauin, From translation to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis,Social Science Information, 22 (1983) 199–235.
S. Cozzens, Using the archive: Derek Price's theory of differences among the sciences,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 431–441.
S. Cozzens, What do citation count? The rhetoric-first model,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 437–447.
D. Crane,Invisible Colleges, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1972.
M. Douglas,Essays in the Sociology of Perception, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1982.
L. Leydesdorff, Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization,Research Policy, 19 (1989a) 209–223.
L. Leydesdorff, The relations between qualitative theory and scientometric methods in science and technology studies. Introduction to the topical issue,Scientometrics, 15 (1989b) 333–347, at pp. 343 f.
L. Leydesdorff, O. Amsterdamska, Dimensions of citation analysis,Science, Technology & Human Values, 15 (1990) 305–335.
L. Lubrano, The hidden structure of Soviet science,Science, Technology & Human Values, 18 (1993) 147–175.
T. Luukkonen,Citations in the Rhetorical, Reward, and Communication Systems of Science, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Tampere, 1990.
T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen, Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration,Science, Technology & Human Values, 17 (1992) 101–126.
M. MacRoberts, B. MacRoberts, Problems of citation analysis: a critical review,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (1989) 342–349.
J. Marton, Obsolence or immediacy? Evidence supporting Price's hypothesis,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 145–153.
A. J. Meadows,Communication in Science, Butterworths, London, 1974.
H. Moed, Bibliometric measurement of research performance and Price's theory of differences among the sciences,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 473–483.
H. Moed, W. J. M. Burger, J. G. Frankfort, A. F. J. van Raan, The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered,Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 177–203.
D. de Solla Price, Networks of scientific papers,Science, 149 (1965) 510–515.
D. de Solla Price, Editorial statements,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 7.
D. de Solla Price, Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience, In:C. E. Nelson, D. K. Pollack (Eds),Communication among Scientists and Engineers, Heath, Lexington, MA, 1970, pp. 3–22.
D. de Solla Price, S. Gürsey, Studies in scientometrics, Part 1: Transience and continuance in scientific authorship,International Forum on Information and Documentation (1976), International Federation for Documentation, Moscow, 1(2), pp. 17–24.
D. de Solla Price, S. Gürsey, Studies in scientometrics, Part 2: The relation between source author and cited author populations,International Forum on Information and Documentation (1976), International Federation for Documentation, Moscow, 1 (3), pp. 19–22.
A. Rip, J.-P. Courtial, Co-word maps of biotechnology: an example of cognitive scientometrics,Scientometrics, 6 (1984) 381–400.
W. van Rossum, K. Y. v.d. Berg, P. Groenewegan, “Actor and Social Network Analyses of a Problem Fields: The Case of DES Research”, revised version of a paper presented at the WorkshopScience Indicators: Their Use in Science Policy and Their Role in Science Studies, Leiden, November 14–15th 1988.
A. Schubert, H. Maczelka, Cognitive changes in scientometrics during the 1980s, as reflected by the reference patterns of its core journal,Social Studies of Science, 23 (1993) 571–581.
W. Shrum, N. Mullins, Network analysis in the study of science and technology, In:A. F. J. van Raan (Ed.),Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 107–133.
I. Spiegel-Rösing, Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis,Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 97–113.
T. D. Stokes, J. A. Hartley, Coauthorship & influence in specialties,Social Studies of Science, 19 (1989) 101–125.
M. Thompson, A. Wildavsky, R. Ellis,Cultural Theory, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1990.
M. Yitzhaki, D. Ben-Tamar, Number of references in biochemistry and other fields: a case study of the Journal of Biological Chemistry throughout 1910–1985,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 3–22.
S. Woolgar, Beyond the citation debate: towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policy,Science and Public Policy, 18 (1991) 319–326.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wouters, P., Leydesdorff, L. Has Price's dream come true: Is scientometrics a hard science?. Scientometrics 31, 193–222 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018560
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018560