Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the influence of dynamic phenomena on the fracture of a reinforced concrete beam under quasistatic loading (computations and experiment)

  • Published:
Mechanics of Solids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction of numerical models which reliably describe the processes of crack formation and development in reinforced concrete permit estimating the bearing capacity and structural strength of any structural element without using expensive full-scale experiments. In the present paper, an example of four-point bending of a rectangular beam is used to consider a finite-element model of concrete fracture. The results obtained by quasistatic calculations and by solving the problem with inertia forces taken into account are compared. The kinetic energy contribution to the total mechanical energy of the system at the crack origination moment, which is greater than 30%, is estimated to justify the expediency of taking the inertia forces into account. The crack distribution characters obtained numerically and observed experimentally are compared. It is shown that the leading role in the evolution of the crack formation process is played by the mechanism of fracture of bonds between the reinforcing elements and the concrete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu. P. Skachkiov, “Determinations of Fracture and Crack Formation Schemes in Short Reinforced Concrete Beams from Experimental Data,” Region. Arkhitekt. Stroit., No. 3, 74–82 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. M. Strulev and R. A. Yarkin, “Mechanism of Fracture and Methods for Increasing the Bearing Capacity of Flexible Reinforced Concrete Elements,” Vestnik TGTU 6 (3), 474–477 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Ruiz, M. Elices, and J. Planas, “Experimental Study of Fracture of Lightly Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Mater. Struct. 31, 683–691 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Carpinteru, J. R. Carmona, and G. Ventura, “Failure Mode Transitions in Reinforced Concrete Beams, Part 2: Experimental Tests,” ACI Struct. J. 108 (3), 286–293 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. A. Bykov, V. P. Matveenko, G. S. Serovaev, et al., “Mathematical Modeling of Vibration Processes in Reinforced Concrete Structures for Setting Up Crack InitiationMonitoring,” Izv. Akad. Nauk. Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 2, 60–72 (2015). [Mech. Solids (Engl. Transl.) 50 (2), 160–170 (2015)].

    Google Scholar 

  6. SP 63. 13330. 2012. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures. Foundations. Actualization of SNiP 52-01-2003 (Minregion Rossii, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

  7. SP 52-101-2003. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures without Prestressed Reinforcement (GUP “NIIZhB”, FGUPTsPP, Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].

  8. GOST 8829-94. Factory-Made Reinforced Concrete and Concrete Structural Products. Loading Tests Methods. Rules for Estimating the Strength, Rigidity, and Crackresistance (Gosstroi Rossii GUPTsPP, Moscow, 1997) [in Russian].

  9. D. Kachlakev and T. F. E. Miller, Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Structures Strengthened with FRP Laminates, Final Report (Oregon Department of Transplantation, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. R. Rashid, “Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessels,” Nuclear Engng Des. 7 (4), 334–344 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. G. Kwak and C. F. Flippou, Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures under Monotonic Loads, Report (Univ. of California, Berkely, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Dahmani, A. Khennane, and S. Kaci, “Crack Identification in Reinforces Concrete Bemas Using ANSYS Software,” Probl. Prochn., No. 2, 141–153 (2010) [Strength of Materials (Engl. Transl.) 42 (2), 232–240 (2010)].

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. J. Wolansky, Flexural Behavior of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Beams Using Finite Element Analysis, Thesis (Marquette University, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. F. Barbosa and G. O. Ribeiro, “Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using ANSYSNonlinear Concrete Model,” in Proc. of Comp. Mechanics. New Trends and Applications, Barcelone, 1998 (Barcelone, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. B. Dawari and G. R. Vesmawala, “Application of Nonlinear ConcreteModel for Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Int. J. Sci. Engng Res. 5 (9), 776–782 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. B. Rasmussen, Analytical and Numerical Modeling of Reinforced Concrete in Serviceability Limit State, Thesis (Aarhus University, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Ngo and A. C. Scordekus, “Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” J. ACI 64 (3), 152–163 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. L. Gamino, J. L. A. O. Sousa, and O. L. Manzoli, “A Comparative Study between Smeared and Embedded Crack Models for Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” in Proc. of FraMCo S. Korean Concrete Institute, 2010.

  19. K. J. William and E. P. Warnke, “Constitutive Model for the Triaxial Behavior of Concrete,” Proc. Int. Associat. Bridge Struct. Engng 19, 1–30 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. I. Lurie, The Theory of Elasticity (Nauka Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Nowacki, Theory of Elasticity (PWN, Warsaw, 1970; Mir, Moscow, 1975).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. N. N. Malinin, Applied Theory of Plasticity and Creep, Manual for students of higher educational institutions, 2nd. ed. (Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, HJ, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Bykov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.A. Bykov, V.P. Matveenko, G.S. Serovaev, I.N. Shardakov, A.P. Shestakov, 2015, published in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Mekhanika Tverdogo Tela, 2015, No. 4, pp. 118–129.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bykov, A.A., Matveenko, V.P., Serovaev, G.S. et al. Analysis of the influence of dynamic phenomena on the fracture of a reinforced concrete beam under quasistatic loading (computations and experiment). Mech. Solids 50, 463–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654415040123

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654415040123

Keywords

Navigation