The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in widespread public and private sector restrictions and a global economic crisis that has intensified existing inequities such as lack of affordable housing, unemployment, longstanding poverty and wealth inequality, and the ongoing impacts of colonization. During COVID-19, there has been an increase in visible homelessness particularly in the form of encampments in urban centres (Lorinc, 2020). The rise of visible homelessness is often paired with troubling public narratives that perpetuate stereotypes, stigma, and discrimination related to crime, substance use, mental health, and poverty, thus intensifying the trauma endured by people experiencing homelessness. Such narratives are often used to justify the displacement of encampments while ignoring that encampment residents lack basic determinants of health and human rights to water, sanitation, food, and shelter. Public health officials are often at the nexus of these controversies and heightened public tensions. In this commentary, we outline the importance and relevance of a human rights approach for informing and bolstering public health responses to homelessness.

Public health is rooted in health equity and social justice, goals (Beauchamp, 1976) that are operationalized in public health standards and competencies (Edwards & Davison, 2008; Public Health Agency of Canada, 2008). Health equity is concerned with the impacts of social conditions on health and promotion of equitable conditions for health with an emphasis on the involvement and engagement of people impacted by inequities (Braveman, 2010). As such, health equity is inextricably linked to human rights including access to adequate housing, food, income, and self-determination as requirements for health justice and enshrined in International Human Rights Covenants (Braveman, 2010; Meier et al., 2018). The 2019 Canadian Housing Strategy Act specifically recognizes that (a) “the right to adequate housing is a fundamental human right affirmed in international law” and (b) “housing is essential to inherent dignity and well-being of the person and to building sustainable and inclusive communities” (Government of Canada, 2019, p. 2). This recognition is echoed in the National Protocol for Homeless Encampments in Canada (National Protocol) outlining the importance of housing as a human right and a human rights approach to homelessness (Farha & Schwan, 2020). Ongoing homelessness and failure to implement these policies is contributing to poor health and premature death for homeless persons (Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation and National Right to Housing Network, 2021). Recognizing the right to housing and protecting human rights are central to public health commitments to health equity and social justice. 

In the absence of housing, COVID-19 guidelines for encampments such as those released by the National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health (NCCEH) (Yehia, 2020) and the best practices released by the British Columbia (BC) Ministry of Health (BCCDC, 2020) offer public health guidance, but fall short of adopting a human rights approach. This shortcoming raises the risk of these guidelines being co-opted and used to justify stigmatization, displacement, criminalization, and inaction due to a lack of focus on human rights to basic determinants of health (Farha & Schwan, 2020). Without a strong public health and human rights approach, public health can be weaponized in service of societal narratives that problematize homelessness as an individual failing, a disease or crime rather than a structurally produced problem with consequences of trauma and violence.

Dominant discourses surrounding encampments

Encampments are often portrayed publicly through three closely linked narratives—individual deficiencies, mental health and substance use, and criminalization—which often inform governmental, community, and non-profit responses to these sites. Despite the fact that people experiencing homelessness are no more likely to break the law, except for laws that punish people for living outdoors (Rankin, 2019), community opposition to encampments is often based in fears of increasing crime rates and jeopardizing public health and safety (Loftus-Farren, 2011).

For example, court cases, such as British Columbia v. Adamson BCSC 1245 (2016), have cited “health and safety risks” such as fire hazards, violence, criminal activities, human waste, pests, substance use, and used needles as reasons to call for dismantling of an encampment. When public health is co-opted by narratives of public safety, it denies the varied human rights and public health concerns raised by residents of encampments that often focus on deficiencies in the determinants of health, such as housing, food and sanitation.

The neoliberal notion that encampments exist because of individual shortcomings ignores how encampments are instead sites of public health deficiencies rooted in government policies related to lack of housing, sanitation, food storage, inadequate incomes, and other resources. In May 2020, a BC ministerial order cited public health concerns of COVID-19 transmission, public safety, and increases in crime when forcing residents out of three public spaces in Vancouver and Victoria (Kines, 2020). Although displacement of the three encampments was accompanied by offers of hotel-style spaces, the process ignored rights to self-determination of encampment residents and forced closure of these encampments despite lack of adequate and sufficient spaces to move everyone indoors.

Instead of citing concerns of safety, crime, mental health, and substance use as public health rationale for displacement of encampments, public health officials should recognize encampment residents as rights holders—people with a right to housing, self-determination and basic determinants of health. This would ensure public health responses are rooted in social justice and bolstered by human rights.

Public health and “a human rights approach”

The National Protocol outlines eight principles, including the right to housing and how to uphold human rights in the absence of housing (Farha & Schwan, 2020). These eight principles can be used to squarely orient public health guidelines, such as those identified earlier, to housing as a human right and a public health approach based on protection of human rights and promotion of health equity and social justice.

The first two principles of the National Protocol recognize those who are homeless as holders of human rights, and the priority of appropriate housing as determined by encampment residents themselves as the only adequate, human rights-centred response to encampments (Farha & Schwan, 2020). As such, public health must acknowledge those who are living unsheltered in encampments as having the fundamental right to housing that is contained in human rights law and recognized as an essential basic determinant of health. Principle 2 of the National Protocol states that residents of encampments must be able to participate in decisions that affect their health and well-being as an “exercise of agency, autonomy, and self-determination” (Farha & Schwan, 2020, p. 16). The public health guidelines laid out by the BC Ministry of Health and the NCCEH neglect to foreground self-determination and the involvement of encampment residents as a fundamental requirement of human rights and core principle of health equity. For example, offers of shelter spaces are often refused by people experiencing homelessness because of lack of privacy and safety (Cohen et al., 2019). Further, any decisions surrounding encampment service provision, harm reduction, hygiene and sanitation, and potential relocation should be centred around the perspectives of people living in encampments and acknowledge that “residents are experts in their own lives”, including how best to promote and protect health (Farha & Schwan, 2020).

Principles 3, 4, and 5 relate to human rights in the context of evictions and relocations. The BC Ministry of Health and NCCEH public health guidelines acknowledge the increased risk of infectious disease spread and other public health and safety risks that come with displacement of encampments. However, this acknowledgement falls short of a human rights perspective that prohibits forcible evictions “in all circumstances”, including but not limited to public health emergencies such as COVID-19 (Farha & Schwan, 2020). Forcible displacement results in a myriad of harms, including trauma and disconnection from services.

The sixth principle of the National Protocol requires governments to “ensure encampments meet basic needs of residents consistent with human rights” (Farha & Schwan, 2020). In the absence of providing adequate housing as determined by encampment residents, a public health and human rights response would ensure access to basic determinants of health such as food, water, sanitation, and garbage disposal. While the BC Ministry of Health and the NCCEH guidelines advocate for the timely provision of such resources, when removed from a rights-based approach these guidelines risk being used for enforcement and displacement when public health standards are not met, instead of protecting rights to basic determinants of health.

Last, principles 7 and 8 speak to the importance of ensuring respect and dignity for all encampment residents with specific attention to Indigenous Peoples. While the BC Ministry of Health refers to human rights and Indigenous rights in their encampment guidelines, the NCCEH guidelines do not mention Indigenous Peoples or Canada’s ongoing history of colonization that has deprived Indigenous people of land and resources and led to an overrepresentation of Indigenous people among those who are homeless. Guidelines that neglect to meaningfully frame recommendations from these perspectives risk inadequate public health responses and actions that violate human rights and are complicit in ongoing processes of colonization.

The eight principles of the National Protocol offer examples of how public health responses to encampments can protect public health and uphold human rights, first and foremost through access to adequate housing as defined by encampment residents, and in absence of that, through the provision of public health resources and supports to address basic determinants of health.

Human rights claims and public health assertions

Dominant narratives place the blame for systemic deficiencies onto residents of encampments to rationalize displacement and eviction of encampments. However, encampments are manifestations of government and public health deficiencies, specifically the “failure to successfully implement the right to adequate housing” (Farha & Schwan, 2020) and protect rights to basic determinants of health.

According to the Pan American Health Organization (n.d.), effective public health “requires explicit and concrete efforts to promote and protect human rights and dignity”. The BC Ministry of Health and NCCEH guidelines are meant to address public health concerns related to encampments in the context of COVID-19. However, in order to do so effectively, they must pair public health with human rights approaches. While these guidelines include “human rights considerations” and maintain that adequate housing is preferable to people living in encampments, meaningfully taking up a human rights approach would begin by firmly stating a right to housing and respecting people experiencing homelessness as rights holders in ensuring adequate housing options and basic determinants of health. To enact public health commitments of health equity and social justice, public health guidance regarding homeless encampments should integrate human rights principles as outlined above from the National Protocol.