Skip to main content
Log in

Tensile behaviour of reinforced UHPFRC elements under serviceability conditions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tension stiffening is an essential effect that influences the behaviour of concrete structures under serviceability conditions, mainly regarding crack control and deflection behaviour. Serviceability conditions can be studied experimentally by running the so-called uniaxial tensile test. This paper reports an extensive experimental research conducted to study the tensile behaviour of reinforced Ultra-High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete (R-UHPFRC) under service conditions by uniaxial tensile testing. The parameters studied were the reinforcement ratio and the steel fibre content in a experimental programme including 36 specimens. Special testing equipment and methodology to measure the post-cracking deformation of R-UHPFRC ties were developed, and special attention was paid to the shrinkage effect. The tensile elements’ axial stiffness was approximately parallel to the bare bar response after microcracking formation showing a full tension-stiffening response. The average tensile capacity of the reinforced elements (tension stiffening response) was achieved. Concrete’s contribution in the R-UHPFRC ties with the tensile properties deriving from four-point bending tests (4PBTs) on non-reinforced UHPFRC specimens was also compared. The experimental results revealed a slight increase in concrete’s contribution with the higher reinforcement ratio. Moreover, the concrete’s contribution in the tensile elements was higher than the characteristic tensile properties deriving from 4PBTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Burns C (2012) Serviceability analysis of reinforced concrete based on the tension chord model, PhD thesis no. 19979, Institute of Structural Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland

  2. Honfi D (2013) Design for Serviceability-A probabilistic approach. Lund University, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sahamitmongkol R, Kishi T (2011) Tension stiffening effect and bonding characteristics of chemically prestressed concrete under tension. Mater Struct 44(2):455–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gribniak V et al (2015) Stochastic tension-stiffening approach for the solution of serviceability problems in reinforced concrete: Constitutive modeling. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 30(9):684–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Muhamad R et al (2012) The tension stiffening mechanism in reinforced concrete prisms. Adv Struct Eng 15(12):2053–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Model Code 2010 (2012), Final Complete Draft, Fib Bull: No.65 and 66, March 2012-ISBN 978-2-88394-105-2 and April 2012-ISBN 978-2-88394-106-9

  7. AFGC S (2002) Bétons fibrés à ultra-hautes performances–Recommandations provisoires. AFGC, France

  8. Committee JC (2008) Recommendations for design and construction of high performance fiber reinforced cement composites with multiple fine cracks. Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cahier Technique SIA 2052 (2014) Béton fibré ultra-performant (BFUP)-Matériaux, dimensionnement et exécution. Projet

  10. Belarbi A, Hsu TT (1994) Constitutive laws of concrete in tension and reinforcing bars stiffened by concrete. Structural Journal 91(4):465–474

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yankelevsky DZ, Jabareen M, Abutbul AD (2008) One-dimensional analysis of tension stiffening in reinforced concrete with discrete cracks. Eng Struct 30(1):206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stramandinoli RS, La Rovere HL (2008) An efficient tension-stiffening model for nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete members. Eng Struct 30(7):2069–2080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins MP, Mitchell D (1991) Prestressed concrete structures, vol 9. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaklauskas G (2001) Integral constitutive model for deformational analysis of flexural reinforced concrete members. Statyba 7(1):3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsu TT (2017) Unified theory of reinforced concrete. Routledge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fields K, Bischoff PH (2004) Tension stiffening and cracking of high-strength reinforced concrete tension members. Structural Journal 101(4):447–456

    Google Scholar 

  17. Patel K, Chaudhary S, Nagpal A (2016) A tension stiffening model for analysis of RC flexural members under service load. Comput Concrete 17(1):29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SC, Cho JY and Vecchio FJ (2013) Tension-Stiffening Model for Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Containing Conventional Reinforcement. ACI Structural Journal 110(4)

  19. Bischoff PH (2003) Tension stiffening and cracking of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 15(2):174–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Amin A, Foster SJ, Watts M (2016) Modelling the tension stiffening effect in SFR-RC. Mag Concrete Res 68(7):339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deluce JR, Vecchio FJ (2013) Cracking Behavior of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Members Containing Conventional Reinforcement. ACI Struct J 110(3):481–490

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bernardi P et al (2016) Experimental and numerical study on cracking process in RC and R/FRC ties. Mater Struct 49(1–2):261–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baby F et al (2013) UHPFRC tensile behavior characterization: inverse analysis of four-point bending test results. Mater Struct 46(8):1337–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee S-C, Kim H-B, Joh C (2017) Inverse Analysis of UHPFRC Beams with a Notch to Evaluate Tensile Behavior. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2017:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  25. Baby F et al (2013) Identification of UHPFRC tensile behaviour: methodology based on bending tests. UHPFRC 2013-International Symposium on Ultra-High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete: 649–658

  26. Baby F et al (2012) Proposed flexural test method and associated inverse analysis for ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. ACI Mater J 109(5):545

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. López JÁ et al (2015) An inverse analysis method based on deflection to curvature transformation to determine the tensile properties of UHPFRC. Mater Struct 48(11):3703–3718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. López JÁ (2017) Characterisation of The Tensile Behaviour of UHPFRC by Means of Four-Point Bending Tests. PhD Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València

  29. Khorami M, Navarro-Gregori J, Serna P (2020) Experimental methodology on the serviceability behaviour of reinforced ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete tensile elements. Strain 56(5):e12361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khorami M et al (2019) A testing method for studying the serviceability behavior of reinforced UHPFRC tensile ties. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Conference Series 596:12–22

  31. Lee N, Chisholm D (2005) Reactive Powder Concrete, Study Report SR 146. Ltd, Judgeford, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beigi MH et al (2013) An experimental survey on combined effects of fibers and nanosilica on the mechanical, rheological, and durability properties of self-compacting concrete. Mater Des 50:1019–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li VC (2002) Large volume, high-performance applications of fibers in civil engineering. J Appl Polym Sci 83(3):660–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Edgington J (1973) Steel fibre reinforced concrete. University of Surrey, Guildford

    Google Scholar 

  35. López J et al (2015) Comparison between inverse analysis procedure results and experimental measurements obtained from UHPFRC Four-Point Bending Tests. in Seventh International RILEM Conference on High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites (HPFRCC7): 185–192

  36. Löfgren I (2005) Fibre-reinforced Concrete for Industrial Construction-a fracture mechanics approach to material testing and structural analysis. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  37. Afroughsabet V, Biolzi L, Ozbakkaloglu T (2016) High-performance fiber-reinforced concrete: a review. J Mater Sci 51(14):6517–6551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Buttignol TET, Sousa J, Bittencourt T (2017) Ultra High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC): a review of material properties and design procedures. Revista IBRACON de estruturas e materiais 10(4):957–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fehling E et al (2014) Ultra-high performance concrete UHPC: Fundamentals, design, examples. Wiley, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Makita T, Brühwiler E (2014) Tensile fatigue behaviour of Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete combined with steel rebars (R-UHPFRC). Int J Fatigue 59:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rauch M and Sigrist V (2010) Dimensioning of Structures made of UHPFRC. in IABSE Symposium Report. 34th International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering 97(34):39–46

  42. Sigrist V and Rauch M (2008) Deformation behavior of reinforced UHPFRC elements in tension. Anonymous Tailor Made Concrete Structures. CRC Press: 405–410

  43. Redaelli D (2006) Testing of reinforced high performance fibre concrete members in tension. in Proceedings of the 6th Int. Ph. D. Symposium in Civil Engineering, Zurich 2006. 2006. Proceedings of the 6th Int. Ph. D. Symposium in Civil Engineering, Zurich

  44. Institution BS (2004) Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures: Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. British Standards Institution, UK

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gribniak V, Kaklauskas G and Bačinskas D (2007) State-of-art review of shrinkage effect on cracking and deformations of concrete bridge elements. The Baltic Journal of Road & Bridge Engineering 2(4):183-193

  46. Torst H (1967) Auswirkungen des superpositionsprinzips auf kriech-und relaxationsprobleme bei beton und spannbeton. Beton-und stahlbetonbau 10(230–238):261–269

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bazant Z (1972) Predictions of concrete effects using age adjusted effective modulus method. J Am Concrete Institute 69:212–217

    Google Scholar 

  48. AFGC (2013)  Ultra high performance fibre-reinforced concretes, recommendations. Documents scientifiques et techniques, Paris

  49. Gowripalan N, Gilbert R (2000) Design guidelines for RPC prestressed concrete beams. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ostergaard L, Walter R and Olesen J (2005) Method for determination of tensile properties of engineered cementitious composites (ECC). Proceedings of ConMat'05, Vancouver, Canada

  51. Kanakubo T (2006) Tensile characteristics evaluation method for ductile fiber-reinforced cementitious composites. J Adv Concrete Technol 4(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study forms part of Project BIA2016-78460-C3-1-R, supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain.

Funding

Project BIA2016-78460-C3-1-R, supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Navarro-Gregori.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Not applicable.

Availability of data Material

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khorami, M., Navarro-Gregori, J. & Serna, P. Tensile behaviour of reinforced UHPFRC elements under serviceability conditions. Mater Struct 54, 43 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01630-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01630-z

Keywords

Navigation