Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Margin Status and Local Recurrence in Phyllodes Tumours of the Breast: A Canadian Series

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Phyllodes tumours of the breast are rare fibroepithelial neoplasms with a propensity for recurrence. While surgical excision remains the standard of care, the optimal margin width is an area of active investigation. Recent studies have questioned the necessity for wide, local excision.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cohort study of patients with phyllodes tumours treated at our institution between 2003 and 2021. Demographic, histopathological, and recurrence data were captured; malignant phyllodes were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify covariates associated with local recurrence.

Results

Of 187 patients with phyllodes tumours, 82.9% (n = 155) were classified as benign while 17.1% (n = 32) were borderline. Initial surgical margins were positive in 26.2% (n = 49), < 2 mm in 50.8% (n = 95), and ≥ 2 mm in 23% (n = 43) patients. Among patients with positive margins, 61.2% (n = 30) underwent margin revision. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, the recurrence rate was 3.7%. On univariate analysis, only a positive margin at the time of initial surgery and not margin width was significantly associated with a higher rate of disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 9.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85–49.2), as was a size greater than 4 cm on preoperative imaging (HR 10.78, 95% CI 0.97–120.1). Revision of an initially positive margin was not significantly associated with decreased local recurrence (p = 1).

Conclusions

In this large cohort of benign and borderline phyllodes tumours, positive resection margins and not margin width at the initial surgery were associated with a increased recurrence. Individualization of decisions regarding margin reexcision is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ang MK, Ooi AS, Thike AA, et al. Molecular classification of breast phyllodes tumors: validation of the histologic grading scheme and insights into malignant progression. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;129(2):319–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tan BY, Acs G, Apple SK, et al. Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a consensus review. Histopathology. 2016;68(1):5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lakhani SREI, Schnitt SJ, et al. World health organization classification of tumours of the breast. Lyon, France: IARC; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tan PH, Ellis I, Allison K, et al. The 2019 world health organization classification of tumours of the breast. Histopathology. 2020;77(2):181–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson HM, Mohamed A, Hassan MM, Geradts J, Geisel L, Vohra NA, Wong JH. Race-related differences in the clinical presentation and histopathologic features of phyllodes tumor. Am Surg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348211029841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi J, Koo JS. Comparative study of histological features between core needle biopsy and surgical excision in phyllodes tumor. Pathol Int. 2012;62(2):120–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parker SJ, Harries SA. Phyllodes tumours. Postgrad Med J. 2001;77(909):428–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chua CL, Thomas A, Ng BK. Cystosarcoma phyllodes: a review of surgical options. Surgery. 1989;105(2 Pt 1):141–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reinfuss M, Mitus J, Duda K, Stelmach A, Rys J, Smolak K. The treatment and prognosis of patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast: an analysis of 170 cases. Cancer. 1996;77(5):910–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zurrida S, Bartoli C, Galimberti V, et al. Which therapy for unexpected phyllode tumour of the breast? Eur J Cancer. 1992;28(2–3):654–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapiris I, Nasiri N, A’Hern R, Healy V, Gui GP. Outcome and predictive factors of local recurrence and distant metastases following primary surgical treatment of high-grade malignant phyllodes tumours of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27(8):723–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moo TA, Alabdulkareem H, Tam A, et al. Association between recurrence and re-excision for close and positive margins versus observation in patients with benign phyllodes tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(10):3088–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ouyang Q, Li S, Tan C, et al. Benign phyllodes tumor of the breast diagnosed after ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy: surgical excision or wait-and-watch? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1129–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spitaleri G, Toesca A, Botteri E, et al. Breast phyllodes tumor: a review of literature and a single center retrospective series analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013;88(2):427–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenberger LH, Thomas SM, Nimbkar SN, et al. Contemporary multi-institutional cohort of 550 cases of phyllodes tumors (2007–2017) demonstrates a need for more individualized margin guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(3):178–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaaban M, Barthelmes L. Benign phyllodes tumours of the breast: (Over) treatment of margins: a literature review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(7):1186–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Genco IS, Purohit V, Hackman K, Ferreira L, Tugertimur B, Hajiyeva S. Benign and borderline phyllodes tumors of the breast: Clinicopathologic analysis of 205 cases with emphasis on the surgical margin status and local recurrence rate. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2021;51:151708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Breast Cancer (Version 8.2021). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2021.

  19. Nair NS, Chitkara G, Hawaldar RW, et al. En bloc excision of phyllodes tumor of the breast: radical approach heralds better outcome. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(3):e228–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toussaint A, Piaget-Rossel R, Stormacq C, Mathevet P, Lepigeon K, Taffe P. Width of margins in phyllodes tumors of the breast: the controversy drags on? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021;185(1):21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu Y, Chen Y, Zhu L, et al. Local recurrence of benign, borderline, and malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(5):1263–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wei Y, Yu Y, Ji Y, et al. Surgical management in phyllodes tumors of the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg. 2022;11(3):513–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Network NCC. 2018

  24. Rodrigues MF, Truong PT, McKevitt EC, Weir LM, Knowling MA, Wai ES. Phyllodes tumors of the breast: the British columbia cancer agency experience. Cancer Radiother. 2018;22(2):112–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chng TW, Gudi M, Lim SH, Li H, Tan PH. Validation of the Singapore nomogram for outcome prediction in breast phyllodes tumours in a large patient cohort. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71(2):125–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sotheran W, Domjan J, Jeffrey M, Wise MH, Perry PM. Phyllodes tumours of the breast–a retrospective study from 1982–2000 of 50 cases in Portsmouth. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(5):339–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tremblay-LeMay R, Hogue JC, Provencher L, et al. How wide should margins be for phyllodes tumors of the breast? Breast J. 2017;23(3):315–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jang JH, Choi MY, Lee SK, et al. Clinicopathologic risk factors for the local recurrence of phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8):2612–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koh VCY, Thike AA, Nasir NDM, Yip GWC, Bay BH, Tan PH. Size and heterologous elements predict metastases in malignant phyllodes tumours of the breast. Virchows Arch. 2018;472(4):615–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim S, Kim JY, Kim DH, Jung WH, Koo JS. Analysis of phyllodes tumor recurrence according to the histologic grade. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;141(3):353–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou ZR, Wang CC, Sun XJ, et al. Prognostic factors in breast phyllodes tumors: a nomogram based on a retrospective cohort study of 404 patients. Cancer Med. 2018;7(4):1030–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen WH, Cheng SP, Tzen CY, et al. Surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast: retrospective review of 172 cases. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91(3):185–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tan PH, Thike AA, Tan WJ, et al. Predicting clinical behaviour of breast phyllodes tumours: a nomogram based on histological criteria and surgical margins. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(1):69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi JE, Kang SH, Tan PH, Bae YK. Recurrence prediction for breast phyllodes tumours: validation of the Singapore nomogram in Korean women. J Clin Pathol. 2020;75(3):159–63. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-207093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenberger LH, Quintana LM, Thomas SM, et al. Limited reporting of histopathologic details in a multi-institutional academic cohort of phyllodes tumors: time for standardization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(12):7404–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Metcalfe LN, Zysk AM, Yemul KS, et al. Beyond the margins-economic costs and complications associated with repeated breast-conserving surgeries. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(11):1084–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ipshita Prakash MD, MSc.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

None of the authors has any relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moldoveanu, D., Iny, E., Theriault, C. et al. Margin Status and Local Recurrence in Phyllodes Tumours of the Breast: A Canadian Series. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 1700–1709 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12894-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12894-2

Navigation