Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Obesity on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a significant public health concern and clear risk factor for complications following breast reconstruction. To date, few have assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) focused on this key determinant.

Objective

Our study aimed to investigate the impact of obesity (body mass index ≥ 30) on postoperative satisfaction and physical function utilizing the BREAST-Q in a cohort of autologous breast reconstruction patients.

Methods

An Institutional Review Board-approved prospective investigation was conducted to evaluate PROs in patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction from 2009 to 2017 at a tertiary academic medical center. The BREAST-Q reconstruction module was used to assess outcomes between cohorts preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after reconstruction.

Results

Overall, 404 patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction with abdominal free-tissue transfer (244 non-obese, 160 obese) and completed the BREAST-Q. Although obese patients demonstrated lower satisfaction with breasts preoperatively (p = 0.04), no significant differences were noted postoperatively (p = 0.58). However, physical well-being of the abdomen was lower in the obese cohort compared with their non-obese counterparts at long-term follow-up (3 years; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Obesity significantly impacts autologous breast reconstruction patients. Although obese patients are more likely to present with dissatisfaction with breasts preoperatively, they exhibit comparable PROs overall compared with their non-obese counterparts, despite increased complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sljivic S, Gusenoff JA. The obesity epidemic and bariatric trends. Clin Plast Surg. 2019;46(1):1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012;307(5):491–497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):804–814.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morimoto LM, White E, Chen Z, et al. Obesity, body size, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: the Women’s Health Initiative (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13(8):741–751.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Panayi AC, Agha RA, Sieber BA, Orgill DP. Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018;34(5):363–375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kroll SS, Evans GR, Reece GP, et al. Comparison of resource costs of free and conventional TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(1):74–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Matros E, Albornoz CR, Razdan SN, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(4):937–946.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sgarzani R, Negosanti L, Morselli PG, Vietti Michelina V, Lapalorcia LM, Cipriani R. Patient satisfaction and quality of life in DIEAP flap versus implant breast reconstruction. Surg Res Pract. 2015;2015:405163.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cornelissen AJM, Beugels J, van Kuijk SMJ, et al. Sensation of the autologous reconstructed breast improves quality of life: a pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;167(3):687–695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dasari CR, Gunther S, Wisner DH, Cooke DT, Gold CK, Wong MS. Rise in microsurgical free-flap breast reconstruction in academic medical practices. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74 Suppl 1:S62–S65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pesce CE, Liederbach E, Czechura T, Winchester DJ, Yao K. Changing surgical trends in young patients with early stage breast cancer, 2003 to 2010: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(1):19–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL, et al. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(5):1640–1648.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fischer JP, Cleveland EC, Nelson JA, et al. Breast reconstruction in the morbidly obese patient: assessment of 30-day complications using the 2005 to 2010 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data sets. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(4):750–761.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer JP, Wes AM, Kanchwala S, Kovach SJ. Effect of BMI on modality-specific outcomes in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR): a propensity-matched analysis using the 2005–2011 ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014;48(5):297–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gfrerer L, Mattos D, Mastroianni M, et al. Assessment of patient factors, surgeons, and surgeon teams in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(2):245e–252e.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Israeli R. Complications of acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5 Suppl 2):159S–172S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen KT, Hanwright PJ, Smetona JT, Hirsch EM, Seth AK, Kim JY. Body mass index as a continuous predictor of outcomes after expander-implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(1):19–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM, Wu LC, Kanchwala S. Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: analysis of 15,937 patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(4):656–664.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Sieber B, et al. Free tissue transfer in the obese patient: an outcome and cost analysis in 1258 consecutive abdominally based reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):681e–692e.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jandali S, Nelson JA, Sonnad SS, et al. Breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer from the abdomen in the morbidly obese. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):2206–2213.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nelson JA, Chung CU, Fischer JP, Kanchwala SK, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Wound healing complications after autologous breast reconstruction: a model to predict risk. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(4):531–539.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang EI, Liu J. Prospective evaluation of obese patients undergoing autologous abdominal free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(2):120e–125e.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nelson JA, Tecci MG, Lanni MA, et al. Function and strength after free abdominally based breast reconstruction: a 10-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(1):22e–31e.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Yan C, et al. The impact of obesity on abdominal wall function after free autologous breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2014;34(5):352–360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cano SJ, Klassen A, Pusic AL. The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(3):98e–106e.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009–2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(2):149–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee C, Sunu C, Pignone M. Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(1):123–133.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345–353.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pusic AL, Lemaine V, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cano SJ. Patient-reported outcome measures in plastic surgery: use and interpretation in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(3):1361–1367.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pusic AL, Matros E, Fine N, et al. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast reconstruction: results of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(22):2499–2506.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sugrue R, MacGregor G, Sugrue M, Curran S, Murphy L. An evaluation of patient reported outcomes following breast reconstruction utilizing Breast Q. Breast. 2013;22(2):158–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(2):293–302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K, et al. Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter comparison of four abdominally based autologous reconstruction methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):758–771.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang X. Firth logistic regression for rare variant association tests. Front Genet. 2014;5:187.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2265–2274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen CL, Shore AD, Johns R, Clark JM, Manahan M, Makary MA. The impact of obesity on breast surgery complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):395e–402e.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ, Samson TD. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(2):447–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Moran SL, Serletti JM. Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(7):1954–1960; discussion 1961–1952.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Spear SL, Ducic I, Cuoco F, Taylor N. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(3):788–795.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, Dalio AL, Crisera CA. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):1519–1526.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kulkarni AR, Katz S, Hamilton AS, Graff JJ, Alderman AK. Patterns of use and patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction among obese patients: results from a population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(2):263–270.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sinha S, Ruskin O, D’Angelo A, McCombe D, Morrison WA, Webb A. Are overweight and obese patients who receive autologous free-flap breast reconstruction satisfied with their postoperative outcome? A single-centre study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(1):30–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Robertson SA, Jeevaratnam JA, Agrawal A, Cutress RI. Mastectomy skin flap necrosis: challenges and solutions. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2017;9:141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Phillips BT, Lanier ST, Conkling N, et al. Intraoperative perfusion techniques can accurately predict mastectomy skin flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: results of a prospective trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(5):778e–788e.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Komorowska-Timek E, Gurtner GC. Intraoperative perfusion mapping with laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging can predict and prevent complications in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(4):1065–1073.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jeon FHK, Varghese J, Griffin M, Butler PE, Ghosh D, Mosahebi A. Systematic review of methodologies used to assess mastectomy flap viability. BJS Open. 2018;2(4):175–184.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. McDaniel JC, Browning KK. Smoking, chronic wound healing, and implications for evidence-based practice. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2014;41(5):415–423; quiz E411–412.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schaverien MV, McCulley SJ. Effect of obesity on outcomes of free autologous breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Microsurgery. 2014;34(6):484–497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Applebaum MA, Miller BT, Lopez J, Doren EL, Laronga C, Smith PD. Change in body mass index after breast reconstruction and associated complications. Eplasty. 2015;15:e43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas A. Nelson MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Dr. Pusic is a co-developer of the BREAST-Q, which is owned by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. She receives a portion of the licensing fees (royalty payments) when BREAST-Q is used in industry-sponsored clinical trials. Dr. Joseph Dayan is a consultant for Stryker, and owns shares in Atea Pharmaceutical. Jonas A. Nelson, Nikhil Sobti, Aadit Patel, Evan Matros, Colleen M. McCarthy, Joseph J. Disa, Peter G. Cordeiro, Babak J. Mehrara, and Robert J. Allen Jr declare no conflicts of interest. Dr. Monica Morrow has received honoraria from Genomic Health and Roche.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nelson, J.A., Sobti, N., Patel, A. et al. The Impact of Obesity on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 1877–1888 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08073-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08073-5

Navigation