Skip to main content
Log in

Risk Factors for Poor Compliance with Adjuvant S-1 Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Curative gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy for 12 months is one of the standard treatments for patients with pathological stage (p-stage) II or III gastric cancer. Although some patients have difficulty maintaining compliance with adjuvant S-1, the risk factors for poor compliance are unknown.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients at 21 institutions who underwent curative gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 for p-stage II or III gastric cancer. Patients who had a recurrence within 12 months after surgery were excluded from the analysis. Associations between clinicopathological factors and both 12-month compliance and the cumulative continuation rate of S-1 were analyzed.

Results

Of 359 patients, 252 (70.2%) continued adjuvant S-1 until 12 months after surgery. Older age (>65 years) and postoperative infectious complications (Clavien–Dindo grade III or higher) were significantly correlated with low compliance with S-1 for 12 months (p = 0.008 and p = 0.042). These two factors also showed significant associations with low cumulative continuation rate (log-rank p < 0.001 and p = 0.018). Continuation rates at 12 months after surgery in patients aged ≤60 years, 61–65, 66–70, 71–75, and 76–80 years were 81.5, 75.9, 65.4, 58.7, and 62.9%, respectively. Type of gastrectomy or body weight loss at 1 month after surgery did not affect either 12-month compliance or the cumulative continuation rate of S-1.

Conclusions

Older age, especially over 65 years, and postoperative infectious complications were independent risk factors for poor compliance with adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1810–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis JL, Selby LV, Chou JF, et al. Patterns and predictors of weight loss after gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(5):1639–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Takiguchi S, Miyazaki Y, Takahashi T, et al. Impact of synthetic ghrelin administration for patients with severe body weight reduction more than 1 year after gastrectomy: a phase II clinical trial. Surg Today. 2016;46(3):379–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim JW, Jung SY, Cho JW, Kim BC, Chung KS, Yang DH. Postoperative body mass index changes in gastric cancer patients according to reconstruction type: effectiveness of long jejunal bypass on weight loss in obese patients after distal gastrectomy. Indian J Surg. 2014;76(3):187–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aoyama T, Yoshikawa T, Shirai J, et al. Body weight loss after surgery is an independent risk factor for continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):2000–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aoyama T, Kawabe T, Fujikawa H, et al. Loss of lean body mass as an independent risk factor for continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(8):2560–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aoyama T, Yoshikawa T, Hayashi T, et al. Risk factors for 6-month continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16(2):133–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Japanease Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):101–12.

  9. Japanease Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):113–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111(5):518–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, et al. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46(6):668–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong JH, Ryu MH, Ryoo BY, et al. Safety and feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for Korean patients with curatively resected advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;70(4):523–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsujimoto H, Horiguchi H, Hiraki S, et al. Tolerability of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative resection in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2012;4(5):1135–39.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamanaka T, Matsumoto S, Teramukai S, Ishiwata R, Nagai Y, Fukushima M. Safety evaluation of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 for short- and long-term delivery in advanced gastric cancer: analysis of 3,758 patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;61(2):335–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sierzega M, Kolodziejczyk P, Kulig J. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival after total gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach. Br J Surg. 2010;97(7):1035–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kubota T, Hiki N, Sano T, et al. Prognostic significance of complications after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(3):891–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY. Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104(7):734–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saito T, Kurokawa Y, Miyazaki Y, et al. Which is a more reliable indicator of survival after gastric cancer surgery: postoperative complication occurrence or C-reactive protein elevation? J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(8):894–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial support was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukinori Kurokawa MD, FACS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Kotaro Yamashita, Yukinori Kurokawa, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Masashi Hirota, Ryohei Kawabata, Jota Mikami, Toru Masuzawa, Shuji Takiguchi, Masaki Mori, and Yuichiro Doki have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamashita, K., Kurokawa, Y., Yamamoto, K. et al. Risk Factors for Poor Compliance with Adjuvant S-1 Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 2639–2645 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5923-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5923-2

Keywords

Navigation