Background

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an obscure autoimmune disease characterized by its multisystem affection. Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among patients with SLE [1, 2].

The most widely used classification for NPSLE is the nomenclature developed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1999 for 19 NPSLE manifestations that are associated with SLE [3]. Nevertheless, several challenges encounter the management of NPSLE, including the potentially equivocal characteristics of several neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestations that could be attributed to various organic and non-specific manifestations [4].

In this retrospective study, we aimed at describing various neuropsychiatric manifestations in a cohort of patients who sought medical advice at Cairo University hospital.

Methods

We derived information from the medical records of 301 patients who sought medical advice from a sought medical advice at the Rheumatology and Rehabilitation department of Cairo University from December 2017 to January 2019. All patients fulfilled the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria [5]. The following data were collected from patients’ medical records: (1) demographic data: whereby: (i) the age at onset was defined as the age at the development of the initial manifestation(s) and (ii) the disease duration was calculated from the initial manifestation(s) till the last recorded visit. (2) Cumulative clinical manifestations, with secondary antiphospholipid syndrome being diagnosed according to the modified Sapporo criteria [6]. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee, according to the provisions of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Assessment of disease activity and damage

Disease activity at the onset of the disease and last visit was assessed through the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2 K (SLEDAI-2 K) [7]. Disease damage was investigated utilizing the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) [8].

Assessment of neuropsychiatric manifestations

Neuropsychiatric manifestations were defined according to the ACR 1999 nomenclature [3] and in absence of any non-SLE disease. None of the patients with NPSLE had infection, electrolyte imbalance, and/or drug toxicity at the time of development of NP manifestation(s). It is of note that the authors of this study published preliminary data of this cohort and preliminary data collected as an abstract [9], where several neuropsychiatric manifestations included were not strictly defined according to the ACR nomenclature and thus were subject to inspecificity.

Statistical analysis

Data were coded and entered using the statistical package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data was summarized using mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum in quantitative data, and using frequency (count) and relative frequency (percentage) for categorical data. Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. p values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

This study included 301 SLE patients, of whom 38 were males (12.6%). The mean age of the cohort was 30.7 ± 9.2 years, whereas the mean age at onset was 24.1 ± 8.3 years. Baseline demographic, clinical, and serologic features are shown in Table 1. The median SLEDAI-2K at onset was 12 [mean ± SD, 14 ± 8], whereas the median age at the last visit was 4 [mean ± SD, 6 ± 7]. The median SDI at the last visit was 1 [mean ± SD, 1 ± 2].

Table 1 Baseline demographic, clinical, and serologic characteristics of the cohort (301 patients)*

Characteristics of patients with NPSLE

Of our cohort (301 patients), 101 (33.5%) had one or more neuropsychiatric manifestation. The demographic, clinical, and serologic characteristics of patients with NPSLE are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Demographic, clinical, and serologic characteristics of neuropsychiatric lupus patients (101 patients)a

Neuropsychiatric involvement was the presenting manifestation in 43/101 (42.6%) patients, whereas it developed after the onset of SLE in 58/101 (57.4%) patients (57.4%), with the median time to occurrence of the NP event being 6 months. The most common NP manifestation was psychosis [34/101 (33.7%)], followed by seizures [22/101 (21.8%)]. The least common NP manifestations were anxiety and movement disorders being present in one (1%) and 2 (2) patients, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 Characteristics of neuropsychiatric manifestations

Differences between NPSLE and non-NPSLE patients

Upon comparing patients with and without NP involvement, patients with NPSLE were characterized by having a younger age of onset (p < 0.001) and had a longer disease duration (p = 0.02) (Table 4). Several cumulative clinical characteristics were more prevalent among patients with NP involvement, including cutaneous vasculitis (p = 0.002), discoid rash (p = 0.03), pleurisy and pleural effusion (p = 0.004, p = 0.03, respectively), pericarditis (p = 0.007), thrombocytopenia (p = 0.04), and APS (p = 0.04). On the other hand, there was no difference in any of the included serologic features between the two groups (Table 4). Interestingly, patients with NPSLE had a higher median SLEDAI-2K score at the disease onset (p = 0.008), yet the SLEDAI-2K score at the last visit was comparable between both groups (p = 0.3). Moreover, NPSLE patients demonstrated a higher median SDI score at the last visit (p < 0.001).

Table 4 Differences between NPSLE and non-NPSLE patientsa

Evaluation of disease activity in relation to various NP manifestations

We investigated the association of disease activity with the most prevalent NP manifestations reported in our study, psychosis, seizures, and CVA, and cognitive impairment. At baseline, there was no association of the SLEDAI-2K score with any of the aforementioned NP manifestations. On the other hand, the SLEDAI at the last visit was higher among patients with cognitive impairment (p = 0.02), with no association between the SLEDAI-2K score at the last visit and any of the other studied NP manifestations (Table 5).

Table 5 Association between NP manifestations and disease activity throughout the disease

Evaluation of the impact of APS on NPSLE

Patients with NPSLE were further divided into those with and without APS. Interestingly, APS-positive NPSLE patients had a higher number of ACR criteria when compared to APS-negative NPSLE patients (p = 0.001). The prevalence of CVA was higher among patients with APS-NPSLE patients (p < 0.001); on the other hand, psychosis was more common among patients with APS-negative NPSLE (p = 0.03). The median SLEDAI-2K score at the disease onset was significantly higher in the APS-negative NPSLE group (p = 0.03), yet both the median SLEDAI-2K and SDI scores at the last visit were comparable between both groups (p = 0.3, p = 0.7, respectively) (Table 6).

Table 6 Differences between APS-positive and APS-Negative NPSLE patientsa

Discussion

The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and characteristics of various neuropsychiatric manifestations in an Egyptian cohort of SLE patients. The prevalence of NPSLE ranges from 4.3 to 95% [10,11,12,13,14,15]. This wide variation could be attributed to several factors including race and ethnicity, patients’ selection criteria by different centers, and the definitions used to classify NPSLE manifestations. In this study, the prevalence of NPSLE was 33.5%, which although is higher than that detected in a previous Egyptian study [16], is comparable to other Egyptian studies [17, 18].

Neuropsychiatric involvement was the presenting manifestation in 43/101 (42.6%) patients, with the median time to developing NP manifestation(s) being 6 months. NP involvement has been reported to occur at the onset or within the first year of diagnosis in previous studies [10, 19].

In our study, the most common NP manifestation was psychosis being present in 34/101 patients (33.7%), followed by seizures [22/101 patients (21.8%)]. Similar to our study, psychosis [14] and seizures [11, 14] have been reported among the most common NP manifestations. On the other hand, headache [20], cognitive impairment [15], and CVA [13, 20] were the most prevalent NP manifestations in previous studies.

Interestingly, there were several differences between patients with and without NP involvement. NPSLE patients were characterized by being younger (p = 0.04) and further showed an earlier age of onset (p < 0.001), and showed a longer disease duration (p = 0.02). NPSLE patients were characterized by a having a longer disease duration in a previous study [20]. Despite a comparable prevalence of the investigated serologic features between both groups, several cumulative clinical manifestations were more prevalent among patients SLE with NP involvement, including cutaneous vasculitis (p = 0.002), discoid rash (p = 0.03), pleurisy (p = 0.004), pericarditis (p = 0.007), pleural effusion (p = 0.03), and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.04). On the other hand, clinical and serologic characteristics were comparable between SLE patients with and without NP involvement in a previous study from Portugal [21]. Moreover, apart from thrombocytopenia, there was no difference in other cumulative clinical characteristics between patients with and without NP involvement in a previous Italian study [20], whom unlike our patients, showed a higher prevalence of aPL, yet it is of interest that our NPSLE patients showed a higher prevalence of secondary APS as opposed to SLE without NP involvement (p = 0.04).

It is of note that the association of APS with NP involvement in SLE has been demonstrated in several studies [21, 22]. Interestingly, an unexpected and rather surprising finding, NPSLE patients without APS in our study showed a higher prevalence of psychosis (p = 0.03); on the other hand, as expected, APS-positive NPSLE patients showed a higher prevalence of CVA (p < 0.001). Seizures were more prevalent among APS-negative NPSLE patients in a previous cohort, which showed a comparable prevalence of psychosis and CVA between APS negative and positive NPSLE patients [21].

The importance of assessing NP manifestations in SLE rises from its association with disease activity and hence, subsequent damage. Compared to patients without NP involvement, NPSLE patients in our study showed a higher SLEDAI-2K score at onset (p = 0.008). This finding is in agreement with a previous Egyptian study that showed an association of the SLEDAI-2K score with NP involvement [22]. Moreover, among our NPSLE cohort, patients with cognitive impairment showed a higher SLEDAI-2K score at the last visit compared to those without (p = 0.02). Previous Egyptian studies showed higher SLEDAI-2K scores among patients with depression, anxiety, and dementia [22, 23]. Furthermore, similar to our study, a previous Egyptian report demonstrated a higher SLEDAI-2K score among patients with cognitive impairment [23]. Moreover, patients with NPSLE had a higher SDI score compared to without NP involvement (p < 0.001), which is similar to a previous report [24].

Being a retrospective study, some data was missing, which could be considered as the study’s main limitation. On the other hand, our study has many strengths including that it involved a large cohort from a tertiary center, and tackled the potential impact of APS on NP involvement in SLE.

Conclusions

The prevalence of NP involvement in our cohort was 33.5%, with the most NP manifestations being psychosis and seizures. NPSLE patients were characterized by a younger age of onset, demonstrated a higher prevalence of several cumulative manifestations including secondary APS, and showed a higher damage score. APS-positive NPSLE patients showed a higher prevalence of CVA, whereas APS-negative NPSLE patients developed psychosis more frequently. Hence, this study highlights the impact of NP involvement on disease activity and damage of SLE, and the potential association of NPSLE with APS.