Background

Uterine malignancies are considered the most common gynecological cancers. Endometrial and cervical carcinomas as well as uterine sarcomas are among the top list [1]. Most endometrial conditions show overlap in terms of imaging features with normal menstrual endometrial phases and variable endometrial pathologies, such as endometrial hyperplasia, polyps, submucosal fibroid, and endometrial carcinoma [2, 3]. Endometrial carcinoma is considered the most common female genital malignancy and the fourth most common type of female cancer [4]. MRI is more specific and accurate than ultrasound (US) in characterizing the endometrial masses. It is also more sensitive in identifying the anatomical origin, shape, composition, and enhancement pattern of these masses; narrowing the differential diagnosis; and making a definitive diagnosis [5, 6]. Diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI depends on the random motion of water molecules within different tissues [7]. The DWI provides excellent tissue contrast, and when associated with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping, DWI can be used to assess metastatic lesions, peritoneal deposits, tumor recurrence, and treatment response [8, 9].

DWI is a T2-weighted sequence in which we use two equal and opposite motion-probing gradients before and after the 180° refocusing pulse. The freely moving water molecules when exposed to the first gradient pulse, they acquire phase shift information and when they exposed to the second gradient but as they are moving when they are exposed to the second gradient they are not in the same location and thus are not exposed to precisely the same gradient. Hence no signal is produced at the time of acquisition (free diffusion), however, static water molecules (diffusion restricted) regain signal, as no significant phase shift has occurred by the time of the second gradient and the signal loss from the first gradient is regained by the second opposite gradient (restricted diffusion) [9, 10].

The ADC value is a quantitative measure of the diffusion in each pixel, and it appears as an image which can use in visual assessment of the diffusion value. The number of b values taken varies; generally, the more the b values, the more accurate is the calculated ADC value. In our study, we take three b values: 0, 500, and 1000.

The advanced diffusion imaging techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging, diffusion spectral imaging, and whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression (DWIBS) have a role in the assessment of pelvic floor muscles and uterine musculature before fertility-preserving surgery as well as used to detect thoracic and abdominal metastatic spread. These techniques can potentially map the nerve fiber preoperatively, which can guide surgeons during surgery and reduce postoperative complications [10].

Functional imaging in the form of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been recently found to be very useful in assessing various tumors. Its ability to identify changes in the molecular level has dramatically changed the diagnostic approach of radiologists which based on the morphological criteria. It can improve the diagnostic accuracy of conventional magnetic resonance imaging and tumor response to treatment regimens and detect tumor recurrence with better spatial resolution.

Our study assesses the role of MRI diffusion on endometrial lesions only not on all uterine lesions and does not include the myometrium or cervical lesions to be more specific. Also, our study combined the result with a histopathological examination to be more accurate and compare the results with other studies.

Methods

This study included 50 patients, who complained of vaginal bleeding and showed on US examination endometrial thickening and focal lesions of the endometrium with different echo pattern. The age of patients was between 25 and 87 years, with an average of 49.6 years. Ethics committee approval was obtained in addition to written informed consent from all included patients.

Inclusion criteria

All the patients who clinically complained of vaginal bleeding with US findings of suspicious uterine focal lesion were included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria included all patients with absolute contraindication to MRI (patients having cardiac pacemakers, prosthetic heart valves, cochlear implants, or any metallic implants) and all patients having a history of claustrophobia or noisy/non-diagnostic MRI/DWI examinations due to motion artifacts.

MRI examination

MRI was performed on a 1.5-T MR imaging unit (Philips Achieva). All patients examined in a supine position using a pelvic phased-array coil and nothing per oral for 3 h. IV injection of an antispasmodic drug (10 mg of Visceralgine) was given immediately before MR imaging to reduce bowel peristalsis.

MR imaging protocol

  • ▪ Localizer images in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes

  • ▪ Fast spin echo (FSE) T1- and T2-weighted images (TR 497 ms and TE 12 ms, and TR 3.3 s and TE 90 ms), matrix 320 × 512, slice thickness 4–5 mm with an inter-slice gap of 1–2 mm, FOV 250 mm, and a flip angle of 90 in axial, coronal, and sagittal plane

  • ▪ DW-MRI using a single-shot spin echo planar sequence with free breathing; the following parameters were used: TR 2.8 s, TE 72, matrix 512 × 512, slice thickness 4 mm with an inter-slice gap of 1 mm, and FOV 300 mm were acquired on axial plane. The diffusion sensitizing gradients were applied using a b factor of 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2 in each patient. ADC maps were automatically generated for all DW images, and ADC values were measured at b value 1000 s/mm2. Mean ADC value measured by placing ROI of about 1 ccm in the solid part of the lesion and expressed in 10−3 mm2/s

Histopathological correlation

DW-MRI findings were associated with histopathologic evaluation as a gold standard for all patients. According to the histopathological findings, the lesions studied were divided into benign and malignant groups.

Statistical analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 19, was used. Data were statistically described in terms of range, mean, standard deviation, frequencies (number of cases), and percentages when appropriate. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the conventional MRI and DWI were calculated separately for each parameter.

Results

A total of 50 patients were included in our study with endometrial lesions causing vaginal bleeding, about 32 patients were postmenopausal and 18 were premenopausal, and their age ranged from 25 to 87 years old (M = ± 49.6 years) (Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sagittal T2-WI (b) revealed a well-defined, small, hyperintense lesion inside the endometrium. Axial T1-WI (a) showed a hypointense signal intensity from the lesion. Diffusion-weighted imaging at b = 0 (c) and b = 1000 (d) showed a low signal intensity from the lesion at high b values (benign feature). ADC mapping (e) showed a high SI from the mass lesion with an ADC of 1.83 × 10−3 mm2/s. Radiological diagnosis: small benign featuring lesion seen inside the endometrium likely endometrial polyp. Final diagnosis (according to histopathology): endometrial polyp

Fig. 2
figure 2

Axial T1-WI (a) revealed a hypointense signal intensity from the thickened endometrium. Axial T2- (b) and sagittal T2-WI (c) revealed diffuse thickening of the endometrium forming a mass-like lesion with a homogenous, high SI, and no infiltration of the junctional zone. Diffusion-weighted imaging at b = 0 (d), b = 500 (e), and b = 1000 (f) showed that the thickened endometrium lost its high SI with increasing b values (benign feature). ADC mapping (g) showed a homogenous high SI from the thickened endometrium with an ADC of 1.891 × 10−3 mm2/s. Radiological diagnosis: benign featuring increased endometrial thickening forming a mass-like lesion likely endometrial hyperplasia. Final diagnosis (according to histopathology): endometrial hyperplasia

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Axial T1-WI revealed a slight hypointense signal intensity from the endometrial lesion. b Axial T2-WI and c Sagittal T2-WI revealed an endometrial mass lesion with a homogenous intermediate SI and infiltration of the junction zone affecting more than 50% of the myometrium. d Diffusion-weighted imaging at b = 0, e b = 500, and f b = 1000 showed a high signal intensity from the endometrium mass lesion at a high b value (malignant feature). g ADC mapping showed low SI from the endometrium mass with an ADC of 0.636 × 10−3 mm2/s. Radiologic diagnosis: malignant featuring endometrial mass lesion likely endometrial carcinoma. Final diagnosis (according to histopathology): endometrial carcinoma

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Axial T1-WI revealed slight hypointense signal intensity from the endometrial lesion. b Axial T2-WI and c sagittal T2-WI revealed an increase in endometrial thickness forming a mass lesion with a high SI and inner areas of low SI; there was infiltration of the junction zone less than 50% of the myometrium which was affected. d Diffusion-weighted imaging at b = 0 and e b = 1000 showed loss of the high SI of the endometrial lesion at increased b values (benign feature). f ADC mapping showed a high SI of the endometrial mass with ADC of 1.341 × 10−3 mm2/s. Radiologic diagnosis: endometrial mass lesion with suspicious criteria at conventional MRI and benign features at DW and ADC images. Final diagnosis (according to histopathology): well-differentiated endometrial carcinoma

Histopathological results of studied lesions

The 50 lesions included in this study were classified according to their histopathological results into two groups: group I, benign lesions (28 lesions; 56 %), and group II, malignant lesions (22 lesions; 44%) (Table 1).

Table 1 Histopathological results of all studied lesions (n = 50)

Conventional MRI findings in all studied endometrial focal lesions

Most of the studied benign and malignant endometrial focal lesions (43/50) showed low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and intermediate to high signal on T2-weighted images with the exception of 5 lesions that proved to be submucosal fibroid that showed low signals in both T1- and T2-WI and 2 lesions of focal adenomyosis that were seen as increased thickness of the junctional zone with ill-defined focal lesions of low signal on T1- and T2-WI but with bright dots on T2-weighted images (Table 2).

Table 2 Conventional MRI findings in all studied lesions (n = 50)

DWI findings with ADC value measurements in group I: benign focal lesions (n = 28)

The majority of the studied benign uterine focal lesions (26/28) were diffusion negative in the form of either low signals in DWI with high signals in ADC value (facilitated diffusion) or high signals in both DWI and ADC map (T2 shin effect) with the exception of uterine fibroid that showed T2-WI blackout effect evidenced as low signal in both DWI and ADC map. The ADC value of all benign focal lesions showed relatively high values that ranged from 1.36 to 1.89 × 10−3 mm2/s with mean ADC value about 1.52 ± 0.25 × 10−3 mm2/s with the exception of submucous fibroid that showed very low ADC values ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 × 10−3 mm2/s with mean ADC value about 0.8 ± 0.27. Only two benign lesions (2/28) showed positive diffusion changes “restricted diffusion,” with low ADC values (1.19 and 1.23 × 10−3 mm2/s), one proved to be endometrial hyperplasia while the other diagnosed as endometrial polyp according the histopathologic results (Table 3).

Table 3 DWI and ADC map findings in group I (benign lesions, n = 28)

DWI findings with ADC value measurements in group II: malignant focal lesions (n = 22)

Twenty lesions of the studied 22 malignant endometrial focal lesions were diffusion positive (restricted diffusion) being of high signal intensity at DWI with persistent or increased signals at high b value (b = 1000) and low signal intensity at ADC map images while the 2 endometrial carcinomas were diffusion negative in the form of intermediate signal intensity at DWI at high b value (b = 1000) and high signal intensity at ADC images that proved to be degenerated and of low cellularity on histopathologic correlations. The ADC value of studied malignant endometrial lesions showed relatively low values that ranged from 0.636 to 1.241 × 10−3 mm2/s with mean ADC value about 0.95 ± 0.24 × 10−3 mm2/s (Table 4).

Table 4 DWI and ADC map findings in group II (malignant lesions, n = 22)

The validity of conventional MRI/DW-MRI in the diagnosis of all studied endometrial focal lesions

In the current study, conventional MRI could correctly diagnose 39 lesions out of the studied 50 lesions, 22/28 benign lesions and 17/22 malignant lesions, achieving 77.27% sensitivity, 78.56% specificity, 78% accuracy, 73.91% predictive positive value (PPV), and 81.48% negative positive value (NPV). When adding DWI with ADC value measurements at high b value (b = 1000) to MRI exam, we could correctly diagnose 47 lesions out of the studied 50 lesions, 26/28 benign lesions and 21/22 malignant lesions, achieving 95.45% sensitivity, 92.86% specificity, 94% accuracy, 91.3% PPV, and 96% NPV (Table 5).

Table 5 Validity of conventional MRI/DW-MRI in the diagnosis of all studied endometrial lesions (n = 50)

Discussion

Recently, MRI was considered better than CT for the detection and staging of gynecological and pelvic malignancies [10].

This study included 50 endometrial focal lesions that were grouped according to histopathology into a benign group (28 lesions) and a malignant group (22 lesions). Endometrial hyperplasia was the most common benign lesion (n = 15) followed by endometrial polyps (n = 6), while endometrial carcinoma was the most common malignant lesion (n = 17) followed by choriocarcinoma (n = 5).

Our results are in agreement with those of Elsammak et al., who classified 42 lesions as benign (24 cases) and malignant (18 cases) groups according to their histopathology results and found that the most common benign lesion was endometrial hyperplasia, while the most common malignant lesion was endometrial carcinoma [3]. Additionally, Kilickesmez et al. reported that endometrial carcinoma was the most common malignant endometrial lesions [11]. Kececi et al. found that 40/42 of the studied malignant lesions were endometrial carcinoma, while 7/14 of the studied benign lesions were endometrial polyps: 5 were submucosal fibroids and only 2 lesions were endometrial hyperplasia [12].

In the current study, conventional MRI showed relatively low diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation of different endometrial focal lesions, as most of the studied benign and malignant lesions showed an iso-low signal intensity on T1-WI and an intermediate-high signal intensity on T2-WI with the exception of five submucosal fibroids that showed low signals on both T1-WI and T2-WI and two focal adenomyosis that showed increased thickness of the junctional zone with low signal foci on T1- and T2-WI but with bright dots on T2-WI.

Our results were in a concordance with those of Kierans et al., who reported that conventional MRI features regarding morphology and signal characteristics were not significantly different in both benign and malignant endometrial pathologies [13]. Additionally, other studies have shown that endometrial polyps and benign hyperplasia often present as a focal mass occupying the uterine cavity or as nonspecific endometrial thickening, and those signs are not sufficient for accurate diagnosis of carcinoma, hyperplasia, and polyps [10]. Tamai et al. reported that ordinary leiomyomas exhibited low signals on both T1- and T2-weighted images [14].

DW-MRI is a functional imaging technique that does not require the exogenous contrast medium administration required [15]. When DWI is combined with MRI, it becomes a good diagnostic tool and provides more information for the differentiation and extension of benign and malignant lesions [16].

According to the present work results, DWI could aid in the differentiation between benign and malignant focal endometrial lesions as most of the studied benign lesions (23/28) showed negative diffusion results, and the remaining 5 submucosal fibroids showed T2-WI blackout effects. The ADC values of benign lesions were found to be relatively high when measured at high b value (b = 1000m2), ranging from 1.36 to 1.89 × 10−3 mm2/s (M = 1.52 ± 0.25 × 10−3 mm2/s), although they were very low for the submucosal fibroids ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 × 10−3 mm2/s (M = 8 ± 0.27). On the other hand, 21/22 malignant endometrial focal lesions were diffusion positive (restricted diffusion), with only 1 endometrial carcinoma that was diffusion negative. The ADC values of the malignant endometrial focal lesions were relatively low ranging from 0.636 to 1.241 × 10−3 mm2/s (M = 0.95 ± 0.24 × 10−3 mm2/s) when measured at high b value (b = 1000).

These results are consistent with the results of Elsammak et al. [3], who found a significant difference between the mean ADC values of malignant masses (0.82 ×103 mm2/s) and benign lesions (1.44 × 10−3 mm2/s), and those of Kececi et al. [12], who revealed that the mean ADC value of 42 malignant lesions (0.94 ± 0.18 × 10−3 mm2/s) was statistically significantly lower than the mean ADC value of benign lesions (1.45 ± 0.22 × 10−3 mm2/s) (P < 0.01), and matched also with Fujii et al. [17], who concluded that malignant tumors namely endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma show lower ADC values than benign tumors. Also, Thulaseedharan et al. [18] and Heo et al.’s [19] studies showed that there was a much lower ADC value for malignant endometrial lesions compared to the benign endometrial lesions.

Our findings as regards DWI results of Submucosal fibroids with the findings of Thomassin-Naggara et al. [20], that revealed DWI low signal intensity for all leiomyomas and as well Namimoto et al. [21] who stated that all studied ordinary leiomyomas (n = 95) were diffusion negative with low SI on DWI, however, Shen et al. [22] stated that submucosal myomas had different mean ADC values that may overlap with malignant lesions.

In our study, conventional MRI study only correctly diagnosed 39/50 studied lesions, achieving 77.27% sensitivity, 78.56% specificity, 78% accuracy, 73.91% PPV, and 81.48% NPV. When adding DWI with ADC value measurements at high b value (b = 1000), we could correctly diagnose 47/50 lesions that increased diagnostic sensitivity to 95.45%, specificity to 92.86%, and accuracy to 94%, as well as PPV to 91.3% and NPV to 96%.

Our results were in harmony with Elsammak et al.’s [3] results which concealed that conventional MRI could correctly diagnose 36/42 cases, achieving 77.8% sensitivity, 99.17% specificity, 87.5 PPV, and 84.6% NPV, and matched also with Bharwani et al. [23] who stated that the addition of DWI to conventional MRI has increased the sensitivity and specificity to 86% and 100%, respectively, in the diagnosis of uterine endometrial lesions; Takeuchi et al. [24, 26] reported a sensitivity and specificity of DWI in endometrial lesions which were 100% and 81%, respectively.

Conclusion

Adding MRI diffusion with ADC mapping at a high b value in MRI examination of the pelvis is valuable for the differentiation of both benign and malignant endometrial lesions with high diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.