Introduction

One of the common complications of diabetes is peripheral neuropathy (PN) affecting about 50% of diabetic patients [1, 2]. It causes progressive degeneration of nerves, making it a big concern for clinicians [3]. Recent evidences show a relation between inflammation and diabetic PN [4].

Studies show that serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and soluble TNF-α receptors (sTNFR1 and sTNFR2) increased in patients with diabetic PN. Tumor necrosis factor-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine, produced by activated macrophages and monocytes, that participates in the pathogenesis of diabetic PN [5,6,7,8].

Diabetic patients with prolonged hyperglycemia show dysregulation of TNF-α control due to associated metabolic derangements (increased polyol flux, accumulation of advanced glycation end products, oxidative stress, and lipid alterations) [9,10,11,12,13].

In diabetic peripheral neuropathy patients, unmyelinated nerves undergo axonal loss while myelinated ones undergo demyelination. The demyelination is due to an immune response, where self-antigens activate T cells producing different cytokines, as TNF-α, with potential positive feedback effect increasing its own immune response and finally mediating the inflammatory reaction [7, 14, 15].

TNF-α also causes oligodendrocyte toxicity and demyelination. It increases secretion of IL-1β and IL-6 and other inflammatory factors, from monocytes and endothelial cells, that enhance its effect indirectly [16].

Regarding blood vessels, TNF-α causes endothelial dysfunction and stenosis, hemodynamic abnormalities, decreased perfusion, and neurotrophic blood vessels damage as it increases several growth factors and cell adhesion molecules. It also inhibits the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity in vascular endothelial cell, resulting in a decrease of NOS-induced vasodilatation [17].

Aim of the work

  1. 1-

    Comparison between diabetic patients with and without PN regarding serum level of TNF-α.

  1. 2-

    Study the relation between serum TNF-α level and nerve conduction velocity in diabetic patients.

Patients and methods

A community sample of 120 patients with the diagnosed of type 2 diabetes mellitus, with or without PN, was recruited from Benha Teaching Hospital diabetes outpatient clinic. Patients with acute diabetic complications (e.g., DKA), acute or chronic illnesses other than diabetes (e.g., liver cell failure), local or general causes that affect nerves (e.g., vasculitis), and non-consenting patients were excluded.

Patients were divided into three groups: group (I), 40 patients with motor or mixed sensorimotor PN of a duration less than 5 years; group (II), 40 patients with motor or mixed sensorimotor PN of a duration of 5–10 years; and group (III) (control group), 40 patients without clinical neuropathy.

All the patients were subjected to the following; (1) History and examination: both general and neurological. (2) Neuropathy symptom score (NSS): developed by Dyck, 2002. It comprises proximal and distal symptoms of muscle weakness, sensory disturbances (e.g., pain, numbness, unsteadiness in walking), and autonomic neuropathy (e.g., impotence, orthostatic hypotension, nocturnal diarrhea). Altogether, 17 symptoms are graded in the NSS: 1 point for the presence of a symptom and 0 if absent (mild symptoms = 3–4, moderate symptoms = 5–6, severe neuropathic symptoms = 7–10). (3) Neuropathy disability score (NDS): developed by Dyck, 1988. It evaluates cranial nerves and upper and lower limbs bilaterally. Impairment of sensation, muscle strength, and tendon reflexes are individually scored, and all scores are summed to give a composite score of neurological deficits (mild neuropathic deficits = 3–5, moderate neuropathic deficits = 6–8, severe neuropathic deficits = 9–10). (4) Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and (5) serum tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α): blood samples were collected from selected patients aseptically by venipuncture then allowed to clot, and the serum was separated from the clot as soon as possible. No additives or preservatives were used to maintain the integrity of the sample. The samples were stored frozen at or below 20 °C in vials for storage. Human TNF-alpha ELISA in vitro enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Gen-Probe Diaclone) was used for the quantitative measurement of TNF-α in serum of selected subjects. (5) Nerve conduction study: performed using Neuroperfect software on windows based Computerized EMG/NCV/EP system (TruTrace NCV/EMG/EP system), band pass filter at room temperature. For motor nerves, a depolarizing square wave current was applied to the peripheral nerve to produce a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) due to summation of the activated muscle fibers. For sensory nerves, a propagated sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) was created in an analogous manner. Nerve conduction velocities were measured in the four limbs with standard surface stimulating and recording techniques. Electrodes were coated with electroconductive gel and held in place with adhesive tape. Patients avoided prior application of topical creams which may increase skin resistance to the applied current requiring stronger levels of electrical stimulation. Cold environment was avoided because cool peripheries (< 32 °C) slow the conduction velocity of nerves. Median, ulnar, common peroneal, and posterior tibial nerves were selected for motor nerve conduction study, and median and sural nerves were selected for sensory nerve conduction study.

The recording montage for motor nerve conduction study was belly tendon montage. Active electrode was placed on motor end plate of muscles (muscle belly), reference electrode placed on the associated tendon (distal to the muscle belly), and ground electrode placed on the dorsum of hand in upper limbs and on the dorsum of foot in lower limbs. The recording and stimulation sites for motor study were as follows: median nerve recorded from abductor pollicis brevis, while stimulated distally at wrist between the tendons of flexor carpi radialis and palmaris longus, and proximally above elbow medial to biceps tendon over the brachial pulse. Ulnar nerve was recorded from the abductor digiti minimi and stimulated distally at wrist just lateral to flexor carpi ulnaris tendon and proximally 5 cm below and above ulnar groove. Peroneal nerve was recorded from extensor digitorum brevis and stimulated distally at ankle between the tendons of tibialis anterior and extensor hallucis longus and proximally just below fibular head. Tibial nerve was recorded from abductor halluces and stimulated distally at the ankle just posterior to the medial malleolus and proximally at the knee in the middle of popliteal crease. Regarding sensory study, antidromic response was used. Sural nerve was stimulated 14 cm proximal to the recording electrode (below and behind lateral malleolus) over the postero-lateral aspect of the leg. Sensory median study: the same site of stimulation as motor study, while recorded from the digital nerves distally at middle or index finger.

Data were analyzed using Statistical Program for Social Science (SPSS) version 18.0. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Qualitative data were expressed as frequency and percentage. The following tests were done: ANOVA with post hoc study, Chi-square (χ2), Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), and binary logistic regression tests.

Results

Eighty patients with clinical diabetic neuropathy (group I, II) were compared to 40 patients without clinical neuropathy (control group III). While the three groups were matched regarding age and sex, groups I and II were also matched regarding other clinical data (e.g., BMI, blood pressure) except for the duration of PN. Statistically significant differences were found between diabetic patients with PN, groups 1 and 2, and patients without, group 3, regarding BMI and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of type 2 diabetic patients with and without peripheral neuropathy

Groups (I) and (II) showed increased TNF- α, when compared to group (III) (P value < 0.001). Compared to each other, group (II) showed increased TNF-α than group (I) (P value < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HA1C) in type 2 diabetic patients with and without peripheral neuropathy

Group (II) showed significant increase in glycosylated hemoglobin (HA1c) when compared to groups (I) and (III) (P value < 0.001), which showed no differences between each other (Table 2).

Serum TNF-α level, in diabetic PN patients, showed negative correlation with motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities but positive correlation with neuropathy disability score (NDS), neuropathy symptom score (NSS), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation between serum levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and nerve conduction velocity, clinical, and lab. data in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that elevated serum level of TNF-α was an independent risk factor for diabetic neuropathy among diabetic patients with odds ratio 3.6 and CI (1.6–7.8) while HA1c, weight, systolic blood pressure, BMI, and diastolic blood pressure were dependent risk factors for diabetic neuropathy (Table 4).

Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for diabetic neuropathy

Discussion

Peripheral neuropathy is a common complication of diabetes mellitus; it occurs in about half of diabetic patients [18]. The mechanism of PN has not yet been elucidated clearly. Researches have indicated that proinflammatory cytokines, as TNF-α, play important roles in the pathogenesis of diabetic PN [19], the finding which the present study tried to address.

In this study, there was no statically significant difference between patients with neuropathy of short duration (group I) and patients without (group III) regarding glycosylated hemoglobin, but patients with neuropathy of longer duration (group II) show statically significant increase in glycosylated hemoglobin in comparison to both groups I and III. Despite that groups I and III did not show significant differences regarding glycosylated hemoglobin, patients in group I developed neuropathy while those in group III did not. Factors other than blood sugar level like genetic predisposition, elevated blood glucose, fat or protein metabolism abnormality, and vascular changes may contribute to the development of PN [20,21,22].

In the present study, statistical significant differences in blood pressure and body mass index were found between patients with PN (groups I and II) and patients without (group III). Furthermore, BMI and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were found to be dependent risk factors for diabetic PN which was consistent with (Thomson et al., Juhani Partanen et al.) [23, 24]. According to Smith and Singleton, obesity and hypertriglyceridemia significantly increase risk for PN [25]. Studies stressed on the necessity of control of blood sugar, blood pressure, blood lipids, neurotrophic factors, antioxidants, and improvement of microcirculation during the treatment of diabetic PN [20,21,22, 26].

A significant increase of serum TNF-α level was found in patients with diabetic PN compared to patients without. Furthermore, TNF-α was found to be an independent risk factor for PN among diabetic patients type II. A finding was supported by the study of Skundric and Lisak and Navarro and Mora [27, 28], who asserted the role of this cytokine in the development diabetic PN. According to Pickup et al. and Shoelson et al. [29, 30], TNF-α significantly increases in non-insulin diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients. Satoh et al. [31] stated that TNF-α inhibits tyrosine kinase activity at the insulin receptors in obese subjects causing insulin resistance.

Recent evidence has shown that diabetic neuropathy is an autoimmune disorder with genetic background. Under normal conditions, the blood-nerve barrier maintains the circulating T cells in the immune tolerance state, but long-term hyperglycemia can damage this vascular barrier. Myelin protein glycosylation changes its antigenicity, making it vulnerable to the phagocytic attack of monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils from blood circulation and tissue, and glial cells from nervous system that specifically recognize the glycosylated myelin antigen. In addition, the activated immune cells secrete cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β, which impart toxic effects on neurons and glial cells, leading to demyelination. The stimulated monocytes and endothelial cells have a positive feedback loop for secretion of inflammatory substances that potentiate nerve damage [32, 33].

Previous studies have proposed that TNF-α stimulates the expression of specific proteins relevant to cellular damage, such as aldose reductase, protein kinase C, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and inducible nitric oxide synthase. All of which potentially play a role in the pathogenesis of diabetic polyneuropathy [34]. It is also proved that TNF-α can regulate the apoptosis of nerve cells in diabetic neuropathy which is crucial in the process of DPN [35]. Furthermore, TNF alpha as a pro-inflammatory cytokine has been involved in hyperalgesia and ectopic firing of sensory neurons [36].

In the present study, positive correlations were found between serum TNF-α and both neuropathy disability score (NDS) and neuropathy symptom score (NSS) were found. Also, the increase in serum TFN-α level was found to be a predictor of the increase of both neuropathy symptom score (NSS) and neuropathy disability score (NDS) in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy.

These results are supported by those of Festa et al. and Spranger et al. [37, 38] and Hussain et al. [18] who found that more severe diabetic neuropathy occurred in patients with increased levels of TNF-α. According to Goldberg [39], increased TFN-α levels were found with neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, and cardiovascular disease in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In Festa et al., Flyvbjerg, and Jung et al.’s [37, 40, 41] study, increase in serum cytokines was associated with the presence of neuropathy in diabetic patients especially with longer duration (more than 5 years) which coincides with the findings of the present study.

In the present study, positive correlations were found between serum TNF-α levels and glycosylated hemoglobin. This result agreed with Nieto-Vazquez et al. [42] and Rajarajeswari et al.’s [43] results where TNF-α levels correlated positively with glycosylated hemoglobin. According to Rajarajeswari et al., a relation between serum TNF-α levels and the degree of obesity was found.

In this study, there was a negative correlation between serum level of TNF-α and nerve conduction velocity (NCV) of motor and sensory nerves. This goes with Matsuda et al. [44] who showed significant negative correlation of TNF-α with sensory nerve conduction velocity. Again, Sumner et al. [34] and Ariyan and Brady [45] reported that this cytokine level may affect the nerve function. On contrast, EL-Badawy et al. found nonsignificant negative correlation with conduction velocity of motor and sensory nerves of upper and lower limbs. This difference may be due to that the patients in EL-Badawy et al.’s study were 65% mixed axonal and demyelinating neuropathy and 35% only demyelinating neuropathy [46].

Again, our result differs from the results of Duksal et al. who found no correlations between TNF-α levels and conduction velocities in the studied nerves [47], but who assessed only dorsal sural and medial planter sensory nerves in their study.

Diabetic PN patients nerve biopsy has shown that advanced glycation end products are deposited in the axons and myelin sheath [16], and these products increase macrophage phagocytosis of nerve myelin by elevating the expression of a number of nuclear factors as NF-kB-mediated inflammatory response genes, preventing NO-dependent vasodilatation and anticoagulation, resulting in segmental demyelination of the nerve cells [16].

As with all studies, there are some limitations. First, small number of patients was included in the study. Second, the study assessed the conduction velocity relation with TNF alpha but not other parameters of nerve conduction study as amplitude of action potentials so the study did not assess axonal neuropathy. As such, larger studies that include both axonal and demyelinating neuropathy are needed in the future.

Conclusion

Serum level of TNF-α was found to be increased in diabetic PN patients, and its level was positively correlated with neuropathy symptoms and disability and negatively correlated with nerve conduction velocity. Elevated serum level of TNF-α was independent risk factor for diabetic neuropathy among diabetic patients. TNF-α might be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic PN, and its serum level might be used as biomarker for the severity of diabetic PN.

Recommendations

  1. 1-

    All patients with diabetes should be screened for diabetic peripheral neuropathy at diagnosis of diabetes and periodically.

  2. 2-

    Measurement of serum tumor necrosis factor alpha in type II diabetes as early predictor of peripheral neuropathy.

  3. 3-

    Larger studies should be done on the role of tumor necrosis factor alpha in diabetic patients including large number of patients and type I diabetes.