Abstract
Head and Neck cancers (HNC) are a heterogeneous group of upper aero-digestive tract cancer and account for 931,922 new cases and 467,125 deaths worldwide. About 90% of these cancers are of squamous cell origin (HNSCC). HNSCC is associated with excessive tobacco and alcohol consumption and infection with oncogenic viruses. Genotyping tumour tissue to guide clinical decision-making is becoming common practice in modern oncology, but in the management of patients with HNSCC, cytopathology or histopathology of tumour tissue remains the mainstream for diagnosis and treatment planning. Due to tumour heterogeneity and the lack of access to tumour due to its anatomical location, alternative methods to evaluate tumour activities are urgently needed. Liquid biopsy approaches can overcome issues such as tumour heterogeneity, which is associated with the analysis of small tissue biopsy. In addition, liquid biopsy offers repeat biopsy sampling, even for patients with tumours with access limitations. Liquid biopsy refers to biomarkers found in body fluids, traditionally blood, that can be sampled to provide clinically valuable information on both the patient and their underlying malignancy. To date, the majority of liquid biopsy research has focused on blood-based biomarkers, such as circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumour cells (CTCs), and circulating microRNA. In this review, we will focus on ctDNA as a biomarker in HNSCC because of its robustness, its presence in many body fluids, adaptability to existing clinical laboratory-based technology platforms, and ease of collection and transportation. We will discuss mechanisms of ctDNA release into circulation, technological advances in the analysis of ctDNA, ctDNA as a biomarker in HNSCC management, and some of the challenges associated with translating ctDNA into clinical and future perspectives. ctDNA provides a minimally invasive method for HNSCC prognosis and disease surveillance and will pave the way in the future for personalized medicine, thereby significantly improving outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are the 7th most common cancer in the world, with 931,922 new cases and 467,125 deaths in 2020 [142]. The Organization Global Cancer Observatory estimates that the number of HNSCC patients will rise by 30% in 2030 [142]. Over 90% of head and neck malignancies are squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). HNSCCs generally originate from the squamous cells lining the mucosal surfaces inside the head and neck region. They can be categorized by anatomical location: oral cavity, pharynx (nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx), larynx, paranasal sinuses, nasal cavity, and salivary gland cancer [24].
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (part of the World Health Organization) has identified diverse risk factors that contribute to the development of HNSCC. Excessive consumption of alcohol and tobacco use are the two major risk factors for the development of HNSCC. It is estimated that at least 75% of HNSCCs are caused by tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption [10, 11, 56]. Heavy users of both cigarettes and alcohol have a 35-fold higher risk of developing the disease [10]. High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) [2, 19] and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) [166] infections are also important risk factors for the development of oropharyngeal cancers and nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC) respectively. Certain types of viruses are common in certain communities. For example, in the Chinese population, especially the Cantonese living in Southern China, they have a higher incidence of EBV associated NPC [167]. Betel quid products are linked to a high incidence rate of oral cavity cancer in China and India [47]. Abnormal eating habits such as intake of preserved or salted food and diet lacking in vegetables [39], have been shown to increase morbidity. In low- and middle-income countries, occupational exposure to carcinogenic air pollutants is closely linked to the development of HNSCC [89]. Gender also matters, as compared to women, men are at 2 to fourfold higher risk of developing HNSCC [64]. Genetic factors can also predispose to the development of HNSCC [35]. It has been demonstrated that people with Fanconi anemia (a rare inherited genetic disease) have a 500–700-fold higher risk of developing HNSCC [7, 157]. In addition, people with poor oral health are also at a higher risk of developing HNSCC [50, 141]. Also, people who have not had the fortune of being vaccinated with HPV vaccination (Gardasil®) are at risk of developing HPV associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) [1]. It is also known that patients with HPV-positive OPSCC have a more favorable prognosis than HPV-negative OPSCC [64].
Current diagnostics and treatment strategies for managing patients with HNSCC
Current diagnostic methods for HNSCC include physical examination, endoscopy, imaging studies, biopsy and tumour biomarker testing [120]. Tissue biopsy either by resection or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is invasive, and in some cases, it is difficult to access the tumour due to its anatomical location. Also, FNA biopsy results in a small of amount of tumour tissue that is available for both histologic diagnosis/subtyping and genetic testing for most advanced stage cancer patients, and in most instances, the tissue often becomes insufficient for genomic analysis after initial histology diagnosis. In addition, inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity may also limit the tumour tissue-based genotyping, and this issue amplifies when determining mechanisms for treatment resistance [130]. Therefore, alternative diagnostic methods are warranted.
Currently available treatments for patients with HNSCC include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy [110]. Treatment decision making is currently based on the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, tumour p16 status, anatomic site, performance status (a scoring system that quantifies cancer patients' activity of daily life and overall well-being and activities of daily life) and patient preferences. For example, for patients with locoregionally advanced oral cavity cancer (OC), the first line of treatment is surgery, whereas chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is more commonly used for oropharyngeal (OPC) and laryngeal cancers (LC) [64]. Postoperative radiation and postoperative chemotherapy are usually applied to patients with pathological risk factors of developing recurrence and metastasis [25]. Immunotherapies are currently approved to treat HNSCC patients with recurrence or metastasis, such as Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) and Nivolumab (Opdivo®), they are recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline.
The need for biomarkers to triage patients with head and neck cancers
In recent decades, new cases of OPSCC are increasing globally due to increasing rates of HPV infections. OPSCC has now surpassed cervical cancer to become the number one cause of HPV-related cancer in the United States and in Australia [24, 155]. There are differences in terms of molecular mechanisms and oncogenic process between HPV-positive OPSCCs and HPV-negative HNSCCs. A better prognosis can be seen in HPV-positive OPSCC [77]. One of the ways to early detect OPSCC is to initiate a screening program targeting individuals within the community who are at a higher risk. However, this approach has not been applied in many countries where OPSCC disease burden is high due to our inability to detect occult OPSCC. This perspective changed in 2020, with the detection of 2 mm occult OPSCC at the back of the throat of an asymptomatic in a healthy individual, a world first, using serial saliva testing for HPV [146].
Before biomarkers can be integrated into a clinical workflow, they will have to undergo five phases of development (preclinical exploratory work, clinical assay development for clinical disease, retrospective longitudinal repository studies, prospective screening studies and cancer control studies [114]) to prove their clinical utility in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Biomarkers that can be sampled using non-invasive methods (saliva and urine) will be a game changer, especially managing patients living in rural and remote communities. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the urgency for rapid, non-invasive, remote testing has come to the forefront, in which salivary diagnostics is showing promise as an alternative diagnostic medium to blood and tumour tissue testing [68]. Salivary diagnostics is still in a research phase but is expected to transform healthcare practice because of its ease of collection and the ability to be done at the conform of one’s home [160].
The application of liquid biopsy to head and neck cancers
The use of precision, targeted genomic therapies in HNSCC lagged behind many other cancer types, leading to poor survival outcomes. As an example, oncogenic PI3KCA mutations are commonly found in HNSCCs [90], and patients with this mutation are most likely to benefit from PI3K pathway inhibitor treatment [46]. However, mutation analysis of the tumour tissue is not routinely done for HNSCC. This would mean that those patients with PI3KCA mutations would not benefit PI3K pathway inhibitor. Given the drawback of using tumour tissue to diagnose and predict treatment response in HNSCC patients, alternative methods are urgently needed to better manage patients with HNSCC [130]. Liquid biopsy, the use of cancer specific biomarkers that are present in body fluids to evaluate tumour activities and to discern underlying disease pathogenesis, is an emerging field in oncology. Some of the biomarkers used include CTC, ctDNA/RNA and exosome, to name a few. The ease of sampling and the ability to collect multiple samples “in real-time” from a cancer patient makes liquid biopsy as an alternative tool to managing HNC patients.
Origin of cell-free DNA and circulating tumour DNA
Mandel and Metais in 1948 detected for the first time cell-free DNA (cfDNA), which is now referred to as short fragments of nuclear acids in circulation [91]. cfDNA is released from both normal and tumour cells into circulation through cellular apoptosis and necrosis [62], having a half-life of 10–15 min. cfDNA is degraded by blood nucleases, and/or eliminated by macrophages in kidney, liver and spleen [148, 159].
Circulating tumour (ctDNA) is derived from tumour and is part of the total cfDNA pool, representing only small fraction of cfDNA. It ranges from 0.01% to 90% [36], but is usually less than 1% of the total cfDNA. ctDNA is released either through passive (apoptosis and necrosis) or active secretion (Fig. 1). ctDNA fragments that are released into circulation due to apoptosis are of 160 bp–180 bp, whilst the ctDNA fragments that are actively secreted into circulation are of 150 bp–250 bp. In contrast, ctDNA released through necrosis are much larger, ranging from 320 bp to more than 1000 bp [36]. In addition, the lysis of CTCs also thought to contribute to the volume of ctDNA detected in circulation, although the exact mechanism is still not well understood [113]. Studies have found high molecular weight DNA fragments associated with ctDNA through electrophoresis techniques, and this is released into circulation due to cell lysis [48]. Sutton et al. [145], revealed that M2-like tumour-associate macrophages (TAMs) can regulate CTCs metastasis by breaking down the basement membrane, promoting angiogenesis and protecting tumour cells from anti-tumour immunization [145]. TAMs can lyse CTCs through phagocytosis and release DNA into circulation [138]. The amount of ctDNA in circulation is influenced by the type of cancer, stage of the tumour, cancer burden, cellular turnover, and therapy response [32]. Muhanna et al. found that the volume of tumour necrosis was positively correlated with plasma ctDNA in a preclinical rabbit model of HNSCC [101].
ctDNA originates from the tumour and is released into circulation
Overview of the tumour mutational landscape in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
The mutational profiles of HNSCC have been reported by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and cBioPortal databases. In general, the majority of HNSCCs present loss of function in tumour suppressor genes [139], and this is also common in genes regulating key cell cycle and cell differentiation pathway. By definition, a driver gene is defined as “a gene whose mutations accelerate net cell growth” [152], but there is no gold standard to identify driver genes. So far, they are mostly defined by computational algorithms that model the genes tumour specific rates compared to its hypothetical background. There are several databases for cancer driver genes/driver mutations, including, Integrative OncoGenomics (N = 691 for HNC) [94], Network of cancer genes and healthy drivers (NCG 7.0, N = 1002 for HNC) [122], Oncovar (N = 2798 for HNC data available in TCGA) [161], DriverDBv3 (N = 2798) [88]. Also, Dietlein et al.,’s publication in Nat Genet (N = 425 for HNC) [33] summarized different cancer drivers in over 28 cancer types. Notably, the mutational profiles between HPV-negative HNC and HPV-positive HNC are different [134], they are likely to have different driver genes because of their biological differences. Figure 2 summarizes HNC driver genes that have been reported in the five databases mentioned above. We are reporting the diver genes that have been reported in more than two databases, along with their roles in HNSCC.
A Venn graph illustrating the numbers of head and neck cancer driver genes in five databases. 5 genes are included in all the databases, 8 genes are included in four databases, 6 genes are included in three databases, and 24 genes are included in two databases
Driver gene mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
The most common mutation in HPV-negative HNSCC is TP53, whose mutations are in 73–100% of HPV-negative HNSCC cases [152]. TP53 is a tumour suppressor gene that functions as a gatekeeper for cell growth and division [79]. This involves, arresting cells in cell cycle, initiating apoptosis or senescence when there are errors in cellular DNA synthesis and replication. However, TP53 mutation is rarely seen in HPV-positive HNSCC, this may be because of the HPV E6 viral protein initiating the degradation of TP53 [5]. The presence of TP53 mutation can be regarded as an early event during tumourigenesis in HNSCC [124]. HNSCC patients who have a TP53 mutation usually respond poorly to cisplatin-fluorouracil neoadjuvant chemotherapy [14], leading to local recurrence after radiation therapy [44]. In addition, TP63 (tumour protein 63) encodes a member of the p53 family of transcription factors. Recurrent focal amplification for 3q26/28 involving the TP63 locus occurs in 15% of HNSCC [16].
Cyclin D1 (CCND1) and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) are two genes involved in cell cycle and DNA repair pathways. Amplification of CCND1 and deletion of CDKN2A occur in 94% of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) [76] and structural alterations (homozygous deletion, intra and inter chromosomal fusions) appear to be prominent in CDKN2A [16]. In addition, studies have shown a mutation (8–12%) and a homozygous deletion in Protocadherin FAT1 (FAT atypical cadherin 1) (6%) in HNSCC [139]. Moreover, functional loss of FAT1 either by mutation or homozygous deletion can activate Wnt signaling pathway to promote tumorigenesis [100].
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that is frequently altered in HNSCC [98] and stimulation of EGFR or other RTKs can active the PI3K/Akt pathway. More than 10% HNSCC patients have amplifications on EGFR of chromosome 7 [124, 147]. Grandis et al. observed that EGFR copy number variations (CNV) is linked to poor prognosis in HNSCC [49].
Ajuba LIM Protein (AJUBA), a gene in WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway, is found to inactivate mutations in HPV-negative HNSCC [6]. It can negatively regulate the NOTCH1/CTNNB1 signaling pathway [8].
Family with sequence similarity 135, member (BFAM135B) is a cancer-related gene on chromosome 8q. It has been shown to increase progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and mutation of FAM135B in ESCC corelated to poor prognosis [137]. Its mutation rate in HNSCC is relatively high, mostly missense mutations in > 10% of patients [33], but its exact role in HNSCC remains to be explored.
Ras homolog family member A (RHOA) encodes a small GTPase in the Rho family, regulating cell motility and tissue development [61]. RHOA mutations in gastric cancers [153] can induce cell proliferation [60], its role in HNSCC remains yet to be explored.
Nuclear receptor-binding SET domain protein 1 (NSD1) encodes a protein containing a SET domain. Truncating mutations, novel focal deletions (includes homozygous deletions and inframe deletions), missense point mutations and inactivating mutations are found in NSD1 in HNSCC [16, 111]. In laryngeal cancer, inactivating mutations in NSD1 are seen as a favorable prognostic biomarker [116].
Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 (NFE2L2) acts as an oxidative stress factor regulating antioxidant and stress-responsive genes. It only mutates in HPV-negative HNSCC, and heavily related to smoking [8].
Caspase-8 (CASP8) is located on chromosome 2 and is involved in cell death through the death receptor pathway. Knockdown of CASP8 makes HNSCCs susceptible to necroptosis [154]. Li et al. illustrated a six-nucleotide deletion variant (− 652 6N del) in the promoter region of CASP8, inversely contributing to the risk of HNSCC development [80]. A lower CASP8 mutation frequency is associated with lower aggressiveness in HNSCC. In addition, CASP8 mutations are found in 10% OSCC tumours [117].
In HPV-positive HNSCC, PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is the most mutated signaling pathway [90] and has shown to correlate with genomic instability. The PI3K/Akt pathway is involved in cell proliferation, survival and morphology [109]. Concurrent mutations of multiple PI3K pathway genes have been shown in patients with advanced-stage HNC [90]. PI3K/Akt mutations are associated with the anatomical site where the tumour originates from, particularly in anatomical locations such as the larynx [45]. Of note, about 10–15% HPV-positive HNSCC patients have an activating mutation in the coding region of the PIK3CA gene, making it the most common mutation [90]. HPV-positive OPC has the highest number of PIK3CA mutations compared with other HPV-negative tumours [106]. PI3K is regulated by tumour suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). Lui’s et al. discovered PTEN gene copy loss in 4/45 HNSCC cases [90], and this can be seen in both HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumours [76, 124].
Mutations in HRAS gene are seen in low frequencies (5%) in both HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC [139]. HRAS is an oncoprotein, which interacts with the PI3K complex in a GTP-dependent manner to increase the catalytic activity of PI3K kinase [125].
Although the NOTCH pathway is oncogenic in some types of cancer, its role in HNSCC seems to be tumour suppressive [117, 139]. Nearly 66% of HNSCC tumours carry genetic mutation in at least one member of the NOTCH pathway [3]. An in vitro study indicated that abrogated or absent NOTCH1 causes loss of proliferation and senescence in HNSCC cell lines [117]. Approximately 15% of patients with HNSCC (both HPV-negative and HPV-positive) have NOTCH1 mutation [3, 117, 139].
FBXW7 is a member of F-box protein family and acts as a tumour suppressor gene that mainly targets NOTCH1 [3]. Its mutations are mostly seen in HPV-negative HNSCC, with little proportion in HPV-positive [134]. Lechner et al. reported copy number variations of FBXW7 in HPV-positive HNC [76], whilst Agrawal et al. reported indels and missense mutations [3]. It is hypothesized that mutation of FBXW7 can modulate the NOTCH pathway. Studies have also shown that HNSCC patients with TP53 mutations had significantly higher mutation rates in FBXW7 [108].
E1A binding protein P300 (EP300) is located on chromosome 22 and acts as a histone acetyltransferase. It regulates transcription by chromatin remodeling [30]. It is also involved in the NOTCH pathway, which affects cell growth and apoptosis.
cAMP-response element binding protein-BP (CREBBP) acts as a tumour suppressor gene and encodes a protein that participates in chromatin remodeling. It is reported to have loss-of-function mutations in many types of malignancies [87] and closely related to paralogue EP300. Loss of function of CREBBP/EP300 is documented to increase the proliferation ability of tumour cells [51].
KMT2D is a tumour suppressor gene encoding histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D, which is vital for embryonic development, and it is widely expressed in adult tissue. Mutation in KMT2D are common in a number of cancers, HNC, brain, bladder, prostate, and lung [40]. Frameshift and nonsense mutations in the SET and PHD domains represent 37% and 60% respectively of KMT2D total mutations [119]. Mutation in KMT2D can affect H3K4me1-marked enhancer [15] regulation, which is a possible mechanism leading to cancer development. In addition, genomic instability during DNA replication and transcription can cause abnormalities in early replicating fragile sites in the chromosome, leading to DNA breaks and formation of tumour [66]. Furthermore, MAPK1 (Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1) mutation (p.D321N and E322K) correlates to Erlotinib sensitivity in HNC patients [105, 164].
cfDNA isolation and detection technologies
cfDNA is separated either by using centrifugal columns or magnetic beads [93] for downstream applications. ctDNA represents only a very small percentage of the total cfDNA, making it very challenging when isolating and detecting it. Based on the analysis, ctDNA technologies can be divided into three categories, single locus or multi-loci, targeted sequencing and whole genome sequencing (WGS) (Table 1). Single loci or multiplex assays, with a rapid turnaround time, are applied mainly to detect/quantify hotspot mutations and to monitor recurrent mutations [159]. For the detection of multi-loci mutations, PCR amplicons and hybrid-capture assays are commonly used [42]. While amplicon-based sequencing has better “on-target” effects, hybridization capture has higher uniformity [126]. In general, hybridization capture method requires > 1 μg DNA (SeqCap is an exception), but amplicon-based sequencing requires only 10–100 ng of total DNA. Non-targeted sequencing can detect unknown genomic alterations, such as detecting chromosomal structural variants by using WGS [159].
Besides the first generation and the next-generation sequencing technologies, Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) is the third-generation sequencing that relies on the detection of electrical changes as nucleic acids passing through a protein nanopore. This technology is predominantly used in sequencing long-length sequences, such as genomic DNA [163]. More recently, Marcozzi et al. [92], developed a new technique based on the ONT, CyclomicsSeq, which is able to detect ctDNA TP53 mutation at frequencies down to 0.02%. Details of ctDNA detection technologies are summarized in Table 1.
Applications of ctDNA
ctDNA has been widely applied in the early detection of cancer, predict tumour burden, monitor response to treatment [129]. As illustrating in Fig. 3, researchers have used a wide range of tumour specific markers to capture tumour activity using ctDNA (Fig. 3).
Application of cfDNA/ctDNA (Icons made by Flaticon, www.flaticon.com). cfDNA can be used to quantified levels and depict cancer genomic landscape
Quantification of cfDNA levels
Levels of cfDNA is associated with the stage of the tumour and can indicate disease progress. Hilke et al. sequenced 20 tumour samples from locally advanced HNSCC patients and followed them longitudinally during and post treatment and found that 85% of patients had detectable cfDNA and that the amount of cfDNA correlated with the gross tumour volume [59]. Lin et al. analyzed plasma samples from 121 patients with OSCC and concluded that a higher level of plasma cfDNA were related to a poor prognosis, indicating that cfDNA levels could serve as a prognostic biomarker [86]. Egyud et al. reported that 50% of HNSCC patients (N = 4) had detectable cfDNA levels prior to recurrence, indicating that cfDNA can be applied as a biomarker to early detect recurrence [34]. Mazurek et al. detected lower levels of cfDNA in HNSCC patients (N = 200) compared with cfDNA levels detected in OPSCC patients. HNSCC patients with late stage (T2, T3 and stage IV) tumours had higher cfDNA levels than those patients from early stages of the disease [96], which is not surprising. In addition, Burgener et al. reported shorter fragment lengths of cfDNA from HNSCC patients (N = 30) compared to healthy controls (N = 20). In contrast, Shukla et al. reported no significant differences in cfDNA levels between OSCC patients (N = 390) and a control group (N = 150) [135]. Furthermore, HNSCC patients who had detectable cfDNA at baseline (collection of blood at diagnosis) were more likely to develop advanced disease and as a consequence showed poorer overall survival [13].
Biomarkers captured on ctDNA
HPV viral DNA
Circulating HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA) has widely been used as a biomarker in disease prediction and treatment monitoring in patients with HNSCC. Cao et al. reported that pre-treatment ctHPVDNA copy number was closely associated with the metabolic activity of lymph nodes and tumour volume in a 64 HNC patient cohort. A reduction in ctHPVDNA copy number was seen in 14 patients receiving chemoradiotherapy. Similarly, the ctHPVDNA levels were elevated in 13 HNSCC patients coinciding with the time of metastasis, further providing evidence that ctHPVDNA levels can be used as a prognostic biomarker [17]. Dahlstrom et al. reported in 262 patients with OPSCC, pre-treatment ctHPVDNA levels were associated with a higher dissemination of cancer cells to lymph nodes, increasing the overall disease stage. HPV-positive OPSCC patients showed better progression-free survival than HPV-negative patients [27]. Hanna et al. discovered that the plasma ctHPVDNA levels were associated with tumour burden and metastatic potential in 22 OPSCC patients. In addition, they also showed that the copy number of ctHPVDNA levels increased in patients with metastasis. They concluded that levels of ctHPVDNA was linked to treatment response and corelated with survival [54]. A separate study by the same group compared the ctHPVDNA levels in paired saliva and plasma samples from OPSCC patients (N = 21) and revealed that ctHPVDNA levels in both fluids can be used as a biomarker of disease surveillance [53]. Damerla et al. reported that 90/97 patients with OPSCC had detectable ctHPVDNA and ctHPV16DNA in 100% of patients with low-volume disease (N1 or an isolated T1-2). Also, the copy numbers of ctHPV16DNA levels reduced after surgery and/or chemoradiation [28]. Chera et al. in 2019 reported that pre-treatment ctHPV16DNA in 103 OPSCC patients were linked to tumour burden. In addition, a rapid clearance profile of HPV DNA may predict disease control [22]. A more recent longitudinal study by the same group in 2020 reported that in 87 patients with undetectable ctHPVDNA at all the post-treatment time points, none of them had developed recurrence (NPV, 100%; 95% CI, 96–100%) [23]. Only 28 patients had detectable ctHPVDNA levels during post-treatment surveillance, 15 of them were diagnosed with recurrence which was proved by tissue biopsy. 15/16 patients who were detected to have two consecutively positive ctHPVDNA blood tests had developed biopsy-proven recurrence. Two consecutively positive blood test of ctHPVDNA indicated a positive predictive value of 94% (95% CI, 70–99%). The median lead time between positivity of ctHPVDNA and recurrence proven by tissue biopsy was 3.9 months (range, 0.37–12.9 months) [23]. Similarly, Reder et al. concluded that elevated ctHPVDNA levels were associated with tumour size based on a study involving 50 OPSCC patients. Whilst OPSCC patients with continuously high levels of ctHPVDNA developed residual disease or recurrence (5/8), patients without recurrence had decreased ctHPVDNA after treatment (N = 25) [121]. In a mono-institutional prospective biomarker study by Veyer et al. using OPSCC patients (p16-positive/HPV16-positive) reported 47 patients (71%) showed ctHPVDNA at the time of diagnosis. Moreover, the abundance of baseline ctHPV16DNA levels being assessed by ddPCR, was significantly related to the T/N/M status and tumour stages. Furthermore, all recurrences and the majority of death (83%) were reported to have positive baseline ctHPV16DNA. The kinetic of pretreatment or posttreatment ctHPVDNA (N = 6) was apparently co-related to treatment success or failure [158]. Haring et al. reported ctHPV16DNA test in HPV-positive recurrence/metastasis OPSCC patients (N = 16) could predict progressive disease prior to radiographic imaging [55]. Rettig et al. [123], reported ctHPVDNA also had pre-diagnostic value, since they could detect HPV16 several years before the onset of HPV16-related HNSCC. Among 10 patients diagnosed with HPV16-positive tumour, three of them were found to had ctHPVDNA at least six months before the diagnosis.
However, it is worth mentioning that even though the above studies all focused on ctHPVDNA, they used different probes of HPV, controls, and analysis methods. The following Table 2 summarized the probes or analysis method in each study.
EBV viral DNA
Infection with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) contributes to the development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) [21]. Similar to ctHPVDNA, circulating plasma EBV (ctEBVDNA) or cell-free EBV DNA (cfEBVDNA) [20, 78] have been used as a prognostic biomarker for investigating tumour burden, treatment response and disease progression [21]. He et al. reported that the present of ctEBVDNA in 949 NPC patients at multiple time points of treatment was associated with poor overall survival (OS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) [57]. Lin et al. reported higher concentrations of ctEBVDNA in NPC (N = 99) patients who relapsed than those who did not. Furthermore, NPC patients with persistently detectable ctEBVDNA had shorter OS than those with undetectable ctEBVDNA [85]. Similarly, Edward et al. reported a rapid decrease in ctEBVDNA levels post-surgery in 21 NPC patients. Importantly, they documented that failure of rapid elimination of ctEBVDNA was predictive for disease recurrence [151]. Chen et al. conducted a longitudinal study involving 1984 NPC patients and found that during the follow-up, 767/1984 NCP patients had detectable ctEBVDNA, and among them, 489/767 (63.8%) developed recurrence. Thus, they concluded that ctEBVDNA can be an early indicator of tumour recurrence [20].
Mutations
ctDNA mutation profiles have been evaluated to monitor response to treatment in HNSCC patients [129, 130]. However, the application of such technology is still in its infancy. The current clinical practice is to profile tumour tissue for mutation and then track these mutations using ctDNA. This works well when the concentration of ctDNA levels is high, as seen in patients with metastatic cancer. However, this approach fails when ctDNA amounts are low, which is the case for most non-metastatic cancers. To overcome this issue, a study by Burgener et al. combined both mutation and methylation analysis and found that 20 out of 30 HNSCC patients had similar mutation frequencies to that of the tumour data derived from TCGA data base [13]. In addition, there was a correlation (r > 0.85) between mutations and methylation levels. HNSCC patients who had detectable pre-treatment ctDNA (using mutation and methylation) showed worse overall survival (HR = 7.5; P = 0.025) independent of clinical stages. Schirmer et al. compared copy number aberrations (CNAs) and genome-wide copy number instability score (CNI) and showed that the CNI may assist in predicting lymph node involvement and prognosis in HNSCC [128].
Schwaederle et al. analyzed ctDNA from various cancer types (HNC = 25) and concluded that HNC was an independent predictor for a higher number of alterations in ctDNA (P = 0.019, median of 3 alterations (95%CI 1–68%) [133]. Braig et al. found that over one third of HNSCC patients showed acquired KRAS, NRAS or HRAS mutations after cetuximab treatment [12]. van Gink et al. reported TP53 mutations in plasma of six HPV-negative HNSCC patients [156]. PIK3CA E545K mutations were detected in the plasma samples from 9/29 HNSCC patients [129].
Tumour and ctDNA mutations
When compared with other cancer types, there is dearth of data relating to tumour tissue mutations and ctDNA mutation profiling in HNSCC. Table 3 highlights studies that have used both tumour and ctDNA. This further infers that cfDNA can be used as a proximity to tumour DNA to determine outcomes in patients. More so, ctDNA holds unique mutation profiles, thus giving clinicians the opportunity to early detect minimal residual disease and may also provide new insights for therapy choice.
DNA methylation
When regulatory regions of tumour suppressor genes are methylated (tumour suppressor genes), their expression levels are reduced, leading to the development of tumour [84, 110]. Sanchez et al. investigated the methylation alterations in common tumour suppressor genes (CDKN2A, MGMT, GSTP1, and DAPK1) in primary tumour samples and matched serum samples from HNSCC patients (N = 50). They found similar DNA methylation profiles between tumour tissue and serum DNA (21 and 50 respectively). For those patients with serum positive hypermethylated DNA, 5 out of 21 developed recurrence, while only 1 out of 29 patients who relapsed had negative serum methylation DNA [127]. Tian et al. analyzed the promoter hypermethylation of five tumour suppressor genes in blood samples from NPC patients (N = 41) and healthy controls (N = 41). They reported percentage methylations of RASSF1 (17.5%), CDKN2A (22.5%), DLEC1 (25.0%), DAPK1 (51.4%) and UCHL1 (64.9%). When combining four-gene methylation markers (CDKN2A, DLEC1, DAPK1 and UCHL1) in predicting NPC, it gave the highest sensitivity and specificity [150]. Mydlarz et al. detected EDNRB, p16 and DCC methylation by analyzing serum DNA from HNSCC patients and revealed that serum EDNRB hypermethylation was highly specific for HNSCC but it was not sensitive [102]. Schröck et al. showed that methylation levels of SHOX2 and SEPT9 in serum from HNSCC patients (N = 284) correlated with tumour and nodal category and was associated with higher risk of death [131]. Jesus et al. compared methylation status of CCNA1, DAPK, CDH8 and TIMP3 between FFPE tumour samples (N = 52) and corresponding plasma samples (N = 15). They detected methylation in 73% of plasma samples, while methylation of CCNA1 was related to recurrence-free survival [29]. Patel et al. [112], compared methylation profiles of pre-treatment and post-treatment ctDNA in HNC patients (N = 8). Significant methylation changes have been seen in the promoter regions of PENK, NXPH1, ZIK1, TBXT and CDO1 between pre-treatment and post-treatment ctDNA. Table 4 highlights genes that are mutated and methylated in HNSCC.
Microsatellite instability
Microsatellite sequences are short non-coding repeat sequences that vary in length between individuals. Nawroz-Danish et al. reported that 45% (68/152) of HNSCC patients had microsatellite alterations in the DNA isolated from serum samples and was identical to the alterations observed in corresponding tumour samples. Furthermore, 16 HNSCC patients with distant metastasis, 11 had detectable microsatellite alterations in DNA derived from serum with one or more markers [103]. Nunes et al. compared microsatellite alterations in 91 paired blood and tumour samples from HNSCC patients and found that 58 of the tumour tissues displayed microsatellite alterations, 29% also exhibited the same alterations in ctDNA [107]. Kakimoto’s et al. discovered that 90% of OSCC patients (N = 20) showed microsatellite alterations in serum DNA, with 10 patients showing allelic imbalance post-operative serum DNA. 70% patients showed an allelic imbalance at pre-operation and post-operation, with a poor prognosis [65].
Allelic imbalance
Allelic imbalance (AI) is a condition in which the expression levels of two alleles of the same gene differ in the same cell, either as a result of the epigenetic inactivation of one of the alleles or as a result of genetic changes in the regulatory regions. Hamana et al. analyzed AI in tumour tissue and serum samples from OSCC patients (N = 64) at three time points (pre-operatively, post-operatively, and 4 weeks post-operatively) and found that 52% patients’ serum samples showed AIs in at least one locus and AIs were frequently detected pre-operatively and post-operatively. Importantly, OSCC patients who had AIs during the post-operative period but turned negative 4 weeks post-operatively were free of disease. In contrast, patients who were AI-positive both post-operatively and 4 weeks post-operatively deceased due to distant metastasis. Therefore, microsatellite status in the serum DNA could be used as a potential biomarker in monitoring disease progression [52]. Jiang et al. analyzed plasma DNA length (integrity index) in HNSCC patients (N = 58) and control subjects (N = 47) and concluded that plasma DNA integrity index was increased in HNCC patients compared with non-cancerous healthy controls [63].
Combining biomarkers present in blood and saliva samples as a means of increasing cancer detection rates
Ahn et al. investigated HPV16DNA levels in saliva and plasma samples from OPSCC patients (N = 93) pre-treatment and post-treatment. For pre-treatment samples combining saliva and serum, the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive values of HPV16DNA were 76%, 100%, 42%, and 100% respectively [4]. Similarly, Wang et al. analyzed saliva and plasma samples from 93 HNSCC patients and reported that tumour DNA (referred to either somatic mutations or human papillomavirus genes) detection rate was 100% in early-stage patients, 95% in late-stage disease, 100% in OC, 91% in OPC, and 100% in LC. In saliva, tumour DNA was detected in all the patients with OC and 70% of patients with cancers from other sites. In plasma, tumour DNA was detected in 80% of patients with OC, and all the patients with cancers from other sites [162]. Hanna et al. discovered that paired blood-saliva HPV DNA can be used in disease surveillance [53]. Carvalho et al. analyzed salivary oral rinse, serum and tumour tissues from 211 HNSCC patients and 527 healthy controls. They used quantitative methylation specific PCR as well as a 21-gene panel and concluded that compared to single marker, combining data from saliva and serum samples showed an improved detection [18].
Future perspective
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumour tissue DNA is emerging as a promising avenue to comprehensively characterize tumour mutation burden. High nonsynonymous tumor mutational burden (TMB), evaluated by WES has shown to correlate with improved clinical outcomes for patients with other types of cancer (lung cancer). However, the use of tumour biopsies to discern clinically available biomarkers have limitations. These include tumour heterogeneity, access to tumour tissues in anatomically challenging locations, insufficient quantity of tumour DNA and the inability to monitor response to treatment in patients who have undergone surgical resections.
Liquid biopsy-based applications are revolutionizing the management of patients with cancer [73]. Studies have shown that using NGS to capture tumour specific mutations is an emerging field of importance to track response to treatment. To confirm whether ctDNA recapitulates de novo tumour tissue genomic landscape, increasing studies are comparing tumour tissue DNA from a patient with HNSCC to their ctDNA derived from blood. As an example, when a drug targets a particular mutation, analysing whether ctDNA carries the same mutation, would allow more precise delivery of treatment, enabling a precision medicine approach. We envisioned that in the future ctDNA analysis will become part of routine clinical management of HNSCC patients, whereby improving outcomes through targeted therapies.
Conclusion
The lack of biomarkers to triage the risk of relapse at diagnosis, disease surveillance and predicting recurrence are considered as the main contributors for poor outcomes in HNSCC. To date, most of the research in liquid biopsies has focused on blood-based biomarkers, predominantly using ctDNA. The analysis of ctDNA has several benefits over traditional tumour biopsy testing. Liquid biopsy enables real-time monitoring of response to treatment, also including those patients with tumours in anatomically challenging locations. However, well-designed multi-center clinical trials using homogeneous HNSCC patient cohorts where the use of ctDNA as a biomarker for disease management should provide meaningful benefits to patients before it is broadly implemented clinically.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
HPV Vaccine Slashes Rates of Oral Infection. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(7):Of6.
Adelstein DJ, Ridge JA, Gillison ML, Chaturvedi AK, D'Souza G, Gravitt PE, Westra W, Psyrri A, Kast WM, Koutsky LA, Giuliano A, Krosnick S, Trotti A, Schuller DE, Forastiere A, Ullmann CD. Head and neck squamous cell cancer and the human papillomavirus: summary of a National Cancer Institute State of the Science Meeting, November 9–10, 2008, Washington, D.C. Head Neck. 2009; 31(11):1393–1422.
Agrawal N, Frederick MJ, Pickering CR, Bettegowda C, Chang K, Li RJ, Fakhry C, Xie TX, Zhang J, Wang J, Zhang N, El-Naggar AK, Jasser SA, Weinstein JN, Treviño L, Drummond JA, Muzny DM, Wu Y, Wood LD, Hruban RH, Westra WH, Koch WM, Califano JA, Gibbs RA, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE, Papadopoulos N, Wheeler DA, Kinzler KW, Myers JN. Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1. Science. 2011;333(6046):1154–7.
Ahn SM, Chan JYK, Zhang Z, Wang H, Khan Z, Bishop JA, Westra W, Koch WM, Califano JA. Saliva and plasma quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based detection and surveillance of human papillomavirus-related head and neck cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(9):846–54.
Akagi K, Li J, Broutian TR, Padilla-Nash H, Xiao W, Jiang B, Rocco JW, Teknos TN, Kumar B, Wangsa D, He D, Ried T, Symer DE, Gillison ML. Genome-wide analysis of HPV integration in human cancers reveals recurrent, focal genomic instability. Genome Res. 2014;24(2):185–99.
Alamoud KA, Kukuruzinska MA. Emerging insights into Wnt/β-catenin signaling in head and neck cancer. J Dent Res. 2018;97(6):665–73.
Amenábar JM, Torres-Pereira CC, Tang KD, Punyadeera C. Two enemies, one fight: an update of oral cancer in patients with Fanconi anemia. Cancer. 2019;125(22):3936–46.
Beck TN, Golemis EA. Genomic insights into head and neck cancer. Cancers Head Neck. 2016;1.
Belic J, Koch M, Ulz P, Auer M, Gerhalter T, Mohan S, Fischereder K, Petru E, Bauernhofer T, Geigl JB, Speicher MR, Heitzer E. Rapid identification of plasma DNA samples with increased ctDNA levels by a modified FAST-SeqS approach. Clin Chem. 2015;61(6):838–49.
Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Winn DM, Austin DF, Greenberg RS, Preston-Martin S, Bernstein L, Schoenberg JB, Stemhagen A, Fraumeni JF Jr. Smoking and drinking in relation to oral and pharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res. 1988;48(11):3282–7.
Boffetta P, Hecht S, Gray N, Gupta P, Straif K. Smokeless tobacco and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(7):667–75.
Braig F, Voigtlaender M, Schieferdecker A, Busch CJ, Laban S, Grob T, Kriegs M, Knecht R, Bokemeyer C, Binder M. Liquid biopsy monitoring uncovers acquired RAS-mediated resistance to cetuximab in a substantial proportion of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(28):42988–95.
Burgener JM, Zou J, Zhao Z, Zheng Y, Shen SY, Huang SH, Keshavarzi S, Xu W, Liu F-F, Liu G, Waldron JN, Weinreb I, Spreafico A, Siu LL, de Almeida JR, Goldstein DP, Hoffman MM, De Carvalho DD, Bratman SV. Tumor-Naïve multimodal profiling of circulating tumor DNA in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(15):4230–44.
Cabelguenne A, Blons H, de Waziers I, Carnot F, Houllier AM, Soussi T, Brasnu D, Beaune P, Laccourreye O, Laurent-Puig P. p53 alterations predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective series. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(7):1465–73.
Callahan SC, Divenko M, Barrodia P, Singh AK, Arslan E, Liu Z, Yang J, Anvar N, Amit M, Xie T, Jiang S, Schulz J, Tang M, Myers JN, Rai K. KMT2D loss promotes head and neck squamous carcinoma through enhancer reprogramming and modulation of immune microenvironment. bioRxiv 2021;2021.2009.2021.461314.
Cancer Genome Atlas N. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015;517(7536):576–82.
Cao H, Banh A, Kwok S, Shi X, Wu S, Krakow T, Khong B, Bavan B, Bala R, Pinsky BA, Colevas D, Pourmand N, Koong AC, Kong CS, Le QT. Quantitation of human papillomavirus DNA in plasma of oropharyngeal carcinoma patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(3):e351-358.
Carvalho AL, Jeronimo C, Kim MM, Henrique R, Zhang Z, Hoque MO, Chang S, Brait M, Nayak CS, Jiang WW, Claybourne Q, Tokumaru Y, Lee J, Goldenberg D, Garrett-Mayer E, Goodman S, Moon CS, Koch W, Westra WH, Sidransky D, Califano JA. Evaluation of promoter hypermethylation detection in body fluids as a screening/diagnosis tool for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(1):97–107.
Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Hernandez BY, Xiao W, Kim E, Jiang B, Goodman MT, Sibug-Saber M, Cozen W, Liu L, Lynch CF, Wentzensen N, Jordan RC, Altekruse S, Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS, Gillison ML. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(32):4294–301.
Chen FP, Huang XD, Lv JW, Wen DW, Zhou GQ, Lin L, Kou J, Wu CF, Chen Y, Zheng ZQ, Li ZX, He XJ, Sun Y. Prognostic potential of liquid biopsy tracking in the posttreatment surveillance of patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2020;126(10):2163–73.
Chen Y-P, Chan ATC, Le Q-T, Blanchard P, Sun Y, Ma J. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The Lancet. 2019;394(10192):64–80.
Chera BS, Kumar S, Beaty BT, Marron D, Jefferys S, Green R, Goldman EC, Amdur R, Sheets N, Dagan R, Hayes DN, Weiss J, Grilley-Olson JE, Zanation A, Hackman T, Blumberg JM, Patel S, Weissler M, Tan XM, Parker JS, Mendenhall W, Gupta GP. Rapid clearance profile of plasma circulating tumor HPV type 16 DNA during chemoradiotherapy correlates with disease control in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(15):4682–90.
Chera BS, Kumar S, Shen C, Amdur R, Dagan R, Green R, Goldman E, Weiss J, Grilley-Olson J, Patel S, Zanation A, Hackman T, Blumberg J, Patel S, Thorp B, Weissler M, Yarbrough W, Sheets N, Mendenhall W, Tan XM, Gupta GP. Plasma circulating tumor HPV DNA for the surveillance of cancer recurrence in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(10):1050–8.
Chow LQM. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):60–72.
Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Campbell BH, Saxman SB, Kish JA, Kim HE, Cmelak AJ, Rotman M, Machtay M, Ensley JF, Chao KS, Schultz CJ, Lee N, Fu KK. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(19):1937–44.
Cui Y, Li H, Zhan H, Han T, Dong Y, Tian C, Guo Y, Yan F, Dai D, Liu P. Identification of potential biomarkers for liver cancer through gene mutation and clinical characteristics. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 733478.
Dahlstrom KR, Li G, Hussey CS, Vo JT, Wei Q, Zhao C, Sturgis EM. Circulating human papillomavirus DNA as a marker for disease extent and recurrence among patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Cancer. 2015;121(19):3455–64.
Damerla RR, Lee NY, You D, Soni R, Shah R, Reyngold M, Katabi N, Wu V, McBride SM, Tsai CJ, Riaz N, Powell SN, Babady NE, Viale A, Higginson DS. Detection of early human papillomavirus-associated cancers by liquid biopsy. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3:1.
de Jesus LM, Dos Reis MB, Carvalho RS, Scapulatempo Neto C, de Almeida GC, Laus AC, Marczynski GT, Leal LF, Melendez ME, de Marchi P, Manuel Reis R, Carvalho AL, de Carvalho AC. Feasibility of methylated ctDNA detection in plasma samples of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Head Neck. 2020;42(11):3307–15.
Delvecchio M, Gaucher J, Aguilar-Gurrieri C, Ortega E, Panne D. Structure of the p300 catalytic core and implications for chromatin targeting and HAT regulation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(9):1040–6.
Diehl F, Li M, Dressman D, He Y, Shen D, Szabo S, Diaz LA Jr, Goodman SN, David KA, Juhl H, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Detection and quantification of mutations in the plasma of patients with colorectal tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(45):16368–73.
Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, Li M, Thornton K, Agrawal N, Sokoll L, Szabo SA, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Diaz LA Jr. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med. 2008;14(9):985–90.
Dietlein F, Weghorn D, Taylor-Weiner A, Richters A, Reardon B, Liu D, Lander ES, Van Allen EM, Sunyaev SR. Identification of cancer driver genes based on nucleotide context. Nat Genet. 2020;52(2):208–18.
Egyud M, Sridhar P, Devaiah A, Yamada E, Saunders S, Stahlberg A, Filges S, Krzyzanowski PM, Kalatskaya I, Jiao W, Stein LD, Jalisi S, Godfrey TE. Plasma circulating tumor DNA as a potential tool for disease monitoring in head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2019;41(5):1351–8.
Ekanayake Weeramange C, Shu D, Tang KD, Batra J, Ladwa R, Kenny L, Vasani S, Frazer IH, Dolcetti R, Ellis JJ, Sturm RA, Leo P, Punyadeera C. Analysis of human leukocyte antigen associations in human papillomavirus-positive and -negative head and neck cancer: comparison with cervical cancer. Cancer. 2022.
Elazezy M, Joosse SA. Techniques of using circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy component in cancer management. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018;16:370–8.
Flach S, Kumbrink J, Walz C, Hess J, Drexler G, Belka C, Canis M, Jung A, Baumeister P. Analysis of genetic variants of frequently mutated genes in human papillomavirus-negative primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, resection margins, local recurrences and corresponding circulating cell-free DNA. J Oral Pathol Med. 2022;51(8):738–46.
Forshew T, Murtaza M, Parkinson C, Gale D, Tsui DW, Kaper F, Dawson SJ, Piskorz AM, Jimenez-Linan M, Bentley D, Hadfield J, May AP, Caldas C, Brenton JD, Rosenfeld N. Noninvasive identification and monitoring of cancer mutations by targeted deep sequencing of plasma DNA. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(136):136ra168.
Freedman ND, Park Y, Subar AF, Hollenbeck AR, Leitzmann MF, Schatzkin A, Abnet CC. Fruit and vegetable intake and head and neck cancer risk in a large United States prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(10):2330–6.
Froimchuk E, Jang Y, Ge K. Histone H3 lysine 4 methyltransferase KMT2D. Gene. 2017;627:337–42.
Gale D, Lawson ARJ, Howarth K, Madi M, Durham B, Smalley S, Calaway J, Blais S, Jones G, Clark J, Dimitrov P, Pugh M, Woodhouse S, Epstein M, Fernandez-Gonzalez A, Whale AS, Huggett JF, Foy CA, Jones GM, Raveh-Amit H, Schmitt K, Devonshire A, Green E, Forshew T, Plagnol V, Rosenfeld N. Development of a highly sensitive liquid biopsy platform to detect clinically-relevant cancer mutations at low allele fractions in cell-free DNA. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3): e0194630.
Galot R, Machiels JH. Current applications and challenges of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;85: 101992.
Galot R, van Marcke C, Helaers R, Mendola A, Goebbels RM, Caignet X, Ambroise J, Wittouck K, Vikkula M, Limaye N, Machiels JH. Liquid biopsy for mutational profiling of locoregional recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2020;104: 104631.
Ganly I, Soutar DS, Brown R, Kaye SB. p53 alterations in recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck refractory to radiotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2000;82(2):392–8.
García-Carracedo D, Villaronga MÁ, Álvarez-Teijeiro S, Hermida-Prado F, Santamaría I, Allonca E, Suárez-Fernández L, Gonzalez MV, Balbín M, Astudillo A, Martínez-Camblor P, Su GH, Rodrigo JP, García-Pedrero JM. Impact of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activation on the prognosis of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oncotarget. 2016;7(20):29780–93.
Glorieux M, Dok R, Nuyts S. Novel DNA targeted therapies for head and neck cancers: clinical potential and biomarkers. Oncotarget. 2017;8(46):81662–78.
Goldenberg D, Lee J, Koch WM, Kim MM, Trink B, Sidransky D, Moon CS. Habitual risk factors for head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131(6):986–93.
Gormally E, Caboux E, Vineis P, Hainaut P. Circulating free DNA in plasma or serum as biomarker of carcinogenesis: practical aspects and biological significance. Mutat Res. 2007;635(2–3):105–17.
Grandis JR, Tweardy DJ. Elevated levels of transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor messenger RNA are early markers of carcinogenesis in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 1993;53(15):3579–84.
Guha N, Boffetta P, Wünsch Filho V, Eluf NJ, Shangina O, Zaridze D, Curado MP, Koifman S, Matos E, Menezes A, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Fernandez L, Mates D, Daudt AW, Lissowska J, Dikshit R, Brennan P. Oral health and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and esophagus: results of two multicentric case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(10):1159–73.
Haft S, Ren S, Xu G, Mark A, Fisch K, Guo TW, Khan Z, Pang J, Ando M, Liu C, Sakai A, Fukusumi T, Califano JA. Mutation of chromatin regulators and focal hotspot alterations characterize human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2019;125(14):2423–34.
Hamana K, Uzawa K, Ogawara K, Shiiba M, Bukawa H, Yokoe H, Tanzawa H. Monitoring of circulating tumour-associated DNA as a prognostic tool for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(12):2181–4.
Hanna GJ, Lau CJ, Mahmood U, Supplee JG, Mogili AR, Haddad RI, Janne PA, Paweletz CP. Salivary HPV DNA informs locoregional disease status in advanced HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2019;95:120–6.
Hanna GJ, Supplee JG, Kuang Y, Mahmood U, Lau CJ, Haddad RI, Janne PA, Paweletz CP. Plasma HPV cell-free DNA monitoring in advanced HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(9):1980–6.
Haring CT, Bhambhani C, Brummel C, Jewell B, Bellile E, Heft Neal ME, Sandford E, Spengler RM, Bhangale A, Spector ME, McHugh J, Prince ME, Mierzwa M, Worden FP, Tewari M, Swiecicki PL, Brenner JC. Human papilloma virus circulating tumor DNA assay predicts treatment response in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2021;12(13):1214–29.
Hashibe M, Brennan P, Benhamou S, Castellsague X, Chen C, Curado MP, Dal Maso L, Daudt AW, Fabianova E, Fernandez L, Wünsch-Filho V, Franceschi S, Hayes RB, Herrero R, Koifman S, La Vecchia C, Lazarus P, Levi F, Mates D, Matos E, Menezes A, Muscat J, Eluf-Neto J, Olshan AF, Rudnai P, Schwartz SM, Smith E, Sturgis EM, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Talamini R, Wei Q, Winn DM, Zaridze D, Zatonski W, Zhang ZF, Berthiller J, Boffetta P. Alcohol drinking in never users of tobacco, cigarette smoking in never drinkers, and the risk of head and neck cancer: pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(10):777–89.
He SS, Wang Y, Bao Y, Cai XY, Yang XL, Chen DM, Chen Y, Lu LX. Dynamic changes in plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA load during treatment have prognostic value in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study. Cancer Med. 2018;7(4):1110–7.
Heitzer E, Ulz P, Belic J, Gutschi S, Quehenberger F, Fischereder K, Benezeder T, Auer M, Pischler C, Mannweiler S, Pichler M, Eisner F, Haeusler M, Riethdorf S, Pantel K, Samonigg H, Hoefler G, Augustin H, Geigl JB, Speicher MR. Tumor-associated copy number changes in the circulation of patients with prostate cancer identified through whole-genome sequencing. Genome Med. 2013;5(4):30.
Hilke FJ, Muyas F, Admard J, Kootz B, Nann D, Welz S, Rieß O, Zips D, Ossowski S, Schroeder C, Clasen K. Dynamics of cell-free tumour DNA correlate with treatment response of head and neck cancer patients receiving radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2020;151:182–9.
Ikari N, Serizawa A, Tanji E, Yamamoto M, Furukawa T. Analysis of RHOA mutations and their significance in the proliferation and transcriptome of digestive tract cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2021;22(4):735.
Jaffe AB, Hall A. Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:247–69.
Jahr S, Hentze H, Englisch S, Hardt D, Fackelmayer FO, Hesch RD, Knippers R. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61(4):1659–65.
Jiang WW, Zahurak M, Goldenberg D, Milman Y, Park HL, Westra WH, Koch W, Sidransky D, Califano J. Increased plasma DNA integrity index in head and neck cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(11):2673–6.
Johnson DE, Burtness B, Leemans CR, Lui VWY, Bauman JE, Grandis JR. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):92.
Kakimoto Y, Yamamoto N, Shibahara T. Microsatellite analysis of serum DNA in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2008;20(5):1195–200.
Kantidakis T, Saponaro M, Mitter R, Horswell S, Kranz A, Boeing S, Aygun O, Kelly GP, Matthews N, Stewart A, Stewart AF, Svejstrup JQ. Mutation of cancer driver MLL2 results in transcription stress and genome instability. Genes Dev. 2016;30(4):408–20.
Keup C, Benyaa K, Hauch S, Sprenger-Haussels M, Tewes M, Mach P, Bittner AK, Kimmig R, Hahn P, Kasimir-Bauer S. Targeted deep sequencing revealed variants in cell-free DNA of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(3):497–509.
Kevadiya BD, Machhi J, Herskovitz J, Oleynikov MD, Blomberg WR, Bajwa N, Soni D, Das S, Hasan M, Patel M, Senan AM, Gorantla S, McMillan J, Edagwa B, Eisenberg R, Gurumurthy CB, Reid SPM, Punyadeera C, Chang L, Gendelman HE. Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat Mater. 2021;20(5):593–605.
Khandelwal AR, Greer AH, Hamiter M, Fermin JM, McMullen T, Moore-Medlin T, Mills G, Flores JM, Yin H, Nathan CAO. Comparing cell-free circulating tumor DNA mutational profiles of disease-free and nonresponders patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020;5(5):868–78.
Kinde I, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. FAST-SeqS: a simple and efficient method for the detection of aneuploidy by massively parallel sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7): e41162.
Kinde I, Wu J, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(23):9530–5.
Kogo R, Manako T, Iwaya T, Nishizuka S, Hiraki H, Sasaki Y, Idogawa M, Tokino T, Koide A, Komune N, Yasumatsu R, Nakagawa T. Individualized circulating tumor DNA monitoring in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2022;11:3960.
Kulasinghe A, Schmidt H, Perry C, Whitfield B, Kenny L, Nelson C, Warkiani ME, Punyadeera C. A collective route to head and neck cancer metastasis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):746.
Laprovitera N, Salamon I, Gelsomino F, Porcellini E, Riefolo M, Garonzi M, Tononi P, Valente S, Sabbioni S, Fontana F, Manaresi N, D’Errico A, Pantaleo MA, Ardizzoni A, Ferracin M. Genetic characterization of cancer of unknown primary using liquid biopsy approaches. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: 666156.
Leary RJ, Kinde I, Diehl F, Schmidt K, Clouser C, Duncan C, Antipova A, Lee C, McKernan K, De La Vega FM, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Diaz LA Jr, Velculescu VE. Development of personalized tumor biomarkers using massively parallel sequencing. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(20):2014.
Lechner M, Frampton GM, Fenton T, Feber A, Palmer G, Jay A, Pillay N, Forster M, Cronin MT, Lipson D, Miller VA, Brennan TA, Henderson S, Vaz F, O’Flynn P, Kalavrezos N, Yelensky R, Beck S, Stephens PJ, Boshoff C. Targeted next-generation sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma identifies novel genetic alterations in HPV+ and HPV- tumors. Genome Med. 2013;5(5):49.
Lechner M, Liu J, Masterson L, Fenton TR. HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: epidemiology, molecular biology and clinical management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19(5):306–27.
Lee AWM, Lee VHF, Ng WT, Strojan P, Saba NF, Rinaldo A, Willems SM, Rodrigo JP, Forastiere AA, Ferlito A. A systematic review and recommendations on the use of plasma EBV DNA for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2021;153:109–22.
Levine AJ. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell. 1997;88(3):323–31.
Li C, Lu J, Liu Z, Wang LE, Zhao H, El-Naggar AK, Sturgis EM, Wei Q. The six-nucleotide deletion/insertion variant in the CASP8 promoter region is inversely associated with risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010;3(2):246–53.
Li G, Pavlick D, Chung JH, Bauer T, Tan BA, Peguero J, Ward P, Kallab A, Bufill J, Hoffman A, Sadiq A, Edenfield J, He J, Cooke M, Hughes J, Forcier B, Nahas M, Stephens P, Ali SM, Schrock AB, Ross JS, Miller VA, Gregg JP. Genomic profiling of cell-free circulating tumor DNA in patients with colorectal cancer and its fidelity to the genomics of the tumor biopsy. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10(5):831–40.
Li J, Wang L, Mamon H, Kulke MH, Berbeco R, Makrigiorgos GM. Replacing PCR with COLD-PCR enriches variant DNA sequences and redefines the sensitivity of genetic testing. Nat Med. 2008;14(5):579–84.
Liebs S, Eder T, Klauschen F, Schutte M, Yaspo ML, Keilholz U, Tinhofer I, Kidess-Sigal E, Braunholz D. Applicability of liquid biopsies to represent the mutational profile of tumor tissue from different cancer entities. Oncogene. 2021;40(33):5204–12.
Lim Y, Wan Y, Vagenas D, Ovchinnikov DA, Perry CF, Davis MJ, Punyadeera C. Salivary DNA methylation panel to diagnose HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck cancers. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):749.
Lin JC, Wang WY, Chen KY, Wei YH, Liang WM, Jan JS, Jiang RS. Quantification of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(24):2461–70.
Lin LH, Chang KW, Kao SY, Cheng HW, Liu CJ. Increased plasma circulating cell-free DNA could be a potential marker for oral cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3303.
Liu K, Wang JF, Zhan Y, Kong DL, Wang C. Prognosis model of colorectal cancer patients based on NOTCH3, KMT2C, and CREBBP mutations. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;12(1):79–88.
Liu SH, Shen PC, Chen CY, Hsu AN, Cho YC, Lai YL, Chen FH, Li CY, Wang SC, Chen M, Chung IF, Cheng WC. DriverDBv3: a multi-omics database for cancer driver gene research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D863–70.
Luce D, Leclerc A, Bégin D, Demers PA, Gérin M, Orlowski E, Kogevinas M, Belli S, Bugel I, Bolm-Audorff U, Brinton LA, Comba P, Hardell L, Hayes RB, Magnani C, Merler E, Preston-Martin S, Vaughan TL, Zheng W, Boffetta P. Sinonasal cancer and occupational exposures: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13(2):147–57.
Lui VW, Hedberg ML, Li H, Vangara BS, Pendleton K, Zeng Y, Lu Y, Zhang Q, Du Y, Gilbert BR, Freilino M, Sauerwein S, Peyser ND, Xiao D, Diergaarde B, Wang L, Chiosea S, Seethala R, Johnson JT, Kim S, Duvvuri U, Ferris RL, Romkes M, Nukui T, Kwok-Shing NP, Garraway LA, Hammerman PS, Mills GB, Grandis JR. Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):761–9.
Mandel P, Metais P. Nuclear acids in human blood plasma. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1948;142(3–4):241–3.
Marcozzi A, Jager M, Elferink M, Straver R, van Ginkel JH, Peltenburg B, Chen LT, Renkens I, van Kuik J, Terhaard C, de Bree R, Devriese LA, Willems SM, Kloosterman WP, de Ridder J. Accurate detection of circulating tumor DNA using nanopore consensus sequencing. npj Genomic Med. 2021; 6(1).
Martignano F. Cell-free DNA: an overview of sample types and isolation procedures. Methods Mol Biol. 1909;13–27:2019.
Martinez-Jimenez F, Muinos F, Sentis I, Deu-Pons J, Reyes-Salazar I, Arnedo-Pac C, Mularoni L, Pich O, Bonet J, Kranas H, Gonzalez-Perez A, Lopez-Bigas N. A compendium of mutational cancer driver genes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(10):555–72.
Marziali A, Pel J, Bizzotto D, Whitehead LA. Novel electrophoresis mechanism based on synchronous alternating drag perturbation. Electrophoresis. 2005;26(1):82–90.
Mazurek AM, Rutkowski T, Fiszer-Kierzkowska A, Malusecka E, Skladowski K. Assessment of the total cfDNA and HPV16/18 detection in plasma samples of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Oral Oncol. 2016;54:36–41.
McDonald BR, Contente-Cuomo T, Sammut SJ, Odenheimer-Bergman A, Ernst B, Perdigones N, Chin SF, Farooq M, Mejia R, Cronin PA, Anderson KS, Kosiorek HE, Northfelt DW, McCullough AE, Patel BK, Weitzel JN, Slavin TP, Caldas C, Pockaj BA, Murtaza M. Personalized circulating tumor DNA analysis to detect residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(504).
Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(14):2787–99.
Mes SW, Brink A, Sistermans EA, Straver R, Oudejans CBM, Poell JB, Leemans CR, Brakenhoff RH. Comprehensive multiparameter genetic analysis improves circulating tumor DNA detection in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2020;109: 104852.
Morris LG, Kaufman AM, Gong Y, Ramaswami D, Walsh LA, Turcan Ş, Eng S, Kannan K, Zou Y, Peng L, Banuchi VE, Paty P, Zeng Z, Vakiani E, Solit D, Singh B, Ganly I, Liau L, Cloughesy TC, Mischel PS, Mellinghoff IK, Chan TA. Recurrent somatic mutation of FAT1 in multiple human cancers leads to aberrant Wnt activation. Nat Genet. 2013;45(3):253–61.
Muhanna N, Di Grappa MA, Chan HHL, Khan T, Jin CS, Zheng Y, Irish JC, Bratman SV. Cell-free DNA kinetics in a pre-clinical model of head and neck cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16723.
Mydlarz WK, Hennessey PT, Wang H, Carvalho AL, Califano JA. Serum biomarkers for detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2016;38(1):9–14.
Nawroz-Danish H, Eisenberger CF, Yoo GH, Wu L, Koch W, Black C, Ensley JF, Wei WZ, Sidransky D. Microsatellite analysis of serum DNA in patients with head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;111(1):96–100.
Newman AM, Bratman SV, To J, Wynne JF, Eclov NC, Modlin LA, Liu CL, Neal JW, Wakelee HA, Merritt RE, Shrager JB, Loo BW Jr, Alizadeh AA, Diehn M. An ultrasensitive method for quantitating circulating tumor DNA with broad patient coverage. Nat Med. 2014;20(5):548–54.
Ngan HL, Poon PHY, Su YX, Chan JYK, Lo KW, Yeung CK, Liu Y, Wong E, Li H, Lau CW, Piao W, Lui VWY. Erlotinib sensitivity of MAPK1p.D321N mutation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. NPJ Genom Med. 2020;5(1):17.
Nichols AC, Palma DA, Chow W, Tan S, Rajakumar C, Rizzo G, Fung K, Kwan K, Wehrli B, Winquist E, Koropatnick J, Mymryk JS, Yoo J, Barrett JW. High frequency of activating PIK3CA mutations in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(6):617–22.
Nunes DN, Kowalski LP, Simpson AJ. Circulating tumor-derived DNA may permit the early diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2001;92(2):214–9.
Ock CY, Son B, Keam B, Lee SY, Moon J, Kwak H, Kim S, Kim TM, Jeon YK, Kwon SK, Hah JH, Lee SH, Kwon TK, Kim DW, Wu HG, Sung MW, Heo DS. Identification of genomic mutations associated with clinical outcomes of induction chemotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142(4):873–83.
Osaki M, Oshimura M, Ito H. PI3K-Akt pathway: its functions and alterations in human cancer. Apoptosis. 2004;9(6):667–76.
Ovchinnikov DA, Wan Y, Coman WB, Pandit P, Cooper-White JJ, Herman JG, Punyadeera C. DNA methylation at the novel CpG sites in the promoter of MED15/PCQAP gene as a biomarker for head and neck cancers. Biomark Insights. 2014;9:53–60.
Pan C, Izreig S, Yarbrough WG, Issaeva N. NSD1 mutations by HPV status in head and neck cancer: differences in survival and response to DNA-damaging agents. Cancers Head Neck. 2019;4:3.
Patel KB, Padhya TA, Huang J, Hernandez-Prera JC, Li T, Chung CH, Wang L, Wang X. Plasma cell-free DNA methylome profiling in pre- and post-surgery oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2023;31:917.
Payne K, Spruce R, Beggs A, Sharma N, Kong A, Martin T, Parmar S, Praveen P, Nankivell P, Mehanna H. Circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker and liquid biopsy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2018;40(7):1598–604.
Pepe MS, Etzioni R, Feng Z, Potter JD, Thompson ML, Thornquist M, Winget M, Yasui Y. Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(14):1054–61.
Perdomo S, Avogbe PH, Foll M, Abedi-Ardekani B, Facciolla VL, Anantharaman D, Chopard P, Calvez-Kelm FL, Vilensky M, Polesel J, Holcatova I, Simonato L, Canova C, Lagiou P, McKay JD, Brennan P. Circulating tumor DNA detection in head and neck cancer: evaluation of two different detection approaches. Oncotarget. 2017;8(42):72621–32.
Peri S, Izumchenko E, Schubert AD, Slifker MJ, Ruth K, Serebriiskii IG, Guo T, Burtness BA, Mehra R, Ross EA, Sidransky D, Golemis EA. NSD1- and NSD2-damaging mutations define a subset of laryngeal tumors with favorable prognosis. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1772.
Pickering CR, Zhang J, Yoo SY, Bengtsson L, Moorthy S, Neskey DM, Zhao M, Ortega Alves MV, Chang K, Drummond J, Cortez E, Xie TX, Zhang D, Chung W, Issa JP, Zweidler-McKay PA, Wu X, El-Naggar AK, Weinstein JN, Wang J, Muzny DM, Gibbs RA, Wheeler DA, Myers JN, Frederick MJ. Integrative genomic characterization of oral squamous cell carcinoma identifies frequent somatic drivers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):770–81.
Porter A, Natsuhara M, Daniels GA, Patel SP, Sacco AG, Bykowski J, Banks KC, Cohen EEW. Next generation sequencing of cell free circulating tumor DNA in blood samples of recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer patients. Transl Cancer Res. 2020;9(1):203–9.
Rao RC, Dou Y. Hijacked in cancer: the KMT2 (MLL) family of methyltransferases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(6):334–46.
Rasheduzzaman M, Kulasinghe A, Dolcetti R, Kenny L, Johnson NW, Kolarich D, Punyadeera C. Protein glycosylation in head and neck cancers: from diagnosis to treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2020;1874(2): 188422.
Reder H, Taferner VF, Wittekindt C, Bräuninger A, Speel EM, Gattenlöhner S, Wolf G, Klussmann JP, Wuerdemann N, Wagner S. Plasma cell-free human papillomavirus oncogene E6 and E7 DNA predicts outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Mol Diagn. 2020;22(11):1333–43.
Repana D, Nulsen J, Dressler L, Bortolomeazzi M, Venkata SK, Tourna A, Yakovleva A, Palmieri T, Ciccarelli FD. The Network of Cancer Genes (NCG): a comprehensive catalogue of known and candidate cancer genes from cancer sequencing screens. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):1.
Rettig EM, Faden DL, Sandhu S, Wong K, Faquin WC, Warinner C, Stephens P, Kumar S, Kuperwasser C, Richmon JD, Uppaluri R, Varvares M, Sethi R, Hanna GJ, Sroussi H. Detection of circulating tumor human papillomavirus DNA before diagnosis of HPV-positive head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer. 2022;151(7):1081–5.
Rizzo G, Black M, Mymryk JS, Barrett JW, Nichols AC. Defining the genomic landscape of head and neck cancers through next-generation sequencing. Oral Dis. 2015;21(1):e11-24.
Rodriguez-Viciana P, Warne PH, Vanhaesebroeck B, Waterfield MD, Downward J. Activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase by interaction with Ras and by point mutation. Embo J. 1996;15(10):2442–51.
Samorodnitsky E, Jewell BM, Hagopian R, Miya J, Wing MR, Lyon E, Damodaran S, Bhatt D, Reeser JW, Datta J, Roychowdhury S. Evaluation of hybridization capture versus amplicon-based methods for whole-exome sequencing. Hum Mutat. 2015;36(9):903–14.
Sanchez-Cespedes M, Esteller M, Wu L, Nawroz-Danish H, Yoo GH, Koch WM, Jen J, Herman JG, Sidransky D. Gene promoter hypermethylation in tumors and serum of head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2000;60(4):892–5.
Schirmer MA, Beck J, Leu M, Oellerich M, Rave-Frank M, Walson PD, Schutz E, Canis M. Cell-free plasma DNA for disease stratification and prognosis in head and neck cancer. Clin Chem. 2018;64(6):959–70.
Schmidt H, Kulasinghe A, Allcock RJN, Tan LY, Mokany E, Kenny L, Punyadeera C. A pilot study to non-invasively track PIK3CA mutation in head and neck cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2018;8(4):79.
Schmidt H, Kulasinghe A, Kenny L, Punyadeera C. The development of a liquid biopsy for head and neck cancers. Oral Oncol. 2016;61:8–11.
Schrock A, Leisse A, de Vos L, Gevensleben H, Droge F, Franzen A, Wachendorfer M, Schrock F, Ellinger J, Teschke M, Wilhelm-Buchstab T, Landsberg J, Holdenrieder S, Hartmann G, Field JK, Bootz F, Kristiansen G, Dietrich D. Free-circulating methylated DNA in blood for diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and monitoring of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients: an observational prospective cohort study. Clin Chem. 2017;63(7):1288–96.
Schröck A, Leisse A, De Vos L, Gevensleben H, Dröge F, Franzen A, Wachendörfer M, Schröck F, Ellinger J, Teschke M, Wilhelm-Buchstab T, Landsberg J, Holdenrieder S, Hartmann G, Field JK, Bootz F, Kristiansen G, Dietrich D. Free-circulating methylated DNA in blood for diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and monitoring of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients: an observational prospective cohort study. Clin Chem. 2017;63(7):1288–96.
Schwaederle M, Chattopadhyay R, Kato S, Fanta PT, Banks KC, Choi IS, Piccioni DE, Ikeda S, Talasaz A, Lanman RB, Bazhenova L, Kurzrock R. Genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA from diverse cancer patients identified by next-generation sequencing. Cancer Res. 2017;77(19):5419–27.
Seiwert TY, Zuo Z, Keck MK, Khattri A, Pedamallu CS, Stricker T, Brown C, Pugh TJ, Stojanov P, Cho J, Lawrence MS, Getz G, Bragelmann J, DeBoer R, Weichselbaum RR, Langerman A, Portugal L, Blair E, Stenson K, Lingen MW, Cohen EE, Vokes EE, White KP, Hammerman PS. Integrative and comparative genomic analysis of HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(3):632–41.
Shukla D, Kale AD, Hallikerimath S, Yerramalla V, Subbiah V. Can quantifying free-circulating DNA be a diagnostic and prognostic marker in oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(2):414–8.
Song C, Liu Y, Fontana R, Makrigiorgos A, Mamon H, Kulke MH, Makrigiorgos GM. Elimination of unaltered DNA in mixed clinical samples via nuclease-assisted minor-allele enrichment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(19): e146.
Song Y, Li L, Ou Y, Gao Z, Li E, Li X, Zhang W, Wang J, Xu L, Zhou Y, Ma X, Liu L, Zhao Z, Huang X, Fan J, Dong L, Chen G, Ma L, Yang J, Chen L, He M, Li M, Zhuang X, Huang K, Qiu K, Yin G, Guo G, Feng Q, Chen P, Wu Z, Wu J, Ma L, Zhao J, Luo L, Fu M, Xu B, Chen B, Li Y, Tong T, Wang M, Liu Z, Lin D, Zhang X, Yang H, Wang J, Zhan Q. Identification of genomic alterations in oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Nature. 2014;509(7498):91–5.
Stejskal P, Goodarzi H, Srovnal J, Hajduch M, van’t Veer LJ, Magbanua MJM. Circulating tumor nucleic acids: biology, release mechanisms, and clinical relevance. Mol Cancer. 2023;22(1):15.
Stransky N, Egloff AM, Tward AD, Kostic AD, Cibulskis K, Sivachenko A, Kryukov GV, Lawrence MS, Sougnez C, McKenna A, Shefler E, Ramos AH, Stojanov P, Carter SL, Voet D, Cortes ML, Auclair D, Berger MF, Saksena G, Guiducci C, Onofrio RC, Parkin M, Romkes M, Weissfeld JL, Seethala RR, Wang L, Rangel-Escareno C, Fernandez-Lopez JC, Hidalgo-Miranda A, Melendez-Zajgla J, Winckler W, Ardlie K, Gabriel SB, Meyerson M, Lander ES, Getz G, Golub TR, Garraway LA, Grandis JR. The mutational landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Science. 2011;333(6046):1157–60.
Strati A, Zavridou M, Economopoulou P, Gkolfinopoulos S, Psyrri A, Lianidou E. Development and analytical validation of a reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) assay for PD-L1 transcripts in circulating tumor cells. Clin Chem. 2021;67(4):642–52.
Sun CX, Bennett N, Tran P, Tang KD, Lim Y, Frazer I, Samaranayake L, Punyadeera C. A pilot study into the association between oral health status and human papillomavirus-16 infection. Diagnostics (Basel). 2017;7(1):11.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.
Sung JS, Chong HY, Kwon NJ, Kim HM, Lee JW, Kim B, Lee SB, Park CW, Choi JY, Chang WJ, Choi YJ, Lee SY, Kang EJ, Park KH, Kim YH. Detection of somatic variants and EGFR mutations in cell-free DNA from non-small cell lung cancer patients by ultra-deep sequencing using the ion ampliseq cancer hotspot panel and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Oncotarget. 2017;8(63):106901–12.
Suppan C, Graf R, Jahn S, Zhou Q, Klocker EV, Bartsch R, Terbuch A, Kashofer K, Regitnig P, Lindenmann J, Posch F, Gerritsmann H, Jost PJ, Heitzer E, Dandachi N, Balic M. Sensitive and robust liquid biopsy-based detection of PIK3CA mutations in hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2022;126(3):456–63.
Sutton TL, Patel RK, Anderson AN, Bowden SG, Whalen R, Giske NR, Wong MH. Circulating cells with macrophage-like characteristics in cancer: the importance of circulating neoplastic-immune hybrid cells in cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(16):3871.
Tang KD, Vasani S, Taheri T, Walsh LJ, Hughes BGM, Kenny L, Punyadeera C. An occult HPV-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma discovered through a saliva test. Front Oncol. 2020;10:408.
Temam S, Kawaguchi H, El-Naggar AK, Jelinek J, Tang H, Liu DD, Lang W, Issa JP, Lee JJ, Mao L. Epidermal growth factor receptor copy number alterations correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2164–70.
Thierry AR, El Messaoudi S, Gahan PB, Anker P, Stroun M. Origins, structures, and functions of circulating DNA in oncology. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(3):347–76.
Thierry AR, Mouliere F, El Messaoudi S, Mollevi C, Lopez-Crapez E, Rolet F, Gillet B, Gongora C, Dechelotte P, Robert B, Del Rio M, Lamy PJ, Bibeau F, Nouaille M, Loriot V, Jarrousse AS, Molina F, Mathonnet M, Pezet D, Ychou M. Clinical validation of the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations from circulating tumor DNA. Nat Med. 2014;20(4):430–5.
Tian F, Yip SP, Kwong DL, Lin Z, Yang Z, Wu VW. Promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in serum as potential biomarker for the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37(5):708–13.
To EW, Chan KC, Leung SF, Chan LY, To KF, Chan AT, Johnson PJ, Lo YM. Rapid clearance of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA after surgical treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(9):3254–9.
Tokheim CJ, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Karchin R. Evaluating the evaluation of cancer driver genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(50):14330–5.
Ushiku T, Ishikawa S, Kakiuchi M, Tanaka A, Katoh H, Aburatani H, Lauwers GY, Fukayama M. RHOA mutation in diffuse-type gastric cancer: a comparative clinicopathology analysis of 87 cases. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19(2):403–11.
Uzunparmak B, Gao M, Lindemann A, Erikson K, Wang L, Lin E, Frank SJ, Gleber-Netto FO, Zhao M, Skinner HD, Newton J, Sikora AG, Myers JN, Pickering CR. Caspase-8 loss radiosensitizes head and neck squamous cell carcinoma to SMAC mimetic-induced necroptosis. JCI Insight. 2020; 5(23).
Van Dyne EA, Henley SJ, Saraiya M, Thomas CC, Markowitz LE, Benard VB. Trends in human papillomavirus-associated cancers—United States, 1999–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(33):918–24.
van Ginkel JH, Huibers MMH, van Es RJJ, de Bree R, Willems SM. Droplet digital PCR for detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA in plasma of head and neck cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):428.
Velleuer E, Dietrich R. Fanconi anemia: young patients at high risk for squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2014;1(1):9.
Veyer D, Wack M, Mandavit M, Garrigou S, Hans S, Bonfils P, Tartour E, Bélec L, Wang-Renault SF, Laurent-Puig P, Mirghani H, Rance B, Taly V, Badoual C, Péré H. HPV circulating tumoral DNA quantification by droplet-based digital PCR: a promising predictive and prognostic biomarker for HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers. Int J Cancer. 2020;147(4):1222–7.
Wan JCM, Massie C, Garcia-Corbacho J, Mouliere F, Brenton JD, Caldas C, Pacey S, Baird R, Rosenfeld N. Liquid biopsies come of age: towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17(4):223–38.
Wan Y, Vagenas D, Salazar C, Kenny L, Perry C, Calvopiña D, Punyadeera C. Salivary miRNA panel to detect HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8(59):99990–100001.
Wang T, Ruan S, Zhao X, Shi X, Teng H, Zhong J, You M, Xia K, Sun Z, Mao F. OncoVar: an integrated database and analysis platform for oncogenic driver variants in cancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D1289–301.
Wang Y, Springer S, Mulvey CL, Silliman N, Schaefer J, Sausen M, James N, Rettig EM, Guo T, Pickering CR, Bishop JA, Chung CH, Califano JA, Eisele DW, Fakhry C, Gourin CG, Ha PK, Kang H, Kiess A, Koch WM, Myers JN, Quon H, Richmon JD, Sidransky D, Tufano RP, Westra WH, Bettegowda C, Diaz LA Jr, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Agrawal N. Detection of somatic mutations and HPV in the saliva and plasma of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(293):293104.
Wang Y, Zhao Y, Bollas A, Wang Y, Au KF. Nanopore sequencing technology, bioinformatics and applications. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(11):1348–65.
Wen Y, Li H, Zeng Y, Wen W, Pendleton KP, Lui VW, Egloff AM, Grandis JR. MAPK1E322K mutation increases head and neck squamous cell carcinoma sensitivity to erlotinib through enhanced secretion of amphiregulin. Oncotarget. 2016;7(17):23300–11.
Wilson HL, D’Agostino RB Jr, Meegalla N, Petro R, Commander S, Topaloglu U, Zhang W, Porosnicu M. The prognostic and therapeutic value of the mutational profile of blood and tumor tissue in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncologist. 2021;26(2):e279–89.
Young LS, Dawson CW. Epstein-Barr virus and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Cancer. 2014;33(12):581–90.
Yu MC, Yuan JM. Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol. 2002;12(6):421–9.
Acknowledgements
Figure 1 was created using Servier Medical Art templates, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License; https://smart.servier.com. Figure 2 was created using https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/. Figure 3 was created using Flaticon, https://www.flaticon.com/
Funding
Chamindie Punyadeera is currently receiving funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP 2002576 and APP 2012560), Cancer Australia (APP1145657), Garnette Passe and Rodney Williams Foundation, NIH R21 and the RBWH Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CP, PL, PD, SV, LZ, SS, GP contributed to the conceptualization of the review. XH, CP, PL, PD contributed to collect information from PubMed databases. XH, PD, PL contributed to construct tables. XH and CP contributed to draw diagrams by using the Servier Medical Art templates and the Flaticon. XH and CP drafted the review. CP, PL, PD, SS, GP, SV, LZ corrected and proofread the paper. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, X., Duijf, P.H.G., Sriram, S. et al. Circulating tumour DNA alterations: emerging biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Biomed Sci 30, 65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-023-00953-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-023-00953-z