Introduction

Clostridium perfringens is a spore-forming and gram-positive anaerobic bacterium that could cause gas gangrene, food poisoning, and necrotizing enteritis in humans and animals [1, 2]. C. perfringens is classified into seven types (from A to G) according to the combination of the six typing toxins: α-toxin (CPA), β-toxin (CPB), ε-toxin (ETX), ι-toxin (ITX), enterotoxin (CPE), and NetB [3]. It also produces non-typing toxins such as β2-toxin (CPB2), BEC, and NetF that are considered to be associated with specific diseases [4]. The toxin-based typing methods are widely used to investigate the epidemiology, causes, and diagnosis of C. perfringens infections. However, this method has intrinsic defects in discriminating particular C. perfringens subtypes from distinctpathotypes [5, 6]. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) has been extensively applied as the gold standard method for bacteria typing and bacterial population genetics analysis [7]. MLST analysis was performed based on sequencing of eight housekeeping genes of C. perfringens for generating different sequence types and clonal complexes [8]. There are two main groups of housekeeping genes that have been used in the MLST analysis of C. perfringens. The first group of housekeeping genes is plc, dut, glpK, gmk, sod, tpi, ddlA and recA which were first used by Jost for C. perfringens in 2006 [8], and the other is the PubMLST database which uses gyrB, sigK, sodA, groEL, pgk, nadA, colA, and plc, and the former group of housekeeping genes is more widely used than the latter.

Over the past few decades, multidrug resistance strains of C. perfringens are increasingly reported in humans and animals which may be caused by the abuse of antibiotics [9, 10]. It has been reported that C. perfringens showed high percentages of resistance to tetracycline, erythromycin, lincomycin, neomycin, erythromycin, and sulfonamides in various types of animals around the world, and exhibited varying degrees of resistance to enrofloxacin, penicillin, fluoroquinolones, and doxycycline [11,12,13,14]. Recently, the novel plasmid-borne ABC transporter gene optrA identified from C. perfringens isolates of animal origin conferred combined resistance to antimicrobial agents in clinics including oxazolidinones and phenicols [15]. The increasing antibiotic resistance of C. perfringens in different animals should raise awareness of global public health security and their control strategy.

Wildlife serves as a potential reservoir for antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and there is a strong correlation between the resistant strains carried by wild birds and those found in human and animal isolates [16,17,18]. Some studies have shown that wild birds have the potential to transmit C. perfringens to poultry [18]. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria can be transmitted to humans through direct contact with infected wild birds or indirectly through exposure to polluted environmental components [19]. Although C. perfringens is widely present in humans, food, and livestock animals [20,21,22,23], there are still limited data on C. perfringens in wild birds and the threat to public health posed by wild birds carrying C. perfringens cannot be ignored. Here, we investigated the prevalence, toxin type, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and genetic diversity of C. perfringens from different wild birds in Beijing, China. This epidemiological investigation on C. perfringens in wild birds provided a reference for monitoring multidrug-resistant bacteria in wildlife.

Material and method

Sample collection and DNA extraction

A total of 328 fecal samples from Night heron (Nycticorax nycticorax), Grey heron (Ardea cinerea), Bar-headed geese (Anser indicus), Swan goose (Anser cygnoides), Mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos), Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus), Daurian jackdaw (Corvus dauuricus) were collected from different wetland park in Beijing, China, between 2022.12 and 2023.04 (winter and spring). Among them, grey herons, night herons, mallard duck and swan geese are migratory birds, while the others are non-migratory birds. Fecal samples were collected into sterile tubes and mixed with PBS buffer and then inoculated on selective Tryptose Sulfite Cycloserine (TSC) agar medium, the single colonies were picked and cultured in Fluid Thioglycollate Medium (FTG). Genomic DNA of cultured bacteria was extracted with TIANamp bacteria DNA kit (TIANGEN Biotech CO., LTD, Beijing) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Toxin gene detection

Multiplex PCR was used to examine the presence of the cpa, cpb, etx, iap, cpe, netB, and cpb2 genes from the isolates (Table 1) [24, 25]. Four reference strains including C. perfringens Type A (CVCC 2015), C. perfringens Type B (CVCC 54), C. perfringens Type C (CVCC 1153), and C. perfringens Type D (CVCC 60,201) from our previous studies were used as positive controls for toxin typing [26]. Electrophoresis was performed on a 1% agarose gel with Gel Red using standard procedures.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

The susceptibility of the C. perfringens isolates to 11 antimicrobial agents (Meropenem, tetracycline, ceftriaxone, penicillin, ampicillin, levofloxacin, piperacillin, erythromycin, Gentamycin, chloramphenicol, and lincomycin) was determined based on the broth micro dilution method suggested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [27]. In brief, we employed a 96-well microplate covered with FTG, and each well was dispensed with 100 µL antibiotic and 100 µL C. perfringens. The plates were incubated at 37℃ for 24 h in an anaerobic atmosphere. The MIC values were defined as the lowest concentration that produces complete inhibition of C. perfringens. The susceptibility results were interpreted according to the CLSI 2019 guidelines [27].

Sequencing of housekeeping genes

According to the C. perfringens MLST method established by Hibberd et al. and Jost et al [8, 28], eight housekeeping genes (plcdutglpKgmksodtpiddlArecA) were selected for PCR amplification (Table 1). PCR assays were performed in the final volume of 50µL containing 25µL of 2×PCR Taq Mastermix; 1µL of each primer (10mmol/L); 1µL of DNA template, and 22µL double-distilled water. Reactions were performed with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, at 94 °C for 30s, at 55 °C for 60s and at 72 °C for 60s, followed by 35 cycles and a final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. Then the PCR products were sequenced by Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), and the same primers were used for amplification and sequencing.

MLST and evolutionary relationship analysis

The genetic relationship of 57 isolates of C. perfringens from wild birds were analyzed using MLST. The above-mentioned sequencing nucleotide sequences of the eight housekeeping genes were aligned and processed using BioNumerics 7.6 software to create an allele database, and sequence type (ST) was given to each strain. The minimum spanning tree was plotted using the minimum spanning tree method in BioNumerics software. This method is based on the allelic differences between different ST types, in which isolates with at least seven alleles being the same are defined as clone complex (CC), and both ST and CC are considered MLST subtypes [28]. Simpson’s diversity index (Ds) was also used to assess the genetic diversity of the isolates [29,30,31].

Result

Occurrence and toxin types of C. perfringens

A total of 57 strains of C. perfringens were isolated from the 328 fecal samples of wild birds with a recovery rate of 17.38%. The positive rates varied greatly in different hosts, ranging from 2.32% (Daurian jackdaw) to 54.76% (Grey heron) (Table 2). All isolates of different regions were identified as C. perfringens type A, which means that cpb, etx, iap, cpe, and netB toxin genes were not detected in all isolates. The high detection rate of the cpb2 gene in all C. perfringens isolates was 70.18% (40/57) (Table 2).

Table 1 Prevalence and toxin gene profiles of C. Perfringens isolates from different host

Antibiotic resistance profiles

The most common resistance phenotypes observed in the C. perfringens isolates were against gentamycin (89.47%), followed by tetracycline (31.58%), lincomycin (29.82%), and erythromycin (22.80%), as detailed in the Table 2. It is worth noting that all the isolates tested showed susceptibility to piperacillin and meropenem. And other antibiotics also exhibited relatively high sensitivity including ampicillin (92.98%), chloramphenicol (94.73%), levofloxacin (98.25%), ceftriaxone (94.73%), and penicillin (98.25%). Among the C. perfringens isolates tested, 22.80% (13/57) were classified as multidrug-resistant strains, which were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Additionally, 14.03% (8/57) of the isolates were resistant to four commonly used antibiotics, and one isolate was even resistant to five antibiotics. (Figures 1 and 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The resistance spectrum of C. perfringens strains to various antibiotic combinations. Abbreviations, ERY-Erythromycin, GEN-Gentamicin, LIN-Lincomycin, TET-Tetracycline.PG- Penicillin, CEF- Ceftriaxone

Table 2 MICs distributions of 57 C. perfringens isolates against 11 antimicrobial agents

MLST analysis

MLST result showed that the average number of alleles for all analyzed loci was 20.1. As shown in Fig. 2, the ddla gene exhibited the highest level of polymorphism with 40 alleles, while the gmk gene had the lowest level of polymorphism with only 10 alleles. In total, 57 isolates of C. perfringens were analyzed and classified into 55 STs, of which 23 isolates from grey heron were divided into 22 STs and 21 isolates from night heron were divided into 21 STs. Among these, ST2 included two strains isolated from grey herons, ST21 contained two strains isolated from swan geese, and the remaining 53 STs each consisted of a single strain. The Ds of all isolates in ST was 0.9812, indicating a high level of genetic diversity within C. perfringens from wild birds.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A total of 57 strains of C. perfringens from different sources were analyzed by constructing an MLST-minimal spanning tree. The minimum spanning tree was constructed using the Bionumerics software (Bionumerics, version 7.0). The shaded section represents eight clone complexes. The number of the circle represents the sequence type; different colors represent different hosts

The minimum spanning tree mainly consisted of eight clonal complexes (CC1-CC8), accounting for 43.9% (25/57) of the examined isolates from different birds. As is shown in Fig. 3, CC1 was the largest CC, contained 7 (12.3%, 7/57) strains (ST19, ST20, ST21, ST22, ST23 and ST34). All the strains isolated from swan goose were clustered in CC1, and ST34 isolated from night heron was also clustered in CC1. CC2 contained 6 (10.5%, 6/57) strains (ST2, ST8, ST12, ST27, ST36) from grey heron (n = 4), night heron (n = 1), and mallard duck (n = 1). CC3 contained 4 (7.0% 4/57) strains (ST3, ST9, ST13, ST18) from grey heron (n = 3) and mallard duck (n = 1), the other CCs (CC4-CC8) only contained 2 strains. Moreover, 32 (56.1%, 32/57) STs were identified as singletons and did not belong to any CC, including the only isolates from Indian peafowl and bar-headed geese.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenetic tree and allelic profiles of 57 Clostridium perfringens sequence types (STs)

Discussion

According to our results, C. perfringens was isolated in 17.38% of 328 fecal samples in Beijing, China, which was slightly lower than that from captive wild birds in India (22.5%) [32]. In general, the carriage rates of C. perfringens varied significantly among bird species, especially Indian peafowl (3.70%) and Daurian jackdaw (2.32%), which had very low rates. In terms of lifestyle, migratory wild birds had higher carriage rates than non-migratory birds, and aquatic birds had higher rates than terrestrial birds. It is tentatively hypothesized that the variation in the prevalence of C. perfringens in different wild birds is due to ecological factors such as feeding habits, habitat preferences and migration patterns. C. perfringens was found to be isolated in all seven species of wild birds, suggesting that wild birds could potentially serve as a reservoir for this bacterium. All the isolates were genotyped for the toxins, and the type A separation rate is 100%, which is in accordance with earlier reports regarding the global dominance of type A [33,34,35,36]. Furthermore, the β2 toxin was accounting for 70.18% of all the isolates, which are encoded by the cpb2 gene and can be produced by all types of C. perfringens. There is currently no clear consensus on the pathogenicity of the β2 toxin and its role in disease, as it may be associated with various diseases. It has been found that the expression level of the cpb2 gene is significantly higher in children with autism compared to normal children [37, 38]. Bueschel et al. found the majority of isolates from cases of porcine enteritis and porcine neonatal enteritis were 85% and 91.8% positive for cpb2 gene, respectively [39].

Previous studies have shown that antibiotic resistance of C. perfringens varies significantly between different countries. In Egypt, 100% of the strains of C. perfringens were found to be resistant to lincomycin, which is significantly higher than the strains in this study (29.82%) [40]. The resistance rate of the C. perfringens strains to tetracycline observed in this study (31.58%) was found to be similar to that reported in India (27.5%) but much lower than the rates observed in Korea (100%) [32, 41]. C. perfringens strains have exhibited high resistance to gentamicin in many studies [29, 40], with the resistance levels approaching nearly 100%, and high resistance rates were also observed in the present study (89.47%). Moreover, treatment of C. perfringens from equine with gentamicin or streptomycin could induce expression of the β2 toxin and lead to a more accentuated and fatal progression of equine typhlocolitis [42]. β-lactams, as an antibacterial with strong susceptibility to C. perfringens, play an important role in the treatment of C. perfringens disease in animals [43]. More than 90% of the isolates in this experiment were sensitive to all three β-lactam antibiotics. Considering the rising rate of antimicrobial resistance, there is a need for continuous monitoring of the antimicrobial susceptibility of C. perfringens in wild birds to minimize resistance trends for effective prevention and treatment of associated diseases.

The prevalence of multi-resistant strains in wild birds (22.80%) was relatively lower compared to those isolated from animals [29,30,31], meat products [20] and human clinics [10], probably due to the extensive use of antibiotics in animal husbandry and human healthcare, whereas wild birds have limited direct exposure to antibiotics, resulting in less antibiotic pressure on the bacteria they harbor. Even though the prevalence of multi-resistant strains may be lower in wild birds, the potential risk of wild birds carrying drug-resistant bacteria should not be overlooked.

MLST is usually used for comparing the genetic evolution of C. perfringens in animals, and the housekeeping genes used for MLST analysis of C. perfringens varied from study to study. In addition to the two groups of housekeeping genes described in the introduction, Hibberd used eight housekeeping genes, ddl, dnaK, glpK, recA, gyrA, groEL, tpi and plc for MLST analysis of the strain [28], and we were unable to compare them with the strains in their studies, which is a shortcoming of this typing method. In order to better analyze the genetic diversity of the strains carried by wild birds, we compared them to strains from studies that used the same housekeeping genes. In our study, 57 isolates from different wild birds were composed of 55 STs, 7 CCs and the Ds is 0.9812. Xu et analyzed 74 strains of C. perfringens from chicken and found an average of 29 alleles, 65 STs, 11 CCs and the Ds is 0.9799 [31]. Li et analyzed 85 strains of C. perfringens from duck and encompassed 54 STs, 5 CCs and the Ds is 0.9556 [12]. By comparing the Simpson Diversity Index, the diversity of sequence types of wild birds was obviously higher than the strain isolated from other poultry. The reason for this maybe that wild birds have a greater range and can be infected by C. perfringens through contact with different animals or objects compared to the intensive breeding of poultry, and therefore have a higher genetic diversity.

The present study found that CC1 includes all the strains isolated from swan geese, indicating a relatively conserved genetic diversity within the swan goose population. The proximity and social interactions within flocks create a conducive environment for the exchange of bacteria among individuals, potentially leading to the spread and maintenance of specific genetic lineages within the swan goose community. The isolates from grey heron and night heron were scattered in different CCs, the sole isolate of mallard duck and a strain isolated from night heron formed the CC8, while neither the strains from the black swan nor the blue peacock participated in any of the CCs. These results indicated that strains of C. perfringens from wild birds exhibited a high degree of genetic variability across different host species, reflecting the complexity of transmission dynamics and evolutionary pressures within different ecological niches. In addition, the cpb2 gene was widely distributed among C. perfringens populations in diverse bird hosts without specific relatedness. The limitations of the present study were that only one strain of C. perfringens was isolated from bar-headed geese, Indian peafowl and Daurian jackdaw, and these few strains of C. perfringens were not sufficient to represent all the strains from these birds.

Conclusion

In summary, this is the first study that reported the prevalence, toxin type, antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of C. perfringens from wild birds in Beijing, China. The result indicates that C. perfringens exhibits a wide range of host adaptations, varying degrees of antimicrobial resistance, and a high degree of genetic diversity in wild birds. However, further studies are needed to link the occurrence of C. perfringens in wild birds to human C. perfringens cases and transmission to other animals.