Background

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a well-recognised complication in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), with a reported incidence of up to 73% after closed or open reduction [1,2,3,4,5]. The sequalae following osteonecrosis includes proximal femoral growth disturbance, femoral head collapse and inhibition of acetabular remodelling, all of which can predispose to early onset osteoarthritis.

In prior research we showed that young adults with osteonecrosis secondary to DDH demonstrated minimal overall physical disability and a normal quality of life; however their hip function was reduced in the presence of osteonecrosis grades III and IV according to Bucholz and Ogden [6]. This previous study excluded patients that had received total hip arthroplasty (THA). To date, there is no literature concerning factors necessitating THA in patients with osteonecrosis secondary to open or closed reductions in DDH.

Whilst modern THA implants in young adults have shown promising functional outcomes and revision rates [7, 8], it is not without its risks and there is high chance of requiring revision in one’s lifetime. It is therefore important to understand the incidence of THA following this complication and the risk factors that necessitate it. This will help us to better inform our patients as well as identify those who might be at higher risk, which may influence surveillance and treatment options to improve hip biomechanics and delay need for THA [9].

The aims of this study were to describe [1] the incidence of THA in patients with osteonecrosis secondary to DDH [2], associations between radiographic parameters and the need for THA, and [3] the characteristics of patients who underwent THA.

Methods

The local Research Ethics Committee approved this study (REC 14/LO/1267). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients over the age of 16 years and written informed consent was obtained from parent/guardians of those under the age of 16 years.

We included patients with a diagnosis of DDH who had received a closed reduction or open reduction with or without osteotomy between 1995 and 2005 and who subsequently developed osteonecrosis. All patients were treated in two tertiary centres and were identified from our previous study [6] with no change in the study population.

Of 140 patients included, 29 had bilateral osteonecrosis, encompassing a total of 169 hips. Of these, 24 hips (14%) proceeded to arthroplasty, whereas two patients received bilateral THA (Fig. 1). The mean age at the time of THA was 21.3 years (range, 16–29 years) (Table 4 in Appendix 1). Another two patients (1%) underwent hip arthrodesis at ages 9 and 12 years. These patients were not representative of the study group and therefore excluded from further analysis. We compared patient-characteristics including sex, laterality, number of prior operations and age at study between patients with and without THA.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram showing patient eligibility and participation. THA, total hip arthroplasty

All participants had a standing AP pelvic radiograph at the time of our previous study assessment in 2017 [6]. In cases where THA had already been undertaken, their latest AP pelvic radiograph prior to hip replacement was used. In one case radiographs prior to THA were not available, therefore radiographic analysis was only performed for 23 hips in the THA group. All radiographs were carried out using a standardised protocol on a digital imaging system (GE Medical Systems Ltd., Buckinghamshire, UK) (Fig. 2). Grade of osteonecrosis was assessed according to Bucholz-Ogden [10]. Grade I changes are limited to the femoral head with hypoplasia of the femoral head but normal ossification of the metaphysis. In Grade II, the lateral metaphysis is injured and the femoral head will grow into valgus. For Grade III, the entire metaphysis is involved resulting in shortening of the femoral neck with trochanteric overgrowth. An injury or defect along the medial metaphysis is present in Grade IV causing varus of the proximal femur (Fig. 3). Osteoarthritis was graded according to Kellgren-Lawrence [11]. Acetabular dysplasia was quantified by measuring the centre-edge angle of Wiberg [12] and the acetabular angle of Sharp [13]. All radiographs were assessed by two independent reviewers as outlined previously [6]. Interrater reliability was deemed excellent for the centre-edge and acetabular angles (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.86), and moderate for the Kellgren-Lawrence (κ = 0.62) and Bucholz-Ogden (κ = 0.64) grading. Consensus was obtained with the senior author (AR) in the case of any disagreements [6]. All patients that underwent THA had their clinical assessment and surgery under the same surgeon (AHN).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A A pelvic radiograph obtained 15 years after open reduction, Salter innominate osteotomy and femoral varus de-rotation osteotomy. It shows grade III osteonecrosis of the left hip in a 17-year-old girl. There is total femoral head involvement, marked acetabular dysplasia and subluxation of the hip. She had a positive Trendelenburg gait and 1 cm difference in leg lengths. B Pelvic radiograph of the same patient 5 years post THA, performed at age 18 years

Fig. 3
figure 3

Radiographs representing Grade I, Grade II, Grade III, and Grade IV (from left to right) of the Bucholz-Ogden classification for osteonecrosis secondary to DDH

Clinical information for the patients that received THA was collected by reviewing the electronic patient records, specifically looking at factors that may influence need for THA. This included the nature of their previous operations of the same hip, co-morbidities [14], medications [15], smoking status [16], drug or alcohol abuse [17, 18], clinical symptoms prior to THA such as pain and walking ability, and examination findings prior to THA [19, 20]. In two cases the exact nature of their previous operations could not be identified.

We compared groups using chi square or Fisher’s exact test and Student’s t test as appropriate. We used univariable logistic regression to examine associations between radiographic characteristics and need for THA. Because ‘subluxation’ is a known risk factor for early hip failure, we tested the effect of osteonecrosis adjusted for subluxation using Firth’s penalised likelihood estimates [21]. We estimated the cumulative occurrence of THA over time using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. We repeated the analysis by randomly excluding of one side in bilateral cases to assess non-independence in these patients, which did not result in any significant change to the reported results [22, 23]. In sensitivity analyses we accounted for potentially missed cases of THA (e.g. those performed in other hospitals, thus unknown to us): we repeated the analyses and randomly selected subjects) into the THA group at 17%, 20%, 22% and 25%; this did not change the estimates of effect. All data were analysed using GraphPad® Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, California, USA).

Results

By age 34 years 24 THA (14%) were observed, two patients (9%) underwent bilateral THA (Fig. 4). In one case these were performed one month apart, and in the other they were performed 28 months apart. One patient (4%) had bilateral osteonecrosis where only a single side warranted THA.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Graph showing the cumulative occurrence of THA (solid line) and 95% confidence interval (dotted line)

Patients with THA were older at the time of study assessment by 3 ± 1 years (p = 0.0003); but they were similar in terms of sex (p = 0.308), laterality (p = 0.635) and number of prior operations (p = 0.227) (Table 1).

Table 1 Group differences based on univariate analysis

Factors associated with THA included osteonecrosis of grade III (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.70–10.77; p = 0.0019); osteoarthritis of grade IV (OR 21.78, 95% CI 7.55–68.11; p < 0.0001); and subluxation (OR 8.22, 95% CI 2.91–29.53, p = 0.0003) (Table 2). A lower neck-shaft angle was weakly associated with THA (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93–0.99; p = 0.0262), which was lost on sensitivity analysis beyond an assumption of any additional patients undergoing THA. Markers of acetabular dysplasia were not associated with THA. The effect of grade III osteonecrosis remained (p = 0.0026) when the analysis was adjusted for subluxation of the hip.

Table 2 Radiographic results based on univariate analysis

Of the hips requiring THA, 11 hips (46%) were reduced closed and 10 (42%) were reduced open. Two hips (8%) received proximal femoral osteotomy only, four hips (17%) received pelvic osteotomy only and eight hips (33%) underwent both proximal femoral and pelvic osteotomy (Table 3). There was no identified association between those that received closed versus open reduction and grade of osteonecrosis or osteoarthritis.

Thirteen patients (59%) had no co-morbidities, five patients (23%) had obesity (BMI > 30), one patient had hypermobility, one had IgA nephropathy following Henoch-Schönlein Purpura, one had asthma and one had bilateral talipes equinovarus. One patient was a smoker (20 cigarettes per day). There was no mention of alcohol or illicit drug use in any of these cases. Average BMI was 25 (range 17 to 41) (Table 3).

Nineteen patients (86%) had reported severe pain prior to THA, including night pain in 16 patients (72%). In the remaining three patients, two were predominantly troubled by stiffness and one experienced pain in conjunction with a 5 cm leg length discrepancy. Reduced mobility, with an inability to walk beyond one mile or 10 min, was reported in 17 cases (77%). A positive Trendelenburg test indicating poor abductor function was reported in six cases (Table 3).

Table 3 Characteristics of 22 patients at the time of receiving THA

Discussion

Osteonecrosis, or physeal arrest, is a serious complication in the treatment of DDH and occurs in up to 73% of cases [1,2,3,4,5]. Whilst its pathogenesis is unknown, risks factors include age at index surgery [24], perioperative injury to the proximal femoral blood supply [25], and an eccentric position of the femoral head in plaster [26]. Our previous study showed overall high scores in patient-reported outcomes at a mean age of 21 years [6]. However, in 18 patients their function was so poor that they had received THA. Since then, a further four patients in this study population have also deteriorated to the point of needing a THA. We wanted to conduct an in-depth analysis of these 24 patients in order to discern common features resulting in THA.

14% of our patients required a THA by age 34 years, some of which were performed as early as 16 years of age. Naturally, the dominating features necessitating THA included severe osteoarthritis in 74% of cases, subluxation of the hip in 83% of cases and grade III osteonecrosis in 52%.

Grade III osteonecrosis according to Bucholz-Ogden is characterised by complete physeal arrest with femoral neck shortening (coxa breva), femoral head flattening (coxa plana) and relative overgrowth of the greater trochanter. It is thus regarded the most severe form of osteonecrosis, not only in terms of morphology but also in terms of functional outcomes [2, 27]. Furthermore, slower acetabular remodelling has previously been observed in dysplastic hips with grade III osteonecrosis [28].

There was no association between grade IV osteonecrosis and the need for THA. This may be confounded by the relatively smaller number of patients with this grade of osteonecrosis in this study.

In contrast, grade II osteonecrosis, which is characterised by lateral physeal arrest and coxa valga, had a protective effect against need for THA. One explanation for this is that such hips would have been more likely to receive varus osteotomies of the proximal femur leading to improved femoral head coverage and joint congruency. This, in turn, would optimise the biomechanics with reduced stress loading and instability [28].

A broken Shenton’s line has been demonstrated to be an accurate radiographic predictor of femoral head subluxation [29]. This has been linked to increased acetabular lateral edge loading and subsequent development of osteoarthritis [30], hence resulting in increased need for THA. From our dataset, 78% of all patients with grade III or IV osteoarthritis displayed a subluxated hip.

A lower neck shaft angle was weakly associated with need for THA. However, this association was lost during sensitivity analysis. Coxa vara in the context of osteonecrosis is frequently associated with additional morphological changes including coxa plana, trochanteric overgrowth and leg length discrepancy, all of which can contribute to development of osteoarthritis, rather than lower NSA being an independent risk factor in itself [31].

Notably, the association between acetabular dysplasia and the need for THA was of borderline statistical significance in this study. Roposch et al. [32] established that in hips with DDH, osteonecrosis reduced acetabular remodelling to a degree that was linked with an increased risk for osteoarthritis.

These factors combined result in development of osteoarthritis. Severe osteoarthritis subsequently results in increasing pain and stiffness, with resultant reduction in mobility, function, and overall quality of life. Validity studies have demonstrated a clear relationship between radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence score, clinical symptoms of hip osteoarthritis including pain and reduced range of motion, and need for THA [33, 34]. Clinically, patients in our cohort required THA due to severe and debilitating hip pain including at night, stiffness, and significant reduction in mobility (to less than 1 mile or 10 min).

Osteonecrosis can result in overgrowth of the greater trochanter with resultant shortening of the abductor lever arm and hence abductor muscle weakness. Whilst some patients in this group had a positive Trendelenburg test to indicate poor abductor function, this was not a clear theme for all patients that underwent THA. Hence, poor abductor function does not appear to be an independent factor associated with need for THA.

There are limitations to this study. Notably, comparative data was only available for radiographic information and number of previous operations, and could not be obtained for clinical parameters due to the retrospective nature of this study. Radiographic markers were limited to a single snapshot in time. The Bucholz-Ogden classification of osteonecrosis secondary to DDH has been reported to have variable interrater reliability, particularly when distinguishing between grades I and II, therefore results should be interpreted with caution [35]. Furthermore, the study design only allows for association rather than true causal relationship. Bias from bilateral cases and potential missed cases was accounted for with no significant change in the reported results.

Whilst this study provides some interesting insights into the factors associated with increased need for THA, further prospective data collection over time is warranted to better explore these associations.

Conclusions

This study identified a 14% incidence of THA by age 34 years in patients with osteonecrosis secondary to DDH following previous closed or open reduction. Associated factors include Bucholz-Ogden grade III osteonecrosis, Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV osteoarthritis and subluxation of the hip. Hips at risk of THA should be reviewed more closely and if symptomatic, discussed with a young adult hip unit with respect to whether further hip preservation surgery should be undertaken so as not to compromise the results of a THA. Furthermore, these findings emphasise the importance to avoid osteonecrosis when treating DDH.