1 Introduction

Let λ be a complex number with λ1. Frobenius [1] studied in great detail the so-called Frobenius-Euler polynomials H n (x|λ) satisfying the following exponential generating function:

1 λ e t λ e x t = n = 0 H n (x|λ) t n n ! .
(1.1)

In particular, H n (λ)= H n (0|λ) are called the Frobenius-Euler numbers. In fact, the Frobenius-Euler polynomials can also be defined recursively by the Frobenius-Euler numbers, as follows:

H n (x|λ)= k = 0 n ( n k ) H k (λ) x n k (n0),
(1.2)

where the Frobenius-Euler numbers obey the recurrence relation

H 0 (λ)=1, ( H ( λ ) + 1 ) n H n (λ)={ 1 λ , n = 0 , 0 , n 1 ,
(1.3)

with the usual convention about replacing H n (λ) by H n (λ). For some interesting arithmetic properties of the Frobenius-Euler polynomials and numbers, one is referred to [213].

Some analogues of the Frobenius-Euler polynomials are the classical Bernoulli polynomials B n (x) and Euler polynomials E n (x). They are usually defined by the following exponential generating functions:

t e x t e t 1 = n = 0 B n (x) t n n ! and 2 e x t e t + 1 = n = 0 E n (x) t n n ! .
(1.4)

Especially, the rational numbers B n = B n (0) and integers E n = 2 n E n (1/2) are called the classical Bernoulli numbers and Euler numbers, respectively. These numbers and polynomials play important roles in many different areas of mathematics including number theory, combinatorics, special functions and analysis. Numerous interesting properties for them can be found in many books; see, for example, [1417]. Obviously the Frobenius-Euler polynomials give the classical Euler polynomials when λ=1 in (1.1).

In [15], Nielsen investigated three formulae of products of the classical Bernoulli and Euler polynomials. In particular, Nielsen showed that for positive integers m, n,

B m ( x ) B n ( x ) = k = 0 { n ( m 2 k ) + n ( n 2 k ) } B 2 k B m + n 2 k ( x ) m + n 2 k + ( 1 ) m + 1 m ! n ! ( m + n ) ! B m + n ,
(1.5)

which was reobtained by Carlitz [18] applying a different method. For further discoveries of Nielsen’s formulae on the classical Bernoulli and Euler polynomials, see [1923] for details. In [24], Carlitz explored some formulae of products of the Frobenius-Euler polynomials and obtained that for non-negative integers m, n,

H m ( x | λ ) H n ( x | μ ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 m ( m k ) H k ( λ ) H m + n k ( x | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n ( n k ) H k ( μ ) H m + n k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 H m + n ( x | λ μ ) ,
(1.6)

when λ1, μ1, λμ1, and if λ1, then for positive integer m and non-negative integer n,

B m ( x ) H n ( x | λ ) = k = 0 m ( m k ) B k H m + n k ( x | λ ) λ λ 1 m k = 0 n ( n k ) H k ( λ ) H m + n k 1 ( x | λ ) + m H m + n 1 ( x | λ ) ,
(1.7)

and if λ0,1, then for positive integers m, n,

H m ( x | λ ) H n ( x | 1 λ ) = ( λ 1 ) k = 1 m ( m k ) H k ( λ ) B m + n + 1 k ( x ) m + n + 1 k + ( 1 λ 1 ) k = 1 n ( n k ) H k ( 1 λ ) B m + n + 1 k ( x ) m + n + 1 k + ( 1 ) n ( λ 1 ) m ! n ! ( m + n + 1 ) ! H m + n + 1 ( λ ) .
(1.8)

Further, Carlitz [24] showed that the case λ=1 in (1.7) and (1.8) can be used to give the expression of B m (x) E n (x) and E m (x) E n (x) stated in [15], respectively.

Motivated by the work of Carlitz [24], in the present paper we establish some new formulae of products of the Frobenius-Euler polynomials by applying the generating function methods and some summation transform techniques. It turns out that some known results including (1.6), (1.7) and (1.8) are obtained as special cases.

2 Restatement of the main results

In this section, we shall establish three new formulae of products of the Frobenius-Euler polynomials to extend formulae (1.6), (1.7) and (1.8) by making use of the generating function methods. As further applications, we also give some new sum relations of products of the Frobenius-Euler polynomials by applying some summation transform techniques, which are analogous to some sum relations of products of the classical Euler polynomials and Frobenius-Euler polynomials stated in [9, 25]. For convenience, in the following we shall denote by H n the harmonic number of order n given by

H 0 =0and H n = k = 1 n 1 k =1+ 1 2 ++ 1 n (n1).
(2.1)

We now state our main results as follows.

Theorem 2.1 Let m, n be non-negative integers. Then, for λ1, μ1, λμ1,

H m ( x | λ ) H n ( y | μ ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 m ( m k ) H m k ( x y | λ ) H n + k ( y | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( y x | μ ) H m + k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 m ( m k ) ( x y ) m k H n + k ( y | λ μ ) .
(2.2)

Proof Observe that

1 λ e u 1 1 μ e v 1 = ( λ e u λ e u 1 + 1 μ e v 1 ) 1 λ μ e u + v 1 .
(2.3)

If we multiply (λ1)(μ1) e x u + y v on both sides of (2.3), then

( λ 1 ) e x u λ e u 1 ( μ 1 ) e y v μ e v 1 = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 ( λ 1 ) e ( 1 + x y ) u λ e u 1 ( λ μ 1 ) e y ( u + v ) λ μ e u + v 1 + λ 1 λ μ 1 ( μ 1 ) e ( y x ) v μ e v 1 ( λ μ 1 ) e x ( u + v ) λ μ e u + v 1 .
(2.4)

Note that from (1.1) we have

λ 1 λ e u 1 e x u = 1 1 λ e u 1 λ e x u = m = 0 H m ( x | 1 λ ) u m m ! .
(2.5)

More generally, the Taylor theorem gives

λ 1 λ e u + v 1 e x ( u + v ) = n = 0 n u n ( λ 1 λ e u 1 e x u ) v n n ! = m = 0 n = 0 H m + n ( x | 1 λ ) u m m ! v n n ! .
(2.6)

By applying (2.5) and (2.6) to (2.4), we obtain

m = 0 n = 0 H m ( x | 1 λ ) H n ( y | 1 μ ) u m m ! v n n ! = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 ( m = 0 H m ( 1 + x y | 1 λ ) u m m ! ) ( m = 0 n = 0 H m + n ( y | 1 λ μ ) u m m ! v n n ! ) + λ 1 λ μ 1 ( n = 0 H n ( y x | 1 μ ) v n n ! ) ( m = 0 n = 0 H m + n ( x | 1 λ μ ) u m m ! v n n ! ) .
(2.7)

It follows from (2.7) and the Cauchy product that

m = 0 n = 0 H m ( x | 1 λ ) H n ( y | 1 μ ) u m m ! v n n ! = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 m = 0 n = 0 [ k = 0 m ( m k ) H m k ( 1 + x y | 1 λ ) H n + k ( y | 1 λ μ ) ] u m m ! v n n ! + λ 1 λ μ 1 m = 0 n = 0 [ k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( y x | 1 μ ) H m + k ( x | 1 λ μ ) ] u m m ! v n n ! .
(2.8)

Comparing the coefficients of u m v n /m!n! in (2.8) gives

H m ( x | 1 λ ) H n ( y | 1 μ ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 m ( m k ) H m k ( 1 + x y | 1 λ ) H n + k ( y | 1 λ μ ) + λ 1 λ μ 1 k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( y x | 1 μ ) H m + k ( x | 1 λ μ ) .
(2.9)

Substituting λ for 1/λ and μ for 1/μ in (2.9), we get

H m ( x | λ ) H n ( y | μ ) = μ 1 λ μ 1 k = 0 m ( m k ) H m k ( 1 + x y | λ ) H n + k ( y | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( y x | μ ) H m + k ( x | λ μ ) .
(2.10)

Since the Frobenius-Euler polynomials obey the difference equation (see, e.g., [9])

H n (x+1|λ)λ H n (x|λ)=(1λ) x n (n0),
(2.11)

so by applying (2.11) to (2.10), the desired result follows immediately. □

It follows that we show some special cases of Theorem 2.1. By setting x=y in Theorem 2.1, we rediscover formula (1.6). Setting λ=μ and x=y in Theorem 2.1, for non-negative integers m, n and λ±1, we have

H m ( x | λ ) H n ( x | λ ) = λ λ + 1 k = 0 m ( m k ) H m k ( λ ) H n + k ( x | λ 2 ) + λ λ + 1 k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( λ ) H m + k ( x | λ 2 ) λ 1 λ + 1 H m + n ( x | λ 2 ) .
(2.12)

Clearly, H 0 (x|λ)=1 (see, e.g., [9]). Hence, by setting n=0 in (2.12), we obtain that for non-negative integer n,

H n (x|λ)= λ λ + 1 k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k (λ) H k ( x | λ 2 ) + 1 λ + 1 H n ( x | λ 2 ) .
(2.13)

Setting x=y and μ=1/ λ 2 in Theorem 2.1, we get that for non-negative integers m, n and λ0,1,

H m ( x | λ ) H n ( x | 1 λ 2 ) = ( λ + 1 ) k = 0 m ( m k ) H m k ( λ ) H n + k ( x | 1 λ ) 1 λ k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( 1 λ 2 ) H m + k ( x | 1 λ ) λ 2 1 λ H m + n ( x | 1 λ ) .
(2.14)

In particular, the case n=0 in (2.14) gives that for non-negative integer n,

λ H n ( x | 1 λ ) + H n (x|λ)=(λ+1) k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( 1 λ ) H k (x|λ),
(2.15)

which was discovered by Kim [9] applying a nice method called the Frobenius-Euler basis { H 0 (x|λ),, H n (x|λ)} for P n consisting of the Frobenius-Euler polynomials with P n being the space of polynomials of degree less than or equal to n.

Theorem 2.2 Let m, n be non-negative integers. Then, for λ1,

B m + 1 ( x ) H n ( y | λ ) = k = 0 m + 1 ( m + 1 k ) B m + 1 k ( x y ) H n + k ( y | λ ) λ λ 1 ( m + 1 ) k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( y x | λ ) H m + k ( x | λ ) + ( m + 1 ) k = 0 m ( m k ) ( x y ) m k H n + k ( y | λ ) .
(2.16)

Proof By setting λ=1 and substituting λ for μ in (2.3), we have

1 e u 1 1 λ e v 1 = ( e u e u 1 + 1 λ e v 1 ) 1 λ e u + v 1 .
(2.17)

Multiplying (λ1)u e x u + y v on both sides of (2.17) leads to

u e x u e u 1 ( λ 1 ) e y v λ e v 1 = u e ( 1 + x y ) u e u 1 ( λ 1 ) e y ( u + v ) λ e u + v 1 + u λ 1 ( λ 1 ) e ( y x ) v λ e v 1 ( λ 1 ) e x ( u + v ) λ e u + v 1 .
(2.18)

Hence, by applying (1.4), (2.5) and (2.6) to (2.18), we obtain

m = 0 n = 0 B m ( x ) H n ( y | 1 λ ) u m m ! v n n ! = ( m = 0 B m ( 1 + x y ) u m m ! ) ( m = 0 n = 0 H m + n ( y | 1 λ ) u m m ! v n n ! ) + u λ 1 ( n = 0 H n ( y x | 1 λ ) v n n ! ) ( m = 0 n = 0 H m + n ( x | 1 λ ) u m m ! v n n ! ) ,
(2.19)

which together with the Cauchy product yields

m = 0 n = 0 B m ( x ) H n ( y | 1 λ ) u m m ! v n n ! = m = 0 n = 0 [ k = 0 m ( m k ) B m k ( 1 + x y ) H n + k ( y | 1 λ ) ] u m m ! v n n ! + 1 λ 1 m = 0 n = 0 [ k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( y x | 1 λ ) H m + k ( x | 1 λ ) ] u m + 1 m ! v n n ! .
(2.20)

Since B 0 (x)=1 (see, e.g., [26]), so by substituting λ for 1/λ and comparing the coefficients of u m + 1 v n /(m+1)!n! in (2.20) we get

B m + 1 ( x ) H n ( y | λ ) = k = 0 m + 1 ( m + 1 k ) B m + 1 k ( 1 + x y ) H n + k ( y | λ ) λ λ 1 ( m + 1 ) k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( y x | λ ) H m + k ( x | λ ) .
(2.21)

Thus, by applying the difference equation of the classical Bernoulli polynomials B n (x+1) B n (x)=n x n 1 for non-negative integer n (see, e.g., [26]) to (2.21), the desired result follows immediately. □

It is obvious that the case x=y in Theorem 2.2 gives formula (1.7).

Theorem 2.3 Let m, n be non-negative integers. Then, for λ0,1,

H m ( x | 1 λ ) H n ( y | λ ) = ( 1 λ 1 ) k = 0 m ( m k ) H m k ( x y | 1 λ ) B n + k + 1 ( y ) n + k + 1 + ( λ 1 ) k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( y x | λ ) B m + k + 1 ( x ) m + k + 1 ( λ 1 ) 2 λ k = 0 m ( m k ) ( x y ) m k B n + k + 1 ( y ) n + k + 1 + ( 1 ) m ( λ 1 ) m ! n ! ( m + n + 1 ) ! H m + n + 1 ( y x | λ ) .
(2.22)

Proof By substituting 1/λ for μ in (2.4), we discover

( λ 1 ) e x u λ e u 1 ( 1 λ 1 ) e y v 1 λ e v 1 = λ ( 1 λ 1 ) ( λ 1 ) e ( 1 + x y ) u λ e u 1 ( e y ( u + v ) e u + v 1 1 u + v ) + ( λ 1 ) ( 1 λ 1 ) e ( y x ) v 1 λ e v 1 ( e x ( u + v ) e u + v 1 1 u + v ) + 1 λ u + v ( ( λ 1 ) e ( 1 + x y ) u λ e u 1 ( 1 λ 1 ) e ( y x ) v 1 λ e v 1 ) .
(2.23)

Notice that from (1.4) and the Taylor theorem we have

e x ( u + v ) e u + v 1 1 u + v = n = 0 n u n ( e x u e u 1 1 u ) v n n ! = m = 0 n = 0 B m + n + 1 ( x ) m + n + 1 u m m ! v n n ! .
(2.24)

On the other hand, if we apply u m = n = 0 m ( m n ) ( u + v ) n ( v ) m n to (2.5), then we get

( λ 1 ) e ( 1 + x y ) u λ e u 1 = n = 0 m = n H m ( 1 + x y | 1 λ ) m ! ( m n ) ( u + v ) n ( v ) m n = n = 0 m = n + 1 H m ( 1 + x y | 1 λ ) m ! ( m n + 1 ) ( u + v ) n + 1 ( v ) m ( n + 1 ) + m = 0 H m ( 1 + x y | 1 λ ) ( v ) m m ! .
(2.25)

Since the Frobenius-Euler polynomials satisfy the symmetric distribution H n (1x| 1 λ )= ( 1 ) n H n (x|λ) for non-negative integer n (see, e.g., [4]), so by (2.5) we can rewrite (2.25) as

1 u + v ( ( λ 1 ) e ( 1 + x y ) u λ e u 1 ( 1 λ 1 ) e ( y x ) v 1 λ e v 1 ) = n = 0 m = n + 1 ( 1 ) n + 1 H m ( y x | λ ) m ! ( m n + 1 ) ( u + v ) n v m ( n + 1 ) = n = 0 m = n + 1 ( 1 ) n + 1 H m ( y x | λ ) m ! ( m n + 1 ) k = 0 n ( n k ) u k v m ( k + 1 ) = k = 0 n = k m = n + 1 ( 1 ) n + 1 H m ( y x | λ ) m ! ( m n + 1 ) ( n k ) u k v m ( k + 1 ) = k = 0 m = k + 1 ( 1 ) k + 1 H m ( y x | λ ) m ! u k v m ( k + 1 ) = k = 0 m = 0 ( 1 ) k + 1 k ! m ! H k + m + 1 ( y x | λ ) ( k + m + 1 ) ! u k k ! v m m ! = m = 0 n = 0 ( 1 ) m + 1 m ! n ! H m + n + 1 ( y x | λ ) ( m + n + 1 ) ! u m m ! v n n ! .
(2.26)

Hence, applying (2.5), (2.24) and (2.26) to (2.23) and then comparing the coefficients of u m v n /m!n! gives

H m ( x | 1 λ ) H n ( y | λ ) = ( 1 λ ) k = 0 m ( m k ) H m k ( 1 + x y | 1 λ ) B n + k + 1 ( y ) n + k + 1 + ( λ 1 ) k = 0 n ( n k ) H n k ( y x | λ ) B m + k + 1 ( x ) m + k + 1 + ( 1 ) m ( λ 1 ) m ! n ! ( m + n + 1 ) ! H m + n + 1 ( y x | λ ) ,
(2.27)

which together with (2.11) yields the desired result. □

It becomes obvious that setting x=y and then substituting m for n and n for m in Theorem 2.3 gives formula (1.8).

Theorem 2.4 Let n be a non-negative integer. Then, for λ1, μ1, λμ1,

k = 0 n H k ( x | λ ) H n k ( y | μ ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n ( n + 1 k + 1 ) H k ( x y | λ ) H n k ( y | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n ( n + 1 k + 1 ) H k ( y x | μ ) H n k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n ( n + 1 k + 1 ) ( x y ) k H n k ( y | λ μ ) .
(2.28)

Proof It is easy to see that (2.2) can be rewritten as

H m ( x | λ ) H n ( y | μ ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 m ( m k ) H k ( x y | λ ) H m + n k ( y | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n ( n k ) H k ( y x | μ ) H m + n k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 m ( m k ) ( x y ) k H m + n k ( y | λ μ ) .
(2.29)

Hence, by substituting l for m and nl for n with 0ln and then making the summation operation l = 0 n in (2.29), we have

l = 0 n H l ( x | λ ) H n l ( y | μ ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 l = 0 n k = 0 l ( l k ) H k ( x y | λ ) H n k ( y | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 l = 0 n k = 0 l ( l k ) H k ( y x | μ ) H n k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 l = 0 n k = 0 l ( l k ) ( x y ) k H n k ( y | λ μ ) .
(2.30)

If we change the order of summations on the right-hand side of (2.30), then we obtain

l = 0 n H l ( x | λ ) H n l ( y | μ ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n l = k n ( l k ) H k ( x y | λ ) H n k ( y | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n l = k n ( l k ) H k ( y x | μ ) H n k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n l = k n ( l k ) ( x y ) k H n k ( y | λ μ ) .
(2.31)

Notice that for non-negative integers m, n (see, e.g., [[27], Lemma 3.1]),

k = m n ( k m ) = ( n + 1 m + 1 ) .
(2.32)

Thus, the desired result follows by applying (2.32) to (2.31). □

We next discuss some special cases of Theorem 2.4. By setting x=y in Theorem 2.4, we obtain that for a non-negative integer n,

k = 0 n H k ( x | λ ) H n k ( x | μ ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n ( n + 1 k + 1 ) H k ( λ ) H n k ( x | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 k = 0 n ( n + 1 k + 1 ) H k ( μ ) H n k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 ( n + 1 ) H n ( x | λ μ ) .
(2.33)

Taking λ=μ in (2.33) we have

k = 0 n H k ( x | λ ) H n k ( x | λ ) = 2 λ λ + 1 k = 0 n ( n + 1 k + 1 ) H k ( λ ) H n k ( x | λ 2 ) λ 1 λ + 1 ( n + 1 ) H n ( x | λ 2 ) ,
(2.34)

which is equivalent to

k = 0 n H k ( x | λ ) H n k ( x | λ ) = 2 λ λ + 1 k = 0 n ( n + 1 k ) H n k ( λ ) H k ( x | λ 2 ) λ 1 λ + 1 ( n + 1 ) H n ( x | λ 2 ) .
(2.35)

It is interesting to point out that formula (2.35) is analogous to the following sum relation on the classical Bernoulli polynomials:

k = 0 n B k (x) B n k (x) 2 n + 2 k = 0 n 2 ( n + 2 k ) B n k B k (x)=(n+1) B n (x),
(2.36)

which was obtained by Kim et al. [25] using a nice method called the Bernoulli basis { B 0 (x),, B n (x)} for P n consisting of the Bernoulli polynomials with P n being the space of polynomials of degree less than or equal to n. For an equivalent version of (2.35), see [[9], Theorem 3] for details.

Theorem 2.5 Let n2 be a positive integer. Then, for λ1, μ1, λμ1,

k = 1 n 1 H k ( x | λ ) H n k ( y | μ ) k ( n k ) = 1 n k = 1 n 1 ( n k ) ( H n 1 H k 1 ) { λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 H k ( x y | λ ) H n k ( y | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 H k ( y x | μ ) H n k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 ( x y ) k H n k ( y | λ μ ) } + 2 H n 1 ( λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 H n ( y | λ μ ) n + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 H n ( x | λ μ ) n ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 H n ( y | λ μ ) n ) .
(2.37)

Proof Let m, n be positive integers. Then, by multiplying 1/mn on both sides of (2.29) and then substituting l for m and nl for n with 1ln1, in light of making the summation operation l = 1 n 1 , we get

l = 1 n 1 H l ( x | λ ) H n l ( y | μ ) l ( n l ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 l = 1 n 1 1 l ( n l ) k = 0 l ( l k ) H k ( x y | λ ) H n k ( y | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 l = 1 n 1 1 l ( n l ) k = 0 l ( l k ) H k ( y x | μ ) H n k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 l = 1 n 1 1 l ( n l ) k = 0 l ( l k ) ( x y ) k H n k ( y | λ μ ) .
(2.38)

Observe that for positive integers m, n,

1 m n = 1 m + n ( 1 m + 1 n ) .
(2.39)

Hence, by applying (2.39) to (2.38), we obtain

l = 1 n 1 H l ( x | λ ) H n l ( y | μ ) l ( n l ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 1 n l = 1 n 1 ( 1 l + 1 n l ) k = 1 l ( l k ) H k ( x y | λ ) H n k ( y | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 1 n l = 1 n 1 ( 1 l + 1 n l ) k = 1 l ( l k ) H k ( y x | μ ) H n k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 1 n l = 1 n 1 ( 1 l + 1 n l ) k = 1 l ( l k ) ( x y ) k H n k ( y | λ μ ) + 2 H n 1 ( λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 H n ( y | λ μ ) n + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 H n ( x | λ μ ) n ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 H n ( y | λ μ ) n ) .
(2.40)

Changing the order of summations on the right-hand side of (2.40), we obtain

l = 1 n 1 H l ( x | λ ) H n l ( y | μ ) l ( n l ) = λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 1 n k = 1 n 1 l = k n 1 ( l k ) ( 1 l + 1 n l ) H k ( x y | λ ) H n k ( y | λ μ ) + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 1 n k = 1 n 1 l = k n 1 ( l k ) ( 1 l + 1 n l ) H k ( y x | μ ) H n k ( x | λ μ ) ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 1 n k = 1 n 1 l = k n 1 ( l k ) ( 1 l + 1 n l ) ( x y ) k H n k ( y | λ μ ) + 2 H n 1 ( λ ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 H n ( y | λ μ ) n + μ ( λ 1 ) λ μ 1 H n ( x | λ μ ) n ( λ 1 ) ( μ 1 ) λ μ 1 H n ( y | λ μ ) n ) .
(2.41)

Note that for non-negative integers m, n (see, e.g., [[27], Lemma 3.1]),

k = m n ( k m ) 1 k = 1 m k = m n ( k 1 m 1 ) = 1 m ( n m ) ,
(2.42)

and

k = m n ( k m ) 1 n + 1 k =( H n + 1 H m ) ( n + 1 m ) .
(2.43)

By combining (2.42) and (2.43), we have

k = m n ( k m ) ( 1 k + 1 n + 1 k ) = 1 m ( n m ) + ( H n + 1 H m ) ( n + 1 m ) = ( H n H m 1 ) ( n + 1 m ) .
(2.44)

Thus, the desired result follows by applying (2.44) to (2.41). □

Obviously the case x=y and λ=μ in Theorem 2.5 gives that for positive integer n2 and λ±1,

k = 1 n 1 H k ( x | λ ) H n k ( x | λ ) k ( n k ) = λ λ + 1 2 n k = 1 n 1 ( n k ) ( H n 1 H k 1 ) H k ( λ ) H n k ( x | λ 2 ) + 2 H n 1 H n ( x | λ 2 ) n ,
(2.45)

which is analogous to the sum relation on the classical Euler polynomials stated in [[25], Theorem 7]. From the above, one can also use Theorems 2.2 and 2.3 to establish some similar sum relations to Theorems 2.4 and 2.5. We leave the details to the interested readers for an exercise.