Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic Profile of an Ascending-Dose, Extended-Regimen Combined Oral Contraceptive to Those of Other Extended Regimens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quartette (levonorgestrel [LNG]/ethinyl estradiol [EE] and EE) is an ascending-dose, extended-regimen combined oral contraceptive (COC) that consists of a constant dose of LNG 150 µg on days 1 to 84 with EE 20 µg on days 1 to 42, 25 µg on days 43 to 63, 30 µg on days 64 to 84, and 10 µg of EE monotherapy on days 85 to 91. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for EE was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling to characterize the PK profile of EE administered in Quartette and other extended-regimen LNG/EE COCs. Model-predicted plasma concentration–time profiles demonstrated a stepwise increase in systemic exposure to EE during the first 84 days of the cycle following each EE dose change. Lower concentrations of EE were noted during the final 7-day period of EE 10 µg. Gradual increases in EE seen with Quartette may decrease the incidence of unscheduled bleeding frequently observed during early cycles of extended-regimen COCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krishnan S, Kiley J. The lowest-dose, extended-cycle combined oral contraceptive pill with continuous ethinyl estradiol in the United States: a review of the literature on ethinyl estradiol 20 mug/levonorgestrel 100 mug + ethinyl estradiol 10 mug. Int J Womens Health. 2010;2:235–239.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson FD, Hait H. A multicenter, randomized study of an extended cycle oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2003;68(2): 89–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiegratz I, Stahlberg S, Manthey T, et al. Effect of extended-cycle regimen with an oral contraceptive containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 2 mg dienogest on bleeding patterns, safety, acceptance and contraceptive efficacy. Contraception. 2011; 84(2): 133–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson FD, Gibbons W, Portman D. Safety and efficacy of an extended-regimen oral contraceptive utilizing continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol. Contraception. 2006;73(3):229–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kroll R, Reape KZ, Margolis M. The efficacy and safety of a low-dose, 91-day, extended-regimen oral contraceptive with continuous ethinyl estradiol. Contraception. 2010;81(1):41–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaunitz AM, Portman DJ, Hait H, Reape KZ. Adding low-dose estrogen to the hormone-free interval: impact on bleeding patterns in users of a 91-day extended regimen oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2009;79(5):350–355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Portman DJ, Howard B, Weiss H, Kaunitz AM, Ricciotti N. Multicenter open-label study to evaluate efficacy and safety of an ascending-dose, extended-regimen ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel combination oral contraceptive for preventing pregnancy in women [abstract]. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:S196–S197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reape KZ, DiLiberti CE, Hendy CH, Volpe EJ. Effects on serum hormone levels of low-dose estrogen in place of placebo during the hormone-free interval of an oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2008;77(1):34–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carr B, Gersten J, Howard B, Weiss H. Bleeding patterns with three ascending-dose, extended-cycle oral contraceptives (OCs) vs Seasonale®. Presented at: 61st Annual Clinical Meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; May 4–8, 2013; New Orleans, LA.

  10. Humpel M, Nieuweboer B, Wendt H, Speck U. Investigations of pharmacokinetics of ethinyloestradiol to specific consideration of a possible first-pass effect in women. Contraception. 1979;19(4): 421–432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stanczyk FZ, Mroszczak EJ, Ling T, et al. Plasma levels and pharmacokinetics of norethindrone and ethinylestradiol administered in solution and as tablets to women. Contraception. 1983;28(3): 241–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, Karlsson MO. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. AAPS J. 2011;13(2):143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Darwish M, Bond M, Ricciotti N, Hsieh J, Fiedler-Kelly J, Grasela T. Pharmacokinetic profile of an ascending-dose, estrogen/progestin combination oral contraceptive [abstract]. Reprod Sci. 2013;20(3 suppl):193A.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Westhoff CL, Torgal AH, Mayeda ER, Pike MC, Stanczyk FZ. Pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive in obese and normal-weight women. Contraception. 2010;81(6): 474–480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reif S, Snelder N, Blode H. Characterisation of the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone in extended-cycle regimens: population pharmacokinetic analysis from a randomised Phase III study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2013; 39(2):e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanarkowski R, Tornatore KM, D’Ambrosio R, Gardner MJ, Jusko WJ. Pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel in relation to smoking. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988;43(1):23–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerstman BB, Piper JM, Tomita DK, Ferguson WJ, Stadel BV, Lundin FE. Oral contraceptives estrogen dose and the risk of deep venous thromboembolic disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133(1): 32–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM, Vandenbroucke JP, Doggen CJ, Rosendaal FR. The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study. BMJ. 2009;339: b2921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hickey M, Agarwal S. Unscheduled bleeding in combined oral contraceptive users: focus on extended-cycle and continuoususe regimens. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2009;35(4): 245–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown TJ, Scherz B, Hochberg RB, MacLusky NJ. Regulation of estrogen receptor concentrations in the rat brain: effects of sustained androgen and estrogen exposure. Neuroendocrinology. 1996;63(1):53–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Klinge CM, Rao V. The steroid hormone receptors. In: Hiscock T, et al., eds. Gynecology & Obstetrics. Volume 5: Reproductive endocrinology, infertility, and genetics. http://www.glowm.com/resources/glowm/cd/pages/v5/v5c004.html. Accessed November 27, 2012.

  22. Endrikat J, Gerlinger C, Plettig K, et al. A meta-analysis on the correlation between ovarian activity and the incidence of intermenstrual bleeding during low-dose oral contraceptive use. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2003; 17(2): 107–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Bond MS, MBA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darwish, M., Bond, M., Ricciotti, N. et al. A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic Profile of an Ascending-Dose, Extended-Regimen Combined Oral Contraceptive to Those of Other Extended Regimens. Reprod. Sci. 21, 1401–1410 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719114526472

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719114526472

Keywords

Navigation