Skip to main content
Log in

Utilizing passive elements to break time reversibility at low Reynolds number: a swimmer with one activated element

  • Regular Article - Soft Matter
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal E Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the realm of low Reynolds number, the shape-changing biological and artificial matters need to break time reversibility in the course of their strokes to achieve motility. This necessity is well described in the so-called scallop theorem. In this work, considering low Reynolds number, a novel and versatile swimmer is proposed as an example of a new scheme to break time reversibility kinematically and, in turn, produce net motion. The swimmer consists of one sphere as a cargo or carried body, joined by one activated link with time-varying length, to another perpendicular rigid link, as the support of two passively flapping disks, at its end. The disks are free to rotate between their fixed minimum and maximum angles. The system’s motion in two dimensions is simulated, and the maneuverability of the swimmer is discussed. The minimal operating parameters for steering of the swimmer are studied, and the limits of the swimmer are identified. The introduced swimming mechanism can be employed as a simple model system for biological living matters as well as artificial microswimmers.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. X. Nassif, S. Bourdoulous, E. Eugène, P.O. Couraud, How do extracellular pathogens cross the blood-brain barrier? Trends Microbiol. 10(5), 227–232 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.P. Celli, B.S. Turner, N.H. Afdhal, S. Keates, I. Ghiran, C.P. Kelly et al., Helicobacter pylori moves through mucus by reducing mucin viscoelasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106(34), 14321–14326 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Fu, S. A. Mirbagheri, Helicobacter pylori Couples Motility and Diffusion to Actively Create a Heterogeneous Complex Medium in Gastric Mucus. In: APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstracts, p. E19–006. (2016)

  4. B.J. Nelson, I.K. Kaliakatsos, J.J. Abbott, Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 12, 55–85 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Peng, Z. Chen, P.S. Kollipara, Y. Liu, J. Fang, L. Lin et al., Opto-Thermoelectr. Microswimmers. Light: Sci. & Appl. 9(1), 1–12 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Katuri, X. Ma, M.M. Stanton, S. Sánchez, Designing micro-and nanoswimmers for specific applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 50(1), 2–11 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G.I. Taylor, The action of waving cylindrical tails in propelling microscopic organisms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Seri. A Math. Phys. Sci. 211(1105), 225–239 (1952)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. G.I. Taylor, Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Seri. A Math. Phys. Sci. 209(1099), 447–461 (1951)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Hancock, The self-propulsion of microscopic organisms through liquids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Seri. A Math. Phys. Sci. 217(1128), 96–121 (1953)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Lauga, Life around the scallop theorem. Soft Matter. 7(7), 3060–3065 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. G.T. Yates, Mechanics of swimming and flying (Stephen Childress). SIAM Rev. 26(4), 596 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Brennen, H. Winet, Fluid mechanics of propulsion by cilia and flagella. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9, 339–398 (1977)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. L.J. Fauci, R. Dillon, Biofluidmechanics of reproduction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38(1), 371–394 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. E.M. Purcell, Life at low Reynolds number. Am. J. Phys. 45(1), 3–11 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Kim, S.J. Karrila, Microhydrodynamics: principles and selected applications. Courier Corporation (2013)

  16. G. Rückner, R. Kapral, Chemically powered nanodimers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(15), 150603 (2007)

  17. R. Golestanian, T.B. Liverpool, A. Ajdari, Propulsion of a molecular machine by asymmetric distribution of reaction products. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(22), 220801 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Stark, Artificial chemotaxis of self-phoretic active colloids: collective behavior. Acc. Chem. Res. 51(11), 2681–2688 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J.F. Brady, Phoretic motion in active matter. J. Fluid Mech. 922, A10 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Vilfan, N. Osterman, A. Vilfan, Magnetically driven omnidirectional artificial microswimmers. Soft Matter. 14(17), 3415–3422 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. R.W. Carlsen, M.R. Edwards, J. Zhuang, C. Pacoret, M. Sitti, Magnetic steering control of multi-cellular bio-hybrid microswimmers. Lab on a Chip. 14(19), 3850–3859 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. E. Lauga, Continuous breakdown of Purcell’s scallop theorem with inertia. Phys. Fluids. 19(6), 061703 (2007)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Hubert, O. Trosman, Y. Collard, A. Sukhov, J. Harting, N. Vandewalle et al., The scallop theorem and swimming at the mesoscale. (2020) . arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.08305

  24. E. Lauga, D. Bartolo, No many-scallop theorem: collective locomotion of reciprocal swimmers. Phys. Rev. E. 78(3), 030901 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Trouilloud, S.Y. Tony, A. Hosoi, E. Lauga, Soft swimming: exploiting deformable interfaces for low Reynolds number locomotion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(4), 048102 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Qiu, T.C. Lee, A.G. Mark, K.I. Morozov, R. Münster, O. Mierka et al., Swimming by reciprocal motion at low Reynolds number. Nat. commun. 5(1), 1–8 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Montino, A. DeSimone, Three-sphere low-Reynolds-number swimmer with a passive elastic arm. Eur. Phys. J. E. 38(5), 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. E. Lauga, T.R. Powers, The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Rep. Prog. Phys. 72(9), 096601 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Ghanbari, M. Bahrami, M.R. Nobari, Methodology for artificial microswimming using magnetic actuation. Phys. Rev. E. 83(4), 046301 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Tottori, B.J. Nelson, Artificial helical microswimmers with mastigoneme-inspired appendages. Biomicrofluidics 7(6), 061101 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. P. Degen, Self-propelling capsules as artificial microswimmers. Curr. Opin. Colloid & Interface Sci. 19(6), 611–619 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Najafi, R. Golestanian, Simple swimmer at low Reynolds number: three linked spheres. Phys. Rev. E. 69(6), 062901 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Ledesma-Aguilar, H. Löwen, J.M. Yeomans, A circle swimmer at low Reynolds number. Eur. Phys. J. E. 35(8), 1–9 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. B. Nasouri, A. Khot, G.J. Elfring, Elastic two-sphere swimmer in Stokes flow. Phys. Rev. Fluids. 2(4), 043101 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. J. Avron, O. Kenneth, D. Oaknin, Pushmepullyou: an efficient micro-swimmer. New J. Phys. 7(1), 234 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. M.A. Jalali, M.R. Alam, S. Mousavi, Versatile low-Reynolds-number swimmer with three-dimensional maneuverability. Phys. Rev. E. 90(5), 053006 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. C. Wischnewski, J. Kierfeld, Snapping elastic disks as microswimmers: swimming at low Reynolds numbers by shape hysteresis. Soft Matter. 16(30), 7088–7102 (2020)

  38. J. Ginsberg. Engineering dynamics. vol. 10. Cambridge University Press (2008)

  39. J. Happel, H. Brenner, Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics: with special applications to particulate media. vol. 1. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

  40. R.L. Graham, D.E. Knuth, O. Patashnik, Concrete Mathematics, AddisonWesley. Reading. MA. 14, 14 (1994)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Sheikhshoaei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Appendices

Appendix A ODEs for the case of straight motion

For the case of symmetric constraining angles, the governing ODEs can be derived upon substituting from Eqs. 2 and 3 into Eqs. 1214 and solving the subsequent linear system of the equations. Considering each phase separately, the ODEs are calculated as:

For the first and third phases:

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} \varvec{{\dot{\theta }}_1}= -{\dot{l}} \left( \frac{27b\pi \text {cos}(\theta )}{a(160a + 45\pi b - 64a\text {cos}^2(\theta ))}\right) {\hat{i}}_3 \end{aligned}$$
(A1)
$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} \varvec{v_O}={\dot{l}}\left( \frac{45b\pi }{96a + 45\pi b+ 64a\text {sin}^2(\theta ) }\right) {\hat{i}}_2 \end{aligned}$$
(A2)

For the second phase:

$$\begin{aligned} \varvec{v_O}={\dot{l}} \left( \frac{9b\pi }{32a + 9\pi b + 16a\text {cos}^2 (\theta _{1,\text {min}})}\right) {\hat{i}}_2 \end{aligned}$$
(A3)

For the fourth phase:

$$\begin{aligned} \varvec{v_O}={\dot{l}} \left( \frac{9b\pi }{32a + 9\pi b + 16a}\right) {\hat{i}}_2 \end{aligned}$$
(A4)

By integrating Eq. A1, expansion (contraction) length of the body link in the phase 1 (phase 3) can be found, which is denoted by \(l_{\text {sym}}\) and given in Eq. 16. From the above equations, it is evident that only the second and fourth phases contribute to the swimmer’s displacement over each cycle, as also explained in Sect. 3.

Appendix B General description of the trajectory for an arbitrary cyclic motion of a swimmer in 2D

Here we consider the motion of a cyclic swimmer in the XY plane of the inertial frame XYZ, in which each cycle of motion leads to the resultant translation \(\delta \) and rotation \(\gamma \) as illustrated in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9
figure 9

The trajectory of an arbitrary swimmer (green line) over two cycles (starting from point A and passing point B, which is the swimmer’s final position in the first cycle and the initial position for the second cycle, the swimmer reaches the eventual position at point C in the second cycle). The body-fixed coordinate system \(E_{1}^AE_{2}^AE_{3}^A\) initially coincides with the laboratory frame XYZ

We will show that all initial and final positions of the swimmer in each cycle are concyclic. We consider an arbitrary cycle during the motion of the swimmer, initially starting from point A and reaching point B at the end of this cycle. We assume \(\Theta \) to be the angle between \(\overrightarrow{AB}\), the vector joining point A to point B, and the positive X axis. Without loss of generality, we assume that \(E_{1}^AE_{2}^AE_{3}^A\) is the body-fixed frame initially coinciding with XYZ frame, and \(E_{1}^BE_{2}^BE_{3}^B\) is the same body-fixed frame at the end of the first cycle at point B (Fig. 9). It can be shown that there is a point \({\varvec{o}}_c=(o_{c,1},o_{c,2})\) such that its position (mathematical representation) is the same in both the former and the latter frames (i.e., \({\varvec{o}}_c=(o_{c,1},o_{c,2})_{E_{1}^AE_{2}^AE_{3}^A}=(o_{c,1},o_{c,2})_{E_{1}^BE_{2}^BE_{3}^B}\)). This point can be calculated as

$$\begin{aligned} {\varvec{o}}_c=\left( \frac{\delta \sin {(\Theta -\gamma /2)}}{2\sin {\gamma /2}}, \frac{\delta \cos {(\Theta -\gamma /2)}}{2\sin {\gamma /2}}\right) \end{aligned}$$
(B5)

As we obtained the point \({\varvec{o}}_c\) in an arbitrary cycle of the motion, this point has the same property for all the proceeding cycles of the swimmer; thus, it is the center of the circle passing through all the initial and final positions of the swimmer. Each cycle gives rise to the rotation of the body frame about point \(\varvec{o_c}\) with angle \(\gamma \). Thus, the positions of the swimmer at the end of each cycle are concyclic, with \({\varvec{o}}_c\) being the center of the circle. The radius of this circle \(\rho \) can be derived as

$$\begin{aligned} \rho =\frac{\delta }{2\sin {\gamma /2}} \end{aligned}$$
(B6)

The system closes the circle after n cycles of motion, simply calculated as, \(n=\lceil \frac{2\pi }{\gamma }\rceil \), where \(\lceil x\rceil \) is the ceiling function mapping the least integer greater than or equal to x [40]. For small values of \(\gamma \), the noise-free trajectory, analogous to Reference [33], is a circle.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheikhshoaei, A., Rajabi, M. Utilizing passive elements to break time reversibility at low Reynolds number: a swimmer with one activated element. Eur. Phys. J. E 46, 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/s10189-023-00273-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/s10189-023-00273-y

Navigation