Abstract
Assuming the interaction of two separable two-level atoms with a single-mode field in the Tavis–Cummings model, we investigate the entanglement generation in the atomic state using the concurrence measure. Specifically, even and odd coherent states are selected as the initial states of the field and the entanglement of the final atomic state is computed and compared with the corresponding one when the ordinary coherent state is the initial field state. It is observed that even and odd coherent states induce more entanglement in the atomic state, so that the Bell states can be obtained by optimizing the parameters. In addition, we observe a direct connection between the non-Gaussianity of field states and the entanglement of atomic states. Also, a mixture of separable and entangled states is generated with the passage of time and the range of entanglement variation decreases.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The article contains all the information and the data deposit is not necessary.]
References
J. Audretsch, Entangled Systems: New Directions in Quantum Physics (Wiley, Berlin, 2008)
X.-L. Feng, Z.-M. Zhang, X.-D. Li, S.-Q. Gong, Z.-Z. Xu, Entangling distant atoms by interference of polarized photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 217902 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.217902
M. Konopka, V. Buzek, Entangling atoms in photonic crystals. Eur. Phys. J. D 10, 285 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100530050550
J. Haegeman, T.J. Osborne, H. Verschelde, F. Verstraete, Entanglement renormalization for quantum fields in real space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 100402 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.100402
K.J. Ahn, Temporal dynamics of zero-delay second order correlation function and spectral entanglement of two photons emitted from ladder-type atomic three-level systems. Opt. Express. 28, 1790 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.382498
C. Crocker, M. Lichtman, K. Sosnova, A. Carter, S. Scarano, C. Monroe, High purity single photons entangled with an atomic qubit. Opt. Express. 27, 28143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.028143
S.J. Phoenix, P. Knight, Establishment of an entangled atom-field state in the Jaynes-Cummings model. Phys. Rev. A 44, 6023 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.6023
T. van Leent, M. Bock, R. Garthoff, K. Redeker, W. Zhang, T. Bauer, W. Rosenfeld, C. Becher, H. Weinfurter, Long-distance distribution of atom-photon entanglement at telecom wavelength. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010510 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.010510
J. Li, M.-T. Zhou, C.-W. Yang, P.-F. Sun, J.-L. Liu, X.-H. Bao, J.-W. Pan, Semideterministic entanglement between a single photon and an atomic ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140504 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.140504
M. Blaha, A. Johnson, A. Rauschenbeutel, J. Volz, Beyond the Tavis–Cummings model: revisiting cavity QED with atomic ensembles. Phys. Rev. A 105, 013719 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.013719
K. Fischer, S. Sun, D. Lukin, Y. Kelaita, R. Trivedi, J. Vuckovic, Pulsed coherent drive in the Jaynes–Cummings model. Phys. Rev. A 98, 021802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.021802
D. Ran, C.-S. Hu, Z.-B. Yang, Entanglement transfer from two-mode continuous variable SU (2) cat states to discrete qubits systems in Jaynes–Cummings Dimers. Sci. Rep. 6, 32089 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32089
D. Afshar, A. Anbaraki, M. Jafarpour, Entanglement transfer from entangled non-linear coherent states of trapped ions to separable qubits. Opt. Commun. 402, 80 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2017.05.054
A. Anbaraki, D. Afshar, M. Jafarpour, Entanglement transfer from entangled nonlinear coherent states to separable qubits. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34, 1366 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.34.001366
D. Afshar, A. Anbaraki, Nonclassical properties and entanglement of superposition of two-mode separable nonlinear coherent states. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33, 558 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.33.000558
E.T. Jaynes, F.W. Cummings, Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser. Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1963.1664
A. Anbaraki, D. Afshar, M. Jafarpour, Entangling two separable qubits using an entangled field state. Optik 201, 163539 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163539
A. Dehghani, B. Mojaveri, R.J. Bahrbeig, F. Nosrati, R.L. Franco, Entanglement transfer in a noisy cavity network with parity-deformed fields. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 36, 1858 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.36.001858
M. Bina, F. Casagrande, M. Genoni, A. Lulli, M. Paris, Dynamical description of state mapping and discontinuous entanglement transfer for tripartite systems. Eur. Lett. 90, 30010 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/90/30010
M. Bina, F. Casagrande, A. Lulli, Decoherence in the solvable dynamics of N strongly driven atoms coupled to a cavity mode. Opt. and Spectrosc. 108, 356 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X10030070
A. Lulli, M. Bina, M.G. Genoni, Robustness of tripartite entanglement transfer from bosonic modes to localized qubits. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 203, 25 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01533-3
J. Restrepo, B.A. Rodriguez, Dynamics of entanglement and quantum discord in the Tavis–Cimmings model. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. 49, 125502 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/49/12/125502
T.E. Tessier, I.H. Deutsch, A. Delgado, I. Fuentes-Guridi, Entanglement sharing in the two-atom Tavis–Cummings model. Phys. Rev. A 68, 062316 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.062316
M. Tavis, F.W. Cummings, Exact solution for an N-molecule-radiation-field Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. 170, 379 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.170.379
M. Tavis, F.W. Cummings, Approximate solutions for an N-molecule-radiation-field Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. 188, 692 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.188.692
P. Barmettler, D. Fioretto, V. Gritsev, Non-equilibrium dynamics of Gaudin models. EPL 104, 10004 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/104/10004
Z. Chen, Y. Qiu, G.-Q. Zhang, J.-Q. You, Dissipative quantum phase transition in a biased Tavis–Cummings model. Chin. Phys. B 29, 044201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ab7b55
C.E.A. Jarvis, D.A. Rodrigues, B.L. Gyorffy, T.P. Spiller, A.J. Short, J.F. Annett, Dynamics of entanglement and ‘attractor’states in the Tavis–Cummings model. New. J. Phys. 11, 103047 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/103047
J.-L. Guo, H.-S. Song, Dynamics of pairwise entanglement between two Tavis–Cummings atoms. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 085302 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/41/8/085302
M. Fasihi, B. Mojaveri, Entanglement protection in Jaynes–Cummings model. Quantum. Inf. Process. 18, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2195-8
E. Boukobza, D. Tannor, Entropy exchange and entanglement in the Jaynes–Cummings model. Phys. Rev. A 71, 063821 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.063821
B.W. Shore, P.L. Knight, The Jaynes–Cummings model. J. Mod. Opt. 40, 1195 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349314551321
S. Ghoreishi, M. Sarbishaei, K. Javidan, Entanglement between two Tavis–Cummings systems with N= 2. Int. J. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 187 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijtmp.20120206.03
M.O. Guslyannikova, E.K. Bashkirov, Atom–atom entanglement in a nonresonant two-photon Tavis–Cummings model. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 84, 281 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873820030107
J.M. Torres, J.Z. Bernad, G. Alber, Quantum teleportation and entanglement swapping of matter qubits with multiphoton signals. Phys. Rev. A. 90, 012304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.012304
C. Gerry, P. Knight, P.L. Knight, Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)
V. Dodonov, I. Malkin, V. Man’Ko, Even and odd coherent states and excitations of a singular oscillator. Physica. 72, 597 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-8914(74)90215-8
L. Huang, Q. Guo, L.-Y. Jiang, G. Chen, X.-X. Xu, W. Yuan, M times photon subtraction-addition coherent superposition operated odd-Schrödinger-cat state: nonclassicality and decoherence. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54, 2952 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-015-2534-1
S.A. Hill, W.K. Wootters, Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5022
M.G. Genoni, M.G. Paris, K. Banaszek, Measure of the non-Gaussian character of a quantum state. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042327 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042327
F. Casagrande, A. Lulli, M.G. Paris, Improving the entanglement transfer from continuous-variable systems to localized qubits using non-Gaussian states. Phys. Rev. A 75, 032336 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032336
P. Chang, B. Shao, G.L. Long, Entanglement transfer from photon-subtracted and photon-added two-mode squeezed fields to a pair of qubits. Phys. Lett. A 372, 7124 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.10.073
R. Gilmore, Backer-Campbell-Hausdorff formulas. J. Math. Phys. 15, 2090 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1666587
Acknowledgements
D. Afshar is supported by Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz through the grant No. SCU.SP1401.812.
Funding
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, SCU.SP1401.812, Davood Afshar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report that they have no competing interests.
Appendix A: Calculation of the coefficients of the atom–field state in the Tavis–Cummings model
Appendix A: Calculation of the coefficients of the atom–field state in the Tavis–Cummings model
Using (2)—(5), the atom–field state at time t is given by:
where \(\hat{H}_{1}\) and \(\hat{H}_{2}\) are as follows:
With the use of Backer-Campbell-Hausdorff lemma, the commutator of \(\hat{H}_{1}\) and \(\hat{H}_{2}\) is [43]:
Assuming the resonance of the atomic and field frequencies \(\left( {\omega = \omega_{a} } \right),\) the commutator in (A.4) vanishes. Thus, (A.1) can be written as:
where \(\hat{U}_{1} \left( t \right)\) and \(\hat{U}_{2} \left( t \right)\) are given by:
In the writing of the matrix (A.6), the orthonormal set \(\left\{ {\left| {00} \right\rangle ,\;\left| {01} \right\rangle ,\;\left| {10} \right\rangle ,\;{\text{and}}\;\left| {11} \right\rangle } \right\}\), has been used. With the assumption of the similarities of the two atoms A and B, \(\hat{U}_{2A}\) and \(\hat{U}_{2B}\) are given by:
Now, assuming initial atomic state as \(\left| {00} \right\rangle\) and using (A.5) – (A.8), we have
By substituting \(\left| {\Psi_{f} \left( 0 \right)} \right\rangle = \sum\limits_{n}^{{}} {g_{n} \left| n \right\rangle }\) in the above equation, the atom–field state is:
where \(a_{n} ,\;b_{n} ,\;c_{n} \;{\text{and}}\;d_{n}\) are given by:
Assuming \(\left| {\Psi_{f} \left( 0 \right)} \right\rangle\) is in the coherent, even coherent and odd coherent states, the coefficients, \(g_{n}\), are, respectively, given by:
where \(N_{e}\) and \(N_{o}\) have been given in (10). By substituting the above equations in (A.11), (7) and (9) are obtained.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Movahedi, R., Afshar, D. & Jafarpour, M. Improvement of the entanglement generation in atomic states using a single-mode field in the Tavis–Cummings model. Eur. Phys. J. D 77, 59 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-023-00647-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-023-00647-z