Abstract
We study a system of n Abelian vector fields coupled to \(\frac{1}{2} n(n+1)\) complex scalars parametrising the Hermitian symmetric space \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}})/ {\textsf{U}}(n).\) This model is Weyl invariant and possesses the maximal non-compact duality group \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}}).\) Although both symmetries are anomalous in the quantum theory, they should be respected by the logarithmic divergent term (the “induced action”) of the effective action obtained by integrating out the vector fields. We compute this induced action and demonstrate its Weyl and \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}})\) invariance. The resulting conformal higher-derivative \(\sigma \)-model on \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}})/ {\textsf{U}}(n)\) is generalised to the cases where the fields take their values in (i) an arbitrary Kähler space; and (ii) an arbitrary Riemannian manifold. In both cases, the \(\sigma \)-model Lagrangian generates a Weyl anomaly satisfying the Wess–Zumino consistency condition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
A unique feature of the Weyl multiplet of \({\mathcal {N}}=4\) conformal supergravity [1] is the presence of a dimensionless complex scalar field \(\phi \) that parametrises the Hermitian symmetric space \(\textsf{SL}(2,{\mathbb {R}}) /\textsf{SO}(2).\)Footnote 1 The most general family of invariant actions for \({\mathcal {N}}=4\) conformal supergravity was derived only a few years ago by Butter et al. [2, 3]. Such an action is uniquely determined by a holomorphic function \({\mathcal {H}}(\phi )\) which accompanies the terms quadratic in the Weyl tensor in the Lagrangian.
For the special choice \({\mathcal {H}}= {\textrm{const}},\) in which case the \({\mathcal {N}}=4\) conformal supergravity action proves to be invariant under rigid \(\textsf{SL}(2,{\mathbb {R}}) \) transformations, the corresponding action was constructed in 2015 by Ciceri and Sahoo [4] to second order in fermions. The bosonic sector of the latter action had been computed in 2012 by Buchbinder et al. [5] as an “induced action”, obtained by integrating out an Abelian \({\mathcal {N}}=4\) vector multiplet coupled to external \({\mathcal {N}}= 4 \) conformal supergravity.Footnote 2 The purely \(\phi \)-dependent part of the Lagrangian is a higher-derivative \(\sigma \)-model of the form [6]:
where \(R_{mn}\) is the spacetime Ricci tensor,
and \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) are numerical parameters. In the case of \({\mathcal {N}}=4\) conformal supergravity, these coefficients are [5]: \(\alpha = \frac{1}{2}\beta =1.\) The Lagrangian (1.1) is invariant under \(\textsf{SL}(2,{\mathbb {R}}) \) transformations
acting on the upper half-plane \({\textrm{Im}}\, \phi >0\) with metric
The functional \(\int \text {d}^4 x \, \sqrt{-g}\, {\mathcal {L}}\) proves to be invariant under Weyl transformations
since the scalar field \(\phi \) is inert under such transformations. The higher-derivative \(\sigma \)-model (1.1) possesses the \({\mathcal {N}}=1\) supersymmetric extension [7] which relates the parameters \(\alpha \) and \(\beta .\) Both parameters are completely fixed if \({\mathcal {N}}=2\) supersymmetry is required [7,8,9].
The conformal higher-derivative \(\sigma \)-model (1.1) admits a nontrivial generalisation that is obtained by replacing the Hermitian symmetric space \(\textsf{SL}(2,{\mathbb {R}}) / \textsf{SO}(2) \) with an arbitrary n-dimensional Kähler manifold \({\mathfrak {M}}^{n},\) with n the complex dimension. We assume that \({\mathfrak {M}}^{n}\) is parametrised by n local complex coordinates \(\phi ^I\) and their conjugates \(\bar{\phi }^{\bar{I}}.\) Let \({\mathfrak {K}}(\phi , \bar{\phi })\) be the corresponding Kähler potential such that the Kähler metric \({\mathfrak {g}}_{I\bar{J}}(\phi ,\bar{\phi })\) is given by \({\mathfrak {g}}_{I{\bar{J}}} = \partial _I \partial _{{\bar{J}}} {\mathfrak {K}}.\) Associated with \({\mathfrak {M}}^n\) is a higher-derivative sigma model of the form
where
with \(\Gamma ^I_{{~}JK}\) being the Christoffel symbols for the Kähler metric \({\mathfrak {g}}_{I\bar{J}}.\) Finally, \({\mathfrak {F}}_{IJ \bar{K}\bar{L}} \) and \({\mathfrak {G}}_{IJ \bar{K}\bar{L}} \) are tensor fields on the target space, which are constructed from the Kähler metric \({\mathfrak {g}}_{I\bar{J}},\) Riemann tensor \({\mathfrak {R}}_{I \bar{J}K \bar{L}} \) and, in general, its covariant derivatives. We recall that the Christoffel symbols \(\Gamma ^I_{{~}JK} \) and the curvature tensor \({\mathfrak {R}}_{I {\bar{J}} K {\bar{L}}} \) are given by the expressionsFootnote 3
A typical expression for \( {\mathfrak {F}}_{IJ \bar{K}\bar{L}}\) is
The possible structure of \({\mathfrak {G}}_{IJ \bar{K}\bar{L}}\) is analogous. It should be pointed out that actions of the form (1.6) naturally emerge at the component level in \({\mathcal {N}}=2\) superconformal higher-derivative \(\sigma \)-models [8] (see also [9]), and in \({\mathcal {N}}=1\) ones [7].
By construction, the action (1.6) is invariant under arbitrary holomorphic isometries of \({\mathfrak {M}}^{n}.\) A nontrivial observation is that (1.6) is also invariant under arbitrary Weyl transformations of spacetime provided the scalars \(\phi ^I\) are inert under these transformations. Choosing \({\mathfrak {M}}^{n}={\mathbb {C}}^n\) and \({\mathfrak {g}}_{I\bar{J}}(\phi ,\bar{\phi }) = \delta _{I\bar{J}}\) in (1.6) and integrating by parts, one obtains the Fradkin–Tseytlin (FT) operator [13, 14]
which is conformal when acting on dimensionless scalar fields.Footnote 4 Given a Weyl inert scalar field \(\varphi ,\) the Weyl transformation (1.5) acts on \(\Delta _0 \varphi \) as
An action of the form \(\int \text {d}^4 x \, \sqrt{-g}\, {\mathcal {L}}(\phi , \bar{\phi }),\) with \({\mathcal {L}}\) given by (1.1), naturally emerges as an induced action in Maxwell’s electrodynamics coupled to a dilaton \(\varphi \) and an axion \(\mathfrak a\) with Lagrangian
Here \({\tilde{F}}^{mn}= \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon ^{mnrs} F_{rs}\) is the Hodge dual of the electromagnetic field strength \(F_{mn}=2\nabla _{[m} A_{n]} = 2\partial _{[m} A_{n]},\) with \(\varepsilon ^{mnrs}\) the Levi-Civita tensor. The second form of the Lagrangian (1.12) is written using two-component spinor notation, where the field strength \(F_{mn} = - F_{nm}\) is replaced with a symmetric rank-2 spinor \(F_{\alpha \beta } = F_{\beta \alpha }\) and its conjugate \({\bar{F}}_{\dot{\alpha }\dot{\beta }}.\) More precisely, if one considers the effective action, \(\Gamma [\phi , \bar{\phi }],\) obtained by integrating out the quantum gauge field in the model (1.12), then the logarithmically divergent part of \(\Gamma [\phi , \bar{\phi }]\) is given by \(\int \text {d}^4 x \, \sqrt{-g}\, {\mathcal {L}}(\phi , \bar{\phi }),\) as demonstrated by Osborn [6]. An important question arises: why is the induced action Weyl and \(\textsf{SL}(2,{\mathbb {R}}) \) invariant?
We recall that the group of electromagnetic duality rotations of free Maxwell’s equations is \({\textsf{U}}(1).\) More than forty years ago, it was shown by Gaillard and Zumino [17, 18] that the non-compact group \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}})\) is the maximal duality group of n Abelian vector field strengths \(F_{mn}= (F_{mn, i}),\) with \(i =1,\ldots , n,\) in the presence of a collection of complex scalars \(\phi ^{ij}=\phi ^{ji}\) parametrising the homogeneous space \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n),\) with \(i, j = 1,\ldots , n.\) In the absence of such scalars, the largest duality group proves to be \({\textsf{U}}(n),\) the maximal compact subgroup of \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}}).\) These results admit a natural extension to the case when the pure vector field part L(F) of the Lagrangian \(L(F;\phi , \bar{\phi })\) is a nonlinear \({\textsf{U}}(1)\) duality invariant theory [19,20,21,22,23] (see [24,25,26] for reviews), for instance Born–Infeld theory. However, in the case that L(F) is quadratic, the F-dependent part of \(L(F; \phi , \bar{\phi })\) is also invariant under the Weyl transformations in curved space. Then, computing the path integral over the gauge fields leads to an effective action, \(\Gamma [\phi , \bar{\phi }],\) such that its logarithmically divergent part is invariant under Weyl and rigid \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}})\) transformations, see, e.g., [27, 28] for formal arguments. Both symmetries are anomalous at the quantum level, but the logarithmically divergent part of the one-loop effective action is invariant under these transformations.
In this paper we demonstrate that an action of the type (1.6) emerges as an induced action in a model for n Abelian gauge fields \(A_{m}=\left( A_{m,i}\right) ,\) \(i=1,\ldots ,n,\) coupled to a complex field \(\phi =(\phi ^{ij}) \) and its conjugate \(\bar{\phi }=(\bar{\phi }^{\,\bar{i}\bar{j}})\) parametrising the homogeneous space \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n),\)
The corresponding Lagrangian is
where we have also introduced the real matrices \(\Xi \) and \(\Upsilon \) defined by
with \(\Xi \) being positive definite. The model described by (1.14) has two fundamental properties: (i) its duality group is \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}})\) (see, e.g. [24] for the technical details); and (ii) it is Weyl invariant. The induced action must respect these properties.
This paper is organised as follows. In Sect. 2 we compute the logarithmically divergent part of the effective action obtained by integrating out the vector fields in the model (1.14). Generalisations of our analysis and open problems are briefly discussed in Sect. 3. The main body of the paper is accompanied by three technical appendices. In Appendix A we collect necessary facts about the Hermitian symmetric space \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} )/ {\textsf{U}}(n).\) Appendix B provides an alternative calculation of the induced action compared with that given in Sect. 2.2. Appendix C provides a complete list of the structures introduced in (2.22).
2 Computing the induced action
In this section we compute the logarithmically divergent part of the effective action, \(\Gamma [\phi , \bar{\phi }],\) defined by
Here \(S[A;\phi ,\bar{\phi }]\) is the classical action corresponding to (1.14),
\(\chi (A)\) denotes a gauge fixing condition, \(\Delta _{\textrm{gh}}\) the corresponding Faddeev–Popov operator [29], and \(\eta \) an arbitrary background field. Since the effective action is independent of \(\eta ,\) this field can be integrated out with some weight that we choose to be
In general, the logarithmically divergent part of the effective action has the form
where \( (a_2)_{\textrm{total}} \) denotes the appropriate sum of diagonal DeWitt coefficients and \(\Lambda \) is a UV cutoff. We identify the induced action with \( \int \!\!\text {d}^4x\,\sqrt{-g}\, (a_2)_{\textrm{total}},\) modulo an overall numerical coefficient.
2.1 Quantisation
We choose the simplest gauge-fixing condition
which leads to the ghost operator
with \(\mathbb {1}\) the \(n\times n\) unit matrix. Integrating the right-hand side of (2.1) with the weight functional (2.3) leads to the gauge-fixing term
As a result, the gauge-fixed action becomes
where here we have introduced hatted indices corresponding to a pair of spacetime and internal indices \(A_{\hat{m}}:=(A_{mi}),\) \(\Delta ^{\hat{m}\hat{n}}:=(\Delta ^{mi,nj}).\) Contractions over hatted indices encode summations over both indices, however the position of the hatted indices (up or down) indicates only the position of the spacetime indices, internal indices are always understood as matrix multiplication. The non-minimal operator \(\Delta ^{\hat{m}\hat{n}}\) is defined as:
From here onward matrix indices will be suppressed, unless there may be ambiguity or confusion. The one-loop effective action is specified by
Since \(\Xi \) is symmetric and positive definite, due to (1.13), its inverse \(\Xi ^{-1},\) square root \(\Xi ^{1/2}\) and inverse square root \(\Xi ^{-1/2}\) are well-defined. We perform a local field redefinition in the path integral:
so that the operator which appeared in (2.8) becomesFootnote 5
Inserting the explicit form of \(\Delta ^{\hat{m}\hat{n}}\) from (2.9a) and (2.9b), the \(\tilde{\Delta }^{\hat{m}}_{{~~}\hat{n}}\) operator is now minimal:
After our field redefinition the one-loop effective action is given by
2.2 Heat kernel calculations
Since the operator \(\tilde{\Delta }^{\hat{m}}_{{~~}\hat{n}}\) defined by (2.13a) is minimal, we can proceed with the standard heat kernel technique in curved space, by bringing it to the form:
The generalised covariant derivative \(\hat{\nabla }_m\) introduced above is defined to act on a column matrix \(A^{\hat{m}} =(A^m_{{~}i})\) as
The generalised covariant derivatives have no torsion, meaning
with \(\hat{R}^{\hat{m}}_{{~~}\hat{n}pq}\) some generalised curvature anti-symmetric in p, q. Explicitly it has the form
Using the standard Schwinger–DeWitt formalism [30,31,32,33,34] in curved spacetime for an operator of the form (2.15a), in the coincidence limit the DeWitt coefficient traced over matrix indices, \((a_2)^{\tilde{\Delta }}(x,x),\) is given by
where ‘\(\text {Tr}\)’ denotes the matrix trace. Similarly for the ghost operator (2.6), the corresponding traced DeWitt coefficient \((a_2)^{\Delta _{gh}}(x,x)\) (noting that the generalised curvature vanishes) is
which contains purely gravitational components. Armed with the set of Eqs. (2.15a–2.18), we expand out \((a_2)^{\tilde{\Delta }}(x,x)\) (2.19) explicitly in terms of \(Q^{\hat{m}}_{{~~}p\hat{n}}\) (2.13b) and \(T^{\hat{m}}_{{~~}\hat{n}}\) (2.13c)
Using the definitions of \(Q^{\hat{m}}_{{~~}p\hat{n}}\) (2.13b) and \(T^{\hat{m}}_{{~~}\hat{n}}\) (2.13c), we perform the laborious task of expanding \((a_2)^{\tilde{\Delta }}(x,x)\) in terms of the matrices \(\Xi \) and \(\Upsilon .\) It reduces to the following form:
where the contributions \(T_1,\ldots , T_{20}\) are listed in Appendix C. We have also introduced:
The total DeWitt coefficient corresponding to the logarithmic divergence of the effective action (2.14) is given by
where \((a_2)^{\Delta _{gh}}(x,x)\) was given in (2.20). Recalling the expression for \(\Xi \) and \(\Upsilon \) in terms of the original fields \(\phi \) and its conjugate \(\bar{\phi }\) (1.15), and defining
the total DeWitt coefficient is given by
where F is the square of the Weyl tensor, G is the Euler density,
and we have removed the total derivative pieces \(\text {Tr}\big [\nabla _m{\mathcal {Y}}^m\big ]\) and \(\text {Tr}\big [\Box {\mathcal {Z}}\big ]\) since they do not contribute to the induced action \(\int \!\!\text {d}^4x\,\sqrt{-g}\,(a_2)_{\textrm{total}}.\) The \(\Box R\) in (2.26) is also a total derivative and can be omitted.
Setting \(n=1\) in (2.26) yields the expected result derived in [5, 6]
2.3 Geometric expression for the induced action
To recast (2.26) in terms of geometric objects defined on the Hermitian symmetric space \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n),\) here we analyse the dependence of (2.26) on the symmetric matrix \(\phi =\left( \phi ^{ij}\right) =\left( \phi ^{ji}\right) \equiv (\phi ^I)\) and its conjugate \(\bar{\phi }=\left( \bar{\phi }^{\,\bar{i}\bar{j}}\right) =\left( \bar{\phi }^{\,\bar{j}\bar{i}}\right) \equiv (\bar{\phi }^{{\bar{I}}}).\)
We make the standard choice for Kähler potential \({\mathfrak {K}}(\phi ^{ij},\bar{\phi }^{\,\bar{i}\bar{j}})\) on \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n)\)
which is well defined since \(\Xi \) is a positive definite matrix. The group \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})\) acts on \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n)\) by fractional linear transformations (A.18). Given such a transformation, the Kähler potential changes as
in accordance with (A.20). Therefore, the Kähler metric is invariant under arbitrary \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})\) transformations.
The Kähler metric is given byFootnote 6
where \((i_1\cdots i_n)\) denotes symmetrisation in indices \(i_1,\ldots ,i_n.\) Note that pairs of indices are symmetrised over due to \(\phi \) being symmetric (1.13). Here and in what follows, we use the notation
In accordance with (1.8), the Christoffel symbols are given by
and the Riemann curvature tensor is
Noting that the inverse Kähler metric of (2.31) is
one can calculate the Christoffel symbols, Riemann curvature tensor and Ricci tensor for the metric considered in (2.31) and we find:
The latter relation means that \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n)\) is an Einstein space.
As pointed out at the beginning of this subsection, the complex variables \(\phi \) and their conjugates \(\bar{\phi }\) can be viewed either as symmetric matrices \(\phi =(\phi ^{ij})\) and \(\bar{\phi }=( \bar{\phi }^{\bar{i}\bar{j}})\) or as vector columns \(\phi = (\phi ^I)\) and \(\bar{\phi }=( \bar{\phi }^{\bar{I}}),\) with \(I,\bar{I}=1,\ldots ,\frac{1}{2}{n(n+1)}.\) Resorting to the latter notation, the geometric structures (2.31) and (2.36a–2.36c) can be used to recast (2.26) in the form:
where
Every isometry transformation (A.18) acts on \(\nabla \phi \) and \({\mathcal {D}}^2 \phi \) as follows:
It is now seen that the induced action defined by (2.37) is invariant under the isometry transformations on \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n).\)
3 Generalisations and open problems
Relation (2.37), which constitutes the induced action, is our main result. The same structure also determines the Weyl anomaly of the effective action
It is well known that the purely gravitational part of this variation satisfies the Wess–Zumino consistency condition [35]
see, e.g., [36,37,38] for a review.Footnote 7 The \(\phi \)-dependent part of the Weyl anomaly will be discussed below.
As a generalisation of (1.6), we can introduce a conformal higher-derivative \(\sigma \)-model associated with a Riemannian manifold \(({\mathcal {W}}^d, {\mathfrak {g}})\) parametrised by local coordinates \(\varphi ^\mu .\) The action is
where
and \( {\mathfrak {F}}_{\mu \nu \sigma \rho } (\varphi )\) is a tensor field of rank (0, 4) on \({\mathcal {W}}^d.\) The Weyl invariance of the above action follows from
In the case that the target space is Kähler, Eq. (1.6), the relation (3.4) takes the form
Choosing \({\mathcal {W}}^d\) to be \(\mathbb {R},\) specifying \({\mathfrak {g}}_{\mu \nu }(\varphi ) \) and \({\mathfrak {F}}_{\mu \nu \sigma \rho } (\varphi )\) to be constant, respectively, and restricting the background spacetime to be flat, the action (3.1) turns into
with f a coupling constant, which is the model studied recently by Tseytlin [39].
Assuming the model (3.3) originates from an induced action of some theory, the \(\varphi \)-dependent part of the Weyl anomaly should have the form
The anomaly satisfies the Wess–Zumino consistency condition (3.2) as a consequence of the relation (3.4).
It would be interesting to study renormalisation properties of a higher-derivative theory in Minkowski space with Lagrangian of the form
where \(L^{(n)}(F;\phi ,\bar{\phi }) \) is given by (1.14), the complex scalar fields \(\phi ^I\) and their conjugates \(\bar{\phi }^{{\bar{I}}}\) parametrise \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} )/ {\textsf{U}}(n),\) and \(f_1, f_2 \) and \(f_3\) are dimensionless coupling constants. All the structures in the F-independent part of (3.8) appear in the induced action (2.37). The ellipsis in (3.8) denotes other \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}})\) terms that are quartic in \(\partial \phi \) and \(\partial \bar{\phi },\) such as the Kähler metric squared structure in (1.9). Such terms are possible for \(n>1.\) The renormalisation of the most general fourth-order sigma models with dimensionless couplings in four dimensions was studied in [40, 41]. All couplings constants in (3.8) are dimensionless, and the freedom to choose them is dictated by \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}}).\) This implies that the theory with classical Lagrangian (3.8) is renormalisable at the quantum level.
It was discovered two years ago that Maxwell’s theory possesses a one-parameter conformal and \({\textsf{U}}(1)\) duality invariant deformation [42, 43]; it was called the ModMax theory in [42]. Using the methods developed in [20,21,22], it can be coupled to the dilaton-axion field (1.12) to result in a conformal and \(\textsf{SL}(2,{\mathbb {R}})\) duality invariant model described by the Lagrangian [44]
where
and \(\gamma \) is a non-negative coupling constant [42]. For \(\gamma = 0\) the model (3.9) reduces to (1.12). A challenging problem is to compute an induced action generated by (3.9).
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: No data is associated with this theoretical work.]
Notes
Some of the relevant terms were missed in [5].
In appendix B, we provide the results for an alternative field redefinition which leads to an equivalent logarithmic divergence up to total derivative.
The partial derivatives with respect to symmetric matrices \(\phi =(\phi ^{ij}) \) and \(\bar{\phi }=(\bar{\phi }^{\,\bar{i}\bar{j}})\) are defined by \(\text {d}{\mathfrak {K}}(\phi ,\bar{\phi }) = \text {d}\phi ^{ij} \frac{\partial {\mathfrak {K}}(\phi ,\bar{\phi })}{\partial \phi ^{ij} } + \text {d}\bar{\phi }^{{\bar{i}} {\bar{j}}} \frac{\partial {\mathfrak {K}}(\phi ,\bar{\phi })}{\partial \phi ^{{\bar{i}} {\bar{j}}} },\) and therefore \(\frac{\partial \phi ^{kl}}{\partial \phi ^{ij}} = \delta ^k_{(i} \delta ^l_{j)}.\) Symmetrisation of n indices includes a 1/n! factor. Vertical bars are notation to exclude indices contained between them from a separate symmetrisation, for example, \((i_1|(i_2i_3)|i_4).\)
The \(\Box R\) term, which contributes to \((a_2)_{\textrm{total}} \) in (3.1), can be removed since it is generated by a local counterterm \( \int \!\!\text {d}^4x\,\sqrt{-g}\, R^2.\)
References
E. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, B. de Wit, Extended conformal supergravity. Nucl. Phys. B 182, 173 (1981)
D. Butter, F. Ciceri, B. de Wit, B. Sahoo, Construction of all N = 4 conformal supergravities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(8), 081602 (2017). arXiv:1609.09083 [hep-th]
D. Butter, F. Ciceri, B. Sahoo, \(N=4\) conformal supergravity: the complete actions. JHEP 01, 029 (2020). arXiv:1910.11874 [hep-th]
F. Ciceri, B. Sahoo, Towards the full \(N = 4\) conformal supergravity action. JHEP 1601, 059 (2016). arXiv:1510.04999 [hep-th]
I.L. Buchbinder, N.G. Pletnev, A.A. Tseytlin, Induced N = 4 conformal supergravity. Phys. Lett. B 717, 274 (2012). arXiv:1209.0416 [hep-th]
H. Osborn, Local couplings and Sl(2, R) invariance for gauge theories at one loop. Phys. Lett. B. 561, 174 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0302119
S.M. Kuzenko, Non-compact duality, super-Weyl invariance and effective actions. JHEP 07, 222 (2020). arXiv:2006.00966 [hep-th]
B. de Wit, S. Katmadas, M. van Zalk, New supersymmetric higher-derivative couplings: full N=2 superspace does not count! JHEP 01, 007 (2011). arXiv:1010.2150 [hep-th]
J. Gomis, P. Hsin, Z. Komargodski, A. Schwimmer, N. Seiberg, S. Theisen, Anomalies, conformal manifolds, and spheres. JHEP 03, 022 (2016). arXiv:1509.08511 [hep-th]
J. Wess, J. Bagger, Supersymmetry and Supergravity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992)
I.L. Buchbinder, S.M. Kuzenko, Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity, Or a Walk Through Superspace (IOP, Bristol, 1995) (Revised Edition 1998)
D.Z. Freedman, A. Van Proeyen, Supergravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012)
E.S. Fradkin, A.A. Tseytlin, Asymptotic freedom in extended conformal supergravities. Phys. Lett. B 110, 117 (1982)
E.S. Fradkin, A.A. Tseytlin, One-loop beta function in conformal supergravities. Nucl. Phys. B 203, 157 (1982)
S.M. Paneitz, A quartic conformally covariant differential operator for arbitrary pseudo-Riemannian manifolds. MIT preprint, March 1983; published posthumously in: SIGMA 4, 036 (2008). arXiv:0803.4331 [math.DG]
R.J. Riegert, A non-local action for the trace anomaly. Phys. Lett. B 134, 56 (1984)
M.K. Gaillard, B. Zumino, Duality rotations for interacting fields. Nucl. Phys. B 193, 221 (1981)
B. Zumino, Duality rotations, in Quantum Structure of Space and Time, ed. by M.J. Duff, C.J. Isham (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982), p. 363
G.W. Gibbons, D.A. Rasheed, Electric-magnetic duality rotations in nonlinear electrodynamics. Nucl. Phys. B 454, 185 (1995). arXiv:hep-th/9506035
G.W. Gibbons, D.A. Rasheed, SL(2, R) invariance of non-linear electrodynamics coupled to an axion and a dilaton. Phys. Lett. B 365, 46 (1996). arXiv:hep-th/9509141
M.K. Gaillard, B. Zumino, Self-duality in nonlinear electromagnetism, in Supersymmetry and Quantum Field Theory, ed. by J. Wess, V.P. Akulov (Springer, Berlin, 1998), p. 121. arXiv:hep-th/9705226
M.K. Gaillard, B. Zumino, Nonlinear electromagnetic self-duality and Legendre transformations, in Duality and Supersymmetric Theories, ed. by D.I. Olive, P.C. West (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999), p. 33. arXiv:hep-th/9712103
M. Araki, Y. Tanii, Duality symmetries in non-linear gauge theories. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 1139 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9808029
S.M. Kuzenko, S. Theisen, Nonlinear self-duality and supersymmetry. Fortsch. Phys. 49, 273 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0007231
P. Aschieri, S. Ferrara, B. Zumino, Duality rotations in nonlinear electrodynamics and in extended supergravity. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 31, 625 (2008). arXiv:0807.4039 [hep-th]
Y. Tanii, Introduction to Supergravity (Springer, Berlin, 2014)
E. Fradkin, A.A. Tseytlin, Quantum equivalence of dual field theories. Ann. Phys. 162, 31 (1985)
R. Roiban, A. Tseytlin, On duality symmetry in perturbative quantum theory. JHEP 10, 099 (2012). arXiv:1205.0176 [hep-th]
L.D. Faddeev, V.N. Popov, Feynman diagrams for the Yang–Mills field. Phys. Lett. B 25, 29 (1967)
B.S. DeWitt, Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965)
A.O. Barvinsky, G.A. Vilkovisky, The generalized Schwinger–Dewitt technique in gauge theories and quantum gravity. Phys. Rep. 119, 1 (1985)
I.G. Avramidi, Heat Kernel and Quantum Gravity. Lecture Notes in Physics Monographs, vol. 64. (Springer, Berlin, 2000)
B.S. DeWitt, The Global Approach to Quantum Field Theory, vol. 1, 2. International Series of Monographs on Physics, vol. 114. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)
D.V. Vassilevich, Heat kernel expansion: user’s manual. Phys. Rep. 388, 279 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0306138
J. Wess, B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous Ward identities. Phys. Lett. B 37, 95 (1971)
E.S. Fradkin, A.A. Tseytlin, Conformal supergravity. Phys. Rep. 119, 233 (1985)
S. Deser, A. Schwimmer, Geometric classification of conformal anomalies in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Lett. B 309, 279 (1993). arXiv:hep-th/9302047
M.J. Duff, Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly. Class. Quantum Gravity 11, 1387 (1994). arXiv:hep-th/9308075
A.A. Tseytlin, Comments on 4-derivative scalar theory in 4 dimensions. arXiv:2212.10599 [hep-th]
I.L. Buchbinder, S.V. Ketov, Single-loop counterterm for four-dimensional sigma model with higher derivatives. Theor. Math. Phys. 77, 1032 (1988)
I.L. Buchbinder, S.V. Ketov, The fourth-order non-linear sigma models and asymptotic freedom in four dimensions. Fortschr. Phys. 39, 1 (1991)
I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin, P.K. Townsend, A non-linear duality-invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations. Phys. Rev. D 102, 121703 (2020). arXiv:2007.09092 [hep-th]
B.P. Kosyakov, Nonlinear electrodynamics with the maximum allowable symmetries. Phys. Lett. B 810, 135840 (2020). arXiv:2007.13878 [hep-th]
S.M. Kuzenko, Superconformal duality-invariant models and \({\cal{N}} = 4\) SYM effective action. JHEP 09, 180 (2021). arXiv:2106.07173 [hep-th]
Acknowledgements
The work of SK is supported in part by the Australian Research Council, Project no. DP200101944. The work of JP is supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Hermitian symmetric space \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} )/ {\textsf{U}}(n)\)
In this appendix we collect necessary facts about the Hermitian symmetric space \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} )/ {\textsf{U}}(n).\) Here the symplectic group is defined by
Its maximal compact subgroup, \(H = {\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} ) \cap \textsf{SO}(2n),\) proves to be isomorphic to \({\textsf{U}}(n).\) One way to see this is to make use of the isomorphism
which is obtained by considering the bijective map
for any \( g \in {\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} ).\) Each complex matrix \( \underline{g} = \varphi (g) \) is characterised by the properties
and thus \(\underline{g} \in {\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {C}} ) \cap \textsf{SU}(n,n).\) The inverse map \(\varphi ^{-1}\) takes every group element \(\underline{g} \in {\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {C}} ) \cap \textsf{SU}(n,n) \) to some \(g \in \textsf{GL}(2n, {\mathbb {R}}).\) For every element h from the maximal compact subgroup, \(h \in H = {\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} ) \cap \textsf{SO}(2n),\) its image \(\underline{h} = \varphi (h) \) is unitary, \(\underline{h}^\dagger \underline{h} ={\mathbb {1}}_{2n}.\) Simple calculations show that every \(h \in H = {\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} ) \cap \textsf{SO}(2n)\) has the form
and for its image \(\underline{h} =\varphi (h)\) we obtain
The group \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} )\) naturally acts on \({\mathbb {C}}^{2n}.\) This action is extended to that on a complex Grassmannian \(\textrm{Gr}_{m, 2n} ({\mathbb {C}}),\) with \(0<m<2n,\) the space of m-planes through the origin in \({\mathbb {C}}^{2n}.\) Of special interest is the Grassmannian \(\textrm{Gr}_{n, 2n} ({\mathbb {C}}).\) Given an n-plane \({\mathcal {P}}\in \textrm{Gr}_{n, 2n} ({\mathbb {C}}),\) it can be identified with a \(2n \times n\) matrix of rank n
defined modulo equivalence transformations
We denote by \({\mathfrak {X}} \subset \textrm{Gr}_{n, 2n} ({\mathbb {C}})\) the collection of all n-planes satisfying the two conditions:
Condition (A.8b) means that the Hermitian matrix \({\mathcal {P}}^\dagger (\text {i}J ) {\mathcal {P}}\) is positive definite. Condition (A.8a) means that \({\mathcal {P}}\) is a Lagrangian subspace of \({\mathbb {C}}^{2n}\) with respect to the symplectic structure J.
By construction, the group \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} )\) naturally acts on \({\mathfrak {X}}.\) It turns out that this action is transitive, and \(\mathfrak {X}\) can be identified with \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} )/ {\textsf{U}}(n).\) The simplest way to see this is to make use of the realisation \({\underline{G}}\) of \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {R}} ),\) Eq. (A.2). The picture changing transformation (A.3) is accompanied with
For the transformed n-plane \(\underline{{\mathcal {P}}}\) the conditions (A.8) take the form
The latter condition tells us that the matrix \(\underline{M}\) in (A.9) is nonsingular, and therefore
In terms of the \(n\times n\) matrix \(\psi ,\) the conditions (A.10) are equivalent to
The complex \(n\times n\) matrix \(\psi \) constrained by (A.12) and its conjugate \(\bar{\psi }\) provide a global coordinate system for \({\mathfrak {X}}.\) Associated with \(\psi \) and \(\bar{\psi }\) is the group element
Its important property is
Thus \({\mathfrak {S}} (\psi , \bar{\psi }) \) maps the “origin” \({\mathcal {P}}_0 \) to the point (A.11) of \({\mathfrak {X}},\) and therefore the group \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n, {\mathbb {C}} ) \cap \textsf{SU}(n,n) \) acts transitively on \({\mathfrak {X}}.\) The isotropy subgroup of \({\mathcal {P}}_0\) can be seen to consist of the group elements (A.6), which span \({\textsf{U}}(n).\) We conclude that
Making use of (A.9)–(A.11), we can reconstruct a generic element of \(\mathfrak X\) in the original real realisation (A.1).
Since the matrices \( {\mathbb {1}}_n \pm \psi \) are non-singular, \({\mathcal {P}}\) is equivalent to
The properties of \(\phi \) follow from (A.8):
In this paper we make use of the \(\phi \)-parametrisation (A.17) of the coset space (A.15).
The group \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})\) acts on \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n)\) by fractional linear transformations
and therefore
Using the definition of symplectic matrices, Eq. (A.1), one can show that the positive-definite matrix \(\Xi ,\) which is defined by (1.15), transforms as follows:
Let \({\mathcal {P}}_1\) and \({\mathcal {P}}_2\) be two points in \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n).\) We associate with them the following two-point function:
By construction, it is invariant under arbitrary \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})\) transformations
It is also invariant under arbitrary equivalence transformations (A.7),
Therefore, \({\mathfrak {s}}^2 ({\mathcal {P}}_1, {\mathcal {P}}_2)\) is a two-point function of \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,\) \({\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n)\) which is invariant under the isometry group \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}}).\) Due to the invariance of \({\mathfrak {s}}^2 ({\mathcal {P}}_1, {\mathcal {P}}_2) \) under arbitrary right shifts (A.23), both \({\mathcal {P}}_1\) and \({\mathcal {P}}_2\) can be chosen to have the form (A.17). In the case that \({\mathcal {P}}_1\) and \({\mathcal {P}}_2\) are infinitesimally separated, \({\mathfrak {s}}^2 ({\mathcal {P}}_1, {\mathcal {P}}_2) \) becomes
which is the Kähler metric on \({\textsf{Sp}}(2n,{\mathbb {R}})/{\textsf{U}}(n),\) Eq. (2.31).
Appendix B: Alternative field redefinition
Here we describe an alternative calculation of \(\text {Tr}\ln {\Delta } \) compared with that given in Sect. 2.2. Consider a path integral over two vector fields
with the operator \(\Delta ^{\hat{m}\hat{n}}\) given in (2.9a). We perform an alternative local field definition in the path integral
which was not possible for the original quadratic action (2.8). Now the operator which appeared in (B.1) has the form
which, once expanded explicitly from (2.9a) and (2.9b), is minimal:
Although both approaches of obtaining a minimal operator will lead to equivalent logarithmic divergences up to total derivative, the alternative field definition proves to be much easier to manage computationally, since it solely involves derivatives of \(\Xi ,\) \(\Xi ^{-1}\) and \(\Upsilon ,\) rather than \(\Xi ^{1/2}\) and \(\Xi ^{-1/2}.\) Following the same procedure as Sect. 2.2, the final result for \((a_2)_\textrm{total}\) (including total derivative contributions) is
Compared to the original field redefinition, the total derivative contributions are the same for \({\mathcal {Y}}^m\) (2.23b) and differ from \({\mathcal {Z}}\) (2.23c)
Indeed the two results for \((a_2)_{\textrm{total}}\) (2.26) and (B.5) differ only by a total derivative, which does not contribute to the induced action \(\int \!\!\text {d}^4x\,\sqrt{-g}\, (a_2)_{\textrm{total}}.\)
Appendix C: Curved space basis structures
Included below is a complete list of the basis structures introduced in (2.22). Note that under the trace over matrix indices some of these structures are equivalent to one another (via their transpose), however, since these structures are generated directly during the computation we have left them distinct for ease of computational reproducibility.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3. SCOAP3 supports the goals of the International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development.
About this article
Cite this article
Grasso, D.T., Kuzenko, S.M. & Pinelli, J.R. Weyl invariance, non-compact duality and conformal higher-derivative sigma models. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 206 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11373-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11373-6