Abstract
We define thermodynamic pressure P by work density W as the conjugate quantity of thermodynamic volume V from field equation. We derive the equations of state P=P(V, T) for the Friedmann–Robertson–Walker (FRW) universe in Einstein gravity and a modified gravity respectively. We find that the equation of state from Einstein gravity shows no P-V phase transition, while the equation of state from the modified gravity does, where the critical exponents are the same as those in mean field theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The Friedmann–Robertson–Walker (FRW) universe is a thermodynamic system similar to a black hole. In theory, a black hole has many well-known properties, e.g. the existence of a horizon, Hawking temperature and Hawking radiation [1], Bekenstein–Hawking entropy, quasi-local energy, unified first law [2, 3], etc. These mentioned properties are all shared by the FRW universe [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
On the other hand, some other properties of black holes have not yet been known to exist for the FRW universe. Take the asymptotically AdS black hole as an example, in both Einstein gravity and modified gravity, it usually has a thermodynamic equation of state \(P=P(V,T)\), where V is the thermodynamic volume, T is the Hawking temperature, and P is the thermodynamic pressure that is usually defined by the cosmological constant [13,14,15,16,17,18]Footnote 1. In some situations such an equation is characterized the P-V phase transition [22,23,24,25,26,27] with a critical point in the P-V phase diagram. However, for the FRW universe, so far there has been rarely any investigations on the equation of state, P-V phase transitions and criticality. In a recent paper [28], the equation of state for the FRW universe with a perfect fluid in Einstein gravity has been constructed, but no P-V phase transition was found.Footnote 2
Out of curiosity, in this paper we would like to find a reasonable way to construct an equation of state that can describe phase transitions of the FRW universe. The construction of such an equation of state depends on: (i) the definition of the thermodynamic quantities (P, V, T); (ii) the choice of the gravitational theory; and (iii) the properties of the matter field or source. The basic setup for this paper is the following: For (i), we follow the definitions of the thermodynamic volume V and the Hawking temperature T in [7, 8], but very importantly we change the definition of P. From the first law of thermodynamics for the FRW universe in Einstein gravity and many modified theories of gravity, we find that the work density W of the matter field is the conjugate variable of the thermodynamic volume, so it should be defined as the thermodynamic pressure
where \(h_{ab}\) and \(T^{ab}\) are the 0, 1-components of the metric and the stress–tensor [7] with \(a,b=0,1, (x^0=t, x^1=r)\). For (ii), after a brief discussion on Einstein gravity, we will mainly focus on a modified theory of gravity that belongs to the Horndeski class, because it gives interesting Friedmann’s equations. For (iii) we treat the matter field as a perfect fluid as is usually done in standard cosmology.
This paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, as a warmup exercise, we construct the equation of state for the FRW universe in Einstein gravity, which does not show P-V phase transition. In Sect. 3, we obtain the equation of state for the FRW universe in a modified gravity that belongs to the Horndeski class. In Sect. 4, we show that P-V phase transition of the FRW universe exists in the modified gravity. Section 5 is for conclusions and discussions. In this paper, we use units \(c=G=\hbar =k_B=1\).
2 Einstein gravity: no P-V phase transition
In this section, we first show that the thermodynamic pressure P can be defined by the work density W for the FRW universe in Einstein gravity, and then construct the equation of state \(P=P(V,T)\), which shows no P-V phase transition.
In the co-moving coordinate system \(\{t,r,\theta ,\varphi \}\), the line-element of the FRW universe can be written as
where a(t) is the time-dependent scale factor,Footnote 3k is the spatial curvature. The stress–tensor of a perfect fluid is usually written as
where \(\rho _m\) is the energy density, \(p_m\) is the pressure and \(u^{\mu }\) is the 4-velocity of the perfect fluid. In Einstein gravity, the line-element (2.1) and the stress–tensor (2.2) satisfy Einstein field equations
which gives the Friedmann’s equations
where \(H:=\dot{a}(t)/a(t)\) is the Hubble parameter.
For convenience in the following discussion, we introduce another form of the line-element (2.1)
where \(a,b=0,1, x^0=t, x^1=r\) and \(R\equiv a(t)r\) is the physical radiusFootnote 4 of the FRW universe. The apparent horizon of the FRW universe is defined by the following condition [5]
which can be easily solved
From the above expression, one can get a useful relation
The surface gravity at the apparent horizon of the FRW universe is given as [5]
and we treat \(\dot{R}_A\) as a small quantity, so that the surface gravity \(\kappa \) is negative, i.e. the apparent horizon of the FRW universe is an inner trapping horizon [2] . This surface gravity has a simple relation with the Ricci scalar of the FRW universe
The Kodama–Hayward temperature is defined from the surface gravity (2.9)
Furthermore, in Einstein gravity we have Bekenstein–Hawking entropy
and Misner–Sharp energy [29, 30]
for the FRW universe.
From (2.3), (2.7) and (2.8), one can express \(\rho _m\) and \(p_m\) in terms of \(R_A\) and \(\dot{R}_A\), i.e.
Thus one can get the work density [2] of the matter field in the FRW universe
and the thermodynamic volume is
With the above quantities defined, the following relation can be easily checked:
Compared with the first law of thermodynamicsFootnote 5
we see that the internal energy U and thermodynamic pressure P can be identified with \(-M\) and W, i.e.
Note that this definition of P using the work density is more natural than that in the literature using the cosmological constant, in the sense that it is here a true variable rather than a constant.
The equation of state for the thermodynamic pressure defined in (2.20) can be easily obtained from (2.11) and (2.15)
It is then natural to ask whether this system has a P-V phase transition, whose necessary condition is that the equation
or equivalently
has a critical-point solution \(T=T_c,\ P=P_c,\ R_A=R_c\). By substituting (2.21) into (2.23), one can easily check that no such solution exists, and thus there is no P-V phase transition for the FRW universe with a perfect fluid in Einstein gravity.
3 Modified gravity: equation of state
In this section, we derive the equation of state for the FRW universe in modified gravity, and we take the gravity with a generalized conformal scalar field as an example, which belongs to the Horndeski class.
3.1 A brief introduction of the gravity with a generalized conformal scalar field
The most generic scalar–tensor theory is Horndeski gravity [26], which allows high order derivatives in the action. Its equations of motion has at most second order derivatives, so there are no Ostrogradsky instabilities [32], which is similar to Lovelock gravity. Horndeski gravity has been used to study the thermodynamics of black holes, where P-V phase transition has been found, and this arouses our interest that whether P-V phase transition can be found for the FRW universe in this gravity.
The general form of the Lagrangian in Horndeski gravity is written as [33],Footnote 6
where \(G_2,G_3,G_4\) and \(G_5\) are arbitrary functions of \(\phi \) and \(X:=-\nabla ^{\mu }\phi \nabla _{\mu }\phi /2\equiv -(\nabla \phi )^2/2\). In the following, we only consider a special example of the Horndeski gravity, where the scalar field is conformally invariant [32]. In this case, the action is obtained asFootnote 7
where
and \(S_m\) stands for the action of other matter fields, such as the perfect fluid. The above action (3.2) is a special example of Horndeski gravity (3.1) with
3.2 The equation of state for the FRW universe
In this part, we apply this modified gravity to the FRW universe and get its equation of state. We start with the Friedmann’s equation, then get the first law of thermodynamics, and obtain the equation of state in the end.
For convenience, we apply this modified gravity (3.2) to the spatially flat (\(k=0\)) FRW universe with stress–tensor (2.2) and \(\Lambda =0\). In this case, the modified Friedmann’s equations [32] are very simpleFootnote 8
and satisfy the continuity equation
Interestingly, the above equations have the same form as the ones from holographic cosmology [37, 38], quantum corrected entropy-area relation [39], generalized uncertainty principle [40], and the 4d EGB gravity [36].
For the spatially flat FRW universe, the relations (2.7) and (2.8) are much simplified
which can be used to rewrite the Friedmann’s equations (3.7) and (3.8), and the results are
Therefore, the work density of the matter field is
and the thermodynamic volume can still take the form of \(V=4\pi R_A^3/3\).
The Kodama–Hayward temperature (2.11) for the spatially flat FRW universe reduces to
but its conjugate entropy may not take the Bekenstein–Hawking form \(S=A/4\), because it is known that this form does not hold in many theories beyond Einstein gravity (see e.g. [39]). Corresponding to the action (3.2) we make the following ansatz for the entropy.Footnote 9
which guarantees that the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy can be recovered in the Einstein gravity limit \(\alpha ,\beta ,\lambda \rightarrow 0\).
The energy for the FRW universe here can be easily obtained from (3.11)
which could be regarded as the effective Misner–Sharp energy, so it should also satisfy the relation (2.17)
except that W, T, S take the new forms in (3.13), (3.14), and (3.15) respectively.
One immediate finding is that the expression of the entropy (3.15) can be determined from (3.17)
where \(A_0\) can take any constant with the dimensionality of area to guarantee the logarithmic function is well defined. In the above entropy, there is only one correction term to the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy as expected, which is also the same form as the static black hole entropy derived in the same theory [32], the black hole entropy with quantum or thermal correction [39, 44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51] and the entropy of 4d Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS space [52].
In the same way as we did for Einstein gravity, here again we identify the internal energy U with \(-E\) and the thermodynamic pressure P with W, i.e.
then the standard first law of thermodynamics (Gibbs equation) can be established
Finally, from (3.13), (3.14) and (3.20), we obtain the equation of state:
4 Modified gravity: P-V phase transition
In this section, we show that the equation of state (3.22) for FRW universe has a critical point and the critical exponents are the same as the mean field theory, i.e. the FRW universe has a P-V phase transition.
For the equation of state (3.22), the critical condition (2.22) can be written as
If \(\alpha >0\), the critical radius and temperature can not be both positive, so there is not any physical solution in this case. If \(\alpha <0\), there is a critical point
A dimensionless constant can be acquired from the above three values:
Near the critical point, there are four critical exponents \((\tilde{\alpha },\beta ,\gamma ,\delta )\) defined in the following way [26, 52]:
where
In most cases, the four critical exponents satisfy the following four scaling laws
in which there are actually two independent relations. In the following, we will calculate the four critical exponents and check whether they satisfy the scaling laws.
The entropy (3.18) of the FRW universe in this modified gravity is also a function of the thermodynamic volume V, so \(C_V\) is zero, which means the first critical exponent \(\tilde{\alpha }\) is zero. To get the other three critical exponents conveniently, one can expand the thermodynamic pressure or the equation of state (3.22) around the critical point
where the coefficients are
The Gibbs free energy is defined as usual
so we have
and thus the Maxwell’s equal area law still holds. The values of P at the two endpoints of the coexistence line are the same
or
where the labels ‘s’ and ‘l’ stand for ‘small’ and ‘large’ respectively. Another relation is
so we have
From the above two relations (4.18) and (4.20), one can get a nontrivial solution
and
which shows that the second critical exponent \(\beta \) is 1/2. Interestingly, because \(a_{11}>0, a_{03}<0\), we have \(t>0\), which means that the coexistence phases in the P-V diagram appear above the critical temperature \(T>T_{c}\). This behavior is different from that of an AdS black hole, where coexistence phases appear below the critical temperature \(T<T_{c}\).
The third critical exponent is from the isothermal compressibility near the critical point
which shows \(\gamma =1\).
The shape of the isothermal line of the critical temperature \(t=0\) is
which provides the fourth critical exponent \(\delta =3\).
In summary, the four critical exponents are:
which are the same as those in the mean field theory and satisfy the scaling laws (4.10).
5 Conclusions and discussions
In this paper, we have studied the thermodynamic properties, especially the equation of state and P-V phase transitions of the FRW universe with a perfect fluid in Einstein gravity and a modified theory of gravity that belongs to the Horndeski class. The thermodynamic pressure P of the FRW universe is defined as the work density W, which is a natural definition directly read out from the first law of thermodynamics. We have derived the equations of state, and impressively in the modified gravity case, it exhibits P-V phase transitions. To our best knowledge of the literature, this is the first time that such phase transitions are found in a spacetime that is not asymptotically AdS black holes. The phase transitions occur above the critical temperature, which is different from the AdS black holes. In the end, we have calculated the four critical exponents, which are the same as those in the mean field theory and thus satisfy the scaling laws.
We would like to discuss a few more open questions related to our work. The first natural question is whether P-V phase transitions can be found for FRW universe in other modified theories of gravity and/or filled with other fields. The second question is whether P-V phase transitions can be found in black holes inside the FRW universeFootnote 10 and other dynamical black holes. We will carry these investigations in the future.
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: There is no additional data (such as figures) associated with this paper.]
Notes
However, it should be noted that from holography or AdS/CFT, the cosmological constant \(\Lambda \) is related with the rank N of a gauge group (or number of colors) [13], so treating the cosmological “constant” in the bulk as a thermodynamical “variable” corresponds to treating the number of colors in the dual boundary theory as a thermodynamical variable [13, 17, 19, 20], which changes the theory and does not belong to the standard thermodynamical method [21].
Note that investigations have shown that the existence of an apparent horizon is the main cause of having a self-consistent thermodynamics [2, 4, 5, 9]. Although the FRW thermodynamics was historically inspired by that of black holes, the self-consistency of the former in principle does not rely on the latter.
It means that the FRW universe belongs to dynamical spacetimes, and has no global timelike Killing vector field, which makes it difficult to define conserved charges using the method for stationary spacetimes. In the Appendix, we show how to define conserved quantities in the FRW universe and why the FRW universe can be regarded as a quasi-equilibrium system.
The metric of the FRW universe in physical coordinates are also given in the Appendix.
If \(\beta \) and \(\lambda \) are zero, it reduces to the action of the regularized 4d Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity [36].
For stationary black holes, there are a number of approaches [41] to calculate the entropy, such as the Euclidean method and Noether charge method. For dynamical black holes, Wald [42] proposed that one can use locally defined geometric quantities to get the entropy. Inspired by Wald’s work, Hayward [43] proposed that one can use Kodama vector instead of Killing vector in the Wald formula to give the definition of dynamical black hole entropy. This method should be applicable to the FRW universe in this modified gravity as well, but it is more complex and will not be used in this paper.
For the McVittie black hole, a Hawking-Page-like phase transition instead of a P-V phase transition has been found in Einstein gravity [53].
References
S.W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes. Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199–220 (1975) (Erratum: Commun. Math. Phys. 46, 206 (1976)). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020
S.A. Hayward, General laws of black hole dynamics. Phys. Rev. D 49, 6467–6474 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6467
S.A. Hayward, Unified first law of black hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics. Class. Quantum Gravity 15, 3147–3162 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/15/10/017. arXiv:gr-qc/9710089 [gr-qc]
T. Padmanabhan, Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons. Phys. Rep. 406, 49–125 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.003. arXiv:gr-qc/0311036 [gr-qc]
R.G. Cai, S.P. Kim, First law of thermodynamics and Friedmann equations of Friedmann–Robertson–Walker universe. JHEP 02, 050 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/02/050. arXiv:hep-th/0501055
M. Akbar, R.G. Cai, Friedmann equations of FRW universe in scalar-tensor gravity, f(R) gravity and first law of thermodynamics. Phys. Lett. B 635, 7–10 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2006.02.035. arXiv:hep-th/0602156
M. Akbar, R.G. Cai, Thermodynamic behavior of Friedmann equations at apparent horizon of FRW universe. Phys. Rev. D 75, 084003 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.084003. arXiv:hep-th/0609128
R.G. Cai, L.M. Cao, Unified first law and thermodynamics of apparent horizon in FRW universe. Phys. Rev. D 75, 064008 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.064008. arXiv:gr-qc/0611071
Y. Gong, A. Wang, The Friedmann equations and thermodynamics of apparent horizons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 211301 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.211301. arXiv:0704.0793 [hep-th]
R.G. Cai, L.M. Cao, Y.P. Hu, Hawking radiation of apparent horizon in a FRW universe. Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 155018 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/15/155018. arXiv:0809.1554 [hep-th]
T. Zhu, J.R. Ren, D. Singleton, Hawking-like radiation as tunneling from the apparent horizon in a FRW Universe. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 19, 159–169 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271810016336. arXiv:0902.2542 [hep-th]
Y.P. Hu, Hawking radiation from the cosmological horizon in a FRW universe. Phys. Lett. B 701, 269–274 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.05.054. arXiv:1007.4044 [gr-qc]
D. Kastor, S. Ray, J. Traschen, Enthalpy and the mechanics of AdS black holes. Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 195011 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/19/195011. arXiv:0904.2765 [hep-th]
D. Kubiznak, R.B. Mann, P-V criticality of charged AdS black holes. JHEP 07, 033 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2012)033. arXiv:1205.0559 [hep-th]
R.G. Cai, L.M. Cao, L. Li, R.Q. Yang, P-V criticality in the extended phase space of Gauss–Bonnet black holes in AdS space. JHEP 09, 005 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2013)005. arXiv:1306.6233 [gr-qc]
B.P. Dolan, Pressure and volume in the first law of black hole thermodynamics. Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 235017 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/23/235017. arXiv:1106.6260 [gr-qc]
D. Kastor, S. Ray, J. Traschen, Chemical potential in the first law for holographic entanglement entropy. JHEP 11, 120 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2014)120. arXiv:1409.3521 [hep-th]
S. Carlip, Black hole thermodynamics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23, 1430023 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271814300237. arXiv:1410.1486 [gr-qc]
C.V. Johnson, Holographic heat engines. Class. Quantum Gravity 31, 205002 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/31/20/205002. arXiv:1404.5982 [hep-th]
B.P. Dolan, Bose condensation and branes. JHEP 10, 179 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2014)179. arXiv:1406.7267 [hep-th]
A. Karch, B. Robinson, Holographic black hole chemistry. JHEP 12, 073 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2015)073. arXiv:1510.02472 [hep-th]
J. Xu, L.M. Cao, Y.P. Hu, P-V criticality in the extended phase space of black holes in massive gravity. Phys. Rev. D 91(12), 124033 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124033. arXiv:1506.03578 [gr-qc]
S.H. Hendi, S. Panahiyan, B. Eslam Panah, M. Momennia, Phase transition of charged black holes in massive gravity through new methods. Ann. Phys. 528(11–12), 819–834 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201600180. arXiv:1506.07262 [hep-th]
S.H. Hendi, R.B. Mann, S. Panahiyan, B. Eslam Panah, Van der Waals like behavior of topological AdS black holes in massive gravity. Phys. Rev. D 95(2), 021501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.021501. arXiv:1702.00432 [gr-qc]
C.H. Nam, Non-linear charged AdS black hole in massive gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 78(12), 1016 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6498-1
Y.P. Hu, H.A. Zeng, Z.M. Jiang, H. Zhang, P-V criticality in the extended phase space of black holes in Einstein–Horndeski gravity. Phys. Rev. D 100(8), 084004 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.084004. arXiv:1812.09938 [gr-qc]
Y.P. Hu, L. Cai, X. Liang, S.B. Kong, H. Zhang, Divergence behavior of thermodynamic curvature scalar at critical point in the extended phase space of generic black holes. Phys. Lett. B 822, 136661 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136661. arXiv:2010.09363 [gr-qc]
H. Abdusattar, S.B. Kong, W.L. You, H. Zhang, Y.P. Hu, First principle study of gravitational pressure and thermodynamics of FRW universe. arXiv:2108.09407 [gr-qc]
H. Maeda, M. Nozawa, Generalized Misner–Sharp quasi-local mass in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity. Phys. Rev. D 77, 064031 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.064031. arXiv:0709.1199 [hep-th]
R.G. Cai, L.M. Cao, Y.P. Hu, N. Ohta, Generalized Misner–Sharp energy in f(R) gravity. Phys. Rev. D 80, 104016 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.104016. arXiv:0910.2387 [hep-th]
S.F. Wu, X.H. Ge, P.M. Zhang, G.H. Yang, Dynamical horizon entropy and equilibrium thermodynamics of generalized gravity theories. Phys. Rev. D 81, 044034 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.044034. arXiv:0912.4633 [gr-qc]
P.G.S. Fernandes, Gravity with a generalized conformal scalar field: theory and solutions. Phys. Rev. D 103(10), 104065 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104065. arXiv:2105.04687 [gr-qc]
T. Kobayashi, Horndeski theory and beyond: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 82(8), 086901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab2429. arXiv:1901.07183 [gr-qc]
C. Deffayet, X. Gao, D.A. Steer, G. Zahariade, From k-essence to generalised Galileons. Phys. Rev. D 84, 064039 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.064039. arXiv:1103.3260 [hep-th]
T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi, J. Yokoyama, Generalized G-inflation: inflation with the most general second-order field equations. Prog. Theor. Phys. 126, 511–529 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.126.511. arXiv:1105.5723 [hep-th]
J.X. Feng, B.M. Gu, F.W. Shu, Theoretical and observational constraints on regularized 4\(D\) Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity. Phys. Rev. D 103, 064002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.064002. arXiv:2006.16751 [gr-qc]
P.S. Apostolopoulos, G. Siopsis, N. Tetradis, Cosmology from an AdS Schwarzschild black hole via holography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 151301 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.151301. arXiv:0809.3505 [hep-th]
N. Bilic, Randall–Sundrum versus holographic cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 93(6), 066010 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.066010. arXiv:1511.07323 [gr-qc]
R.G. Cai, L.M. Cao, Y.P. Hu, Corrected entropy-area relation and modified Friedmann equations. JHEP 08, 090 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/08/090. arXiv:0807.1232 [hep-th]
J.E. Lidsey, Holographic cosmology from the first law of thermodynamics and the generalized uncertainty principle. Phys. Rev. D 88, 103519 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.103519. arXiv:0911.3286 [hep-th]
V. Iyer, R.M. Wald, A comparison of Noether charge and Euclidean methods for computing the entropy of stationary black holes. Phys. Rev. D 52, 4430–4439 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.4430. arXiv:gr-qc/9503052 [gr-qc]
R.M. Wald, Black hole entropy is the Noether charge. Phys. Rev. D 48(8), R3427–R3431 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.48.R3427. arXiv:gr-qc/9307038
S.A. Hayward, S. Mukohyama, M.C. Ashworth, Dynamic black hole entropy. Phys. Lett. A 256, 347–350 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00225-X. arXiv:gr-qc/9810006
S.N. Solodukhin, Entropy of Schwarzschild black hole and string: black hole correspondence. Phys. Rev. D 57, 2410–2414 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.57.2410. arXiv:hep-th/9701106
R.B. Mann, S.N. Solodukhin, Universality of quantum entropy for extreme black holes. Nucl. Phys. B 523, 293–307 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00094-7. arXiv:hep-th/9709064
R.K. Kaul, P. Majumdar, Logarithmic correction to the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5255–5257 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5255. arXiv:gr-qc/0002040
S. Carlip, Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the Cardy formula. Class. Quantum Gravity 17, 4175–4186 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/302. arXiv:gr-qc/0005017 [gr-qc]
S. Das, P. Majumdar, R.K. Bhaduri, General logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy. Class. Quantum Gravity 19, 2355–2368 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/19/9/302. arXiv:hep-th/0111001
S. Mukherji, S.S. Pal, Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy and AdS / CFT correspondence. JHEP 05, 026 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/05/026. arXiv:hep-th/0205164
G. Gour, A.J.M. Medved, Thermal fluctuations and black hole entropy. Class. Quantum Gravity 20, 3307–3326 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/20/15/303. arXiv:gr-qc/0305018
A. Chatterjee, P. Majumdar, Universal canonical black hole entropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 141301 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.141301. arXiv:gr-qc/0309026
S.W. Wei, Y.X. Liu, Extended thermodynamics and microstructures of four-dimensional charged Gauss–Bonnet black hole in AdS space. Phys. Rev. D 101(10), 104018 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.104018. arXiv:2003.14275 [gr-qc]
H. Abdusattar, S.B. Kong, Y. Yin, Y.P. Hu, The Hawking-Page-like phase transition from FRW spacetime to McVittie black hole. JCAP 8(8), 60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/060. arXiv:2203.10868 [gr-qc]
M.K. Parikh, New coordinates for de Sitter space and de Sitter radiation. Phys. Lett. B 546, 189–195 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02701-6. arXiv:hep-th/0204107
H. Kodama, Conserved energy flux for the spherically symmetric system and the back reaction problem in the black hole evaporation. Prog. Theor. Phys. 63, 1217 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.63.1217
M. Minamitsuji, M. Sasaki, Local conservation law and dark radiation in cosmological brane world. Phys. Rev. D 70, 044021 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.044021. arXiv:gr-qc/0312109
R.G. Cai, L.M. Cao, Thermodynamics of apparent horizon in brane world scenario. Nucl. Phys. B 785, 135–148 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.06.016. arXiv:hep-th/0612144
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the valuable comments from the referees and useful discussions with Li-Ming Cao, Shao-Wen Wei, Yen Chin Ong, Wen-Long You, et al.
Funding
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grants Nos. 12175105, 11575083, 11565017, Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (TAPP), and “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, No. NS2020054” of China. H. Zhang is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No.12235019, and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2020YFC2201400).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: The quasi-equilibrium properties of the FRW universe
Appendix A: The quasi-equilibrium properties of the FRW universe
One can use the physical radius \(R:=a(t)r\) instead of the comoving coordinate r and get a new line element for the FRW universe [10]
which is quite similar to the Painlevé-de Sitter metric [54] in the case \(k=0\). If one demands the Hubble parameter H to be a constant as well as \(k=0\), it is just the Painlevé-de Sitter metric. If H changes very slowly, the FRW universe is a quasi-de Sitter space.
For the FRW universe as well as other dynamical spacetimes, there exists a counterpart of the Killing vector field, which is the Kodama vector field. For spacetimes with spherical symmetry, the Kodama vector is defined as [10, 29, 30, 55, 56]
For the above line element (A1), the Kodama vector can be obtained as
which is very similar to the Killing vector \((\partial /\partial t)^a\) in de Sitter space.
With the Kodama vector field, one can define conserved quantities such as the Misner–Sharp energy for the FRW universe. At first, one can define the energy current
which is divergence free
in Einstein gravity, and many modified theories of gravity. Then, one can define the associated conserved charge (generalized Misner–Sharp energy)
where \(\Sigma \) is a hypersurface and \(\textrm{d}\Sigma _{\mu }\) is its directed surface element. The Misner–Sharp energy satisfies the unified first law [3, 8], which after being projected onto the apparent horizon leads to the first law of thermodynamics. One can find that, for the FRW universe in Einstein gravity and some modified theories of gravity, the Clausius relation holds, which also suggests that the FRW universe is an (quasi-)equilibrium thermodynamic system [31, 57].
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3. SCOAP3 supports the goals of the International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development.
About this article
Cite this article
Kong, SB., Abdusattar, H., Yin, Y. et al. The P-V phase transition of the FRW universe. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1047 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10976-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10976-9