Abstract.
In heavy ion collisions at low energy (E/A < 10–15 MeV/nucleon) the N/Z ratio in the entrance channel is closely related to the isospin degree of freedom and can influence the reaction mechanisms and consequently the production of the fragments in the exit channel. We analyse the fragment production cross sections in the reactions 86Kr + 48Ca and 78Kr + 40Ca , at the laboratory energy of 10 MeV/nucleon. The experiment was conducted at the INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud in Catania, by using the \( 4\pi\) detector CHIMERA. For the two reactions, elastic scattering measurements are performed to extract the normalization factor used to evaluate the absolute cross sections. Velocity and energy spectra, mass and charge distributions, as well as dynamic features of reaction products, are studied. The study of the characteristics of mass and charge distributions, energy and velocity spectra of the reaction products shows mainly a relaxed component, related to fusion reaction followed by evaporation or binary decay. Nevertheless signals ascribable to a non equilibrated component are present. Structure effects are evident in the staggered shape of emitted fragments cross sections and are more pronounced in the neutron poor system. The analysis highlights clear differences for the two systems in the contributions arising from different reaction mechanisms. Besides, a study of the overall influence from the entrance channel energy is performed. Comparisons to DNS (DiNuclear System) and GEMINI++ models are reported. The data analysis indicates a slightly higher fusion-evaporation cross section and a strongly pronounced probability of fission-like processes for the neutron poor system with respect to the neutron rich one. The neutron enrichment seems thus to limit the formation of the composite system and to inhibit the fission decay channel.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Feshbach, Theoretical Nuclear Physics, Nuclear Reactions (J. Wiley & Sons, INC, 1992)
U. Mosel, Treatise on Heavy Ion Science, Vol. 2, edited by D.A. Bromley (Springer, 1985) p. 3
P. Eudes, Z. Basrak, F. Sebille, V. de la Mota, G. Royer, Phys. Rev. C 90, 034609 (2014)
G. Cardella et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 064609 (2012)
K. Godbey, A.S. Umar, C. Simenel, Phys. Rev. C 95, 011601 (2017)
I. Lombardo et al., Phys. Rev. C 84, 024613 (2011)
P. Russotto et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 014610 (2015)
L.G. Sobotka, M.L. Padgett, G.J. Wozniak, G. Guarino, A.J. Pacheco, L.G. Moretto, Y. Chan, R.G. Stokstad, I. Tserruya, S. Wald, Phis. Rev. Lett. 51, 2187 (1983)
G. Ademard et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 054619 (2011)
G. Casini et al., Phys. Rev. C 86, 011602 (2012)
M. D’Agostino et al., Nucl. Phys. A 861, 47 (2011)
G. Politi et al., EPJ Web of Conferences 21, 02003 (2012)
M. La Commara et al., EPJ Web of Conferences 31, 2012 (2012)
S. Pirrone et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 1524, 7 (2013)
M. La Commara et al., EPJ Web of Conferences 66, 03052 (2014)
B. Gnoffo, Nuovo Cimento C 39, 275 (2016)
A. Pagano et al., Nucl. Phys. A 734, 504 (2004)
E. De Filippo, A. Pagano, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 32 (2014)
G. Peilert, H. Stocker, W. Greiner, Rep. Prog. Phys. 57, 6 (1994)
A. Pagano, Proceedings of the XLII International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics, Bormio (Italy), edited by I. Iori (Università degli Studi di Milano, Ricerca Scientifica ed Educazione Permanente, 2004) suppl. 123, p. 359
M. Alderighi et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 279 (2006)
M. Alderighi et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52, 1624 (2005)
R. Bassini et al., IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Record N14, 173 (2006)
K. Summerer, B. Blank, Phys. Rev. C 61, 034607 (2000)
W.W. Wilcke, J.R. Birkelund, H.J. Wollersheim, A.D. Hoover, J.R. Huizenga, W.U. Schroeder, L.E. Tubbs, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 25, 389 (1980)
I. Lombardo et al., Nucl. Phys. A 834, 458 (2010)
H. Morgenstern, W. Bohen, W. Galster, K. Grabisch, A. Kyanowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1104 (1984)
L.G. Moretto, Nucl. Phys. A 247, 211 (1975)
R.J. Charity, D.R. Bowmanand, Z.H. Liu, R.J. McDonald, M.A. McMahan, G.J. Wozniak, L.G. Moretto, S. Bradley, W.L. Kehoe, A.C. Mignerey, Nucl. Phys. A 476, 516 (1988)
K.X. Jing, L.G. Moretto, A.C. Veeck, N. Colonna, I. Lhenry, K. Tso, K. Hanold, W. Skulski, Q. Sui, G.J. Wozniak, Nucl. Phys. A 645, 203 (1999)
F. Auger, B. Berthier, A. Cunsolo, A. Foti, W. Mittig, J.M. Pascaud, E. Plagnol, J. Quebert, J.-P. Wieleczko, Phys. Rev. C 35, 190 (1987)
D. Hinde, J. Leigh, J. Bokhorst, J. Newton, R. Walsh, J. Boldeman, Nucl. Phys. A 472, 318 (1987)
V.E. Viola, K. Kwiatkowski, M. Walker, Phys. Rev. C 31, 1550 (1985)
C. Beck, A.S. de Toledo, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1989 (1996)
D. Hinde, A. Berriman, M. Dasgupta, J. Leigh, J. Mein, C. Morton, J. Newton, Phys. Rev. C 60, 054602 (1999)
B. Gnoffo, Nuovo Cimento C, in preparation
B. Gnoffo et al., EPJ Web of Conferences 117, 08012 (2016)
J. Boger, J.M. Alexander, A. Elmaani, S. Kox, R.A. Lacey, A. Narayanan, D. Moses, M.A. McMahan, P.A. DeYoung, C.J. Gelderloos, Phys. Rev. C 49, 1597 (1994)
Sh.A. Kalandarov, G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko, W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. C 82, 044603 (2010)
Sh.A. Kalandarov, G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko, W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. C 83, 054611 (2011)
Sh.A. Kalandarov et al., Phys. Rev. C 84, 054607 (2011)
Sh.A. Kalandarov, G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko, W. Scheid, J.P. Wieleczko, Phys. Rev. C 84, 064601 (2011)
G. Adamian, N. Antonenko, W. Scheid, Cluster in Nuclei, Vol. 2, edited by C. Beck, Lect. Notes Phys. Vol. 848 (Springer, 2012) p. 165
Sh.A. Kalandarov, G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko, Phys. Part. Nucl. 43, 825 (2012)
Sh.A. Kalandarov, G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko, J.P. Wieleczko, Phys. Rev. C 90, 024609 (2014)
G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko, Sh.A. Kalandarov, Phys. Part. Nucl. 47, 1 (2016)
Sh.A. Kalandarov, D. Lacroix, G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko, J.P. Wieleczko, S. Pirrone, G. Politi, Phys. Rev. C 93, 024613 (2016)
D. Lacroix, A. VanLauwe, D. Durand, Phys. Rev. C 69, 054604 (2004)
A.V. Ignatiuk, Statistical Properties of Excited Atomic Nuclei (Energoizdat Moscow, 1983)
L. Shvedov, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, Phys. Rev. C 81, 054605 (2010)
C. Rizzo, M. Colonna, V. Baran, Phys. Rev. C 90, 054618 (2014)
H. Hauser, H. Feshbach, Phys. Rev. 87, 366 (1952)
A.J. Sierk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 582 (1985)
N. Carjan, J.M. Alexander, Phys. Rev. C 38, 1692 (1988)
D. Mancusi, R.J. Charity, J. Cugnon, Phys. Rev. C 82, 044610 (2010)
N. Bohr, J.A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 56, 426 (1939)
A.Y. Rusanov, M.G. Itkis, V.N. Okolovic, Phys. At. Nucl. 60, 683 (1997)
R. Bass, Phys. Lett. B 47, 139 (1973)
R. Bass, Nucl. Phys. A 231, 45 (1974)
S. Cohen, F. Plasil, W.J. Swiatecki, Ann. Phys. 82, 557 (1974)
A. Umar, C. Simenel, W. Ye, Phys. Rev. C 96, 024625 (2017)
E. Williams et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 022501 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. Di Pietro
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: All data generated during this study are contained in this published article.]
Publisher’s Note
The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pirrone, S., Politi, G., Gnoffo, B. et al. Isospin influence on fragments production in 78Kr + 40Ca and 86Kr + 48Ca collisions at 10 MeV/nucleon. Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12695-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12695-4