Abstract.
In this article, we study the \( C\gamma_5\otimes \gamma_5C\) type and \( C\otimes C\) type scalar \( cs\bar{c}\bar{s}\) tetraquark states with the QCD sum rules by calculating the contributions of the vacuum condensates up to dimension 10 in a consistent way. The ground state masses \( M_{C\gamma_5\otimes \gamma_5C}=3.89\pm 0.05\) GeV and \( M_{C\otimes C} =5.48\pm0.10\) GeV support assigning the \( X(3915)\) as the ground state \( C\gamma_5\otimes \gamma_5C\) type tetraquark state with \( J^{PC}=0^{++}\) , but do not support assigning the \( X(4700)\) as the ground state \( C\otimes C\) type \( cs\bar{c}\bar{s}\) tetraquark state with \( J^{PC}=0^{++}\) . Then we tentatively assign the \( X(3915)\) and \( X(4500)\) as the 1S and 2S \( C\gamma_5\otimes \gamma_5C\) type scalar \( cs\bar{c}\bar{s}\) tetraquark states respectively, and obtain the 1S mass \( M_{1S}= 3.85^{+0.18}_{-0.17}\) GeV and 2S mass M 2S = 4.35+0.10 -0.11 GeV from the QCD sum rules, which support assigning the X(3915) as the 1S \( C\gamma_5\otimes \gamma_5C\) type tetraquark state, but do not support assigning the X(4500) as the 2S \( C\gamma_5\otimes \gamma_5C\) type tetraquark state.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Aaij et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 022003 (2017)
R. Aaij et al., Phys. Rev. D 95, 012002 (2017)
H.X. Chen, E.L. Cui, W. Chen, X. Liu, S.L. Zhu, arXiv:1606.03179
X.H. Liu, arXiv:1607.01385
L. Maiani, A.D. Polosa, V. Riquer, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054026 (2016)
R. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054009 (2016)
R.F. Lebed, A.D. Polosa, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094024 (2016)
Z.G. Wang, arXiv:1606.05872
Z.G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 657 (2016)
A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D 12, 147 (1975)
T. DeGrand, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, J.E. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2060 (1975)
Z.G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1524 (2011)
R.T. Kleiv, T.G. Steele, A. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 87, 125018 (2013)
Z.G. Wang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 59, 451 (2013)
Z.G. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 79, 094027 (2009)
Z.G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 67, 411 (2010)
Z.G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2874 (2014)
Z.G. Wang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 63, 466 (2015)
Z.G. Wang, T. Huang, Nucl. Phys. A 930, 63 (2014)
M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B 147, 385 (1979)
M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B 147, 448 (1979)
L.J. Reinders, H. Rubinstein, S. Yazaki, Phys. Rep. 127, 1 (1985)
P. Pascual, R. Tarrach, QCD: Renormalization for the Practitioner (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1984)
Z.G. Wang, T. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 89, 054019 (2014)
Z.G. Wang, Acta Phys. Pol. B 44, 1971 (2013)
Z.G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 131 (2013)
P. Colangelo, A. Khodjamirian, hep-ph/0010175
S. Narison, Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 17, 1 (2002)
C. Patrignani et al., Chin. Phys. C 40, 100001 (2016)
S.J. Brodsky, D.S. Hwang, R.F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 112001 (2014)
Z.G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 387 (2016)
Z.G. Wang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 63, 325 (2015)
Z.G. Wang, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51, 507 (2012)
Z.G. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1550168 (2015)
M.S. Maior de Sousa, R. Rodrigues da Silva, Braz. J. Phys. 46, 730 (2016)
C.A. Dominguez, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1430069 (2014)
A. Ayala, C.A. Dominguez, M. Loewe, arXiv:1608.04284
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. Peshier
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, ZG. Reanalysis of the X(3915) , X(4500) and X(4700) with QCD sum rules. Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12208-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12208-7