Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of currents in ITER correction coils

  • Mathematical Modeling and Computational Physics 2013 Dubna, Russia, July 8–July 12, 2013
  • Computer Technologies in Physics
  • Published:
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In tokamaks non-axisymmetric magnetic field perturbations (error fields) can induce in plasma locked modes and cause disruption. In ITER the main contributor to error fields is assembly and manufacturing errors of the magnet system of the machine. To suppress intrinsic error fields and guarantee the expected plasma performance ITER is provided with the proper correction coils (CC). The paper is related to optimization of CC currents. The optimization takes into account as constraints both CC current capacities and an allowable level of error fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. J. La Haye, R. Fitzpatrick, T. C. Hender, A. W. Morris, J. T. Scoville, and T. N. Todd, “Critical error fields for locked mode instability in Tokamaks,” Phys. Fluids 4, 2098–2103 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. M. Fishpool, D. J. Campbell, R. Fitzpatrick, and P. S. Haynes, “A locked mode associated with low density in JET,” in Proceedings of IAEA Meeting on Avoidance and Control of Tokamak Disruption (1991), p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Fitzpatrick and T. C. Hender, “The interaction of resonant magnetic perturbations with rotating plasmas,” Phys. Fluids 3, 644 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. J. la Haye, “Physics of locked mode in ITER: error field limits, rotation for obviation, and measurement of error fields,” US Home Team Physics Contribution: General Atomics report GA-A22468 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. C. Hender et al., “MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions,” in Progress in ITER Physics Basis, Nucl. Fusion 47, 512–515 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Foussat, P. Libeyre, N. Mitchell, et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 20, 402–406 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Mitchell and J. Knaster, “Contributions to plasma error fields from the CS, PF and TF coils,” ITER report ITER-D-23DVQU (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Knaster,“Updated data. Magnets manufacturing and positioning tolerances,” ITER report ITER-D-6YBRVW (2011).

  9. V. Amoskov, A. Belov, V. Belyakov, et al., “Fourier analysis of 3D error fields in Tokamaks,” Plasma Dev. Operation 12, 285–297 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.-K. Park, A. H. Boozer, J. E. Menard, and M. J. Schaffer, “Error field correction in ITER,” Nucl. Fusion 48, 45 (2008).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Tikhonov and V. Arsenin, Methods of Solving Incorrect Problems (Nauka, Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Amoskov, A. Belov, V. Belyakov, et al., “Statistical analysis of expected error fields in Tokamaks and their correction,” Plasma Dev. Operat. 13, 87–103 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Knaster, V. Amoskov, A. Formizano, et al., “ITER non-axisymmetric error fields induced by its magnet system,” Fusion Eng. Des. 86, 1053–1056 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Amoskov, A. Belov, Y. Gribov, et al., “Error fields produced by TF, CS and PF coils and their correction (3-mode criterion),” ITER report ITER-D-3UYV33 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. M. Amoskov.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amoskov, V.M., Belyakov, V.A., Gribov, Y.A. et al. Optimization of currents in ITER correction coils. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 12, 375–379 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477115030048

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477115030048

Keywords

Navigation