Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Initial Stages of Recovery of Soil Macrofauna Communities after Reduction of Emissions from a Copper Smelter

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analysis of natural recovery of communities after reduction of industrial emissions is important for gaining an insight into their stability. However, there is obvious deficit in observations on the course of this recovery; in particular, no data on direct comparisons of the state of communities before and after reduction of emissions are available for soil macroinvertebrates. We have studied the structure of soil macrofauna communities at the level of supraspecific taxa in southern taiga spruce-fir forests in the region exposed to emissions from the Middle Ural Copper Smelter (MUCS; Revda, Sverdlovsk oblast). The data over three periods—high, reduced, and almost terminated emissions (1990–1991, 2004, and 2014–2016, respectively)—have been compared to test the hypothesis that the communities do not recover rapidly. The results partly confirm this hypothesis. On the one hand, the response of pedobionts to pollution at a qualitative level has remained basically unchanged: in each of the three periods, their total abundance (and that of the majority of groups) decreased abruptly as the MUCS was approached, with dominance shifting from saprophages to phyto- and zoophages. On the other hand, signs of recovery have appeared during the last period: the abundance of pedobionts has increased, and pollution-sensitive groups (earthworms, enchytraeids, and mollusks) have approached closer to the MUCS. This is most likely explained by decrease in the toxicity of metals due to normalization of soil pH. Rapid recolonization of defaunated territory may be accounted for by the presence in it of microsites with more favorable conditions, compared to the surrounding area, which allow low-mobile forms to survive beyond the boundaries of their main distribution area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brussaard, L., Pulleman, M.M., Ouedraogo, E., et al., Soil fauna and soil function in the fabric of the food web, Pedobiologia, 2007, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paoletti, M.G. and Bressan, M., Soil invertebrates as bioindicators of human disturbance, Crit. Rev. Plant Sci, 1996, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 21–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Vauflery, A. Poinsot-Balaguer, N., et al., The use of invertebrate soil fauna in monitoring pollutant effects, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 1999, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rusek, J. and Marshall, V.G., Impacts of airborne pollutants on soil fauna, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 2000, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 395–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bengtsson, G. and Tranvik, L., Critical metal concentrations for forest soil invertebrates: A review of the limitations, Water Air Soil Pollut., 1989, vol. 47, nos. 3–4, pp. 381–417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stepanov, A.M., Chernen’kova, T.M., Vereshchagina, T.N., and Bezukladova, Yu.O., Assessment of the impact of technogenic emissions on soil invertebrates and vegetation, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1991, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 699–707.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nekrasova, L.S., Impact of copper smelting on soil macrofauna, Ekologiya, 1993, no. 5, pp. 83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nahmani, J. and Lavelle, P., Effects of heavy metal pollution on soil macrofauna in a grassland of Northern France, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 2002, vol. 38, nos. 3–4, pp. 297–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gongalsky, K.B., Filimonova, Z.V., Pokarzhevskii, A.D., and Butovskii, R.O., Differences in responses of herpetobionts and geobionts to impact from the Kosogorsky Metallurgical Plant (Tula region, Russia), Russ. J. Ecol., 2007, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanasevich, A.V., Rybalov, L.B., and Kamaev, I.O., Dynamics of soil macrofauna in the zone of technogenic impact, Lesovedenie, 2009, no. 6, pp. 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vorobeichik, E.L., Ermakov, A.I., Zolotarev, M.P., and Tuneva, T.K., Changes in the diversity of soil macrofauna along an industrial pollution gradient, Russ. Entomol. J., 2012, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Korkina, I.N. and Vorobeichik, E.L., The humus index: A promising tool for environmental monitoring, Russ. J. Ecol., 2016, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 526–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Korkina, I.N. and Vorobeichik, E.L., Humus index as an indicator of the topsoil response to the impacts of industrial pollution, Appl. Soil. Ecol., 2018, vol. 123, pp. 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vorobeichik, E.L. and Nesterkova, D.V., Technogenic boundary of the mole distribution in the region of copper smelter impacts: Shift after reduction of emissions, Russ. J. Ecol., 2015, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 377–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sukhareva, T.A. and Lukina, N.V., Mineral composition of assimilative organs of conifers after reduction of atmospheric pollution in the Kola Peninsula, Russ. J. Ecol., 2014, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 95–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Belskii, E. and Grebennikov, M., Snail consumption and breeding performance of pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) along a pollution gradient in the Middle Urals, Russia, Sci. Tot. Environ., 2014, vol. 490, pp. 114–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pacyna, J.M., Pacyna, E.G., and Aas, W., Changes of emissions and atmospheric deposition of mercury, lead, and cadmium, Atmos. Environ., 2009, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 117–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Babin-Fenske, J. and Anand, M., Terrestrial insect communities and the restoration of an industrially perturbed landscape: Assessing success and surrogacy, Restor. Ecol., 2010, vol. 18, Suppl. 1, pp. 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Babin-Fenske, J. and Anand, M., Patterns of insect communities along a stress gradient following decommissioning of a Cu-Ni smelter, Environ. Pollut., 2011, vol. 159, no. 10, pp. 3036–3043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nahmani, J. and Rossi, J.-P., Soil macroinvertebrates as indicators of pollution by heavy metals, C. R. Biol., 2003, vol. 326, no. 3, pp. 295–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Niemeyer, J.C., Nogueira, M.A., Carvalho, G.M., et al., Functional and structural parameters to assess the ecological status of a metal contaminated area in the tropics, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2012, vol. 86, pp. 188–197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma, W.-C. and Eijsackers, H., The influence of substrate toxicity on soil macrofauna return in reclaimed land, in Animals in Primary Succession. The Role of Fauna in Land Reclamation, Cambridge, 1989, pp. 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Curry, J.P. and Good, J.A., Soil faunal degradation and restoration, in Soil Restoration, Lal, R. and Stewart, B.A., Eds., New York, 1992, pp. 171–215.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Dunger, W., Wanner, M., Hauser, H., et al., Development of soil fauna at mine sites during 46 years after afforestation, Pedobiologia, 2001, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 243–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cristescu, R.H., Frere, C., and Banks, P.B., A review of fauna in mine rehabilitation in Australia: Current state and future directions, Biol. Conserv., 2012, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vorobeichik, E.L. and Kaigorodova, S.Yu., Long-term dynamics of heavy metals in the upper horizons of soils in the region of a copper smelter impacts during the period of reduced emission, Euras. Soil Sci., 2017, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 977–990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vorobeichik, E.L., Sadykov, O.F., and Farafontov, M.G., Ekologicheskoe normirovanie tekhnogennykh zagryaznenii nazemnykh ekosistem (lokal’nyi uroven’) (Ecological Rating of Technogenic Pollutants in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Local Level), Yekaterinburg: Nauka, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vorobeichik, E.L., Response of the soil biota to emissions from copper smelters in forest ecosystems of the Middle Urals, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Yekaterinburg, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vorobeichik, E.L., Populations of earthworms (Lumbricidae) in forests of the Middle Urals in conditions of pollution by discharge from copper works, Russ. J. Ecol., 1998, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vorobeichik, E.L., Trubina, M.R., Khantemirova, E.V., and Bergman, I.E., Long-term dynamic of forest vegetation after reduction of copper smelter emissions, Russ. J. Ecol., 2014, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 498–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaigorodova S.Yu. and Vorobeichik E.L., Changes in certain properties of grey forest soil polluted with emissions from a copper-smelting plant, Russ. J. Ecol., 1996, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vorobeichik, E.L., Seasonal changes in the spatial distribution of cellulolytic activity of soil microflora under conditions of atmospheric pollution, Russ. J. Ecol, 2007, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mikryukov, V.S., Dulya, O.V., and Vorobeichik, E.L., Diversity and spatial structure of soil fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in forest litter contaminated with copper smelter emissions, Water Air Soil Pollut., 2015, vol. 226, no. 4, pp. 1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Smorkalov, I.A. and Vorobeichik, E.L., The mechanism of stability of CO2 emission from the forest litter under industrial pollution, Lesovedenie, 2016, no. 1, pp. 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kuznetsova, N.A. Soil-dwelling Collembola in coniferous forests along the gradient of pollution with emissions from the Middle Ural Copper Smelter, Russ. J. Ecol., 2009, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 415–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ermakov, A.I., Structural changes in the Carabid fauna of forest ecosystems under a toxic impact, Russ. J. Ecol., 2004, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 403–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Belskaya, E.A. and Zinov’ev, E.V., The structure of ground beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in natural and technogenic forest ecosystems in the southwest of Sverdlovsk oblast, Sib. Ekol. Zh., 2007, no. 4, pp. 533–543.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zolotarev, M.P. and Nesterkov, A.V., Arachnids (Aranei, Opiliones) in meadows: Response to pollution with emissions from the Middle Ural Copper Smelter, Russ. J. Ecol., 2015, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 81–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ermakov, A.I., Changes in the assemblage of necrophilous invertebrates under the effect of pollution with emissions from the Middle Ural Copper Smelter, Russ. J. Ecol., 2013, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 515–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Belskaya, E.A. and Vorobeichik, E.L., Responses of leaf-eating insects feeding on aspen to emissions from the Middle Ural Copper Smelter, Russ. J. Ecol., 2013, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mukhacheva, S.V., Long-term dynamics of heavy metal concentrations in the food and liver of bank voles (Myodes glareolus) in the period of reduction of emissions from a copper smelter, Russ. J. Ecol., 2017, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 559–568.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Belskaya, E.A., Dynamics of trophic activity of leaf-eating insects on birch during reduction of emissions from the Middle Ural Copper Smelter, Russ. J. Ecol., 2018, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mikhailova, I.N., Initial stages of recovery of epiphytic lichen communities after reduction of emissions from a copper smelter, Russ. J. Ecol., 2017, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 335–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tyler, G., Leaching rates of heavy metal ions in forest soil, Water Air Soil Pollut., 1978, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Vorobeichik, E.L. and Pishchulin, P.G., Industrial pollution reduces the effect of trees on forming the patterns of heavy metal concentration fields in forest litter, Russ. J. Ecol., 2016, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 431–441.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lajeunesse, M.J., Bias and correction for the log response ratio in ecological meta-analysis, Ecology, 2015, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 2056–2063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Elpat’evskii, P.V. and Filatova, L.D., Soil macrofauna under anomalous ecological and geochemical conditions, Geogr. Prir. Resur., 1988, no. 1, pp. 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Haimi, J. and Matasniemi, L., Soil decomposer animal community in heavy-metal contaminated coniferous forest with and without liming, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 2002, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 131–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. De Vries, W., Romkens, P.F.A.M., and Schutze, G., Critical soil concentrations of cadmium, lead, and mercury in view of health effects on humans and animals, Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2007, vol. 191, pp. 91–130.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sivakumar, S., Effects of metals on earthworm life cycles: A review, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2015, vol. 187, no. 8, pp. 1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. McBride, M., Sauve, S., and Hendershot, W., Solubility control of Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb in contaminated soils, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 1997, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 337–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dube, A., Zbytniewski, R., Kowalkowski, T., et al., Adsorption and migration of heavy metals in soil, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 2001, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Vorobeichik, E.L. and Pozolotina, V.N., Microscale spatial variation in forest litter phytotoxicity, Russ. J. Ecol., 2003, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 381–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Grumiaux, F., Demuynck, S., Pernin, C., and Lepretre, A., Earthworm populations of highly metal-contaminated soils restored by fly ash-aided phytostabilization, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2015, vol. 113, pp. 183–190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kapusta, P. and Sobczyk, L., Effects of heavy metal pollution from mining and smelting on enchytraeid communities under different land management and soil conditions, Sci. Tot. Environ., 2015, vol. 536, pp. 517–526.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Schellhorn, N.A., Bianchi, F., and Hsu, C.L., Movement of entomophagous arthropods in agricultural landscapes: Links to pest suppression, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 2014, vol. 59, pp. 559–581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wellings, P.W., How variable are rates of colonization?, Eur. J. Entomol., 1994, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Eijsackers, H., Earthworms as colonizers: Primary colonization of contaminated land, and sediment and soil waste deposits, Sci. Tot. Environ., 2010, vol. 408, no. 8, pp. 1759–1769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Eijsackers, H., Earthworms as colonizers of natural and cultivated soil environments, Appl. Soil. Ecol., 2011, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Cameron, E.K. and Bayne, E.M., Spatial patterns and spread of exotic earthworms at local scales, Can. J. Zool., 2015, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 721–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kramarenko, S.S., Active and passive migration of terrestrial mollusks: A review, Ruthenica, 2014, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ozgo, M. and Bogucki, Z., Colonization, stability, and adaptation in a transplant experiment of the polymorphic land snail Cepaea nemoralis (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) at the edge of its geographical range, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 2011, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 462–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Gongalsky, K.B., Belorustseva, S.A., Kuznetsova, D.M., et al., Spatial avoidance of patches of polluted chernozem soils by soil invertebrates, Insect Sci., 2009, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 99–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Gongalsky, K.B., Filimonova, Zh.B., and Zaitsev, A.S., Relationship between soil invertebrate abundance and soil heavy metal contents in the environs of the Kosogorsky Metallurgical Plant, Tula oblast, Russ. J. Ecol., 2010, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lukkari, T. and Haimi, J., Avoidance of Cu- and Zn-contaminated soil by three ecologically different earthworm species, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2005, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 35–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Vorobeichik, E.L., Ermakov, A.I., Nesterkova, D.V., and Grebennikov, M.E., Coarse woody debris as a microhabitat for soil macrofauna in polluted areas, Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2019 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Artem’ev, A.V., Populyatsionnaya ekologiya mukholovkipestrushki v severnoi zone areala (Population Ecology of the Pied Flycatcher in the Northern Part of Its Range), Moscow: Nauka, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Plant an Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, 620144, Russia

    E. L. Vorobeichik, A. I. Ermakov & M. E. Grebennikov

Authors
  1. E. L. Vorobeichik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. I. Ermakov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. E. Grebennikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. L. Vorobeichik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vorobeichik, E.L., Ermakov, A.I. & Grebennikov, M.E. Initial Stages of Recovery of Soil Macrofauna Communities after Reduction of Emissions from a Copper Smelter. Russ J Ecol 50, 146–160 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413619020115

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413619020115

Keywords

Search

Navigation