Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Wind on Soil-Atmosphere Gas Exchange

  • SOIL PHYSICS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global climate change in recent decades is accompanied by rising temperatures and increasing cyclonic activity with strong air flows. How do they affect soil respiration? Is it possible to expect an increase in CO2 emissions and, consequently, a positive feedback of climate change through the greenhouse effect? These questions cannot be answered without the insight into the effect of wind speed on the gas exchange between soil and atmosphere in different landscapes. The paper summarizes the long-term measurements of CO2 efflux from forest-steppe chernozems (Kursk oblast, Russia) in natural and anthropogenic landscapes with forest or herbaceous vegetation depending on wind speed; it presents a physically grounded approach to its quantitative first-approximation (linear) description. The approach assumes an impact of wind through increased forced convection and turbulent diffusivity along with a potential reduction in diffusion mass transfer due to a decrease in the gradient of CO2 concentration between the atmosphere and soil. The constructed inverse parabolic dependence adequately describes the empirical data and assumes a twofold increase in the emission with the wind speed increase to the critical value of 3 m/s and its decreases to the initial level with the further wind speed increase to 6–7 m/s. The intensity of forced convection of soil air turns out to be by five–six orders of magnitude lower than the wind speed in the atmosphere but not inferior to the intensity of conventional isothermal CO2 diffusion, which suggests that this mechanism is to be taken into account in the models of soil–atmosphere gas exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. I. S. Belyuchenko, A. V. Smagin, and L. B. Popok, Data Analysis and Mathematical Modeling in Ecology and Nature Management (Kuban State Agrarian University, Krasnodar, 2015) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Valentini, Yu. A. Kurbatova, and I. I. Vasenev, “Information and methodological support for regional monitoring of greenhouse gases,” Dokl. Timiryazevsk. S-kh. Akad., No. 284, 212 (2012).

  3. D. V. Karelin, D. I. Lyuri, S. V. Goryachkin, V. N. Lunin, and A. V. Kudikov, “Changes in the carbon dioxide emission from soils in the course of postagrogenic succession in the chernozem forest-steppe,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 1229–1241 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. V. Karelin, A. V. Pochikalov, D. G. Zamolodchikov, and M. L. Gitarskii, “Factors of spatiotemporal variability of CO2 fluxes from soils of southern taiga spruce forests of Valdai,” Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 7, 743–751 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Monitoring of Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Natural Ecosystems, Ed. by D. G. Zamolodchikov, D. V. Karelin, M. L. Gitarskii, and V. G. Blinov (Amirit, Saratov, 2017) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. N. Kudeyarov, G. A. Zavarzin, S. A. Blagodatskii, A. V. Borisov, P. Yu. Voronin, V. A. Demkin, T. S. Demkina, I. V. Evdokimov, D. G. Zamolodchikov, D. V. Karelin, A. S. Komarov, I. N. Kurganova, A. A. Larionova, V. O. Lopes de Gerenyu, et al., Carbon Pools and Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems of Russia, Ed. by G. A. Zavarzin (Nauka, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. V. Smagin, Gas Phase of Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. V. Smagin, “The problem of unaccounted carbon stock and the possible role of heterophase physical barriers in its solution: brief analytical review,” Ekol. Vestn. Sev. Kavk. 16 (1), 4–10 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. G. Bogatyrev, A. V. Smagin, M. M. Akishina, and V. G. Vityazev, “Geographical aspects of forest litters,” Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 68, 26–31 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. M. Bridges and N. H. Batjes, “Soil gaseous emissions and global climate change,” Geography 81 (2), 155–169 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Dolman and A. Shvidenko, “The carbon balance of Russia,” Geophys. Res. Abstr. 15, EGU2013-1888-1 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. S. Campbell, Soil Physics with BASIC (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. A. Keen, The Physical Properties of the Soil (Longmans, Green, London, 1931).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. A. Kimball and E. R. Lemon, “Theory of soil air movement due to pressure fluctuations,” Agric. Meteorol. 9, 163–181 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Mohr, T. Laemmel, M. Maier, and D. Schindler, “Analysis of air pressure fluctuations and topsoil gas concentrations within a Scots pine forest,” Atmosphere 7, (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7100125

  16. K. R. Redeker, A. J. Baird, and Y. A. Teh, “Quantifying wind and pressure effects on trace gas fluxes across the soil–atmosphere interface,” Biogeosciences 12, 7423–7434 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7423-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Rochette, “Towards a standard non-steady-state chamber methodology for measuring soil N2O emissions,” Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 166–167, 141–146 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Roland, S. Vicca, M. Bahn, T. Ladreiter-Knauss, M. Schmitt, and I. A. Janssens, “Importance of nondiffusive transport for soil CO2 efflux in a temperate mountain grassland,” J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 120 (3), 502–512 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. E. P. Sánchez-Cañete, A. S. Kowalski, P. Serrano-Ortiz, O. Pérez-Priego, and F. Domingo, “Deep CO2 soil inhalation/exhalation induced by synoptic pressure changes and atmospheric tides in a carbonated semiarid steppe,” Biogeosciences 10, 6591–6600 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6591-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Simunek, M. Th. van Genuchten, and M. Sejna, The HYDRUS Software Package for Simulating the Two- and Three-Dimensional Movement of Water, Heat, and Multiple Solutes in Variably-Saturated Media: Technical Manual, Version 1.0 (PC Progress, Prague, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. V. Smagin, “Kinetic assessment of gas exchange between the soil and the atmosphere by the static chamber method,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 719–725 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229315070108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. E. S. Takle, W. J. Massman, J. R. Brandle, R. A. Schmidt, X. Zhou, I. V. Litvina, R. Garcia, G. Doyle, and C. W. Rice, “Influence of high-frequency ambient pressure pumping on carbon dioxide efflux from soil,” Agric. For. Meteorol. 124, 193–206 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. G. Wesseling, PhD Thesis (Wageningen, 2009).

Download references

Funding

The analytical part of the study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (megagrant no. 19-77-30012) and the field studies of soil emission, by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant no. 19-29-05025mk). D.V. Karelin was working under the State assignment no. 0148-2019-0006 for the Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. V. Karelin.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by G. Chirikova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smagin, A.V., Karelin, D.V. Effect of Wind on Soil-Atmosphere Gas Exchange. Eurasian Soil Sc. 54, 372–380 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321030133

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321030133

Keywords:

Navigation