Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diversity of the soil biota in burned areas of southern taiga forests (Tver oblast)

  • Soil Biology
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relations between soil biota diversity and its contribution to the performance of some ecosystem functions were assessed based on the results obtained in undisturbed and burned spruce forests near the Central Forest Nature Biosphere Reserve (Tver oblast). In August 2014, in two 4-year-old burned areas, abiotic parameters of the soils, indicators of the state of the microbial communities, the number, taxonomic diversity, and the abundance of the main groups of soil invertebrates (testate amoebae, nematodes, enchytraeids, mites, collembolans, and the mesofauna as a whole) were determined. In the soils of the burned areas, higher CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions were observed. The number of bacterial cells remained similar, and the total length of active mycelium was not significantly different. All this implies a certain intensification of biogenic processes promoting the mobilization of carbon and nitrogen after fire. The number of most of the groups of soil animals was lower (not always significantly) in the burned area than that in the soils of the undisturbed forests. The changes in the taxonomic diversity were specific for each taxon studied. Overall, the diversity of invertebrates was related to the litter thickness. However, the high taxonomic diversity of soil fauna did not always correspond to the active functioning of the ecosystem. Thus, for some taxa, a quite close correlation was found, for instance, between the total number of species (of testate amoebae in particular) and the berry crop, as well as between the soil mesofauna population and the dead wood stock. The total diversity of the investigated taxa included in the detrital trophic web was the most reliable indicator of the carbon stock in the burned areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. V. Arinushkina, Manual on the Chemical Analysis of Soils (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. N. Bezkorovainaya, P. A. Tarasov, G. A. Ivanova, A. V. Bogorodskaya, and E. N. Krasnoshchekova, “The nitrogen reserves in sandy podzols after controlled fires in pine forests of Central Siberia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 40 (6), 700–707 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. B. Gongalsky, Forest Wildfires and Soil Fauna (KMK, Moscow, 2014) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. V. Dobrovolskiy and E. D. Nikitin, Ecology of Soils. The Theory of Soil Ecological Functions (Moscow State University, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. A. Dymov, Yu. A. Dubrovsky, and D. N. Gabov, “Pyrogenic changes in iron-illuvial podzols in the middle taiga of the Komi Republic,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 47 (2), 47–56 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. V. N. Karnaukhov, Luminescent Analysis of Cells (Analiticheskaya Mikroskopiya, Pushchino, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manual on Soil Zoological Analysis, Ed. by M. S. Gilyarov (Nauka, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].

  8. Manual on Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, Ed. by D. G. Zvyagintsev (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

  9. National Strategy of Biodiversity Conservation in Russia (Ministry of Natural Resources of Russian Federation, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian]. http://biodata.ecoinfo.ru/ doc/gef/A25.html

  10. A. A. Rakhleeva and G. A. Korganova, “Analysis of population number and species diversity of rhizopods (Rhizopoda, Testacea) in taiga soils,” Zool. Zh. 84 (12), 1427–1436 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. L. Stepanov and L. V. Lysak, Use of Gas Chromatography in Soil Microbiology (MAKS Press, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. Tishkov, Biospheric Functions of Natural Ecosystems of Russia (Nauka, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. D. Allison, Y. Lu, C. Weihe, et al., “Microbial abundance and composition influence litter decomposition response to environmental change,” Ecology 94, 714–725 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Birkhofer, I. Schöning, F. Alt, et al., “General relationships between abiotic soil properties and soil biota across spatial scales and different land-use types,” PLoS One 7, art. e43292 (2012). doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0043292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Bongers and M. Bongers, “Functional diversity of nematodes,” Appl. Soil Ecol. 10, 239–251 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(98)00123-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. U. Choromanska and T. H. DeLuca, “Microbial activity and nitrogen mineralization in forest mineral soils following heating: evaluation of post-fire effects,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 263–271 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00180-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. C. Daily, “What are ecosystem services?” in Nature Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Ed. by G. C. Daily (Island Press, Washington, 1997), pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. T. de Vries, E. Thébault, M. Liiri, et al., “Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 14296–14301 (2013). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305198110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. F. Fisher and D. Binkley, Ecology and Management of Forest Soils (Wiley, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Gamfeldt, T. Snall, R. Bagchi, et al., “Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species,” Nat. Commun. 4, 1340 (2013). doi: 10.1038/ncomms2328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. B. Gongalsky, A. Malmström, A. S. Zaitsev, S. V. Shakhab, J. Bengtsson, and T. Persson, “Do burned areas recover from inside? An experiment with soil fauna in a heterogeneous landscape,” Appl. Soil Ecol. 59, 73–86 (2012). doi: 10.1016/ j.apsoil.2012.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. B. Gongalsky and T. Persson, “Recovery of soil macrofauna after wildfires in boreal forests,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 57, 182–191 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio. 2012.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. I. M. Lubbers, K. J. van Groenigen, S. J. Fonte, et al., “Greenhouse-gas emissions from soils increased by earthworms,” Nat. Clim. Change 3, 187–194 (2013). doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Malmström, “The importance of measuring fire severity: evidence from microarthropod studies,” For. Ecol. Manage. 260, 62–70 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Nie, E. Pendall, C. Bell, et al., “Positive climate feedbacks of soil microbial communities in a semi-arid grassland,” Ecol. Lett. 16, 234–241 (2013). doi: 10.1111/ele.12034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. U. N. Nielsen, E. Ayres, D. H. Wall, and R. D. Bardgett, “Soil biodiversity and carbon cycling: a review and synthesis of studies examining diversityfunction relationships,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 62, 105–116 (2011). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01314.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. B. Postma-Blaauw, F. T. de Vries, R. G. M. De Goede, et al., “Within-trophic group interactions of bacterivorous nematode species and their effects on the bacterial community and nitrogen mineralization,” Oecologia 142, 428–439 (2005). doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1741-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Römbke, “Enchytraeen (Oligochaeta) als Bioindikator,” Umweltwiss. Schadst.-Forsch. 7, 246–249 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Sánchez-Moreno, H. Ferris, A. Young-Mathews, et al., “Abundance, diversity and connectance of soil food web channels along environmental gradients in an agricultural landscape,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 2374–2383 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.07.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Setälä and V. Huhta, “Soil fauna increase Betula pendula growth: laboratory experiments with coniferous forest floor,” Ecology 72, 665–671 (1991). doi: 10.2307/2937206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D. Standing, O. G. G. Knox, C. E. Mullins, et al., “Influence of nematodes on resource utilization by bacteria–an in vitro study,” Microb. Ecol. 52, 444–450 (2006). doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9119-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. K. van Cleve, L. Oliver, R. Schlentner, et al., “Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems,” Can. J. For. Res. 13, 747–766 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. H. D. Wall, A. M. Bradford, G. M. S. John, et al., “Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent,” Global Change Biol. 14, 2661–2677 (2008). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01672.x

    Google Scholar 

  34. G. W. Yeates, “Effects of plants on nematode community structure,” Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 37, 127–149 (1999). doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii pr. 33, Moscow, 119071, Russia

    K. B. Gongalsky, A. S. Zaitsev, D. I. Korobushkin, R. A. Saifutdinov, T. E. Yazrikova, A. Yu. Gorbunova, I. A. Gorshkova, D. M. Kuznetsova & S. V. Shakhab

  2. Kazan Federal University, ul. Kremlevskaya 18, Kazan, 420008, Russia

    R. A. Saifutdinov

  3. Faculty of Soil Science, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia

    T. E. Yazrikova, A. I. Benediktova, N. V. Kosina, E. V. Lapygina & A. A. Rakhleeva

  4. Skryabin All-Russian Research Institute of Fundamental and Applied Parasitology of Animals and Plants, ul. Bol’shaya Cheremushkinskaya 28, Moscow, 117218, Russia

    K. O. Butenko

Authors
  1. K. B. Gongalsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. S. Zaitsev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. I. Korobushkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. A. Saifutdinov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. E. Yazrikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. I. Benediktova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Yu. Gorbunova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. I. A. Gorshkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. K. O. Butenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. N. V. Kosina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. E. V. Lapygina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. D. M. Kuznetsova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. A. A. Rakhleeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. S. V. Shakhab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. B. Gongalsky.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © K.B. Gongalsky, A.S. Zaitsev, D.I. Korobushkin, R.A. Saifutdinov, T.E. Yazrikova, A.I. Benediktova, A.Yu. Gorbunova, I.A. Gorshkova, K.O. Butenko, N.V. Kosina, E.V. Lapygina, D.M. Kuznetsova, A.A. Rakhleeva, S.V. Shakhab, 2016, published in Pochvovedenie, 2016, No. 2, pp. 388–397.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gongalsky, K.B., Zaitsev, A.S., Korobushkin, D.I. et al. Diversity of the soil biota in burned areas of southern taiga forests (Tver oblast). Eurasian Soil Sc. 49, 358–366 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316030042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316030042

Keywords

Search

Navigation