Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution of transformed organic matter in structural units of loamy sandy soddy-podzolic soil

  • Soil Physics
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of land use types and fertilizing systems on the structural and aggregate composition of loamy sandy soddy-podzolic soil and the quantitative parameters of soil organic matter has been studied. The contribution of soil aggregates 2–1 mm in size to the total Corg reserve in the humus horizon is higher than the contributions of other aggregates by 1.3–4.2 times. Reliable correlations have been revealed between the contents of total (Corg), labile (Clab), and active (C0) organic matter in the soil. The proportion of C0 is 44–70% of Clab extractable by neutral sodium pyrophosphate solution. The contributions of each of the 2–1, 0.5–0.25, and <0.25 mm fractions to the total C0 reserve are 14–21%; the contributions of each of the other fractions are 4–12%. The chemically labile and biologically active components of humic substances reflect the quality changes of soil organic matter under agrogenic impacts. A conceptual scheme has been proposed for the subdivision of soil organic matter into the active, slow (intermediate), and passive pools. In the humus horizon of loamy sandy soddy-podzolic soil, the active, slow, and passive pools contain 6–11, 34–65, and 26–94% of the total Corg, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrophysical Methods of Soil Studies (Nauka, Moscow, 1966) [in Russian].

  2. A. I. Es’kov, S. I. Tarasov, and N. A. Tamonova, “The ress of long-term studies of the efficiency of the aftereffect of manure,” Plodorodie, No. 6, 10–12 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. B. Zinyakova and V. M. Semenov, “Influence ofcreasing rates of organic and mineral fertilizers on the reserves of dissolved, mobile, and active organic matter in the gray forest soil,” Agrokhimiya, No. 6, 8–19 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Körschens, “The e of humus content in soil fertility and nitrogen cycle,” Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 122–131 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. M. Kogut, “Principles and methods of assessing the content of labile organic matter in plowed soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 36 (3), 283–290 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. M. Kogut, S. A. Sysuev, and V. A. Kholodov, “Water stability and labile humic substances of typical chernozems under different land uses,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45 (5), 496–502 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. M. Kogut and A. S. Frid, “Comparative assessment of the methods for determination of the humus content in soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 9, 119–123 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. M. Kuznetsov, L. A. Ivannikova, V. Yu. Semin, S. M. Nadezhkin, and V. M. Semenov, “Influence of the long-term application of fertilizers on the biological quality of organic matter in leached chernozem,” Agrokhimiya, No. 11, 21–31 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. V. Kuznetsova, “Role of organic matter in the formation of water-stable structure in soddy-podzolic soils,” Pochvovedenie, No.11, 34–41 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. M. Lukin, Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Yu. Milanovskii, Soil Humic Substances as the Natural Hydrophobic–Hydrophylic Compounds (GEOMoscow, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. S. Orlov and L. A. Grishina, Practicum on Humus Chemistry (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Assessment of Soils for the Content and Quality of Humus for Models of Soil Fertility: Recommendations, Ed. by K. V. D″yakova (Agropromizdat, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

  14. N. I. Savvinov, Soil Structure and Its Strength in Virgin, Fallow, and Old-Arable Soils (Sel’khozgiz, Moscow, 1931) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. M. enov, L. A. Ivannikova, N. A. Semenova, A. K. Khodzhaeva, and S. N. Udal’tsov, “Organic matter mineralization in different soilgregate fractions,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43 (2), 141–148 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V. M. Semenov, L. A. Ivannikova, and A. S. Tulina, “Stabilization of onic matter in soil,” Agrokhimiya, No. 10, 77–96 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. V. Khan, OrganominerCompounds and Soil Structure (Nauka, Moscow, 1969) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. A. Kholodov, “The capacity of soil particles for spontaneous fation of macroaggregates after a wetting–drying cycle,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46 (6), 660–667 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. I. N. Sharkov and A. A. Danilova, “Influence of agrotechnical methods on changes in the humus content in arable soils,” Agrokhimiya, No. 1 72–81 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. V. Shein and E. Yu. Milanovskii, “The role of organic matter in the formation and stability of soil aggregates,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 36 (1), 58 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Abiven, S. Menasseri, and C. Chenu, “The effects of organic inputs over time on soil aggregate stability — a literature analysis,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. J. Bronick and R. Lal, “Soil structure and management: a review,” Geoderma 124, 3–22 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. L. Cochra, H. P. Collins, A. Kennedy, and D. F. Bezdicek, “Soil carbon pools and fluxes after land conversion in a semiarid shrub-steppe ecosystem,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 43, 479–489 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. H. B. Hayes, “Solvent systems for the isolation of organic components from soils,” Soili. Soc. Am. J. 70 (3), 986–994 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. D. Jastrow, “Soil aggregate formation and the accrual of patricianly, mineral associated organic matter,” Soil Bi Biochem. 28, 657–676 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. John, T. Yamashita, B. Ludvig, and H. Flessa, “Storage of organic carbon in aggregate and density fractions of silty soils under different types of land use,” Geoderma 128, 63–79 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Mueller, G. Shepherd, U. Schindler, B. C. Ball, L. J. Munkholm, V. Hennings, E. Smolentseva, O. Rukhovic, S. Lukin, and C. Hui, “Evaluation of soil structure in the framework of an overall soil quality rating,” Soil Tillage Res. 127, 74–84 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. D. C. Olk and E. G. Gregorich, “Overview of the symposium proceedings, Meaningful pools in determining soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70 (3), 967–974 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. E. Paul, S. J. Morris, R. T. Conant, and A. F. Plante, “Does the acid hydrolysis–incubation method measure meaningful soil organic carbon pools?” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70 (3), 1023–1035 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L. Schwendenmann and E. Pendall, “Response of soil organic matter dynamics to conversion from tropical forest to grassland as determined by long-term incubation,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 44 (8), 1053–1062 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Six, H. Bossuyt, S. Degryze, and K. Denef, “A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dmics,” Soil Tillage Res. 79, 7–31 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Six E. T. Elliott, and K. Paustian, “Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-till agriculture,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 2099–2103 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Six and K. Paustian, “Aggregate-associated s organic matter as an ecosystem property and a measurement tool,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 68, A4–A9 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. von Lützow, I. Kögel-Knabner, K. Ekscht, E. Matzner, G. Guggenberger, B. Marschner, and H. Flessa, “Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their releve under different soil conditions — a review,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 57, 426–445 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. von Lützow, I. Kögel-Knabner, B. Ludwig, E. Matzner, H. Flessa, K. Ekschmitt, G. Guggenberger, B. Marschnernd K. Kalbitz, “Stabilization mechanisms of organic matter in four temperate soils: development and application of a conceptual model,” J. Plant NutSoil Sci. 171 (1), 111–124 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. M. Kogut.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © B.M. Kogut, M.A. Yashin, V.M. Semenov, T.N. Avdeeva, L.G. Markina, S.M. Lukin, S.I. Tarasov, 2016, published in Pochvovedenie, 2016, No. 1, pp. 52–64.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kogut, B.M., Yashin, M.A., Semenov, V.M. et al. Distribution of transformed organic matter in structural units of loamy sandy soddy-podzolic soil. Eurasian Soil Sc. 49, 45–55 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316010075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316010075

Keywords

Navigation