Skip to main content
Log in

Copper(II) binding by free and kaolinite-sorbed humic substances

  • Soil Chemistry
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humic preparations isolated from different sources—soils (a soddy-podzolic soil and a typical chernozem), high-moor peat, and brown coal—have been used. To analyze the binding of copper ions by humic substances (HSs), the preparations were obtained in two forms: solutions and humic-clay complexes (HSs irreversibly sorbed on kaolinite). With this approach, the binding of copper(II) ions by HSs has been studied in different systems: (1) Cu(II)-HSs irreversibly sorbed on kaolinite, (2) Cu(II)-dissolved HSs, and (3) Cu(II)-dissolved HSs-HSs irreversibly sorbed on kaolinite. In the systems containing both dissolved HSs and humic-clay complexes, HSs of similar structure isolated from the same source were used. The quantitative estimation of the copper binding was based on the constant of sorption (K) for HSs in humic-kaolinite complexes and the stability constant (β) of complexes for free (dissolved) substances. Both parameters were expressed in similar units: L/kg. The values of logK = 3.31—3.33 are independent of the quantity and quality of the HSs in the sorption complexes but reliably exceed the K value for pure kaolinite (2.92). The value of β is not affected by the presence of insoluble HSs together with their soluble forms, but it depends on the source of HSs. The value of logβ varies in the range from 5.62 to 6.93, which significantly exceeds K and indicates a significantly higher affinity of dissolved HSs for copper ions than that of irreversibly sorbed HSs. The revealed regularities have shown that the content of HSs in the soil solution can significantly affect the mobility of a heavy metal bound to the soil organic matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. A. Badun, N. A. Kulikova, M. G. Chernysheva, Z. A. Tyasto, V. I. Korobkov, V. M. Fedoseev, E. A. Tsvetkova, A. I. Konstantinov, A. V. Kudryavtsev, I. V. Perminova, “Tritium label as a unique instrument to study the behavior of humic substances in living systems,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 2: Khimiya, 50(5), 348–354 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. D. Budaeva, E. V. Zoltoev, G. I. Khanturgaeva, and B. S. Zhambalova, “Copper and zinc sorption by humic acids from model solutions,” Khim. Interesakh Ustoich. Razvit., No. 2, 142–146 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Yu. Grechishcheva, V. A. Kholodov, I. A. Vakhrush- kina, S. V. Meshcheryakov, I. V. Perminova, “Application of model organomineral complexes based on humic acids and kaolinite to study the sorption of PAHs in water and soil media,” Zashchita Okruzh. Sredy Neftegaz. Kompl., No. 5, 21–25 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Kabata-Pendias and H. Pendias, Trace Elements in Soils and Plants (CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. M. Karpukhin and D. V. Ladonin, “Effect of soil components on the adsorption of heavy metals under technogenic contamination,” Eur. Soil Sci. 41(11), 1228–1237 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Classification and Diagnostics of Soils of the Soviet Union (Kolos, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

  7. L. V. Perelomov, D. L. Pinskii, and A. Violant, “Effect of organic acids on the adsorption of copper, lead, and zinc by goethite,” Eur. Soil Sci. 44(1), 22–28 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. I. V. Perminova, Analysis, Classification, and Prediction of the Properties of Humic Acids Dr. Sci. (Chem.) Dissertation (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. G. Petrov, M. A. Shumilova, M. V. Lopatina, and V. A. Aleksandrov, “A study of sorption of copper 2+ ions by soils,” Vestn. Udmurtsk. Univ., Ser. Fizika, Khimiya, No. 2, 74–77 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. L. Pinskii, T. M. Minkina, and Yu. I. Gaponova, “Comparative analysis of mono- and polyelement adsorption of copper, lead, and zinc by an ordinary chernozem from nitrate and acetate solutions,” Eur. Soil Sci. 43(7), 748–756 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. V. Portnova and V. V. Vol’khin, “Immobilization of copper (II) ions by humic acid transformed into a low-soluble state,” Vestn. Nizhegorod. Univ. im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, No. 4, 71–75 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicity ed. by G. W. Ware (Springer, Berlin, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. B. Rogova and Yu. N. Vodyanitskii, “Zinc and copper sorption by soils in the impact zone of the Cherepovets smelter,” Byull. Pochv. inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 65, 65–74 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. A. Kholodov, A. I. Konstantinov, A. V. Kudryavtsev, and I. V. Perminova, “Structure of humic acids in zonal soils from 13C NMR data,” Eur. Soil Sci. 44(9), 976–983 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. A. Kholodov, A. I. Konstantinov, and I. V. Perminova, “The carbon distribution among the functional groups of humic acids isolated by sequential alkaline extraction from gray forest soil,” Eur. Soil Sci. 42(11), 1229–1233 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Sh. Shaimukhametov and K. A. Voronina, “Method of fractionation of organo-clay soil complexes with the use of laboratory centrifuges,” Pochvovedenie, No. 8, 134–138 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Arias, B. Soto, and M. T. Barral, “Copper sorption characteristics on mineral-humic acid substrates,” Agrochimica 46(3–4), 155–164 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. U. Balcke, N. A. Kulikova, D. Kopinke, I. V. Permi- nova, S. Hesse, F. H. Frimmel, “The influence of humic substances structure on their adsorption onto kaolin clay,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66, 1805–1812 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. “Canadian soil quality guidelines for the protection of environmental and human health: copper,” in Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg, 1999).

  20. Complexation Reactions in Aquatic Systems: An Analytical Approach, ed. by J. Buffle (Ellis Horwood Publ., Chichester, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Fukushima, S. Tanaka, K. Nakayasu, K. Sasaki, K. Tatsumi, “Evaluation of copper (II) binding abilities of humic substances by a continuous site-distribution model considering proton competition,” Anal. Sci. 15, 185–188 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. C. Gupta and F. L. Harrison, “Effect of humic acid on copper adsorption by kaolin,” Water Air Soil Pollut. 17(4), 357–360 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Hizal and R. Apak, “Modeling of cadmium (II) adsorption on kaolinite-based clays in the absence and presence of humic acid,” Appl. Clay Sci. 32, 232–244 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Itabashi, D. Yamazaki, H. Kawamoto, and H. Akaiwa, “Evaluation of the complexing ability of humic acids using solvent extraction technique,” Anal. Sci. 17, 785–787 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C. P. Jordao, C. Reis, C. R. Bellato, and J. L. Pereira, “Adsorption of Cu2+ ions on humic acids,” Esc. Minas 54(2), 109–114 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Kaemmerer, M. Guiresse, J. C. Revel, P. Koetz, P. Facal, F. Rey, “Conductimetric behaviour of humic acids with Cu(II) ions,” Analusis 27(5), 421–423 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. I. Kostic, T. Andlkovic, R. Nicolic, A. Bojic, M. Puren- ovic, S. Blagojevic, D. Andelkovic, “Copper (II) and lead (II) complexation by humic acid and humic-like ligands,” J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 76(9), 1325–1336 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. E. M. Murphy and J. M. Zachara, “The role of sorbed humic substances on the distribution of organic and inorganic contaminants in groundwater,” Geoderma 67(1–2), 103–124 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. C. Novoa-Munoz, M. Arias-Estevez, C. Perez- Novo, and J. E. Lopez-Periago, “Diffusion-induced changes on exchangeable and organic bound copper fractions in acid soil samples enriched with copper,” Geoderma 148(1), 85–90 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Perez-Novo, M. Pateiro-Moure, F. Osorio, J. C. Novoa-Munoz, E. Lopez-Periago, M. Arias-Estevez, “Influence of organic matter removal on competitive and noncompetitive adsorption of copper and zinc in acid soils,” J. Coll. Interface Sci. 322, 33–40 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Schubert, “Ion exchange studies of complex ions as a function of temperature, ionic strength, and presence of formaldehyde,” J. Phys. Chem. 56, 113–118 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R. S. Swift, “Organic Matter Characterization,” in Methods of Soil Analysis (Madison, WI: Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI, 1996), part 3, 1018–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Yu, Z. L. He, C. Y. Huang, G. C. Chen, D. V. Calvert, “Adsorption-desorption behavior of copper at contaminated levels in red soils from China,” J. Environ. Qual. 31, 1129–1136 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Kholodov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.A. Kholodov, A.V. Kiryushin, N.V. Yaroslavtseva, A.S. Frid, 2014, published in Pochvovedenie, 2014, No. 7, pp. 803–811.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kholodov, V.A., Kiryushin, A.V., Yaroslavtseva, N.V. et al. Copper(II) binding by free and kaolinite-sorbed humic substances. Eurasian Soil Sc. 47, 662–669 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229314070060

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229314070060

Keywords

Navigation