Abstract
The effect of the rate of heating of kaolinite Al4[Si4O10](OH)8 on its transformation into mullite 3Al2O3 · 2SiO2 has been studied. The mullite yield increases with the heating rate. The temperature rise at a high rate promotes rapid dehydration of kaolinite, which is accompanied by detachment of hydroxo groups and structural disordering. The effects of preliminary mechanoactivation of kaolin in a ball-and-ring mill, which abrases a material, and in a planetary mill, in which shock loads dominate, have been compared. It has been established that attrition treatment is ineffective. The intense impact-abrasion treatment in a planetary mill breaks up packets and layers; a part of hydroxo groups appear on the outer surface of polycrystallites, which facilitates dehydroxylation.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
H. Schneider, R. X. Fischer, and J. Schreuer, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 98, 2948 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.13817
A. J. M. Araújo, H. P. A. Alves, R. M. Andrade, L. F. A. Campos, D. A. Macedo, A. L. S. Pinho, P. M. Nascimento, and C. A. Paskocimas, Ceram. Int. 45, 8525 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.166
E. K. Saeidabadi, T. Ebadzadeh, and E. Salahi, Ceram. Int. 44, 21053 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.166
F. Demir, Clays Clay Miner. 64, 753 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2016.064029
Y. F. Chen, M. C. Wang, and M. H. Hon, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 24, 2389 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00631-9
E. G. Avvakumov, M. Senna, and N. Kosova, Soft Mechanochemical Synthesis (Springer, Berlin, 2002).
P. Balaž, Mechanochemistry in Nanoscience and Minerals (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
V. V. Boldyrev, Russ. Chem. Rev. 75, 177 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2006v075n03ABEH001205
M. Valášková, K. Barabaszová, M. Hundáková, M. Ritz, and E. Plevová, Appl. Clay Sci. 54, 70 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2011.07.014
F. Dellisanti and G. Valdrè, Int. J. Miner. Process. 102–103, 69 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2011.09.011
S. Ding, L. Zhang, X. Ren, B. Xu, H. Zhang, and F. Ma, Energy Proc. 16, 1237 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.197
R. Hamzaoui, F. Muslim, S. Guessasma, A. Bennabi, and J. Guillin, Powder Technol. 271, 228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.11.018
A. Mitrovic and M. Zdujic, Int. J. Miner. Process. 132, 59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2014.09.004
C. Vizcayno, de R. M. Gutiérrez, R. Castello, E. Rodriguez, and C. E. Guerrero, Appl. Clay Sci. 49, 405 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2009.09.008
B. Ilic, V. Radonianin, M. Malešev, M. Zdujic, and A. Mitrovic, Appl. Clay Sci. 123, 173 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.01.029
J. Tole, K. Habermehl-Cwirzen, and A. Cwirzen, Mineral. Petrol. 113, 449 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-019-00666-y
E. Becker, J. Jiusti, F. D. Minatto, D. E. E. Delavi, O. R. K. Montedo, and R. de Noni, Jr., Ceramica 63, 295 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1590/0366-69132017633672077
C. Y. Heah, H. Kamarudin, A. M. M. Bakri, M. Bnhussain, M. Luqman, J. Khairul Nizar, C. M. Ruzaidi, and Y. M. Liew, Austral. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 7 (5), 34 (2013).
I. Bálezár, T. Korim, A. Kovács, and E. Makó, Ceram. Int. 42, 15367 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.182
J. Ondruška, S. Csáki, V. Trnovcová, I. Štubňa, F. Lukáč, J. Pokorný, L. Vozár, and P. Dobroň, Appl. Clay Sci. 154, 36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.12.038
S. Seifi, M. T. Diatta-Dieme, P. Blanchart, G. L. Lecomte-Nana, D. Kobor, and S. Petit, Constr. Build. Mater. 113, 579 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.095
T. Ebadzadeh, J. Alloys Compd. 489, 125 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.030
N. V. Filatova, N. F. Kosenko, O. P. Denisova, and K. S. Sadkova, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Khim. Khim. Tekhnol. 65 (8), 85 (2022). https://doi.org/10.6060/ivkkt.20226508.6656
O. Castelain, B. Soulestin, J. P. Bonnet, and P. Blanchard, Ceram. Int. 27, 517 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-8842(00)00110-3
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was carried out using the resources of the Center for Collective Use of Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology.
Funding
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, project no. 075-15-2021-671.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by E. Bondareva
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filatova, N.V., Kosenko, N.F. & Badanov, M.A. The Effect of the Mode of Heat Treatment and Mechanoactivation of Kaolinite on Mullite Formation. Tech. Phys. Lett. 49, 81–85 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785023700025
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785023700025