Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Combined with Low-Density Solvent-Based Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction as an Efficient and Sensitive Method for the Determination of Clodinafop-Propargyl Herbicide in Wheat Samples

  • ARTICLES
  • Published:
Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, a new approach that uses ultrasound-assisted extraction clean-up combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction has been developed for the preconcentration of trace amounts of clodinafop-propargyl herbicide in wheat samples. The clodinafop-propargyl was then determined using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. In this technique, wheat samples were extracted by ultrasound-assisted extraction followed by a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) step for further purification and enrichment of clodinafop-propargyl. By using a Pasteur pipette as an extraction device, a low-density extraction solvent like water is possible to use in the DLLME method. The effects of various parameters on the extraction efficiency of the proposed technique were investigated and optimized. Good linearity was obtained from 20 to 1000 µg/kg. The limit of detection was 10 µg/kg (S/N = 3). The relative recoveries at the three spiked levels ranged from 88 to 96% with an RSD less than 13% (n = 3). The technique has been successfully applied to the determination of clodinafop-propargyl herbicide in wheat samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Tette, P.A.S., Guidi, L.R., De Abreu Gloria, M.B., and Fernandes, C., Talanta, 2016, vol. 149, p. 124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Konstantinou, I.K., Hela, D.G., and Albanis, T.A., Environ. Pollut., 2006, vol. 141, p. 555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baghestani, M.A., Zand, E., Soufizadeh, S., Beheshtian, M., Haghighi, A., Barjasteh, A., Ghanbarani Birgani, D., and Deihimfard, R., J. Crop Prot., 2008, vol. 27, p. 104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Deihimfard, R. and Zand, E., Final Report of Study on Environmental Impacts of Herbicide Application in Wheat in Iran during the Past 10 years and Future Strategies to Optimize the Amount of Herbicide Application, Shahid Beheshti University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Agricultural Ministry of Iran, Statistical report on wheat and barely 2008–2009. Tehran: Iranian Ministry of Agricultural, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. EPA, Draft Assessment Report: European Commission Clodinafop Propargyl, Annex B, 2003, vol. 3, p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  7. EPA, Chemicals Evaluated for Carcinogenic Potential. Science Information Management, Branch Health Effects Division Office of Pesticide Programs, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bagheri, H. and Asgari, S., Chromatographia, 2014, vol. 77, p. 723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Song, S., Zhu, K., Han, L., Sapozhnikova, Y., Zhang, Z., and Yao, W., J. Agric. Food Chem., 2018, vol. 66, p. 5031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bagheri, H., Es’haghi, A., and Es-haghi, A., J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 2013, vol. 93, p. 450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bagheri, H., Es’haghi, A., Es-haghi, A., and Mesbahi, N., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2012, vol. 740, p. 36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farajzadeha, M.A., Kiavar, L., and Pezhhanfar, S., J. Chromatogr. A, 2021, vol. 1653, Article 462427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blount, B.C., Kobelski, R.J., McElprang, D.O., Ashley, D.L., Morrow, J.C., Chambers, D.M., and Cardinali, F.L., J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 2006, vol. 832, p. 292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. De Souza Pinheiro, A. and De Andrade, J.B., Talanta, 2009, vol. 79, p. 1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fazeli-Bakhtiyari, R., Sorouraddin, M.H., Farajzadeh, M.A., and Jouyban, A., Bioanalysis, 2015, vol. 7, p. 21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehotay, S.J., Kok, A.D., Hiemstra, M., and Bodegraven, P.V., J. AOAC Int., 2005, vol. 88, p. 595.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kokosa, J.M., TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem., 2013, vol. 43, p. 2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Farajzadeh, M.A., Seyedi, S.E., Shalamzari, M.S., and Bamorowat, M., J. Sep. Sci., 2009, vol. 32, p. 3191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hashemi, P., Beyranvand, S., Mansur, R.S., and Ghiasvand, A.R., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2009, vol. 655, p. 60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, H., Chen, R., and Li, S., J. Chromatogr. A, 2010, vol. 1217, p. 1244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nuclear Fuel Cycle Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, P.O. Box 14395-836, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Rezaee

  2. Department of Chemistry, College of Basic Science, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 1815163111, Tehran, Iran

    Faezeh Khalilian

Authors
  1. Mohammad Rezaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Faezeh Khalilian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Rezaee.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rezaee, M., Khalilian, F. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Combined with Low-Density Solvent-Based Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction as an Efficient and Sensitive Method for the Determination of Clodinafop-Propargyl Herbicide in Wheat Samples. J Anal Chem 79, 540–545 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934824050083

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934824050083

Keywords:

Search

Navigation