Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative characteristics of cathodes with different catalytic systems in hydrogen–oxygen and hydrogen–air fuel cells with proton-conducting polymer electrolyte

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characteristics of low-temperature hydrogen–oxygen (air) fuel cell (FC) with cathodes based on the 50 wt % PtCoCr/C and 40 wt % Pt/CNT catalysts synthesized on XC72 carbon black and carbon nanotubes (CNT) are compared with the characteristics of commercial monoplatinum systems 9100 60 wt % Pt/C and 13100 70% Pt/C HiSPEC. It is shown that the synthesized catalysts exhibit a high mass activity, which is not lower than that of commercial Pt/C catalysts, a high selectivity with respect to the oxygen reduction to water, and a significantly higher stability. The characteristics of PtCoCr/C and Pt/CNT were confirmed by testing in the hydrogen—oxygen FCs. However, when air was used at the cathode, especially in the absence of excessive pressure, a voltage of FC with the cathode based on PtCoCr/XC72 is lower as compared with the commercial systems. Probably, this is associated with the transport limitations in the structure of trimetallic catalyst synthesized on XC72 carbon black due to the absence of mesopores. This drawback was eliminated to a large extent by raising the volume of mesopores as a result of application of mixed support (XC72 + CNT) and the use of only CNT for the synthesis of the monoplatinum catalyst. However, this did not eliminate another drawback, namely, a low platinum utilization coefficient in the cathode active layer as compared with that measured under the model conditions in the 0.5 M Н2SO4 solution. Therefore, further research is required to improve the structure of the catalytic systems, which are synthesized both on carbon black and nanotubes, while maintaining their high stability and selectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avakov, V.B., Aliev, A.D., Beketaeva, L.A., Bogdanovskaya, V.A., Burkovskii, E.V., Datskevich, A.A., Ivanitskii, B.A., Kazanskii, L.P., Kapustin, A.V., Korchagin, O.V., Kuzov, A.V., Landgraf, I.K., Lozovaya, O.V., Modestov, A.D., Stankevich, M.M., Tarasevich, M.R., and Chalykh, A.E., Russ. J. Electrochem., 2014, vol. 50, p. 773.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Avakov, V.B., Bogdanovskaya, V.A., Vasilenko, V.A., Ivanitskii, B.A., Koltsova, E.M., Kuzov, A.V., Kapustin, A.V., Landgraf, I.K., Stankevich, M.M., and Tarasevich, M.R., Russ. J. Electrochem., 2015, vol. 51, p. 719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Neyerlin, K.C., Gu, W., Jorne, J., Clark, A., and Gasteiger, H.A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 2007, vol. 154, p. B279.

  4. Liu, Y., Murphy, M.W., Baker, D.R., Gu, W., Ji, C., Jorne, J., and Gasteiger, H.A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 2009, vol. 156, p. B970.

  5. Avakov, V.B., Bogdanovskaya, V.A., Ivanitskii, B.A., Kapustin, A.V., Kuzov, A.V., Landgraf, I.K., Modestov, A.D., Radina, M.V., Stankevich, M.M., Tarasevich, M.R., and Tripachev, O.V., Russ. J. Electrochem., 2014. V. 50. P. 656.

  6. Jomori, S., Nonoyama, N., and Yoshida, T., J. Power Sources, 2012, vol. 215, p. 18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hao, L., Moriyama, K., Gu, W., and Wang, C.-Y., J. Electrochem. Soc., 2015, vol. 162, p. F854.

  8. Tarasevich, M.R. and Korchagin, O.V., Russ. J. Electrochem., 2014, vol. 51, p. 737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tarasevich, M.R. and Bogdanovskaya, V.A., Al’tern. Energ. Ekol., 2009, no. 12, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bogdanovskaya, V.A. and Tarasevich, M.R., Russ. J. Electrochem., 2011, vol. 47, p. 380.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bogdanovskaya, V.A., Tarasevich, M.R., and Lozovaya, O.V., Russ. J. Electrochem., 2011, vol. 47, p. 846.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tarasevich, M.R., Zhutaeva, G.V., Bogdanovskaya, V.A., Reznikova, L.A., Radina, M.V., and Kazanskii, L.P., Korroziya: Materialy, Zashchita, 2010, no. 8, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Emets, V.V., Tarasevich, M.R., and Busev, S.A. Al’tern. Energ. Ekol., 2009, vol. 12, no. 8 (76), p. 102.

  14. Bogdanovskaya, V.A., Krasil’nikova, O.K., Kuzov, A.V., Radina, M.V., Tarasevich, M.R., Avakov, V.B., Kapustin, A.V., and Landgraf, I.K., Russ. J. Electrochem., 2015, vol. 51, p. 602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bogdanovskaya, V.A., Kol’tsova, E.M., Radina, M.V., Zhutaeva, G.V., Kazanskii, L.P., Tarasevich, M.R., Skichko, E.A., and Gavrilova, N.N., Fizikokhim. Poverkhn. Zashch. Mater., 2016, vol. 52, no. 1, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mukundan, R., James, G., Ayotte, D., Davey, J.R., Langlois, D., Spernjak, D., Balasubramanian, D.T.S., Weber, A.Z., More, K.L., and Borup, R.L., ECS Trans., 2013, vol. 50, p. 1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Kuzov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.R. Tarasevich, V.A. Bogdanovskaya, A.V. Kuzov, M.V. Radina, 2017, published in Elektrokhimiya, 2017, Vol. 53, No. 7, pp. 804–812.

Published on the basis of a report delivered at the 13th International Meeting “Fundamental Problems of Solid State Ionics,” Chernogolovka, 2016.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarasevich, M.R., Bogdanovskaya, V.A., Kuzov, A.V. et al. Comparative characteristics of cathodes with different catalytic systems in hydrogen–oxygen and hydrogen–air fuel cells with proton-conducting polymer electrolyte. Russ J Electrochem 53, 713–720 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193517070126

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193517070126

Keywords

Navigation