Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable Land Management and Land Degradation Neutrality

  • Thematic Issue on Problems of Geography
  • Published:
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The active development of the concept of sustainable land management (SLM) is inextricably linked with approaches to land degradation neutrality (LDN). It is considered that so-called good land management practices make it possible to prevent or reduce the risk of land degradation and reverse it while maintaining the productivity potential and ecosystem functions. Based on analysis of the correspondence of good practices to SLM parameters and the hierarchy and typology of land management developed on this basis (with the categories of practice, model, type, class), it is shown that individual practices and technologies do not always lead to the achievement of land degradation neutrality and, conversely, it is not always achieved by sustainable land management approach. SLM modeling using qualitative rating scales and radar charts has shown high effectiveness in visualizing the integrity of models and adjusting them to achieve the best result. An improved typology is proposed with three main classes of land management: simple, supported, and expanded. Particular attention is paid to the other forms class, which includes natural functioning, long-term abandonment of land, and destructive land management. An algorithm scheme to recognize sustainable land management in the case of land degradation is proposed, as is an inverse algorithm to achieve land degradation for different land management models. A hypothesis has been put forward about the landscape‒ecological framework of SLM, which makes it possible to explain the causes of the discrepancy between the estimates of LDN for objects of different scales: achieving land degradation neutrality in a certain territory is possible not so much by continuous coverage of this territory with good SLM practices as by preserving the framework of SLM models, types, and classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. J. Smyth and J. Dumanski, “FESLM: An international framework for evaluating sustainable land management,” World Soil Resources Report, No. 73 (1993). https://www.faoswalim.org/resources/Land/FESLM.pdf.

  2. J. Dumanski, “Criteria and indicators for land quality and sustainable land management,” ITC Journal, No. 3/4, 216–222 (1997).

  3. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on September 25, 2015. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol= A/RES/70/1&Lang=E

  4. E. Fernandes, R. Burcroff, Anderson J., et al., Sustainable Land Management: Challenges, Opportunities, and Trade-offs (World Bank, Washington, 2006). http:// documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/973741468135939915/ Sustainable-land-management-challenges-opportunities-and-trade-offs

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Akhtar-Schuster, L. C. Stringer, A. Erlewein, et al., “Unpacking the concept of land degradation neutrality and addressing its operation through the Rio Conventions,” J. Environ. Manage. 195, 4–15 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. J. Orr, A. L. Cowie, V. M. Castillo Sanchez, et al., Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality: A Report of the Science-Policy Interface (United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn, 2017).

  7. M. J. Sanz, J. de Vente, J.-L. Chotte, et al., Sustainable Land Management Contribution to Successful Land-Based Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: A Report of the Science-Policy Interface (United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn, 2017).

  8. Global Soil Partnership: Plenary Assembly, Sixth Session, Rome, June 11–13, 2018. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/GSP/ sixth_plenary/RUSSIAN/GSPPA_VI_2018_3_r.pdf

  9. H. P. Liniger, R. M. Studer, C. Hauert, M. Gurtner, Sustainable Land Management in Practice: Guidelines and Best Practices for Sub-Saharan Africa (TerrAfrica, World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT), and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2011). https://www.fao.org/3/i1861e/i1861e00.pdf.

  10. State of Europe’s Forests 2020 (Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 2020). https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ SoEF_2020.pdf.

  11. Sustainable food and agriculture. https://www.fao.org/ sustainability/background/en/.

  12. J. L. Chotte, E. Aynekulu, A. Cowie, et al., Realizing the Carbon Benefits of Sustainable Land Management Practices: Guidelines for Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon in the Context of Land Degradation Neutrality Planning and Monitoring: A Report of the Science-Policy Interface (United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn, 2019). https://catalogue.unccd.int/1209_UNCCD_SPI_2019_ Report_1.1.pdf

  13. W. Critchley, N. Harari, and R. Mekdaschi-Studer, Restoring Life to the Land: The Role of Sustainable Land Management in Ecosystem Restoration (UNCCD and WOCAT, 2021). https://www.unccd.int/sites/default/files/documents/ 2021-10/211018_RestoringLifetotheLand_Report%20%282%29.pdf

  14. Sustainable land management. https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/csd/csd16/documents/ fao_factsheet/land.pdf

  15. E. B. Barbier and Hochard J.P., Land Degradation, Less Favored Lands, and the Rural Poor: A Spatial and Economic Analysis: A Report for the Economics of Land Degradation Initiative (Department of Economics and Finance, University of Wyoming, 2014). ELD_assessment_2015_web.pdf (eld-initiative.org).

  16. H. Liniger, R. Mekdaschi, P. Moll, and U. Zander, Making Sense of Research for Sustainable Land Management (Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern, Switzerland and Helmholtz, Centre for Environmental Research GmbH–UF, Leipzig, 2017). https://www.ufz.de/export/data/2/126685_full_version_WOCAT_Glues.pdf

  17. A. Reichhuber, N. Gerber, A. Mirzabaev, et al., The Land-Drought Nexus: Enhancing the Role of Land-Based Interventions in Drought Mitigation and Risk Management: A Report of the Science-Policy Interface (United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn, 2019). https://knowledge.unccd.int/sites/default/files/2019-08/03EP_UNCCD_SPI_2019_Report_2.pdf

  18. Integration of the Sustainable Development Goals and targets into the implementation of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification and the report of the Intergovernmental Working Group on Land Degradation Neutrality (UNCCD, 2015). https://www.unccd.int/sites/default/files/sessions/ documents/ICCD_COP12_4/4eng.pdf

  19. G. Kust, O. Andreeva, and A. Cowie, “Land degradation neutrality: Concept development, practical applications, and assessment,” J. Environ. Manage. 195, 16–24 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. O. V. Andreeva, V. A. Lobkovsky, G. S. Kust, and I. S. Zonn, “The concept of sustainable land management: Modern state, models, and typology development,” Arid Ecosyst. 11, 1–10 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O. V. Andreeva and G. S. Kust, “Land assessment in Russia based on the concept of land degradation neutrality,” Reg. Res. Russ. 10 (4), 593–602 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. National Report “Global Climate and Soil Cover in Russia: Desertification and Land Degradation, Institutional, Infrastructural, Technological Adaptation Measures (Agriculture and Forestry),” Ed. by R. S.-Kh. Edel’geriev (MBA, Moscow, 2019), Vol. 2 [in Russian].

  23. WOCAT. Global database on sustainable land management 2022. https://www.wocat.net/en/global-slm-database

  24. Agroecomission: Knowledge base on the best resource-saving farming technologies. 2022. https://agriecomission.com/

  25. G. S. Kust, O. V. Andreeva, V. A. Lobkovsky, and S. K. Kostovska, “Methodological approaches to the development of a typology of sustainable land management models,” Ekol. Urbaniz. Territorii, No. 3, 34–40 (2019).

  26. Trends earth: Tracking the change from Conservation International. https://trends.earth/docs/en/

  27. V. A. Lobkovsky, G. S. Kust, O. V. Andreeva, and L. G. Lobkovskaya, “Ways of choosing indicators for assessing land degradation neutrality taking into account local and regional characteristics of Russia,” Ekol. Urbaniz. Territorii, No. 3, 75–82 (2020).

  28. O. V. Andreeva and G. S. Kust, “Taking into account multidirectional trends in landscape dynamics in the Holocene for a modern assessment of the neutral balance of land degradation,” in Ecosystems Dynamics in the Holocene (Dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of L.G. Dinesman): Proceedings of the V Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation, Moscow, November 11–15, 2019, Ed. by A. B. Savinetskii (Media-PRESS, Moscow, 2019), pp. 24–26 [in Russian].

  29. A. N. Zolotokrylin, “Global warming, desertification/degradation, and droughts in arid regions,” Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., No. 1, 3–13 (2019).

  30. F. R. Zaidel’man, Degradation of Reclaimed Soils in Russia and Neighboring Countries as a Result of Anthropogenic Changes in Their Water Regime and Protection Methods (Kvarta, Voronezh, 2014) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  31. V. A. Lobkovsky, O. V. Andreeva, and G. S. Kust, “Integration of international and national systems for monitoring and assessing land degradation in Russia,” Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., No. 1, 1–18 (2022).

  32. G. S. Kust, V. A. Lobkovsky, O. V. Andreeva, and S. K. Kostovska, Land Degradation and Desertification in Russia: The Latest Approaches to Problem Analysis and Solutions (Pero, Moscow, 2019) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. S. Kust, O. V. Andreeva, V. A. Lobkovsky, and V. D. Slavko, “Land management and land degradation issues in the context of the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Program,” Vopr. Geogr. 152, 222–252 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported within topic FMWS-2022-0001 of a State Assignment of the RAS Institute of Geography.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to O. V. Andreeva, G. S. Kust or V. A. Lobkovsky.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by B. Alekseev

Ol’ga Valentinovna Andreeva, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), is a Senior Researcher in the Department of Physical Geography and Problems of Environmental Management of the RAS Institute of Geography (IG RAS). German Stanislavovich Kust, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), is Chief Researcher in the same IG RAS department. Vasilii Anatol’evich Lobkovsky, Cand. Sci. (Geogr.), is Head of the above department.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andreeva, O.V., Kust, G.S. & Lobkovsky, V.A. Sustainable Land Management and Land Degradation Neutrality. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 92, 285–296 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622030066

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622030066

Keywords:

Navigation