Skip to main content
Log in

Happiness as a scientific category

  • Review
  • Published:
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even the very title of this article may cause perplexity. Note that science usually implies studying something that can be grasped, measured, or evaluated in one way or another. As for happiness, the majority of people perceive it as intangible matter, if matter at all. In recent years, however, the word happiness has made increasingly frequent appearances in documents of international organizations and institutes; happiness is studied; attempts are made to use this notion as a criterion of success in the development of states. This necessitates a clear definition of this notion, its connotations, and its place in the series of close categories. In analyzing the respective scope of problems, the authors of this article present their opinion about the meaning of life as the key component of life satisfaction and happiness. As one of the main elements of happiness in collective cultures, they consider collective meanings of life and, as their main source, the national idea, the absence of which in modern Russia gives rise to a number of social illnesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. M. Popova, S. M. Shakhrai, and A. A. Yanik, Progress Measurements (Nauka, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Layard, Happiness: Lessons from a New Science (Penguin, London, 2005; Izd. Inst. Gaidara, Moscow, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Seligman, Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being (Free Press, New York, 2011; Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, Moscow, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Diener and E. Suh, “Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators,” Soc. Indic. Res. 40, 189 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Argyle, The Psychology of Happiness (Methuen, 1987; Piter, St. Petersburg, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. V. Stepashin, Public Audit and the Economy of the Future (Nauka, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. China Modernization Report Outlook (2001–2010), Ed. by Ch. He (Peking Univ. Press, Beijing, 2010; Ves’ Mir, Moscow, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. A. Dzhidar’yan, The Psychology of Happiness and Optimism (Inst. Psikhol. RAN, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. C. McKennel, “Cognition and affect in perception of well-being,” Soc. Indic. Res. 5(4) (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. C. Compton, M. L. Smith, K. A. Cornish, and D. L. Qualls, “Factor structure of mental health measures,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71, 406 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Giovanini, J. Hall, A. Morrone, and G. Rannuzi, “A framework to measure the progress of societies,” OECD Working Paper (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. D. Ryff, “Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being,” J. of Pers. and Soc. Psychol. 57(6) (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. A. Khashchenko, “Typology of subjective economic well-being,” Psikhol. Zh. 28(1), 58 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. V. Yurevich, “Dynamics of the psychological condition of contemporary Russian society,” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 79(1), 35 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. V. Yurevich, D. V. Ushakov, and I. P. Tsapenko, “Quantitative evaluation of present-day Russian society macropsychological state,” Psikhol. Zh. 28(4), 23 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. K. Levashov, Sociopolitical Dynamics of Russian Society: 2000–2006 (Academia, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. A. King and C. K. Napa, “What makes a life good?,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87(1) (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. E. Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning (Washington Square Press, 1985; Progress, Moscow, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. A. Leont’ev, The Psychology of Meaning (Smysl, Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. Z. V. Sikevich, “The’ image’ of the past and present in the symbolic consciousness of Russians,” Sotsiol. Issled., No. 1 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. H. Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature (Viking Press, New York, 1971; Smysl, Moscow, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. N. Podd”yakov, “The psychology of happiness and flourish and the problem of evil”, in The Morals of Contemporary Russian Society: A Psychological Analysis, Ed. by A. L. Zhuravlev and A. V. Yurevich (Inst. Psikhol. RAN, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Inglehart and P. Norris, Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Russia’s National Idea, in 6 vols. (Nauchnyi Ekspert, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrei Vladislavovich Yurevich.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich, 2014, published in Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 2014, Vol. 84, No. 8, pp. 715–723.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuravlev, A.L., Yurevich, A.V. Happiness as a scientific category. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 84, 292–299 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331614040091

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331614040091

Keywords

Navigation