Abstract
The effect of quinoline additions and amount of the sulfiding agent added on the activity of the in situ prepared NiWS catalyst in naphthalene hydrogenation was studied. In the presence of 1 wt % quinoline, the obtained catalyst shows high activity (>95% naphthalene conversion). The physicochemical properties of the catalyst were studied by XPS, X-ray diffraction analysis, and TEM. At the W : substrate molar ratio of 1 : 40 and 360°С, an increase in the amount of the sulfiding agent from 1 to 5 wt % leads to a decrease in the selectivity with respect to decalins from 68 to 39%, respectively. The degree of decoration with nickel on adding 1 wt % sulfiding agent is 0.1. As the amount of the sulfiding agent added is increased to 5 wt %, the degree of decoration with nickel increases to 0.3.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Naumkin, A.V., Kraut-Vass, A., Gaarenstroom, S.W., and Powell, C.J., NIST X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database, Version 4.1, Gaithersburg: National Inst. of Standards and Technology, 2012. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4T88K
REFERENCES
Marafi, A., Albazzaz, H., and Rana, M.S., Catal Today, 2019, vol. 329, pp. 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.067
Guerrero-Ruiz, A., Sepulveda-Escribano, A., RodriguezRamos, I., Lopez-Agudo, A., and Fierro, J.L.G., Fuel, 1995, vol. 74, pp. 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(95)92666-T
Looi, P.Y., Mohamed, A.R., and Tye, C.T., Chem. Eng. J., 2012, vol. 181, pp. 717–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.080
Trakarnpruk, W., Seentrakoon, B., and Porntangjitlikit, S., Silpakorn Univ. Sci. Technol. J., 2008, vol. 2, pp. 7–13. https://doi.org/10.14456/sustj.2008.1
Trejo, F. and Ancheyta, J., Catal. Today, 2005, vol. 109, nos. 1–4, pp. 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.08.005
Raghuveer, C.S., Thybaut, J.W., De Bruycker, R., Metaxas, K., Bera, T., and Marin, G.B., Fuel, 2014, vol. 125, pp. 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.017
Marafi, A., Hauser, A., and Stanislaus, A., Catal. Today, 2007, vol. 125, nos. 3–4, pp. 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2007.03.060
Sizova, I.A. and Maksimov, A.L., Petol. Chem., 2017, vol. 57, pp. 595–599. https://doi.org/10.1134/S096554411707009X
Zepeda, T.A., Pawelec, B., Obeso-Estrella, R., de León, J.D., Fuentes, S., Alonso-Núñez, G., and Fierro, J.L.G., Appl. Catal. B, 2016, vol. 180, pp. 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.013
Humbert, S., Izzet, G., and Raybaud, P., J. Catal., 2016, vol. 333, pp. 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2015.10.016
Rana, M.S., Al-Barood, A., Brouresli, R., Al-Hendi, A.W., and Mustafa, N., Fuel Process. Technol., 2018, vol. 177, pp. 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.04.014
Venuti Björkman, J.J., Hruby, S.L., Pettersson, L.J., and Kantarelis, E., Catalysts, 2022, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12070736
Nikul’shina, M.S., Mozhaev, A.V., and Nikul’shin, P.A., Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 2019, vol. 92, pp. 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1134/S10704272190100154
Vutolkina, A.V., Makhmutov, D.F., Zanina, A.V., Maksimov, A.L., Kopitsyn, D.S., Glotov, A.P., Egazar’yants, S.V., and Karakhanov, E.A., Petol. Chem., 2018, vol. 58, pp. 1227–1232. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544118140141
Kuchinskaya, T.S., Mamian, L.G., and Kniazeva, M.I., Petrol. Chem., 2021, vol. 61, pp. 1124–1130. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544121100054
Vutolkina, A.V., Baigildin, I.G., Glotov, A.P., Pimerzin, A.A., Akopyan, A.V., Maximov, A.L., and Karakhanov, E.A., Appl. Catal. B, 2022, vol. 312, article 121403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121403
Sizova, I.A., Serdyukov, S.I., and Maksimov, A.L., Petrol. Chem., 2015, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 468–478. https://doi.org
Vutolkina, A.V., Makhmutov, D.F., Zanina, A.V., Maksimov, A.L., Glotov, A.P., Sinikova, N.A., and Karakhanov, E.A., Petrol. Chem., 2018, vol. 58, pp. 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965544118070095
Hashemi, R., Nassar, N.N., and Almao, P.P., Appl. Energy, 2014, vol. 133, pp. 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.069
Khadzhiev, S.N., Kadiev, Kh.M., Zekel’, L.A., and Kadieva, M.Kh., Petol. Chem., 2018, vol. 58, pp. 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544118070046
Ma, Y., Zhang, J., Wu, W., Cai, Z., Cao, Y., Huang, K., and Jiang, L., Chem. Eng. Sci., 2022, vol. 253, article 117516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.117516
Leglise, J., van Gestel, J., and Duchet, J.C., J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, no. 5, pp. 611–612. https://doi.org/10.1039/C39940000611
Furimsky, E. and Massoth, F.E., Catal. Rev., 2005, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 297–489. https://doi.org/10.1081/CR-200057492
Funding
The study was performed within the framework of the government assignment for the Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.L. Maximov, M.I. Knyazeva, and T.S. Kuchinskaya formulated the research goals and suggested the set of physicochemical analysis methods for studying the catalyst. T.S. Kuchinskaya and A.F. Ziniatullina processed data obtained by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and X-ray phase analysis. A.F. Ziniatullina performed catalytic experiments, interpreted the results of chromatographic analysis of the product mixtures, and prepared figures for the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
A.L. Maximov is the Editor-in-Chief of the Neftekhimiya/Petroleum Chemistry journal. The other authors declare no conflict of interest requiring disclosure in this article.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ziniatullina, A.F., Kuchinskaya, T.S., Knyazeva, M.I. et al. Effect of Quinoline Additions on the Activity of In Situ Formed NiWS Catalysts. Pet. Chem. 63, 939–948 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544123060245
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544123060245