Abstract
We studied the influence of additional images (distractors) on the recognition of test objects, which included low-contrast Landolt circles with sizes of 1.1, 1.5, and 2.2 angular degrees and were presented eccentrically at 13.2 degrees from fixation. The distractors were either Landolt Cs or full circles with the same spatial characteristics. The distance between the test objects and the distractors varied from 2.2 to 24.2 angular degrees. The subjects were required to report the orientation of the tests (simple task) or to report the orientation of the tests and the shape of the distractor (dual task). The first group of subjects performed both simple and dual tasks, while the second group only performed the simple task. A significant deterioration of performance was recorded at all tested separations in both tasks; it was more pronounced in the dual task. The percent of correct responses was lower when Landolt circles were distractors as compared with full circles. The subjects tended to report the orientation of the distractors instead of tests in the cases of small and large separations. The recognition of distractors was also performed at a lower level in the cases of small and large distances. The data show that attention contributes to the task performance in two ways: the features of tests and distractors are integrated, or the tests are substituted by distractors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, J., Review of human visual development: crowding and dyslexia, in Vision and Visual Dyslexia, London: Macmillan, 1991, p.44.
Flom, M.C., Contour interaction and the crowding effect, Probl. Optom., 1991, vol. 3, no. 2, p.237.
Pelli, D.G., Palomares, M., and Majaj, N.J., Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature detection and integration, J. Vision, 2004, vol. 4, p. 1136.
Strasburger, H., Unfocussed spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision, J. Vision, 2005, vol. 5, no. 11, p. 1024.
Danilova, M V. and Bondarko, V.M., Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system, J. Vision, 2007, vol. 7, no. 2, p.1.
Levi, D.M., Crowding—an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini review, Vision Res., 2008, vol. 48, p.635.
Bouma, H., Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition, Nature, 1970, vol. 226, no. 5241, p.177.
Strasburger, H., Rentchler, I., and Jüttner, M., Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review, J. Vision, 2011, vol. 11, no. 5, p.1.
Bondarko, V.M., Danilova, M.V., Solnushkin, S.D., and Chikhman, V.N., Estimation of the sizes of inhibitory areas in crowding effect in the periphery, Hum. Physiol., 2014, vol. 40, no. 3, p.244.
Bondarko, V.M., Danilova, M.V., Solnushkin, S.D., and Chikhman, V.N., The effect of additional images on recognition of peripheral stimulus, Sens. Sist., 2014, vol. 28, no. 2, p.3.
Strasburger, H., Harvey, L.O., and Rentchler, I., Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view, Percept. Psychophys., 1991, vol. 49, p.495.
Hanus, D. and Vul, E., Quantifying error distributions in crowding, J. Vision, 2013, vol. 13, no. 4, p.1.
Freeman, J., Chakravarthi, R., and Pelli, D., Substitution and pooling in crowding, Atten. Percept. Psychophys., 2012, vol. 74, p.379.
Treisman, A., Strategies and models of selective attention, Psychol. Rev., 1969, vol. 76, p.282.
Treisman, A. and Gelade, G., A feature-integration theory of attention, Cognit. Psychol., 1980, vol. 12, p.97.
Harrison, W.J. and Bex, P.J., A unifying model of orientation crowding in peripheral vision, Curr. Biol., 2015, vol. 25, p. 3213.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © V.M. Bondarko, M.V. Danilova, S.D. Solnushkin, V.N. Chikhman, 2018, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2018, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 16–25.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bondarko, V.M., Danilova, M.V., Solnushkin, S.D. et al. Discrimination of Image Orientation in the Presence of Distractors. Hum Physiol 44, 371–379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119718020044
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119718020044