Skip to main content
Log in

Is the Hubble Constant Scale-Dependent?

  • Published:
Gravitation and Cosmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

An exact determination of the Hubble constant remains one of key problems in cosmology for almost a century. However, its modern values derived by various methods still disagree from each other by almost 10%, larger values being obtained by measurements at relatively small distances (e.g., by Cepheid stars as standard candles), while smaller values are characteristic of the methods associated with huge spatial scales (e.g., from the analysis of cosmic microwave background fluctuations). A reasonable way to resolve this puzzle is to assume that the Hubble constant is inherently scale-dependent. This idea seems to be particularly attractive in the light of the latest observational results on the early-type galaxies, where dark matter halos are almost absent. Therefore, an average contribution of the irregularly distributed dark matter to the rate of the cosmological expansion should be substantially different at various spatial scales. As follows from rough estimates, the corresponding variation of the Hubble constant can be about 10% and even more, which well explains the spread in its values obtained by different methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Ryden, “A constant conflict,” Nature Physics 13, 314 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. G. Riess et al., “A 2.4% determination of the local value of the Hubble constant,” Astrophys. J. 826, 56 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), “Planck intermediate results: XLVI. Reduction of large-scale systematic effects in HFI polarization maps and estimation of the reionization optical depth,” Astron. Astrophys. 596, A107 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Q.-G. Huang and K. Wang, “How the dark energy can reconcile Planck with local determination of the Hubble constant,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 506 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. D. Linde, “The Inflationary Universe,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 47, 925 (1984).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. K. A. Olive and J. A. Peacock, “Big-Bang cosmology,” in: C. Patrignani, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Chinese Physics C 40, 100001 (2016), p. 355.

  7. J. Liu, X. Chen, and X. Ji, “Current status of direct dark matter detection experiments,” Nature Physics 13, 212 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Buchmueller, C. Doglioni, and L.-T. Wang, “Search for dark matter at colliders,” Nature Physics 13, 217 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Swinbank, “Distant galaxies lack dark matter,” Nature 543, 318 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Genzel et al., “Strongly baryon-dominated disk galaxies at the peak of galaxy formation ten billion years ago,” Nature 543, 397 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. O. Lahav and A. R. Liddle, “The cosmological parameters,” in: C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Chinese Physics C 40, 100001 (2016), p. 386.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Křízěk and L. Somer, “Excessive extrapolations in cosmology,” Grav. Cosmol. 22, 270 (2016).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. V. Dumin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dumin, Y.V. Is the Hubble Constant Scale-Dependent?. Gravit. Cosmol. 24, 171–172 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289318020068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289318020068

Navigation