Skip to main content
Log in

TPP Ashes As a Sorbent for Waste Water Purification from Ammonium Ions

  • ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A review of the use of waste from thermal power plants as secondary resources in industry and agriculture has been carried out. The results of a study of the structural-surface and physicochemical properties of ash and slag from a thermal power plant operating in an industrially developed region of the far north (the city of Apatity, Murmansk oblast) are presented. According to the data of chemical analysis, silicon and aluminum oxides predominate in their composition, the content of calcium oxide does not exceed 2.1%. It was established by the BET and BJH methods that the material has a predominantly mesoporous structure and a specific surface area of 17.8 m2/g that corresponds to the maximum observed in European medium-sized TPP plants. The phase composition of ash and slag was identified using the International Diffraction Database JCPDC-ICDD 2002; the dominance of quartz and calcium ferrite is noted in the mineral composition, but a significant part of the material is present in the X-ray amorphous state. It was found that, in terms of the main indicators, ash and slag correspond to the F-type of the international classification ASTM C 618, which makes it possible to recommend them for use as a sorbent in the treatment of domestic wastewater. The predominant extraction of the multicomponent composition of cationic forms from solutions was predicted from the pH value of the isoionic point equal to 7.63. Experimental data were obtained on model solutions in the range of concentrations of ammonium ions typical for municipal wastewaters of the city geographically adjacent to the TPP. Processing of the results obtained using the Langmuir sorption equations was carried out. The sorption capacity of ash and slag is 20.43 mg \({{{\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }} {\text{g}}}} \right. \kern-0em} {\text{g}}}{\text{.}}\) According to the results of experiments on the study of the kinetics of sorption on model solutions, the degree of extraction of ammonium ions when using ash and slag reaches 90% of the equilibrium concentration within 1 h, the sorption process is limited by external diffusion. An assumption is made about the expediency of using the spent sorbent, which is proposed as an ameliorant with a prolonged fertilizing effect, for the formation of bulk soils during the restoration of anthropogenically disturbed territories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The method of mathematical description of physical adsorption proposed by Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (hereinafter BET).

  2. The BJH method (Barret‒Joyner‒Halenda) is a method for calculating the pore size distribution in a porous material from adsorption or desorption isotherms.

REFERENCES

  1. GOST R 57789-2017. Ashes, Slags and Ash-Slags Mixture of Thermal Power Plants for Manufacturing of Artificial Porous Aggregate. Specifications (Standartinform, Moscow, 2017).

  2. Ya. E. Yudovich and M. P. Ketris, Toxic Elements as Admixtures in Fossil Coals (Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Yekaterinburg, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. M. H. Asl, H. Javadian, M. Khavarpour, C. Belviso, M. Taghavi, and M. Maghsudi, “Porous adsorbents derived from coal fly ash as cost-effective and environmentally-friendly sources of aluminosilicate for sequestration of aqueous and gaseous pollutants: A review,” J. Cleaner Prod. 208, 1131–1147 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Xu and X. Shi, “Characteristics and applications of fly ash as a sustainable construction material: A state-of-the-art review,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 136, 95–109 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. S. Iyer and J. A. Scott, “Power station fly ash — A review of value-added utilization outside of the construction industry,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 31, 217–228 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00084-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Ding, S. Ma, S. Shen, Z. Xie, S. Zheng, and Y. Zhang, “Research and industrialization progress of recovering alumina from fly ash: A concise review,” Waste Manage. 60, 375–387 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. K. Sahoo, K. Kim, M. A. Powell, and S. M. Equeenuddin, “Recovery of metals and other beneficial products from coal fly ash: A sustainable approach for fly ash management,” Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 3, 267–283 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-016-0141-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Li and X. Qiao, “A new approach to prepare mesoporous silica using coal fly ash,” Chem. Eng. J. 302, 388–394 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. C. Ram and R. E. Masto, “Fly ash for soil amelioration: A review on the influence of ash blending with inorganic and organic amendments,” Earth-Sci. Rev. 128, 52–74 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. S. Sabry, S. H. Peter, and C. D. Tsadilas, “Opportunities and challenges in the use of coal fly ash for soil improvements — A review,” J. Environ. Manage. 145, 249–267 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Mushtaq, M. Zahid, I. A. Bhatti, S. Nasir, and T. Hussain, “Possible applications of coal fly ash in wastewater treatment,” J. Environ. Manage. 240, 27–46 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. C. Hower, J. G. Groppo, U. M. Graham, C. R. Ward, I. J. Kostova, M. M. Maroto-Valer, and S. Dai, “Coal-derived unburned carbons in fly ash: A review,” Int. J. Coal Geol. 179, 11–27 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2017.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. V. Vassilev and C. G. Vassileva, “Methods for characterization of composition of fly ashes from coal-fired power stations: A critical overview,” Energy Fuels 19, 1084–1098 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef049694d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Visa, L. Isac, and A. Duta, “Fly ash adsorbents for multi-cation wastewater treatment,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 6345–6352 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Hermassi, C. Valderrama, N. Moreno, O. Font, X. Querol, N. H. Batis, and J. L. Cortina, “Fly ash as reactive sorbent for phosphate removal from treated waste water as a potential slow release fertilizer,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5, 160–169 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.11.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Wang, S. Lü, C. Gao, X. Xu, X. Zhang, X. Bai, M. Liu, and L. Wu, “Highly efficient adsorption of ammonium onto palygorskite nanocomposite and evaluation of its recovery as a multifunctional slow-release fertilizer,” Chem. Eng. J. 252, 404–414 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. GOST 12536-2014. Soils. Methods of Laboratory Granulometric (Grain-Size) and Microaggregate Distribution (Standartinform, Moscow, 2019).

  18. GOST 27753.3-88. Greenhouse Grounds. Method for Determination of Water Extract pH (Gosstandart SSSR, Moscow, 1988).

  19. K. V. Ikonnikova, L. F. Ikonnikova, T. S. Minakova, and Yu. S. Sarkisov, Theory and Practice of Determining the Acid-Base Properties of the Surface of Solids by the pH-Metry Method (Tomsk. Politekh. Univ., Tomsk, 2014) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Moreno, X. Querol, J. M. Andrés, K. Stanton, M. Towler, H. Nugteren, M. Janssen-Jurkovicová, and R. Jones, “Physico-chemical characteristics of European pulverized coal combustion fly ashes,” Fuel 84, 1351–1363 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.06.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. A. Wendling, G. B. Douglas, S. Coleman, and Z. Yuan, “Nutrient and dissolved organic carbon removal from natural waters using industrial by-products,” Sci. Total Environ. 442, 63–72 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ASTM. Standard C618-08 Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2008).

  23. K. Taleb, J. Markovski, Z. Veličković, J. Rusmirović, M. Rančić, V. Pavlović, and A. Marinković, “Arsenic removal by magnetite-loaded amino modified nano/microcellulose adsorbents: Effect of functionalization and media size,” Arabian J. Chem. 12, 4675–4693 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. V. N. Pereverzev, N. M. Korobeinikova, and L. A. Baskova, “The effectiveness of the use of organic and mineral fertilizers when growing oats on newly developed and poorly cultivated podzolic soils,” Agrokhimiya, No. 2, 35–39 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. V. Mayorov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorbacheva, T.T., Mayorov, D.V. TPP Ashes As a Sorbent for Waste Water Purification from Ammonium Ions. Therm. Eng. 69, 210–216 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601522030041

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601522030041

Keywords:

Navigation