Abstract
The article describes the design features of condensing turbines for ultrasupercritical initial steam conditions (USSC) and large-capacity cogeneration turbines for super- and subcritical steam conditions having increased steam extractions for district heating purposes. For improving the efficiency and reliability indicators of USSC turbines, it is proposed to use forced cooling of the head high-temperature thermally stressed parts of the high- and intermediate-pressure rotors, reaction-type blades of the high-pressure cylinder (HPC) and at least the first stages of the intermediate-pressure cylinder (IPC), the double-wall HPC casing with narrow flanges of its horizontal joints, a rigid HPC rotor, an extended system of regenerative steam extractions without using extractions from the HPC flow path, and the low-pressure cylinder’s inner casing moving in accordance with the IPC thermal expansions. For cogeneration turbines, it is proposed to shift the upper district heating extraction (or its significant part) to the feedwater pump turbine, which will make it possible to improve the turbine plant efficiency and arrange both district heating extractions in the IPC. In addition, in the case of using a disengaging coupling or precision conical bolts in the coupling, this solution will make it possible to disconnect the LPC in shifting the turbine to operate in the cogeneration mode. The article points out the need to intensify turbine development efforts with the use of modern methods for improving their efficiency and reliability involving, in particular, the use of relatively short 3D blades, last stages fitted with longer rotor blades, evaporation techniques for removing moisture in the last-stage diaphragm, and LPC rotor blades with radial grooves on their leading edges.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yu. K. Petrenya, L. A. Khomenok, I. I. Pichugin, O. A. Vladimirskii, V. M. Lyapunov, A. S. Lisyanskii, Yu. Ya. Kachuriner, T. A. Ignat’eva, and S. A. Ivanov, “The design features of the high-and intermediatepressure cylinders with forced cooling for turbines for ultrasupercritical steam conditions,” Therm. Eng. 55, 39–44 (2008).
I. A. Pichugin, L. A. Khomenok, I. A. Kovalev, O. A. Vladimirskii, Yu. Ya. Kachuriner, and I. V. Zaitsev, “The concept of a constructive profile of a new generation turbounit for ultrasupercritical steam parameters,” Nadezhnost Bezop. Energ., No. 3, 14–17 (2012).
V. S. Shargorodskii, L. A. Khomenok, S. Sh. Rozenberg, and A. N. Kovalenko, “Improving the technical level of steam turbines during the introduction of systems for forced steam cooling of rotors,” Elektr. Stn., No. 1, 30–36 (1999).
L. A. Khomenok, V. V. Bozhko, I. S. Leonova, I. V. Zaitsev, and D. V. Prokhorov, “Extending the service life of steam turbines using the systems for cooling the thermally stressed parts of high-and intermediatepressure cylinders,” Therm. Eng. 59, 199–203 (2012).
V. G. Orlik, N. V. Averkina, L. L. Vainshtein, N. A. Varentsova, Yu. Ya. Kachuriner, I. A. El’shleger, V. F. Chervonnyi, M. A. Filaretov, and A. N. Zinchenko, Patent RF No. 2279551 S1 F01D5/08, Byull. Izobtret., No. 19 (2006).
L. A. Shubenko-Shubin and S. I. Ostrovskii, “Steam turbine KhTGZ SKR-100 with cooling for supercritical steam parameters,” Energomashinostroenie, No. 6, 4–10 (1962).
B. A. Arkadyev, “Features of steam turbine cooling by the example of an SKR-100 turbine for supercritical steam parameters,” Therm. Eng. 62, 728–734 (2015). doi 10.1134/S004060151510002X
RTM 108.020.33-86. Labyrinth Packings of Stationary Steam and Gas Turbines and Compressors. Design and Calculation (Tsentr. Kotlo-Turbinnyi Inst., Leningrad, 1988).
K. Segavo and E. Ulikano, “An Improvement of performance in steam turbine by developing three-dimensionally designed blades,” JSME Int._J., Ser. B 41, 1035–1041 (1998).
A. Novi and P. J. Walker, “Erste Mesergebnisse an Turbinen mit neuer Schaufelgenerazion,” VGB Kraftwerstech., No. 12, 60–65 (1999).
T. Harid and H. Oeynhausen, “Modernisierung von Turbinen,” BWK 57, 57–63 (2005).
W. Trabl, “Dampfturbinen fur die Zukunft,” VGB Kraftwerkstech., No. 8, 85–91 (1988).
V. G. Orlik, N. V. Averkina, Yu. Ya. Kachuriner, F. M. Sukharev, and M. A. Filaretov, “Experience of industrial application of the guiding blade warming for the reduction of erosion of wet-steam turbine stages,” Elektr. Stn., No. 2, 24–28 (2004).
V. G. Orlik, Yu. Ya. Kachuriner, N. V. Averkina, L. L. Vainshtein, M. A. Filaretov, A. V. Matyushin, and V. F. Chervonnyi, Patent No. 2267617 C1 F01D25/32 RF, Byull. Izobret., No. 1 (2006).
B. M. Troyanovskii, Turbines for Nuclear Power Plants (Energiya, Moscow, 1978).
M. V. Bakuradze, V. I. Kirillov, N. N. Gudkov, V. V. Ermolaev, and L. A. Zhuchenko, Patent RF No. 2334880, Byull. Izobret., No. 27 (2008).
A. M. Gribkov and S. A. Fadeev, “The longitudinal layout alternate version of cogeneration steam turbines with the generator placed on the side of the high-pressure cylinder,” Therm. Eng. 60, 223–226 (2013). doi 10.1134/S0040601512090030
A. E. Zaryankin, S. V. Arianov, and V. A. Zaryankin, “High-power heating steam turbines with toggleable low-pressure cylinder,” Tyazh. Mashinostr., No. 3, 7–11 (2013).
V. M. Neuimin, “On durability of the stellite protection of working blades of last stages of steam turbines,” Energosberezhenie Vodopodgot., No. 2, 52–54 (2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © V.E. Mikhailov, L.A. Khomenok, I.I. Pichugin, I.A. Kovalev, V.V. Bozhko, O.A. Vladimirskii, I.V. Zaitsev, Yu.Ya. Kachuriner, I.A. Nosovitskii, V.G. Orlik, 2017, published in Teploenergetika.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mikhailov, V.E., Khomenok, L.A., Pichugin, I.I. et al. Concept of turbines for ultrasupercritical, supercritical, and subcritical steam conditions. Therm. Eng. 64, 787–793 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601517110076
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601517110076