Skip to main content
Log in

Possibility of Application of a 1565ch Alloy in the Automotive Industry

  • APPLIED PROBLEMS OF STRENGTH AND PLASTICITY
  • Published:
Russian Metallurgy (Metally) Aims and scope

Abstract

The ductility margins of a grade 5182 aluminum–magnesium alloy, which is traditionally used in the automotive industry, and a 1565ch aluminum–magnesium alloy having a higher magnesium content and microalloyed with zirconium are analyzed and compared. The mechanical properties, their anisotropy, and the microstructures of the alloys in the annealed state are studied, and forming limit and limiting stress diagrams are plotted. The stamping of a typical automobile-body part, namely, an inner hood panel, is simulated by the finite element method. The 1565ch alloy is found to have the ductility that is high enough for an automobile-body sheet: its ductility is comparable with that of the grade 5182 alloy and even slightly exceeds it in the uniaxial tension zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To study the influence of zirconium on the strength properties, it would be better to choose an AMg6 alloy, the magnesium content in which is close to that in a 1565ch alloy. However, an AMg6 alloy has not been used and, apparently, will not be used for automobile-body sheets because of its low ductility. At the same time, a 1565ch alloy has good ductility for such a high magnesium content [19], which is likely to be caused by the fact that Al3Zr particles additionally refine subgrains and retard the motion of their boundaries during polygonization [23].

  2. In some cases, the direction of cutting aluminum alloy specimens can be different, since their texture can differ substantially because of chemical composition and be different for two alloys in the same as-delivered state [25, 26].

REFERENCES

  1. D. V. Wilson, “Aluminium versus steel in the family car—the formability factor,” J. Mech.Work. Techn. 16 (3), 257–277 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Hirsch, “Aluminium in innovative lightweight car design,” Mater. Trans. 52 (5), 818–824 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Z. H. Jia, H. L. Huang, X. L. Wang, Y. Xing, and Q. Liu, “Hafnium in aluminum alloys: a review,” Acta Metall. Sinica (English Lett.) 29 (2), 105–119 (2016).

  4. V. G. Davydov, V. I. Elagin, V. V. Zakharov, and L. D. Rostova, “Alloying aluminum alloys with scandium and zirconium additives,” Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 38 (8), 347–352 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V. V. Zakharov, “About alloying of aluminum alloys with transition metals,” Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 59 (1–2), 67–71 (2017).

  6. F. Wang, D. Qiu, Z. L. Liu, and J. Taylor, “The grain refinement mechanism of cast aluminium by zirconium,” Acta Mater. 61 (12), 5636–5645 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Røyset and N. Ryum, “Scandium in aluminium alloys,” Int. Mater. Rev. 50 (1), 19–44 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Murray, A. Peruzzi, and J. P. Abriata, “The Al–Zr (aluminium–zirconium) system,” J. Phase Equilib. 13 (3), 277–291 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. B. Kang and A. D. Pelton, “Critical evaluation and thermodynamic optimization of the Al–Ce, Al–Y, Al‒Sc and Mg–Sc binary systems,” Calphad. 32 (2), 413–422 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Forbord, H. Hallem, and N. Ryum, “Precipitation and recrystallization in Al–Mn–Zr with and without Sc,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 387, 936–939 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. N. Seidman, E. A. Marquis, and D. C. Dunand, “Precipitation strengthening at ambient and elevated temperatures of heat-treatable Al (Sc) alloys,” Acta Mater. 50 (16), 4021–4035 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. L. Kendig and D. B. Miracle, “Strengthening mechanisms of an Al–Mg–Sc–Zr alloy,” Acta Mater. 50 (16), 4165–4175 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Ocenasek and M. Slamova, “Resistance to recrystallization due to Sc and Zr addition to Al–Mg alloys,” Mater. Characteriz. 47 (2), 157–162 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Yang, D. Yan, and L. Rong, “The separation of recrystallization and precipitation processes in a cold-rolled Al–Mg–Sc solid solution,” Scr. Mater. 68 (8), 587–590 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Elkhodary, W. Lee, L. P. Sun, D. W. Brenner, and M. A. Zikry, “Deformation mechanisms of an Ω precipitate in a high-strength aluminum alloy subjected to high strain rates,” J. Mater. Res. 26 (4), 487–497 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. I. Elkhodary and M. A. Zikry, “Dynamic crack nucleation, propagation, and interactions with crystalline secondary phases in aluminum alloys subjected to large deformations,” Philos. Mag. 92 (32), 3920–3949 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. O. China, “Effects of precipitation behaviors on the microstructure and fracture toughness of Al–Cu–Mg aluminum alloys,” Optoelectronics Adv. Mater.–Rapid Communic. 10 (7, 8), 583–589 (2016).

  18. L. S. Toropova, A. N. Kamardinkin, V. V. Kindzhibalo, and A. T. Tyvanchuk, “Investigation of alloys of the Al–Sc–Zr system in the aluminium-rich range,” Phys. Met. Metallogr. 70 (6), 106–110 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. S. Oryshchenko, E. P. Osokin, N. N. Barakhtina, and A. M. Drits, “Aluminum–magnesium 1565ch alloy for cryogenic application,” Tsvetn. Met., No. 11, 84–90 (2012).

  20. A. M. Drits, V. V. Ovchinnikov, and R. N. Rastopchin, “Properties of welded joints of the 1565ch alloy as applied to fabrication of welds,” Tsvetn. Met., No. 12, 85–90 (2012).

  21. S. V. Rushchits, E. V. Aryshensky, and S. M. Sosedkov, “Modeling the hot deformation behavior of 1565ch aluminum alloy,” Key Eng. Mater. 684, 35–41 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. V. Rushchits, E. V. Aryshenskii, and R. Kawalla, “Investigation of texture structure and mechanical properties evolution during hot deformation of 1565 aluminum alloy,” Mater. Sci. Forum 854, 73–78 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Cabibbo, S. Spigarelli, and E. Evangelista, “Microstructural characterization of secondary-phase particles in a hot-deformed Al–Cu–Mg–Zr alloy,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35 (1), 293–300 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. O. Engler and J. Hirsch, “Polycrystal-plasticity simulation of six and eight ears in deep-drawn aluminum cups,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A 452, 640–651 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. K. Velmanirajan, “Experimental investigation of forming limit, void coalescence and crystallographic textures of aluminum alloy 8011 sheet annealed at various temperatures,” Archives of Civil and Mechan. Eng. 14 (3), 398–416 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. V. K. Barnwal, R. Raghavan, A. Tewari, K. Narasimhan, and S. K. Mishra, “Effect of microstructure and texture on forming behaviour of AA-6061 aluminium alloy sheet,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 679, 56–65 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. V. L. Kolmogorov, Mechanics of Metal Forming (Metallurgiya, Moscow, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. E. Galiev.

Additional information

Translated by K. Shakhlevich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aryshenskii, E.V., Guk, S.V., Galiev, E.E. et al. Possibility of Application of a 1565ch Alloy in the Automotive Industry. Russ. Metall. 2018, 995–1001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036029518100026

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036029518100026

Keywords:

Navigation