Abstract
Ceria (CeO2) nanocatalysts were synthesized by three different methods via a simple sol–gel method (SGM), precipitation method (PPM), and solution combustion method (SCM) for CO oxidation reaction. The results show that the CeO2 catalysts prepared by SGM possess small crystallite size (9 nm), more lattice defects (active sites), high specific surface area (188 m2 g–1), and better thermal stability. Raman spectra showed that large number oxygen vacancies were possessed by CeO2-SGM catalysts as compared to CeO2-PPM and CeO2-SCM. It was observed that the catalytic activity for CO oxidation reaction is greatly influenced by the preparation method. The order of activity and stability of CeO2 material prepared by different methods for CO oxidation process is as follows: CeO2-SGM > CeO2-PPM > CeO2-SCM, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
A. Singhania and A. N. Bhaskarwar, Catal. Rev. (2017, in press).
A. Singhania, A. N. Bhaskarwar, D. M. Kale, et al., IN Patent No. 2308/DEL/2014 (2014).
A. Singhania, V. V. Krishnan, A. N. Bhaskarwar, et al., Catal. Commun. 93, 5 (2017).
F. Liu, C. Wu, G. Yang, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 15500 (2015).
W. Song, Y. Su, and E. J. M. Hensen, J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 27505 (2015).
J. X. Liu, Z. Liu, I. A. W. Filot, et al., Catal. Sci. Technol. 7, 75 (2017).
Y. P. G. Chua, G. T. K. K. Gunasooriya, M. Saeys, et al., J. Catal. 311, 306 (2014).
C. H. Kuo, W. Li, W. Song, et al., Appl. Mater. Interface 6, 11311 (2014).
D. Liu, Y. F. Zhu, and Q. Jiang, RSC Adv. 5, 1587 (2015).
K. J. Yoon, H. K. Kang, and J. E. Yie, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 14, 399 (1997).
A. Singhania and S. M. Gupta, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 8, 264 (2017).
A. Singhania and S. M. Gupta, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 8, 1546 (2017).
N. Sasirekha, P. Sangeetha, and Y. W. Chen, J. Phys. Chem C 118, 15226 (2014).
X. Ning, H. Yu, F. Peng, et al., J. Catal. 325, 136 (2015).
X. Du, H. Y. Li, J. Yu, et al., Catal. Sci. Technol. 5, 3970 (2015).
C. M. Olmos, L. E. Chinchilla, J. J. Delgado, et al., Catal. Lett. 146, 144 (2016).
B. M. Reddy, G. Thrimurthulu, L. Katta, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 15882 (2009).
B. M. Reddy, K. N. Rao, and P. Bharali, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 8478 (2009).
B. M. Reddy, P. Lakshmanan, P. Bharali, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 10478 (2007).
B. M. Reddy, P. Bharali, P. Saikia, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 11729 (2008).
R. W. McCabe, R. K. Usmen, in Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, Ed. by W. N. Delgass, E. Iglesia, and A. T. Bell (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996), Vol. 101, p. 355.
N. Murayama, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 11621, 1167 (2008).
F. Caputo, M. De Nicola, A. Sienkiewicz, et al., Nanoscale 7, 15643 (2015).
C. Sun, H. Li, and L. Chen, Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 8475 (2012).
A. Singhania, V. V. Krishnan, A. N. Bhaskarwar, et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 10538 (2016).
A. Singhania, A. N. Bhaskarwar, D. M. Kale, et al., in Patent No. 2259/DEL/2014 (2014).
P. Gross, W. F. Biller, D. F. Greene, and K. K. Kearby, US Patent No. 3370914.
M. Shelef and R. W. McCabe, Catal. Today 62, 35 (2000).
Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Zhou, et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34, 1688 (2009).
Y. Zhang, R. Wang, X. Lin, et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39, 10853 (2014).
N. Laosiripojana and S. Assabumrungrat, Appl. Catal., B 60, 107 (2005).
W. Shen, X. Dong, Y. Zhu, et al., Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 85, 157 (2005).
X. S. Huang, H. Sun, L. C. Wang, et al., Appl. Catal., B 90, 224 (2009).
J. Qin, J. Lu, M. Cao, et al., Nanoscale 2, 2739 (2010).
F. Huber, H. Venvik, M. Ronning, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 137, 686 (2008).
Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Zhou, et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33, 602 (2008).
R. K. Usmen, R. W. McCabe, G. W. Graham, W. H. Weber, C. R. Peters, and H. S. Gandhi, Soc. Automotive Eng. Paper No. 922336 (Soc. Automotive Eng., 1992).
M. F. Luo, Y. P. Song, J. Q. Lu, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 12686 (2007).
E. S. Barca, M. Filipescu, C. Luculescu, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 363, 245 (2016).
A. Singhania, V. V. Krishanan, A. N. Bhaskarwar, et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy (2017, in press).
T. Hattori, K. Kobayashi, and M. Ozawa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56, 1 (2017).
I. V. Zagaynov, A. V. Vorobiev, and S. V. Utsev, Mater. Lett. 139, 237 (2015).
K. Otsuka, Y. Wang, E. Sunada, et al., J. Catal. 175, 152 (1998).
C. Agrafiotis, A. Tsetsekou, C. J. Stournaras, et al., Appl. Catal., B 34, 149 (2001).
S. S. Deshmukh, M. H. Zhang, V. I. Kovalchuk, et al., Appl. Catal., B 45, 135 (2003).
J. Qi, J. Chen, G. Li, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 8937 (2012).
C. Ho, J. C. Yu, T. Kwong, et al., Chem. Mater. 17, 4514 (2005).
M. Piumetti, T. Andana, S. Bensaid, et al., AIChe J. 63, 216 (2016).
M. L. D. Santos, R. C. Lima, C. S. Riccardi, et al., Mater. Lett. 62, 4509 (2008).
J. Lin, L. Li, Y. Huang, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 16509 (2011).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the grant under FRGS from GGSIPU, New Delhi to undertake the work and thank IIT Delhi for granting access to the characterization equipment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
1The article is published in the original.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amit Singhania, Shipra Mital Gupta Highly Active CeO2 Nanocatalysts for Low-Temperature CO Oxidation. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 92, 1900–1906 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024418100321
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024418100321