Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dependence of the Annual Asymmetry in NmF2 on Geomagnetic Latitude and Solar Activity

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The properties of the annual asymmetry in the electron density of the F2-layer maximum NmF2 at noon are analyzed based on the global empirical model of the F2-layer critical frequency median (SDMF2 model). As a characteristic of this asymmetry, we used the R index, i.e., the January/July ratio of the total (at a given and geomagnetically conjugate points) NmF2 density at noon averaged over all longitudes. It was found that the R index decreases with increasing solar activity at low geomagnetic latitudes (Φ < 31°–33°). At higher latitudes, the R index increases with an increase in solar activity. During low solar activity, the main R maximum is located at latitude Φ = 22°–24°. During high solar activity, this R maximum is located at Φ = 64°–66°. At latitude Φ = 22°–24° in the Northern and Southern hemispheres, the longitudinal average NmF2 density in January is higher than that in July for any level of solar activity. At Φ = 64°–66°, an increase in R with increasing solar activity is mainly caused by a January increase in NmF2 in the Northern Hemisphere. The global (average over all latitudes) R index increases with increasing solar activity. Additional analysis showed that the global R index decreases with increasing solar activity in the IRI model both with URSI option and, even more so, with CCIR option. This appears to be due to the limited amount of experimental data on the obtainment of the CCIR and URSI coefficients, especially over the oceans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bilitza, D., IRI the international standard for the ionosphere, Adv. Radio Sci., 2018, vol. 16, pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, S., Bilitza, D., and Yiğit, E., Improvements to predictions of the ionospheric annual anomaly by the international reference ionosphere model, Ann. Geophys. Discuss., 2018. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2018-97

  3. Deminov, M.G. and Deminova, G.F., Dependence of the local index of annual asymmetry for NmF2 on solar activity, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2021, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 227–233.

  4. Gulyaeva, T.L., Arikan, F., Hernandez-Pajares, M., and Veselovsky, I.S., North–south components of the annual asymmetry in the ionosphere, Radio Sci., 2014, vol. 49, pp. 485–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones, W.B. and Gallet, R.M., The representation of diurnal and geographic variations of ionospheric data by numerical methods (Pt. 1), Telecomm. J., 1962, vol. 29, pp. 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jones, W.B. and Gallet, R.M., The representation of diurnal and geographic variations of ionospheric data by numerical methods (Pt. 2), Telecomm. J., 1965, vol. 32, pp. 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koochak, Z. and Fraser-Smith, A.C., An update on the centered and eccentric geomagnetic dipoles and their poles for the years 1980–2015, Earth Space Sci., 2017, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 626–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lei, J., Dou, X., Burns, A., Wang, W., Luan, X., Zeng, Z., and Xu, J., Annual asymmetry in thermospheric density: Observations and simulations, J. Geophys. Res.: Space, 2013, vol. 118, pp. 2503–2510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mendillo, M., Huang, C.L., Pi, X., Rishbeth, H., and Meier, R., The global ionospheric asymmetry in total electron content, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2005, no. 15, pp. 1377–1387.

  10. Mikhailov, A.V. and Perrone, L., The annual asymmetry in the F2 layer during deep solar minimum (2008–2009): December anomaly, J. Geophys. Res.: Space, 2015, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 1341–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rishbeth, H. and Müller-Wodarg, I.C.F., Why is there more ionosphere in January than in July? The annual asymmetry in the F2-layer, Ann. Geophys., 2006, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 3293–3311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rush, C.M., PoKempner, M., Anderson, D.N., Perry, J., Stewart, F.G., and Reasoner, R., Maps of foF2 derived from observations and theoretical data, Radio Sci., 1984, vol. 19, pp. 1083–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rush, C., Fox, M., Bilitza, D., Davies, K., McNamara, L., Stewart, F., and PoKempner, M., Ionospheric mapping—an update of foF2 coefficients, Telecomm. J., 1989, vol. 56, pp. 179–182.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sai Gowtam, V. and Tulasi Ram, S., Ionospheric annual anomaly—new insights to the physical mechanisms, J. Geophys. Res.: Space, 2017a, vol. 122, pp. 8816–8830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sai Gowtam, V. and Tulasi Ram, S., Ionospheric winter anomaly and annual anomaly observed from Formosat-3/COSMIC radio occultation observations during the ascending phase of solar cycle 24, Adv. Space Res., 2017b, vol. 60, pp. 1585–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shubin, V.N., Global empirical model of critical frequency of the ionospheric F2-layer for quiet geomagnetic conditions, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 414–425.

  17. Tanskanen, E.I., Pulkkinen, T.I., Viljanen, A., et al., From space weather toward space climate time scales: substorm analysis from 1993 to 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 2011, vol. 116, A00I34. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yonezawa, T., The solar-activity and latitudinal characteristics of the seasonal, non-seasonal and semi-annual variations in the peak electron densities of the F2-layer at noon and at midnight in middle and low latitudes, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 1971, vol. 33, pp. 887–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng, Z., Burns, A., Wang, W., Lei, J., Solomon, S., Syndergaard, S., Qian, L., and Kuo, Y.-H., Ionospheric annual asymmetry observed by the COSMIC radio occultation measurements and simulated by the TIEGCM, J. Geophys. Res., 2008, vol. 113, A07305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, B., Wan, W., Liu, L., Mao, T., Ren, Z., Wang, M., and Christensen, A.B., Features of annual and semiannual variations derived from the global ionospheric maps of total electron content, Ann. Geophys., 2007, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 2513–2527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to the creators of the IRI website (irimodel.org) for the FORTRAN code to calculate the medians of the F2-layer critical frequency foF2 with the IRI model both with the CCIR and URSI coefficients.

Funding

The study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-05-00050 (for low and middle latitudes), and the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 20-72-10023 (for high latitudes).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Wave Propagation (IZMIRAN), Russian Academy of Sciences, Troitsk, Moscow, Russia

    M. G. Deminov & V. N. Shubin

  2. Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia

    R. G. Deminov

Authors
  1. M. G. Deminov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. N. Shubin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. G. Deminov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. G. Deminov.

Additional information

Translated by M. Chubarova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deminov, M.G., Shubin, V.N. & Deminov, R.G. Dependence of the Annual Asymmetry in NmF2 on Geomagnetic Latitude and Solar Activity. Geomagn. Aeron. 61, 359–364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221030038

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221030038

Search

Navigation