Skip to main content
Log in

Dependence of the Annual Asymmetry Local Index for the NmF2 Median on Solar Activity

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the medians of the F 2-layer maximum electron concentration NmF 2 for two ionospheric stations, Boulder and Hobart, in 1963–2013, an analysis of the dependence of the annual asymmetry local index R at noon on solar activity has been performed, where the R index is the January/July ratio of the summary NmF2 concentration for this pair of stations. Solar activity indices averaged over 81 days are used: Fobs is the solar radio emission flux at a wavelength of 10.7 cm measured by ground-based radio telescopes and Fadj is the value of Fobs reduced to a fixed distance from the Sun of one astronomical unit. It is found that the regression equations that manifest the NmF2 medians dependence on Fobs make it possible to obtain the annual asymmetry index R for a fixed value of Fobs with allowance for a substitution of Fobs by cFobs in these regression equations, the c coefficient is equal to 1.03 and 0.97 for January and July, respectively. The c = 1 case corresponds to neglecting the annual asymmetry in the Fobs index due to the ellipticity of the Earth’s orbit. For the c = 1 version, the R index increases with a solar activity increase from 1.2 under low activity up to almost 1.4 under high activity. An additional allowance for the annual asymmetry in Fobs leads to an increase in the R index by approximately 0.1 almost independently of the solar activity level. Apparently, this conclusion is being drawn for the first time. The Fadj index also makes it possible to obtain a correct estimate of the R index, because the annual asymmetry in the solar radiation flux is indirectly taken into account via the experimental values of NmF 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Brown, S., Bilitza, D., and Yiğit, E., Improvements to predictions of the ionospheric annual anomaly by the international reference ionosphere model, Ann. Geophys. Discuss., 2018. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2018-97

  2. Dang, T., Wang, W., Burns, A., Dou, X., Wan, W., and Lei, J., Simulations of the ionospheric annual asymmetry: Sun–Earth distance effect, J. Geophys. Res.: Space, 2017, vol. 122, pp. 6727–6736. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deminov, M.G. and Deminova, G.F., Dependence of the local index of annual asymmetry for NmF2 on solar activity, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2021, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221020055

  4. Deminov, M.G. and Deminova, G.F., Dependence of NmF2 local annual asymmetry index on local time and solar activity, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2023, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222600801

  5. Lei, J., Wang, W., Burns, A.G., Luan, X., and Dou, X., Can atomic oxygen production explain the ionospheric annual asymmetry?, J. Geophys. Res.: Space, 2016, vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 7238–7244. https://doi.org/10.1002@2016JA022648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mikhailov, A.V. and Perrone, L., The annual asymmetry in the F2 layer during deep solar minimum (2008–2009): December anomaly, J. Geophys. Res.: Space, 2015, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 1341–1354. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rishbeth, H. and Müller-Wodarg, I.C.F., Why is there more ionosphere in January than in July? The annual asymmetry in the F2-layer, Ann. Geophys., 2006, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 3293–3311. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-3293-2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wintoft, P., The variability of solar EUV: A multiscale comparison between sunspot number, 10.7 cm flux, LASP MgII index, and SOHO/SEM EUV flux, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2011, vol. 73, no. 13, pp. 1708–1714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeng, Z., Burns, A., Wang, W., Lei, J., Solomon, S., Syndergaard, S., Qian, L., and Kuo, Y.-H., Ionospheric annual asymmetry observed by the COSMIC radio occultation measurements and simulated by the TIEGCM, J. Geophys. Res.: Space, 2008, vol. 113, p. A07305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012897

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The data on the critical frequencies foF2 at the Boulder and Hobart stations and solar activity indices were taken from the sites of the Space Physics Interactive Data Resource (SPIDR, http://spidr.ngdc.noaa.gov/, to 2015), World Data Center for Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Chilton (http://www.ukssdc.ac.uk/wdcc1/), and Solar Influences Data Analysis Center (SIDC, http://sidc.oma.be/silso/).

Funding

The work was partially supported by the Russian Scientific Foundation, project no. 20-72-10 023.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. G. Deminov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by A. Danilov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deminov, M.G., Deminova, G.F. Dependence of the Annual Asymmetry Local Index for the NmF2 Median on Solar Activity. Geomagn. Aeron. 63, 421–425 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793223600339

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793223600339

Navigation