Skip to main content
Log in

Structure of ovipositors and cladoendesis of Saltatoria, or Orchesopia

  • Published:
Entomological Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The oldest circumscriptional names of the taxon under consideration are Orchesopia Rafinesque, 1815 and Saltatoria Latreille, 1817. The recent Saltatoria are divided into two subordinate taxa whose circumscriptional names are Dolichocera Bey-Bienko, 1964 and Caelifera Ander, 1936 [= Metorthoptera Crampton, 1927 = Brachycera Bey-Bienko, 1964 (non Brachycera Zetterstedt, 1842)]. The name Ensifera Chopard, 1920, according to its original circumscription, belongs to the taxon which includes Tridactylidae; the name Caelifera Ander, 1936 originally belongs to the taxon which also includes Tridactylidae; therefore, these two circumscriptional names cannot be used in the same classification. Saltatoria belong to Tegminoptera Kluge, 2013, which belong to Rhipineoptera Kluge, 2012. Holophyly of Saltatoria is well proved by autapomorphies, the most conclusive of which are the stagnofemoral leaping specialization of the hind legs with the irreversibly reduced trochanter, and the inversed position of protoptera at the penultimolarval and ultimolarval stages. All the Saltatoria can be divided into an extinct plesiomorphon Permorchesopia taxon n. (characterized by primitively 5-segmented tarsi) and Neorchesopia taxon n. (characterized by partial or complete fusion of the 1st and 2nd tarsomeres). The structure and evolution of ovipositors are discussed. The term kinetapophyses is proposed as a common name for homologous abdominal appendages: the retractile vesicles on the pregenital segments of Triplura and Diplura and the 1st and 2nd ovipositor valves on abdominal segments VIII and IX of female Amyocerata. The portion of the sternum containing the muscles that extend to the kinetapophyses and styli can be referred to either as a styliger, a bistyliger, or a pair of unistyligers; the term “coxite” should be avoided since it implies doubtful homologization of these appendages. In the digging ovipositor of Caelifera, the shortened kinetapophyses IX are not vestiges but functionally important components. Examination of Ripipteryx gives insight into the origin of the peculiar lateral apodemes present in the ovipositors of the other representatives of Caelifera. Based on new hypotheses about character polarity in the ovipositor morphology and about evolution of stridulatory and hearing apparatuses, a new phylogenetic classification of Saltatoria is suggested, in which Dolichocera includes taxa with new circumscriptional names Stratensifera taxon n., Acoustopoda taxon n., Mesensifera taxon n., Striduloptera taxon n., Tettigensifera taxon n., and Gryllensifera taxon n., and Caelifera includes taxa with new circumscriptional names Vectocaelifera taxon n. and Acoustogastra taxon n.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ander, K., “Vergleichend-Anatomische und Phylogenetische Studien über die Ensifera (Saltatoria),” Opuscula Entomologica. Supplementum 2, 1–306 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beier, M., “Embioidea und Orthopteroidea, Ordnung Saltatoria,” in Bronn, H.G., Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. Bd 5, Abt. 3, Buch 6, Lief 1 (1955), pp. 1–304.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beier, M., “Klassifikation,” in Handbuch der Zoologie, Bd 4: Arthropoda, Hälfte 2: Insecta, Teil 1: Allgemeines, Ed. by J.G. Helmcke, D. Stark, and H. Wermuth (1969), pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bethoux, O., “Grylloptera—a Unique Origin of the Stridulatory File in Katydids, Crickets, and Their Kin (Archaeorthoptera),” Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 70 (1), 43–68 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bey-Bienko, G.Ya., Keys to Insects of the European Part of the USSR. Vol. I (Nauka, Moscow, 1964) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boudreaux, H.B., Arthropod Phylogeny, with Special Reference to Insects (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cappe de Baillon, P., “Contribution anatomique et physiologique a l’étude de la reproduction chez les Locustiens et les Grilloniens,” La Cellule. Recuel de Cytologie et d’Histologie Générale 31 (1), 7–245 (1919).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crampton, G.C., “The Thoracic Sclerites and the Systematic Position of Grylloblatta campodieformis Walker, a Remarkable Annectant, ‘Orthopteroid’ Insect,” Entomological News 26 (10), 337–350 (1915).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Desutter-Grandcolas, L., “Phylogeny and the Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Extant Ensifera (Insecta, Orthoptera),” Zoologica Scripta 32 (6), 525–561 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dirsch, V.M., “A Preliminary Revision of the Families and Subfamilies of Acridoidea (Orthoptera, Insecta),” Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology 9, 351–419 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dirsch, V.M., “Acridoidea of Angola. I,” Museo de Dondo. Companghia de Diamantes de Angola (Diamang), Publicacoes Culturais 74, 1–527 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dominique, J.J., “Catalogue des Orthoptères de la Loire-Inferieure,” Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de l’Ouest de la France 3 (1), 71–93 (1893).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fenn, J.D., Song, H., Cameron, S.L., and Whiting, M.F., “A Preliminary Mitochondrial Genome Phylogeny of Orthoptera (Insecta) and Approaches to Maximizing Phylogenetic Signal Found within Mitochondrial Genome Data,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49, 59–68 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fieber, F.X., “Orthoptera Oliv. (et omn. auct.) Oberschlesiens,” in Zu der öffentsichen Prüfung aller Klassen des Königlichen Gymnasiums zu Ratibor (1852), pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Flook, P.K., Klee, S., and Rowell, C.H.F., “Combined Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of the Orthoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) and Implications for Their Higher Systematics,” Systematic Biology 48 (2), 233–253 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerstaecker, A., “Arthropoden,” in Peters, W.C.H., Carius, J.V., and Gerstaecker, A., Handbuch der Zoologie, Bd 2 (Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, 1863) pp. 1–414.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gorochov, A.V., “System and Evolution of the Suborder Ensifera (Orthoptera),” Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta RAN 260 (1), 1–224; (2), 1–212 (1995a).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gorochov, A.V., “On the System and Evolution of the Order Orthoptera,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 74 (10), 39–45 (1995b).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gorochov, A.V. and Rasnitsyn, A.P., “Superorder Gryllidea Laicharting, 1781 (= Orthopteroidea Handlirsch),” in History of Insects, Ed. by A.P. Rasnitsyn and D.L.J. Quicke (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002), pp. 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gwynne, D.T., “Phylogeny of the Ensifera (Orthoptera): A Hypothesis Supporting Multiple Origins of Acoustic Signaling, Complex Spermatophores and Maternal Care in Crickets, Katydids, and Weta,” Journal of Orthoptera Research 4, 203–218 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haeckel, E., Systematische Phylogenie. Zweiter Theil: Systematische Phylogenie der wirbellosen Thiere (Invertebrata) (Verlag von Georg Reimer, Berlin, 1896).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Handlirsch, A., “Zur Phylogenie der Hexapoden,” Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 112 (1), 1–23 (1903).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Handlirsch, A., “Geschichte, Literatur, Technik, Paläontologie, Phylogenie, Systematik,” in Schröder, Ch., Handbuch der Entomologie. Bd III (Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1925), pp. 1–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hennig, W., “Kritische Bemerkungen zum phylogenetischen System der Insecten,” Beiträge zur Entomologie, Sonderheft 3, 1–85 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hennig, W., “Veränderungen am phylogenetischen System der Insecten seit 1953,” in Tagungsberichte. Nr. 45. Bericht über die 9. Wanderversammlung Deutscher Entomologen 6. bis 9 Juni 1961 in Berlin (1962), pp. 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hennig, W., Die Stammesgeschichte der Insecten (W. Kramer, Frankfurt am Main, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hennig, W., Insect Phylogeny. Translated and Edited by A.C. Pont, Revisionary Notes by D. Schlee (J. Wiley & Sons, 1981).

  28. Jost, M.C. and Shaw, K.L., “Phylogeny of Ensifera (Hexapoda: Orthoptera) Using Three Ribosomal Loci, with Implications for the Evolution of Acoustic Communication,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38, 510–530 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kirby, W. and Spence, W., An Introduction to Entomology. Vol. 3 (Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme & Brown, London, 1826).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kluge, N.J., “Myths in Insect Systematics and Principles of Zoological Nomenclature,” Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 75 (4), 939–944 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kluge, N.J., “A System of Alternative Nomenclatures of Supra-Species Taxa. Linnaean and Post-Linnaean Principles of Systematics,” Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 78 (1), 224–243 (1999) [Entomological Review 79 (2), 133–147 (1999)].

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kluge, N.J., Modern Systematics of Insects. Part I. Principles of Systematics of Living Organisms and General System of Insects, with Classification of Primary Wingless and Paleopterous Insects (Lan, St. Petersburg, 2000) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kluge, N.J., “The Homology of Mouthparts in Fleas (Insecta, Aphaniptera),” Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 81 (4), 808–816 (2002) [Entomological Review 82 (8), 1020–1026 (2002)].

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kluge, N.J., The Phylogenetic System of Ephemeroptera (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004a).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Kluge, N.J., “Larval Leg Structure of Nannochorista and Characteristics of Mecoptera,” Russian Entomological Journal 12 (4), 349–354 (2004b).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kluge, N.J., “Larval/Pupal Leg Transformation and a New Diagnosis for the Taxon Metabola Burmeister, 1832 = Oligoneoptera Martynov, 1923,” Russian Entomological Journal 13 (4), 189–229 (2005a).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kluge, N.J., “Metamorphosis and Homology of Mouthparts in Neuropteroidea (Hexapoda: Metabola), with Remarks on Systematics and Nomenclature,” Russian Entomological Journal 14 (2), 87–100 (2005b).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kluge, N.J., “Circumscriptional Names of Higher Taxa in Hexapoda,” Bionomina 1, 15–55 (2010a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kluge, N.J., “Paradoxical Moulting Process in Orthezia urticae and Other Coccids (Arthroidignatha, Gallinsecta),” Zoosystematica Rossica 19 (2), 246–271 (2010b).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kluge, N.J., “Cladoendesis and a New Look at the Evolution of Insect Metamorphosis,” Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 91 (1), 63–78 (2012a) [Entomological Review 92 (6), 622–632 (2012)].

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kluge, N.J., “General System of Neoptera with Description of a New Species of Embioptera,” Russian Entomological Journal 21 (4), 371–384 (2012b).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kluge, N.J., “Additions to the System of Neopterous Insects (Neoptera),” Trudy Russkogo Entomologicheskogo Obshchestva 84 (2), 53–60 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kluge, N.J. and Novikova, E.A., “Systematics of the Mayfly Taxon Acentrella (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae), with Description of New Asian and African Species,” Russian Entomological Journal 20 (1), 1–56 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Latreille, P.A., Histoire naturelle, générale et particuliere des Crustacés et des Insectes. Vols. 1–12 (Imprimerie de F. Dufar, Paris, 1802–1804).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Legendre, F., Robillard, T., Song, H., Whiting, M.F., and Desutter-Grandcolas, L., “One Hundred Years of Instability in Ensiferan Relationships,” Systematic Entomology 35, 475–488 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Linnaeus, C., Systema Naturae per regna tria Naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I (Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 1758).

    Google Scholar 

  47. MacLeay, W.S., Horae Entomologicae, or Essay on the Annulose Animals. Vol. I. Part II.Containing an Attempt to Ascertain the Rank and Situation which the Celebrated Egyptian Insect, Scarabaeus Sacer, Holds among Organized Beings (Printed for S. Bagster by Richard and Arthur Taylor, London, 1821), pp. 161–524.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Olivier, A.G., “Insectes. Characteres des genres des insectes,” in Encyclopedie methodique. Histoire naturelle. T. 4 (1789), pp. 19–44.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Packard, A.S., “On the Nature and Origin of the So-Called “Spiral Thread” of Tracheae,” The American Naturalist 20 (5), 438–442 (1886).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sharov, A.G., “Phylogeny of Orthopteroid Insects,” Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR 118, 1–216 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Snodgrass, R.E., “The Abdominal Mechanisms of a Grasshopper,” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 94 (6), 1–89 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stephens, J.F., A Systematic Catalog of British Insects: Being an Attempt to Arrange all the Hitherto Discovered Indigenous Insects in Accordance with Their Natural Affinities (Baldwin and Cradock, London, 1829).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Vickery, V.R. and Kevan, D.K., “A Monograph of the Orthopteroid Insects of Canada and Adjacent Regions,” Lyman Entomological Museum and Research Laboratory 13 (1), 1–679 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Walker, E.M., “The Terminal Abdominal Structures of Orthopteroid Insects: a Phylogenetic Study,” Annals of Entomological Society of America 12, 267–316 (1919).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zeuner, F.E., Fossil Orthoptera Ensifera (British Museum Natural History, London, 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zompro, O., “Inter- and Intra-Ordinal Relationships of the Mantophasmatodea, with Comments on the Phylogeny of Polyneopteran Orders (Insecta: Polyneoptera),” Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg 89, 85–116 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. J. Kluge.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.J. Kluge, 2016, published in Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 2016, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 765–800.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kluge, N.J. Structure of ovipositors and cladoendesis of Saltatoria, or Orchesopia. Entmol. Rev. 96, 1015–1040 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873816080078

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873816080078

Navigation